Re: [CentOS] problem with telnet

On 24/06/2008, at 3:28 PM, fabian dacunha wrote: Dear All i have a centos 5 server running as a backup PC server and is working perfect for abt 3 months jus a couple of days back when i tried to telnet to the server it gave me connection refused What on earth are you using telnet for?

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: Well, I assumed from the title of the message that Centos-5.2 had been "officially released". Well then you assume wrong! It hasn't been released yet! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/

Re: [CentOS] problem with telnet

fabian dacunha wrote: jus a couple of days back when i tried to telnet to the server it gave me connection refused i go to the server and when i say telnet localhost it says getaddrinfo: localhost Name or service not known Are there lots of telnet sessions already running? You could have hi

[CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

Hi, folks. I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a surprise: The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87 GB(i386), but the size of the DVD image of CentOS 5.2(i386) is so large that is 3.74 GB! I kown that Cent

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Michael Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD > image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a surprise: > > The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87 > GB(i386), but the size of the DV

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

Michael, did you get an official announcement for 5.2? I didn't. To my knowledge any 5.2 release yet is unofficial. Therefor I wouldn't use it. Gerald Michael Liang wrote: Hi, folks. I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 is here!

Will CentOS 5.2 support Intel GM965 / GL960 graphic shipset? On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let me be the first (maybe): > > CentOS 5.2 is here (at least): > > http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/ > > Thank you all who worked on it! > > No virus

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

Michael Liang wrote: > Hi, folks. > > I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD > image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a surprise: > > The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87 > GB(i386), but the size of the DVD image of CentOS 5.2(i386) is so > lar

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

2008/6/24 Dirk Gfroerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > as Tim already wrote, CentOS 5.2 is not released yet, so don't use it. > > Also please note there are two DVDs on RHN: > the server version with 2,934 MB > and the client version with 3,682 MB > > CentOS distributes only one DVD which contains everythi

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

Tim Verhoeven wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Michael Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87 GB(i386), but the size of the DVD image of CentOS 5.2(i386) is so large that is 3.74 GB! ... This is because you download a not-re

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

2008/6/24 Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ... >> This is because you download a not-released version of CentOS 5.2. The >> iso you have is faulty. > > Isn't it just the x86_64 ISO that's wrong? I just have downloaded the i386 DVD image. The sha1sum.txt: 9e8da103db2217f10e07b0387edce09395723cbf

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Michael Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just have downloaded the i386 DVD image. The sha1sum.txt: > > 9e8da103db2217f10e07b0387edce09395723cbf CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1of6.iso > e9d0a51d638caf1ed3adde834672d0f6a82cfd92 CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-2of6.iso > 1c12052662

[CentOS] Bonding question - active-backup

Hi I have bonding working and i can failover between active (eth0) and backup (eth1) without issue, however is there a way to automatically fail back to eth0 when this link once again becomes available? I understand this may be undesirable due to flapping etc but i just wonder if its possibl

Re: [CentOS] backup question

I think so, at least you do the way I use it because you boot the machine off the Clonezilla CD, then mount the device/partition you're backing up to and select the device/partition being backed up. But Clonezilla also has a whole network mode of operation involving a Clonezilla server, so I c

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen

Adriano dos Santos Vieira (Hapia IN) wrote: > Hi, guys! > > Please, could I ask you by some documentation about XEN and Cluster on > CEntOS-5. Theese one could be from basic to advanced level. Not that hard to find. Ralph pgpkHIampCbRE.pgp Description: PGP sign

Re: [CentOS] Bonding question - active-backup

Tom Brown wrote: Hi I have bonding working and i can failover between active (eth0) and backup (eth1) without issue, however is there a way to automatically fail back to eth0 when this link once again becomes available? I understand this may be undesirable due to flapping etc but i just won

Re: [CentOS] Bonding question - active-backup

I believe you can do this with the 'primary' option to the bonding module - in your case 'primary=eth0' yes - that does it thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Craig White wrote: >> I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running, >> so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released. > > you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update' > > When 5.2 is released, those updates will be installed Are you saying

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update' >> >> When 5.2 is released, those updates will be installed > > Are you saying that simply running "yum update" on a Centos-5.1 system > will convert it to Cen

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: Craig White wrote: I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running, so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released. you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update' When 5.2 is released, those updates will be ins

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

> > > Yup > > All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 -> 5.1 -> 5.1) will happen > automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's officially released > for updates. And I'm almost certain most, if not every, other Linux distro > also works like this > sorry for the studid question

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Michael Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> Yup >> >> All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 -> 5.1 -> 5.1) will happen >> automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's officially released >> for updates. And I'm almost certain most, if not

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Michael Simpson wrote: Yup All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 -> 5.1 -> 5.1) will happen automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's officially released for updates. And I'm almost certain most, if not every, other Linux distro also works like this sorry for the

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Rudi Ahlers wrote: ... upgrade Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set. See update for more details. Doesn't /etc/yum.conf have obsoletes=1 by default, thus making "yum update" do the same as "yum upgrade"? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, C

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Mogens Kjaer wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: ... upgrade Is the same as the update command with the --obsoletes flag set. See update for more details. Doesn't /etc/yum.conf have obsoletes=1 by default, thus making "yum update" do the same as "yum upgrade"? Mogens Why don't y

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Thanks guys. these things often occur to me at work where i am surrounded by windows boxen and 22 is blocked on the firewall. had to get special dispensation for gmail! /me has instant gratification problems :-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

[CentOS] Upgrading my local repo to 5.2

This will be the first version change with my local repo so I want to check the steps out. I have a /Centos/5.1 directory with all the contents of the ISO CDs. I have a /Centos/5 directory with a symbolic link to the 5.1 directory. I ASSUME that I will create a /Centos/5.2 directory and drop th

[CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> Are you saying that simply running "yum update" on a Centos-5.1 system >> will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released? > All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 -> 5.1 -> 5.1) will > happen automatically when you run yum upgrade, and when it's offic

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: > > Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2? > Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch, > one could download a more up-to-date version? Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features and so on, while still basically

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Michael Simpson wrote: ... sorry for the studid question but do we use yum upgrade or yum update and what is the difference between the 2 /etc/yum.conf has obsoletes=1, thus "yum upgrade" behaves like "yum update". No need to read the manuals :-) Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Compute

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 14:16 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > >> Are you saying that simply running "yum update" on a Centos-5.1 system > >> will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released? > > > All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 -> 5.1 -> 5.1) will

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Are you saying that simply running "yum update" on a Centos-5.1 system will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released? All upgrades / updates in the major versions (5.0 -> 5.1 -> 5.1) will happen automatically when you run yu

[CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2? >> Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch, >> one could download a more up-to-date version? > > Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features > and so on, while still ba

Re: [CentOS] backup question

admin wrote: I think so, at least you do the way I use it because you boot the machine off the Clonezilla CD, then mount the device/partition you're backing up to and select the device/partition being backed up. But Clonezilla also has a whole network mode of operation involving a Clonezilla

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > >> Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2? > >> Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch, > >> one could download a more up-to-date version? > > > > Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2? Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch, one could download a more up-to-date version? Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features and s

Re: [CentOS] Why CentOS 5.2 is so large?

2008/6/24 Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't wan to be rude. But you won't get any official > support/news/help about this until the release has been announced > officially. But, as you know, the famous distro users had jammed the download server when new distro launched didn't show thei

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Rudi Ahlers wrote: ... Why don't you check? :) On a 5.1 machine ready for 5.2: # yum update >/tmp/update.log n # yum upgrade >/tmp/upgrade.log n # diff /tmp/update.log /tmp/upgrade.log 2c2 < Setting up Update Process --- > Setting up Upgrade Process Looks to me that update==upgrade. Why doe

[CentOS] centos 5.2 for real this time

I did a yum update last night at about 23h15 EDT (-4). No upgrade. I just did a yum update this morning at about 08h45 (-4). for my system there's about 348 megs of updates. Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which is being upgraded to 2.3.whatever. I'm using 2.

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Mogens Kjaer wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: ... Why don't you check? :) On a 5.1 machine ready for 5.2: # yum update >/tmp/update.log n # yum upgrade >/tmp/upgrade.log n # diff /tmp/update.log /tmp/upgrade.log 2c2 < Setting up Update Process --- > Setting up Upgrade Process Looks to me that upd

[CentOS] SME on CentOS, telnet and MySQL

After failing to install on two different machines that were running Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have every seen, 15

RE: [CentOS] centos 5.2 for real this time

Donald Buchan wrote: > I did a yum update last night at about 23h15 EDT (-4). No upgrade. > > I just did a yum update this morning at about 08h45 (-4). for my system > there's about 348 megs of updates. > > Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which > is being upgr

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 for real this time

Donald Buchan wrote: I did a yum update last night at about 23h15 EDT (-4). No upgrade. I just did a yum update this morning at about 08h45 (-4). for my system there's about 348 megs of updates. Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which is being upgraded to 2.3.

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading my local repo to 5.2

Robert Moskowitz wrote: This will be the first version change with my local repo so I want to check the steps out. I have a /Centos/5.1 directory with all the contents of the ISO CDs. I have a /Centos/5 directory with a symbolic link to the 5.1 directory. I ASSUME that I will create a /Centos/

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 for real this time

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:13:54 -0400 Donald Buchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now all I have to do is figure out how to remove OO.o 2.0.whatever which > is being upgraded to 2.3.whatever. I'm using 2.4.1 on my 4.6 boxes > (have always been using the latest OO.o on them since installation a > coup

Re: [CentOS] SME on CentOS, telnet and MySQL

Michael wrote: After failing to install on two different machines that were running Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 for real this time

Thanks Johnny, I'll look into it. (Trying to remove the CentOS version, and install the OO.o rpms.) I'll also try Ross' suggestion. (the 5.2 upgrade is still happily chugging along with the downloads at 09h50 (-4), at #145 of 222 downloads.) On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 08:43 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrot

[CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Hi, has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't find it. Thanks Gerald -- Gerald Balzer, Senior Partner T: +41 44 440 55 13 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Unicum Consulting & Marketing GmbH Luzernerstrasse 51a,

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Gerald Balzer wrote: Hi, has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't find it. The version of php for centos is 5.1.6-20 ... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Gerald Balzer wrote: > Hi, > > has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't > find it. > its in the testing repo, it never made it to release because clearly no one really uses it. They all just got together made a lot of noise about it just to be heard, and then when w

Re: [CentOS] SME on CentOS, telnet and MySQL

Johnny Hughes wrote: Michael wrote: After failing to install on two different machines that were running Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest in

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Karanbir Singh wrote: Gerald Balzer wrote: Hi, has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't find it. its in the testing repo, it never made it to release because clearly no one really uses it. They all just got together made a lot of noise about it just to be heard,

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Right, but according to Karanbir Singh you were working on a "official" 5.2.x version for CentOS 5. This version was to be released on the centoplus repos some time ago. Therefore I asked. Gerald Johnny Hughes wrote: Gerald Balzer wrote: Hi, has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been re

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Sad, I needed it, since some apps that we are hosting require 5.2.4+ . I'm currently running the version 5.2.5 from the yjl.repo. But I'd appreciate to have a more official one, of course. Gerald Karanbir Singh wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: Gerald Balzer wrote: Hi, has the CentOS version of

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Gerald Balzer wrote: Sad, I needed it, since some apps that we are hosting require 5.2.4+ . I'm currently running the version 5.2.5 from the yjl.repo. But I'd appreciate to have a more official one, of course. If you want to organise a testing group of people, maybe 5 or so, who would be happ

RE: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Hi everybody, depends on what you expect, but I'm willing to help in testing that - seems that I will need PHP 5.2 in the near future, and I'd be happy if it would be available for CentOS 5. cu, __ /homas -- Thomas Bleier, DI Information Management Austrian Research Centers GmbH - ARC HG Wien -

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Thanks for your kind offer, but since I'm the only one in my group using centos 5 (rest is on fedora) I think I'll switch to the remi repo and wait for the next major release. Of course if someone on this list wants to join, we can start. Thanks again Gerald Karanbir Singh wrote: Gerald Balz

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Bleier Thomas wrote: Hi everybody, depends on what you expect, but I'm willing to help in testing that - seems that I will need PHP 5.2 in the near future, and I'd be happy if it would be available for CentOS 5. Sounds good, over the next few days lets try and get something started. Are you

[CentOS] rsh issue/update (access denied)...

hi... i've got an "access denied" issue with rsh on one of my boxes (and before we start, no "use ssh" comments.. rsh is what i'm dealing with for now!!) i've got a few boxes in my network, and i can successfully rsh into them with no issue. however, on one box, i can't access it using rsh, and i

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Karanbir Singh wrote: Bleier Thomas wrote: Hi everybody, depends on what you expect, but I'm willing to help in testing that - seems that I will need PHP 5.2 in the near future, and I'd be happy if it would be available for CentOS 5. Sounds good, over the next few days lets try and get some

Re: [CentOS] SME on CentOS, telnet and MySQL

Michael wrote: After failing to install on two different machines that were running Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have

[CentOS] DNS query

Dear All, i have the following setup CentOS 5 server running as a primary DNS server for a long time and is working perfectly fine the server is on public IP and we have abt 5 zones apart from the reverse n local zone now our sister company have recently setup their own DNS and we are supposed

Re: [CentOS] DNS query

fabian dacunha wrote: > really wd apprecite your help and ideas with examples add this to your bind options section forwarders { 172.31.1.240; }; and restart named, your named will now forward all requests that it's not authoritative for to the above system. nate _

[CentOS] backup question

on: Sun Jun 22 08:00:34 UTC 2008, Gergely Buday gbuday at gmail.com wrote: > Dear CentOs users, > > I have a centos server with nothing important at the moment, but I > would like to install some web-based project management tool (trac for > the curious) that would contain important data. And, as

[CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Rudi Ahlers wrote: Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2? >>> Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features >>> and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5. >>> >>> Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service pack 2. >>

Re: [CentOS] DNS query

fabian dacunha wrote: Dear All, i have the following setup CentOS 5 server running as a primary DNS server for a long time and is working perfectly fine the server is on public IP and we have abt 5 zones apart from the reverse n local zone now our sister company have recently setup their own

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 for real this time

Just reread your message. I was still having problems with the 2.0 centos version coming back even though I'd removed it. I tried Ross' suggesting, it removed things successfully (for both 2.0.whatever and 2.4.1.) But the new 2.4.1 won't install because "package jre-1.6.0_04-fcs is already insta

RE: [CentOS] centos 5.2 for real this time

Donald Buchan wrote: > Just reread your message. > > I was still having problems with the 2.0 centos version > coming back even > though I'd removed it. > > I tried Ross' suggesting, it removed things successfully (for both > 2.0.whatever and 2.4.1.) But the new 2.4.1 won't install because > "

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2? Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5. Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service pack

Re: [CentOS] AM/FM tuner for centos 4 or 5?

Jason Pyeron wrote: Looking for a radio tuner for my audio server. Needs to do AM. Any hardware reccomendations? I hooked up an original Griffin RadioShark to my CentOS 5.1 server for a lark last month, streaming with DarkIce. Unfortunately, that machine is dark and 2500 miles away - I won't

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... > and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are > really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. I think that the problem is

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 > Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... > > and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are > > really just a "frozen point in time" of C

[CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.2 i386 and x86_64

Karanbir Singh wrote: We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.2 for the i386 and x86_64 Architectures. and let the fun begin... $ rsync -avH --delete --exclude=ia64 --exclude=s390\* --exclude=alpha \ mirrors.kernel.org::mirrors/centos /zdata/

RE: [CentOS] AM/FM tuner for centos 4 or 5?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Key > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:00 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] AM/FM tuner for centos 4 or 5? > > Jason Pyeron wrote: > > Looking for a radio tuner for my audio serv

[CentOS] 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 history/diff?

Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from 5.0, and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0? I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this. Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.

[CentOS] CentOS 5 based distribution

I've been trying to create a Linux distribution based on CentOS 5, similar to (actually, exactly like) how CentOS is based on RHEL. I have been unable to find any information about this. Most of what I find are tutorials and instructions on using Kickstart. Sometimes I've found allusions to doing t

Re: [CentOS] 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 history/diff?

Ignore. I found it. On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Scott R. Ehrlich wrote: Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from 5.0, and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0? I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this. Thanks. Scott __

Re: [CentOS] AM/FM tuner for centos 4 or 5?

why not do both and look at your options... john plemons Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Key Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:00 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] AM/FM tuner for centos 4 or 5?

Re: [CentOS] 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 history/diff?

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Scott R. Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from 5.0, > and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0? > > I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this. More than what's in the wiki?

Re: [CentOS] 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 history/diff?

Scott R. Ehrlich wrote: Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from 5.0, and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0? I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this. Look through the release notes for 5.1 and 5.2 _

[CentOS] bittorrent

Looks the only way now to grab a DVD is by torrent. What is the yum install name to get it on the machine? I have downloaded the torrent file, but what do I execute to grab the DVD? Thanks, great effort CentOS Team. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Johnny Hughes wrote: CentOS-5 is the Release CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. Yum upgrades will always get you all the updates that are r

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: Are you saying that simply running "yum update" on a Centos-5.1 system will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released? At this very moment, if I do "yum update" on my 5.1 home server, it tells me that it will get upgraded to 5.2 if I hit the "Y" key. I won

Re: [CentOS] bittorrent

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks the only way now to grab a DVD is by torrent. > > What is the yum install name to get it on the machine? > > I have downloaded the torrent file, but what do I execute to grab the DVD? > > Thanks, great effort CentO

[CentOS] Trash under sudo

Hi, Where do files get copied when deleting files under sudo? I have some files in my trash can that I can clean because they where deleted with a sudo. -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@c

[CentOS] Upgrade mail server to new machine

I have an old RHEL3 box that I am upgrading to CentOS5. I picked up a new Dell Poweredge R200 to use for that. Is there an easy way to copy all the user accounts and existing mail from the old server to the new one? Thanks. -- -=/>Thom ___ CentOS mail

[CentOS] Suggestions for a plug and play CA certificate manager?

I have played with self-signed end-use PKI certificates for about a decade now and would really like to set up a proper, albeit private, PKI using some sort of OFS CA management software. I have looked at OpenCA and found a few packages on sourceforge but they all seem to fall short of my desires i

[CentOS] Re: PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gerald Balzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sad, I needed it, since some apps that we are hosting require 5.2.4+ . I'm > currently running the > version 5.2.5 from the yjl.repo. But I'd appreciate to have a more official > one, of course. I always get frustrat

Re: [CentOS] bittorrent

Jerry Geis wrote: Looks the only way now to grab a DVD is by torrent. What is the yum install name to get it on the machine? I have downloaded the torrent file, but what do I execute to grab the DVD? you need a torrent application, such as ctorrent or rtorrent for linux, or utorrent fo

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade mail server to new machine

I have an old RHEL3 box that I am upgrading to CentOS5. I picked up a new Dell Poweredge R200 to use for that. Is there an easy way to copy all the user accounts and existing mail from the old server to the new one? if local users copy /home/* /etc/passwd /etc/shadow after first making

Re: [CentOS] recommendations for copying large filesystems

Mag Gam wrote: I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this? For example, I plan on doing rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs /targetfs is a NFS mounted

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. I th

RE: [CentOS] bittorrent

I used Azureus. Worked fine. The image'll be used for new installs, for already installed machines yum update works faster. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:58 PM To: CentOS ML Subject: [CentOS] bit

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Les Mikesell wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: CentOS-5 is the Release CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. Yum upgrades will always get you all t

Re: [CentOS] Re: PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Tony Mountifield wrote: I always get frustrated with apps requiring the latest and greatest versions of PHP, etc., before they are made available for the major distributions. Is it that the very newest feature is really indispensable and the app can't possibly make do without it, or just because

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Timothy Murphy wrote: Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2? Is it just that if installing Centos from scratch, one could download a more up-to-date version? You only have to remember these: 1) CentOS 4 versus CentOS 5 is like XP versus Vista (*) 2) Keep doing "yum

RE: [CentOS] bittorrent

Jerry Geis wrote: > Looks the only way now to grab a DVD is by torrent. > > What is the yum install name to get it on the machine? > > I have downloaded the torrent file, but what do I execute to grab the > DVD? You can download the dvd-iso (http/ftp) from a mirror-site. Have a look at: http

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade mail server to new machine

At 12:56 PM 6/24/2008, you wrote: I have an old RHEL3 box that I am upgrading to CentOS5. I picked up a new Dell Poweredge R200 to use for that. Is there an easy way to copy all the user accounts and existing mail from the old server to the new one? Thanks. -- -=/>Thom I have used Webmin/Vir

Re: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

Florin Andrei wrote: Timothy Murphy wrote: Are you saying that simply running "yum update" on a Centos-5.1 system will convert it to Centos-5.2, as and when that is released? At this very moment, if I do "yum update" on my 5.1 home server, it tells me that it will get upgraded to 5.2 if I hi

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade mail server to new machine

At 01:17 PM 6/24/2008, you wrote: I have an old RHEL3 box that I am upgrading to CentOS5. I picked up a new Dell Poweredge R200 to use for that. Is there an easy way to copy all the user accounts and existing mail from the old server to the new one? if local users copy /home/* /etc/passwd

  1   2   >