Gregory Gerard wrote:
Does someone have a list I can place in the packages section which is
known to work and really get everything?
yum install \*
Considering you could be pulling in upto 5,000 pkgs, make sure you have
enough drive space, fat network pipe, and lots of time.
--
Karanbir Sin
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03,
CPU1 the same).
I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3.
The previ
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
> crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
> with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping
> 0
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
Hello.
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Olaf Mueller
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> since upgrading to CentOS 5.2 my notebook hangs while booting [...]
> Could you create a bug report on bugs.centos.org ? [...]
Ok, done as ID 0002912.
Thank you and regards
Olaf
___
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
> connection to the server. Now when I rerun the "yum upgrade" it fails due
> to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig myself a deeper
Use a kickstart-file that has a "nobase" statement..
And have a look at CLIP (http://oss.tresys.com/projects/clip/wiki/WikiStart)
for a truly minimal kickstart (and a lot of other security related stuff, if
you're interested)..
Cheers,
Bart
- Original Message -
From: "Karanbir Singh"
Agree with everything you're saying about bleeding edge distros.
Having written quite a bit of PHP, however, I think its fair to say that
most developers are fully aware that software is always evolving and
probably believe that you may as well write for the latest version
because before long
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I do not know the command line for symbolic links. I created the
symbolic link of /Centos/5 to /Centos/5.1 in Nautilus which does not
have a method of changing a symbolic link. Only deleting it and
creating a new one.
Not that I know of, I always just delete an rec
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:13:11 -0400
> "J" == John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
J> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko
J> A. Jennings Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:18 PM To:
J> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [C
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that
it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to downgrade, however you ca
Thanks for the answers
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:51:37 -0400
> "MS" == Meenoo Shivdasani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MS> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Johnny Hughes
MS> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is a BUG with nss_ldap:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
connection to the server. Now when I rerun the "yum upgrade" it fails due
to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig
Hi list,
Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account
I have these 2 errors messages:
-bash: [: =: unary operator expected
-bash: [: -le: unary operator expected
After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d:
/etc/profile.d/krb5-workstation
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:31 AM, kfx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account I
> have these 2 errors messages:
> -bash: [: =: unary operator expected
> -bash: [: -le: unary operator expected
>
> After investigation, the trou
kfx wrote:
Hi list,
Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account
I have these 2 errors messages:
-bash: [: =: unary operator expected
-bash: [: -le: unary operator expected
After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d:
/etc/profile.d/krb5
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
> > crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
> > with dua
>> I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3.
I don't have the necessary knowledge to evaluate kernel related issues,
but it seems to me that there's some kind of confusion involved here.
People are reporting problems with Intel Pentium II and III machines yet
PowerNow is a speed thrott
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Could you post the output of the command "/bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n'" ?
I would add a | sort to that like this:
"/bin/rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | sort"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
--
Best Wishes
Sorin
-
http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/
Proud member of TEAM OS/2.
M
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get
> the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
Zero problems here after upgrading a bunch of servers. I guess the majority of
users without probl
Ha, until now it looks ok, but i only upgraded yesterday evening...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:29:41 +0200
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorin.srbu> Hi all,
sorin.srbu>
sorin.srbu> Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to
5.2?? I get the
sorin.srbu> feelin
Ian Blackwell wrote:
cups-libs-1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
you have a few pkgs like this where more than 1 version is installed in
the rpmdb, no idea what the real state on the machine drive is.
Remove the NEWER version of these packages then redo the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it
just worked, wont get reported, but if things b
There are lots of exciting things happening in the CentOS ecosystem at
the moment, by which I mean "upstream" or "across stream" in Fedora and
RHEL.
I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious
entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server, and
Re
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3.
>
> I don't have the necessary knowledge to evaluate kernel related issues, but
> it seems to me that there's some kind of confusion involved here.
> People are reporti
There are lots of exciting things happening in the CentOS ecosystem at
the moment, by which I mean "upstream" or "across stream" in Fedora
and RHEL.
I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious
entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server,
and
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 00:16 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > AND HURRY UP! My new "fat" pipe (potential 1.25MB/sec) has finally edged
> > up to 85.5KB/sec. I need the help folks! ;-)
> >
>
> Is that for uplink or downlink ? if you are downloading at 85k/sec there
> is
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 03:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > I do not know the command line for symbolic links. I created the
> > symbolic link of /Centos/5 to /Centos/5.1 in Nautilus which does not
> > have a method of changing a symbolic link. Only deleting it and
>
admin wrote:
I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious
entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server, and
RedHat's Emerging Technologies projects such as Cobbler, FreeIPA and
Ovirt. Also JBoss middleware.
A lot ( if not all ) of these are going t
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:09 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 6/23/08, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Orlando, FL. The move from Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 should be a big
> improvement for those of us who are Desktop users.
Be aware that the FF beta version RH released will not successfu
Andreas Micklei <> scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM:
> Thank you CentOS team for the good work!
I second that!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailma
William L. Maltby wrote:
After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help.
might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ?
iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent
perhaps does not.
- KB
_
Karanbir Singh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2??
I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it
just worked, wont get
Karanbir Singh <> scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:51 PM:
>> Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I
>> get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
>>
>
> well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it
> jus
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:59:36AM +0200, Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686
> > > ]
> >
On 6/25/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> > After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help.
> >
>
> might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc,
> almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorre
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> > After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help.
>
> might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ?
> iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rto
ED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
___
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:54 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote:
> On 6/25/08, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > William L. Maltby wrote:
> >
> > might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc,
> > almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent perh
Dunc wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2??
I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
__
Thanks to all that offered advice to help solve this for me. Here's a
round up for those that may follow in similarly ill-fated foot-steps.
1. Don't update/upgrade remotely without using "screen". Dropping the
ssh session caused yum to die inelegantly, with duplicate packages in
the RPM data
I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than 30
download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but it is
fake.
My company does NOT allow use "torrent" to download files. Any ideal?
___
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Ian Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all that offered advice to help solve this for me. Here's a round
> up for those that may follow in similarly ill-fated foot-steps.
>
> 1. Don't update/upgrade remotely without using "screen". Dropping the ssh
>
2008/6/25 mcclnx mcc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than
> 30 download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but
> it is fake.
This URL works for me
"http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/mirror.centos.org/5.2/isos/x
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get
> the
> feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to
5.2
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 13:30 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Andreas Micklei <> scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM:
>
> > Thank you CentOS team for the good work!
>
> I second that!
Me too !! And another donation on its way to CentOS ! :)
Regards,
Michel
_
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
2008/6/25 mcclnx mcc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than
30 download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but
it is fake.
This URL works for me
"http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/m
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that
worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to
the release notes and/or wiki.
It was in the listening section as follows:
# A space separated list of IP or host addresses where to li
Hi Guys!
Thanks to the whole Centos team for all their hard work. You have no IDEA
how much I appreciate it!
I ran "yum upgrade" last night, rebooted this morning and encountered
a couple of small problems:
1. "shutdown -h now" goes all the way down but does not power down the
box like it always
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:39 +0200, Michel van Deventer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to
> 5.2, tonight I'll upgrade the host machine but I do not expect any
> problems.
> I'm only cautious to upgrade my old webserver which is a dual PIII and
>
Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did "yum update" on my Desktop. Everything
seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning, it
began to boot the new Kernel and then seemed to die. Instead of getting the
progress of the boot on the CRT, the screen was blank and nothing happeni
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did "yum update" on my Desktop. Everything
> seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning, it
> began to boot the new Kernel and then seemed to die. Instead of gettin
Hi,
I did a standard i386 install of 5.2 on a test machine. Then I ran the
following command
yum install \*
and got the following error.
Error: Missing Dependency: pilot-link-devel >= 0.11.8 is needed by package
gnome-pilot-devel
Checking my local repo and my usual upstream mirrors for pi
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 15:13 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> > on 6-20-2008 12:41 AM Luigi Perroti spake the following:
> > >Hello, I'd like to ask a couple of things:
> > >
> > >1) I would like to move from Debian to CentOS.
> > >One th
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_6
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did "yum update" on my Desktop. Everything
> > seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this m
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_6
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
/mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
oop's its the -devel package you are looking for... will investigate.
this package isnt in the upstream distro eithe
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Tony Molloy wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
> > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
> > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
Jun Salen wrote:
I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running,
so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released.
>>>
>>> you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update'
>>>
>>> When 5.2 is released, those updates will be installed
For
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Tony Molloy wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
> > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
> > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:27:27 Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > Tony Molloy wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos
> >> /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm
> >
> > oop's its the -devel package you are look
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
The best way to remove duplicate package is using rpm itself and the
--justdb switch. This will only remote entries inside the RPM database
and not on the filesytem itself. If you remove the newest version of
the duplicate packages you can run the yum update again and it will
fred smith wrote:
Hello.
> 1. "shutdown -h now" goes all the way down but does not power down the
> box like it always has before. Same when shutting down via the GUI
> shutdown dialog.
I know this from systems with older processors. For me a 'apm=power-off'
in the /etc/grub.conf kernel-line does
I noticed, that the directory
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin
is not installed for the new firefox
(After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink
it works all right)
_
Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
I noticed, that the directory
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin
is not installed for the new firefox
(After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink
it works all right)
installing a
I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming
down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one
for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier.
Would someone be kind enough to point me to a mirror with a known good
torrent file?
_
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that
it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to dow
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming
down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one
for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier.
You should be able to check the tracker, make sure its on .centos.org
Here are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karanbir Singh wrote:
| David Hláčik wrote:
|> My question is, which way i will achieve really minimum install
(with yum).
|> So far, i have during install unchecked all packages , then
customized
|> groups and removed everything including base syst
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> >> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that
> it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
>
> My question is,
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming
down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one
for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier.
You should be able to check the tracker, make sure its o
Michael A. Peters wrote:
That appears to have been my problem -
184da12dd38aeb2b813104214889211b CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
nevermind - that was md5 not sha1 - my file was good, guess it's just
slow right now.
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
That appears to have been my problem -
184da12dd38aeb2b813104214889211b CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
nevermind - that was md5 not sha1 - my file was good, guess it's just
slow right now.
_
Dunc wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that
worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to
the release notes and/or wiki.
It was in the listening section as follows:
# A space separated list of IP or host addresse
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did "yum update" on my Deskt
kalinix wrote:
> Just saw and installed yum-security on CentOS 5.x on i386. I think this
> is what you're looking for.
Had you tried it before posting your mail you would have found out that
it errors out with:
Skipping security plugin, no data
Ralph
pgpxE2G5tHmIb.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did "yum update" on my Desktop
On Wed, June 25, 2008 11:01 am, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> FOLLOW ON: On my box, when it is trying to boot the latest Kernel
> (2.6.18-92.1.1el5) the last thing I see on the CRT is "starting udev"
> and after that, the screen goes blank and there is no HD activity.
This sounds a lot like the problem w
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
> crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
> with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping
> 0
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Marko A. Jennings <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, June 25, 2008 11:01 am, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
> > FOLLOW ON: On my box, when it is trying to boot the latest Kernel
> > (2.6.18-92.1.1el5) the last thing I see on the CRT is "starting udev"
> > and after that
Ned Slider wrote:
That's strange Dunc.
The new config file was written to /etc/dovecot/conf.rpmnew (as
expected) for me, so your modified original doesn't get overwritten. I
can see no difference between the 5.1 and 5.2 config files wrt the
'listen' directive. Mine was, and still is, set to
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:03:26 +0100
> "KS" == Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
KS> Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>> I noticed, that the directory /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
>> is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the
>> flash-plugin is not install
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 15:08 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming
> > down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one
> > for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier.
>
> You sh
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Bernhard Gschaider <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:03:26 +0100
> > "KS" == Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>KS> Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>>> I noticed, that the directory /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
>>>
Dunc wrote:
Hi
Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same. But
using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with [::] I
could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times, and
eventually changing the original to [*] allowed me to connect.
I then
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:58 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> kalinix wrote:
> > Just saw and installed yum-security on CentOS 5.x on i386. I think this
> > is what you're looking for.
>
> Had you tried it before posting your mail you would have found out that
> it errors out with:
>
> Skipping se
I got mine down at 10-12Mbps at work, and nearly as fast at home. And that was
yesterday when supposedly everybody and their dogs were downloading 5.2. OTOH,
that might be why it went so fast... 8-)
Are you sure your ISP doesn't cap/stop/whatever p2p generally? If you are,
what kind of settings ha
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Marko A. Jennings <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, June 25, 2008 11:01 am, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>
>> > FOLLOW ON: On my box, when it is trying to boot the latest Kernel
>> > (2
But... That's what the checksums are for. Don't you trust them?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rudi Ahlers
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] What torrent are y'all using?
Michael A. Pete
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 17:14, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which configuration file do I edit, to make that change? TIA! Lanny
/etc/grub.conf if you use grub.
/etc/lilo.conf if you use lilo.
HTH
--
WC Fields - "I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally."
_
Judging from the frequency of my messages here one could think that
I'm too stupid to upgrade a workstation to 5.2 (but the servers I've
tried work without problem)
OK. The problem: I've tried to upgrade a 5.1-x86_64-workstation to 5.2.
During the upgrade immidiatly after (according to the
/var/l
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:29 AM, ne... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 17:14, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Which configuration file do I edit, to make that change? TIA! Lanny
>
>
> /etc/grub.conf if you use grub.
> /etc/lilo.conf if you use lilo.
Thanks a
!st install of 5.2; system requires custom partitioning (Scalix mail
server).
Boot and Swap are hard partitions, rest of drive is LVM.
In LVM, three ext3 partitions: /, /home, /var/opt/scalix
lvcreate failed for the last (named Scalix_02). It was the last of the
three partitions and used up
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:46:53PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> > 1. "shutdown -h now" goes all the way down but does not power down the
> > box like it always has before. Same when shutting down via the GUI
> > shutdown dialog.
> I know this from systems with old
Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
KS> Also, sitewide plugins are better in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
KS> which comes from the xulrunner rpm.
You're right. I wasn't aware of this directory. The funny thing
is: the flash-plugin did a symbolic link to the .so there, but firefox
doesn't recogniz
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:39 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> !st install of 5.2; system requires custom partitioning (Scalix mail
> server).
>
> Boot and Swap are hard partitions, rest of drive is LVM.
>
> In LVM, three ext3 partitions: /, /home, /var/opt/scalix
>
> lvcreate failed for the las
Thanks, but...
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:39 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
!st install of 5.2; system requires custom partitioning (Scalix mail
server).
Boot and Swap are hard partitions, rest of drive is LVM.
In LVM, three ext3 partitions: /, /home, /var/opt/scalix
lv
Hi all
I'm looking at setting up software RAID 10, using CentOS 5.1 x64 - what
is the best way todo this?
I'm reading some sources on the internet, and get a lot of different
"suggestions"
1 suggestion says to boot up with a Live CD like Knoppix or
SystemRescueCD, setup the RAID 10 partiti
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
