On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I also have KDE installed (rarely used, but it's there) and during some very
> brief use, with KDE, the Evolution Calendar Application also crashed, so it
> is not limited to GNOME.
>
> I did not have this issue, before the
MHR, this has been asked already yesterday. *Please* do read other posts!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
one of my developers is using a mod_python module called xml.dom.minidom
and its causing the issue as outlined below
http://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModPython/Articles/ExpatCausingApacheCrash
This is on CentOS 4.5 and so Apache 2.0.52-38 - I cant change the OS
version but i could change the apa
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 21:11 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> Is there some way, (with dd I might guess) to do a hardare level copy?
I've seen many posts on this list that recommend Clonezilla for this
sort of thing. You run off CD and it is said to be faster than DD
because it is hardware awa
Anne Wilson wrote:
> So 'size_limit' is what I'm looking for. Thanks everyone. Now comes the
> really hard bit. I have to tell her, blindfolded, how to tell the size of
> the message she is sending. She uses btinternet's yahoo mailer, and I
> haven't a clue what she can see there. :-(
See
Amitava Shee wrote:
> How do I get utf-8 support with PCRE?
>
> I am having problems building lucene index using Zend_Lucene. I get the
> following error
>
>
> PHP Notice: iconv(): Detected an illegal character in input string in
> /var/www/ZendFramework-1.5.2/library/Zend/Search/Lucene/Analysi
How about installing one, and using the anaconda-ks that is generated to
install the other two?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 4:23 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Three Ident
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 12:41 +1000, hce wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:18 AM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:57 -0500, Alex White wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> > /proc delivers the *truth*. And for some things, settings can be changed
> > there th
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 05:22 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 21:11 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
>
> >
> because it is hardware aware (forgive the alliteration) and so only
s/hardware/file system/ # I *knew* I needed coffee first.
> copies actual data.
>
--
Bil
I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's only
94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about installing one, and using the anaconda-ks that is generated to
install the other two?
That was my first plan. But that just saves the time going through the
install selection and getting the same stuff installed.
I would still have to do the yum update (
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 21:11 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is there some way, (with dd I might guess) to do a hardare level copy?
I've seen many posts on this list that recommend Clonezilla for this
sort of thing. You run off CD and it is said to be
Tom Brown wrote:
one of my developers is using a mod_python module called xml.dom.minidom
and its causing the issue as outlined below
http://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModPython/Articles/ExpatCausingApacheCrash
This is on CentOS 4.5 and so Apache 2.0.52-38 - I cant change the OS
version but i co
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Tom Brown wrote:
one of my developers is using a mod_python module called
xml.dom.minidom and its causing the issue as outlined below
http://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModPython/Articles/ExpatCausingApacheCrash
This is on CentOS 4.5 and so Apache 2.0.52-38 - I cant change th
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's only
94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
If this partition is on a LARGER drive, you may need to use parted and
not fdisk to crea
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
"sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start" return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u bac
Specifically ... I am looking at the httpd and python and pyexpat used
in CentOS 4 ... I get this:
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# python
Python 2.3.4 (#1, Dec 11 2007, 05:28:55)
[GCC 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-9)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more informatio
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am building three identical systems. Well they will have different
host names, and with time the software setups will drift. But at install
time they are identical.
..snip...
I would hope this is faster than 2 more installs.
its not
do the install over the network
On Friday 04 July 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
> >
> > fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's only
> > 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
>
> If this partition is on a LA
Jim Perrin wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:47:03 -0400:
> This is a known issue with rpm's http code. It doesn't do cookies. It
> can't really follow redirects (302 or otherwise) well, and generally
> it's a hack.
Ah, well, now I understand. Yes, there occurs a redirect. It once used to
work, with a
Amos Shapira wrote on Fri, 4 Jul 2008 14:12:41 +1000:
> For a start, the "cmdline" directive in the kickstart seems to be
> ignored and it stays in "text" (ncurses) mode.
I'm using cmdline all the time and there *is* a difference to text. The
output is b/w and if it has to fallback to the "gui"
> Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
> > fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's
only
> > 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
>
> If this partition is on a LARGER drive, you may need to use
> parted and
Hi,
On Fri, July 4, 2008 6:16 am, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
>
> fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's only
> 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
I would to check `parted /device/path print` to ver
On Friday 04 July 2008, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > > I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
> > > fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's
>
> only
>
> > > 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
> >
> > If this partiti
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am building three identical systems. Well they will have different
host names, and with time the software setups will drift. But at install
time they are identical.
..snip...
I would hope this is faster than 2 more installs.
its not
do the ins
> On Friday 04 July 2008, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > > Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > > > I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB)
> partition. fdisk
> > > > claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's
> >
> > only
> >
> > > > 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
>
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 14:09 +0100, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > > I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
> > > fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's
> only
> > > 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
> >
> > If th
> > > Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > > > I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB)
> partition. fdisk
> > > > claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's
> > only
> > > > 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
> > parted claims it's 879GB so the partition appears to
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 15:29 +0100, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > > > Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > > > > I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB)
> > partition. fdisk
> > > > > claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's
> > > only
> > > > > 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do someth
Good morning to you all:
I've been trying for a few hours to connect to the tracker for the
5.2 x64 DVD. It has been giving a "connection refused" error. A few
days ago the 5.2 i386 downloaded succesfully. Is the tracker down??
Or is something odd happening on my side??
thanks,
Kwan
__
On Fri, July 4, 2008 10:22 am, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> Good morning to you all:
>I've been trying for a few hours to connect to the tracker for the
> 5.2 x64 DVD. It has been giving a "connection refused" error. A few
> days ago the 5.2 i386 downloaded succesfully. Is the tracker down??
> Or is som
Shaun Meyer wrote:
On Fri, July 4, 2008 10:22 am, Kwan Lowe wrote:
Good morning to you all:
I've been trying for a few hours to connect to the tracker for the
5.2 x64 DVD. It has been giving a "connection refused" error. A few
days ago the 5.2 i386 downloaded succesfully. Is the tracker down
Kevin Thorpe wrote on Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:29:40 +0100:
> I'm not bothered about an odd 45GB, it's that df says it's only 94GB
> in total that worries me.
There's no chance you or the software somehow confuses that 100GB
partition with the big one? I mean 94 GB ~ 100 GB.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Ber
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am building three identical systems. Well they will have different
host names, and with time the software setups will drift. But at install
time they are identical.
..snip...
I would hope this is faster than 2 more installs.
its not
do the in
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is there some way, (with dd I might guess) to do a hardare level copy?
I've seen many posts on this list that recommend Clonezilla for this
sort of thing. You run off CD and it is said to be faster than DD
because it is hardware aware (forgive the alliteration) and
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 03 July 2008 23:05:19 nate wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
So 'size_limit' is what I'm looking for. Thanks everyone. Now comes the
really hard bit. I have to tell her, blindfolded, how to tell the size
of the message she is sending. She uses btinternet's yah
I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be
cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way the
upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).
In 5.1 X worked. I could startx from init 3 and get into GNOME. Also
VNC into the box and have a GN
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 11:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Yes, dd is actually pretty slow in wall clock time. Where it wins is in
> human time since you just type a short command line and go away, and it
> duplicates any setup work you've done in addition too installing the
> packages.
But
On Friday 04 July 2008 17:45:33 Mark Weaver wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 July 2008 23:05:19 nate wrote:
> >> Anne Wilson wrote:
> >>> So 'size_limit' is what I'm looking for. Thanks everyone. Now comes
> >>> the really hard bit. I have to tell her, blindfolded, how to tell the
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MHR, this has been asked already yesterday. *Please* do read other posts!
>
Strange - I read everything posted in this list. I don't always
understand everything, but I read them all.
I ran a search for "usb script" in the
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 17:45:33 Mark Weaver wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 03 July 2008 23:05:19 nate wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
So 'size_limit' is what I'm looking for. Thanks everyone. Now comes
the really hard bit. I have to tell her, bli
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about installing one, and using the anaconda-ks that is generated to
install the other two?
That was my first plan. But that just saves the time going through the
install selection and getting the same stuff installed.
I would still ha
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:10 AM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You need an application to do that. I've only used various Gnome desktop
> facilities. The file manager (Nautilus?) should do that when you double
> click a sound file. I'll test ... BRB
>
> Yep. I went to /usr/share/s
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It will be many times faster than doing DD images of entire drives.
eg. in my case here, i can provision a new machine in 2 min and 43
seconds for a base+core minimal centos-5 install. installing over http
from a machine on a GiB/sec link and installing to a 2 disk rai
Hi,
I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when
i run yum for udpate system show this error:
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of
drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos
file /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd
Mhr wrote on Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:47:39 -0700:
> I ran a search for "usb script" in the archives and did not find
> anything - pray tell, where was I so blind?
It's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Running shell scripts from external media". Maybe it got lost in your
spam filter?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin
I am building the Clonezilla live CD now
Les Mikesell wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It will be many times faster than doing DD images of entire drives.
eg. in my case here, i can provision a new machine in 2 min and 43
seconds for a base+core minimal centos-5 install. installing over
h
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Running shell scripts from external media". Maybe it got lost in your
> spam filter?
>
Nope I found the thread in my deleted (read) mail. It only partially
answered the question. Spiro's pos
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 10:47 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MHR, this has been asked already yesterday. *Please* do read other posts!
> >
>
> Strange - I read everything posted in this list. I don't always
> understand everything, b
I am trying to compile a module for a Realtek 8168 for thinstation.
I have pulled the developer tarball and executed the script to enter its build
environment.
I also have the source for the module I want to compile, but when I execute
#make clean modules
it errors out. Reading the errors, I can
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am building the Clonezilla live CD now
is there any reason why your system sends multiple References: headers:
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is invalid according to RFC2822, section 3.6, wher
Hi,
I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of
GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1).
All is working fine. However, I would like to specify a primary
interface for each bond. This means I need to specify different
options to the bonding m
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:54 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For a sample, search for your name & 2008 and July. NADA!
>
Well, at least THAT part works properly
:-)
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.c
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:59 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
> running kernel. From within the chroot build environment, I run a #uname -r
> and see it displays exactly
> that, and not the build environments expected 2.6.21.1 that it has in the
> /source/kernel-2.6.21.1/linux-2.6.21.1
> dir. I
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:54 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > For a sample, search for your name & 2008 and July. NADA!
> >
>
> Well, at least THAT part works properly
How so? Did you not post earlier? ... OH!
s/y
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:28 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:54 PM, William L. Maltby
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > For a sample, search for your name & 2008 and July. NADA!
>> >
>>
>> Well, at
HI,
I am migraing from windows to linux squid proxy server.I configured squid
its working fine.But i want to integrate with windows 2003 Active
Directory Service for user authentication.Can any one help me in configuring
the same. its very urgent for me.
Thanks in advance
lingu
_
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:25:32AM +0530, lingu wrote:
> HI,
>
> I am migraing from windows to linux squid proxy server.I configured squid its
> working fine.But i want to integrate with windows 2003 Active Directory
> Service for user authentication.Can any one help me in configuring the same.
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 11:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Yes, dd is actually pretty slow in wall clock time. Where it wins is in
human time since you just type a short command line and go away, and it
duplicates any setup work you've done in addition too i
Where I work, we have an application that has been merrily running
away (and being built) on FC1 (yes, you read that right).
One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first
effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build
process (FC1) uses mkdep to generate
>I don't normally dink with this stuff anymore. But from watching the
>lists, IIRC, you need a kernel development rpm to be installed. Use the
>yum available stuff and if you see something promising, give it a shot.
>Being a holiday here, I don't know how long until someone knowledgeable
>will repl
MHR wrote:
Where I work, we have an application that has been merrily running
away (and being built) on FC1 (yes, you read that right).
One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first
effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build
process (FC1) uses mkdep
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That will probably build as is on CentOS-3
>
Our aim is to bring it up to 5.2 (the latest) if possible.
Thanks.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 17:38 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 11:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >> Yes, dd is actually pretty slow in wall clock time. Where it wins is in
> >> human time since you just type a sh
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 17:38 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> Now actually, I would have perfered renaming the LVM partition and its
> internal ext3 partitions. I even had a naming convention laid out if I
> had do this via Install instead.
If it's a boot drive, remember to rebuild your ini
Another little problem I am now having on CentOS 5.2 that I was not
seeing on FC8:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lane]$ cvs update
poll: protocol failure in circuit setup
cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any)
I could understand if there was something that had changed f
On Jul 4, 2008, at 17:50, MHR wrote:
One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first
effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build
process (FC1) uses mkdep to generate the dependency files that are
subsequently used by the makes to build the app. mkdep
> One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first
> effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build
> process (FC1) uses mkdep to generate the dependency files that are
My FC2 system doesn't have a mkdep command.
> Can someone enlighten me on this, particul
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 16:32 -0700, MHR wrote:
>
> What command tells me which distro I'm on? I forget)
# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-2.el5.centos
# lsb_release -a
LSB
Version::core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch
Distributor ID: CentOS
Descrip
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I also have KDE installed (rarely used, but it's there) and during some
> very
> > brief use, with KDE, the Evolution Calendar Application also crashed, so
Understood. However, the investment in ks, now, may reap greater
dividends in the future. My opinion, only.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 6:35 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 11:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Yes, dd is actually pretty slow in wall clock time. Where it wins is
in human time since you just type a short command line and go away,
and it duplicates any setup work you've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Understood. However, the investment in ks, now, may reap greater
dividends in the future. My opinion, only.
Unless, of course, you'd like to copy a windows image or some other
distribution that doesn't use kickstart. Clonezilla is pretty agnostic
about the contents
Greetings, all.
I'm in need of a minimal ks.cfg file for the smallest possible install
with yum. I've got the scripting for yum to install the apps I need, I
just want to insure all the cruft is not on the system as well. Using
the s-c-ks app, the smallest I have gotten is 600MB. This is for a
74 matches
Mail list logo
