On Friday 20 June 2008 09:45:16 Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 20 June 2008 06:13, Martin Garcia wrote:
> > Hi Anne, I have many servers running clamav, simply use the dag repos
> > http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/ and install it via yum "yum install clamav
> > clamd" then run freshclam, thats it. I pres
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Cool, this worked from my Windows Laptop to the Dell server, but I see
> it's only a very basic info type setup. Do you run any specific software
> on your Linux server to give you more control?
>
> I was actually hoping that I could use this as a KVM over IP type thing
> to m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
hi
this is my named.conf
//
// named.conf for Red Hat caching-nameserver
//
options {
directory "/var/named";
dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db";
statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt";
/*
* If there is a fir
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Sorry, I have no clue about your question. However, I have several
AMD K6 chips (pentium-equivalent) lying around should you trip over
a motherboard that'll run them. That would solve your 486 problem, I
think, so let me know if such a chip would help you out.
Fred - thanks for the offer - how
nate wrote:
Some management systems have additional options which include full
VGA KVM abilities, I have a demo Dell box with DRAC 5 which has this
ability though I haven't been able to get it to work. HP systems
have this ability as well but require an additional ~$300 license
add on(iLO Advance
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network.
What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there
a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs
/targetfs is a NFS mounted filesystem.
Any t
Mag Gam wrote:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via
network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use
rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs
/targetfs is a NFS mounted
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
So, how do I actually access these servers remotely? If possible, I'd
like todo it via another CentOS server at the DC using SSH.
Dell's usually come with their openmange suite, so you might google
for that. I think a java-enabled browser should connect and get an
apple
On 6/21/08, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found their web support to be excellent if you can get past the
> place where they sort out the individual/small/large business users.
> Try to find support/downloads and the place where you put in the model
> number or their tag number wh
Mag Gam wrote:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network.
What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there
a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs
/targetfs is a NFS mounted f
I tried RHEL 3 (I believe) on a Pentium class system, and that did not work
well.
For everything but the kernel, there was a 386 version available (glibc,
ssl, etc), so we recompiled the kernel for the 586.
Unfortunately, glibc, when you compile it for anything below a 686, did not
support NTPL t
MHR wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Once I build a system and bring it to our defined baseline, I rarely use rpm
from that point forward...I custom roll almost everything -- especially
apache. (red hat's layout makes my skin crawl) When did CPAN become so
Hi all:
I am using Centos 5.1. But now I have a problem when unmount a removable
usb hard disk with right click and choose unmount volume command. When I did
that, system reminds me with a message like this:Cannot unmount volume
"xxx", Detail: Cannot remove directory, "xxx" represents a tempora
Am 21.06.2008 um 15:33 schrieb Mag Gam:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via
network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use
rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetf
on 6-21-2008 6:17 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
Sorry, I have no clue about your question. However, I have several
AMD K6 chips (pentium-equivalent) lying around should you trip over
a motherboard that'll run them. That would solve your 486 problem, I
think, so let me know if such a chip wo
Scott Silva wrote:
> I still think Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, or one of the BSD's will be your best
> option on that hardware. But Gentoo would take forever to compile/install on
> that hardware.
I thought I read at some point that Debian etch dropped 486 support.
Another option may be CentOS 3.x o
ÀîêÍ wrote:
> I googled this problem for many days and didn't find any way to solve
> this problem. Maybe it is a bug. I hope someone can help me. Thank you.
You may lose data doing this but at least for NFS volumes if something
is stuck I umount the file systems with the "-l -f" options. I'
nate wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
I still think Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, or one of the BSD's will be your best
option on that hardware. But Gentoo would take forever to compile/install on
that hardware.
I thought I read at some point that Debian etch dropped 486 support.
Another option may be Ce
Network is a 10/100
1 million large files
No SAN, JBOD
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Am 21.06.2008 um 15:33 schrieb Mag Gam:
>
>
> I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network.
>> What is the best option to do this? I
Am 21.06.2008 um 21:51 schrieb Mag Gam:
Network is a 10/100
You're kidding?
1 million large files
No SAN, JBOD
Move the data by moving the storage itself.
It will take months to transfer 100 TB via FastEthernet.
cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Duffner
CISSP, LPI, MCSE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mag Gam wrote:
Network is a 10/100
1 million large files
No SAN, JBOD
assuming 100baseT wire speed of about 10Mbyte/sec, moving 100TB will
take a minimum of 100TB/10MB/s = 10,000,000 seconds or 2900 hours, or
about 4 months. even on a gigE network, this would still take about 2
weeks or mo
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/21/08, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've found their web support to be excellent if you can get past the
place where they sort out the individual/small/large business users.
Try to find support/downloads and the place where you put in the model
number or t
Can add fiber network card to each server? fiber switch? if not try to
plugin to each server giga ethernet card put a crossover cable and
start rsync... i did that with 1tb of photos and takes a lot of
timekeep power supply working and cross the fingers
I hope this can help
2008/6/21
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 5:12 PM, nightduke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can add fiber network card to each server? fiber switch? if not try to
> plugin to each server giga ethernet card put a crossover cable and
> start rsync... i did that with 1tb of photos and takes a lot of
> timekeep p
Am 21.06.2008 um 23:44 schrieb Matt Morgan:
O
Then if you get the network sorted out, the fastest & most reliable
way I know to copy lots of files is
star --copy
You can get star with
yum install star
Now that I know the details - I don' think this is going to work. Not
with 100 TB
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a
directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory
on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same
files from th
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Well ... you would need to Join the "Samba Server" to your "Windows
Domain". If that domain is ADS (Active Directory Services) then it is
a different procedure than if it is a WinNT type Windows Domain.
This is getting well outside the range of comple
Rob Townley wrote:
dmesg > dmesg.log
or
cd /var/log/
ls -lat | more
i liked the old days when dmesg, /var/log/messages and other syslog
stuff was displayed automatically on a tty console. I tried a softlink
from /var/log/messages to tty9, but didn't have any luck. Would it
require a tee o
On one of our servers wtmp is growing very fast.
The binary file is about 50M but when I change it to ascii with fwtmp command,
The ascii file is only 10M.
binary file is being 5 times bigger than text file ?
Any suggestion ?
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:33 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via
> network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use
> rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this?
At gigabit speeds, you're looking at over a week
Thanks for the reply. I think we are making progress, see
comments/questions interspersed below.
Les Mikesell wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Well ... you would need to Join the "Samba Server" to your "Windows
Domain". If that domain is ADS (Active Directory Services) then i
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 21:48 -0400, Ted Miller wrote:
> I have been using 'share' mode, but a little reading makes it sound like I
> should switch to 'user' mode to make my life easier. I have been adding
> various user permission lines to each share. Will they keep working if I
> just comment
Thank you for your help. I will try this when I mount the hard disk next
time. Thanks again.
2008/6/22 nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ÀîêÍ wrote:
>
> > I googled this problem for many days and didn't find any way to solve
> > this problem. Maybe it is a bug. I hope someone can help me. Thank you
Ted Miller wrote:
Is samba running there? If so, you are mostly done.
Yes, at the moment I have Samba running, but apparently not properly
configured. I am also in the process of moving this machine from Centos
4 to Centos 5, and am trying to do it better this time. At the moment
office2
I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server that's
coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives (500GB) hooked to it,
running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These issues boil down to the card
periodically throwing errors like the following:
sd 1:0:0:0
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server
that's coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives
(500GB) hooked to it, running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These
issues boil down to the card periodically throwing errors like
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 at 9:12pm, John R Pierce wrote
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server
that's coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives (500GB)
hooked to it, running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These issues boi
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 at 9:12pm, John R Pierce wrote
I have no experience with that raid card, most of our larger systems
use external SAN storage, but I will say that, IMHO, is a very large
raid-6. we usually don't make single raid sets much large than 7-8
drives,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 at 1:01am, Ruslan Sivak wrote
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 at 9:12pm, John R Pierce wrote
I have no experience with that raid card, most of our larger systems use
external SAN storage, but I will say that, IMHO, is a very large raid-6.
we usually don't m
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> periodically throwing errors like the following:
>
> sd 1:0:0:0: WARNING: (0x06:0x002C): Command (0x8a) timed out, resetting
> card.
Wondering if you have scheduled automatic media scans of all of the
disks in the array? Perhaps you have a disk that is going bad
causi
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been having no end of issues with a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 in a server
> that's coming on a year old. I've got 24 WDC WD5001ABYS drives (500GB)
> hooked to it, running as a single RAID6 w/ a hot spare. These issues
Hi all
I have a problem switch in our data centre, which is connected to a
linux server via a serial cable. I know I can / could access the switch
from my Windows PC back at the office, using hyperterm, but trying to
access it using minicom just doesn't seem to work.
I have changed the comms
Dear all,
I am trying to install Samba 3.0.30 on a new Centos 5 machine and I am getting
following error. Samba has been downloaded form setnet. Could some please let
me know how to fix this?
rpmdb: Program version 4.3 doesn't match environment version
error: db4 error(-30974) from dben
>Have other folks had good luck with this card? What sorts of configs are you
>running? I'm in the position of needing more storage, and I'm a bit gun shy on
>3ware at the moment...
Does that drive have a jumper to slow it down to 1.5Gb transfer rate?
Cheap controllers and drives just cant do it
45 matches
Mail list logo
