Hello, I'd like to ask a couple of things:
1) I would like to move from Debian to CentOS.
One thing I will probably miss is the debsecan tool.
This utility sends me a mail whenever there is a change regarding the
vulnerabilities' status on my system.
It lists new ones, resolved ones and current on
Morning everyone,
I was hoping to use mdbtools to extract data from some Access databases
overnight. I have yum installed the tools from Dag and also downloaded and
(eventually!) compiled the latest release from the mdbtools web site, but I
either get 'buffer overflow' errors or no output from mo
On Friday 20 June 2008 06:13, Martin Garcia wrote:
> Hi Anne, I have many servers running clamav, simply use the dag repos
> http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/ and install it via yum "yum install clamav
> clamd" then run freshclam, thats it. I presume your configuration is not
> properly done.
>
It turned
Hi - daft one for Friday morning coffee break:
I have been trying to mount floppies on a couple of CentOS5 servers - the
usual "mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy" (yes, /mnt/floppy exists!).
On both servers, the mount command just doesn't come back and I have to hit
CTRL-C. I have tried different medi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> options {
> default-key "rndckey";
> default-server 127.0.0.1;
> default-port 953;
> };
You bind it to localhost, but
> controls {
>inet 172.18.3.57 port 953
>allow { 172.18.3.57; } keys { "rndckey"; };
> };
don't allow
Luigi Perroti wrote:
> One thing I will probably miss is the debsecan tool.
> This utility sends me a mail whenever there is a change regarding the
> vulnerabilities' status on my system.
> It lists new ones, resolved ones and current ones.
>
> Is there anything similar for CentOS?
Not yet (there
Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> So is it me, CentOS 5 or something else? (Ideas, anyone!?). It could be a
> set of duff floppies and three flaky drives (two brand new), but I thought
> I'd ask before I spend too much more time on it!
As always: Logfile excerpts could have been a great help. Also dmesg
pr
All,
Apologies for cluttering the list, but I just wanted to say hello and
prepare all for a barage of silly discussions from a tech-hypochondriac!
We have recently purchased two servers running CentOS, and as I'm from
more of a Debian based background, it would be good if someone could
point
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ralph Angenendt
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:01 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mounting Floppies
Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> So is it me, CentOS 5 or something else? (Ideas, anyone!?). It could
Matt Harwood wrote:
All,
Apologies for cluttering the list, but I just wanted to say hello and
prepare all for a barage of silly discussions from a tech-hypochondriac!
We have recently purchased two servers running CentOS, and as I'm from
more of a Debian based background, it would be good if
Matt Harwood ha scritto:
All,
Apologies for cluttering the list, but I just wanted to say hello and
prepare all for a barage of silly discussions from a tech-hypochondriac!
We have recently purchased two servers running CentOS, and as I'm from
more of a Debian based background, it would be go
fred smith wrote:
I'm using Centos 4.x (fully up to date) on a system at work. I have also
been using firefox 2 (directly from mozilla.org) on it for a long time,
and it tends to work just fine.
yesterday I installed the new FF3 release. It works fine too, with one
exception: The print dialog
Thank you Johnny and Lorenzo! Much, much appreciated. I do feel silly
just asking for general advice, and not Googling (I am, but time is
restricted) but I need to get up to speed using CentOS instead of Deb
ASAP.. as our servers are deployed next week. Thank you so much again, I
shall get read
Rob Townley wrote on Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:57:05 -0500:
> Why do distributions put in very old versions of Firefox - 1.5 when 2.0
> has been out for a year or more and 3.0 was just released.
Because at *that time* when the distribution was finalized it seemed to be
the best decision and a newer
Matt Harwood wrote:
Thank you Johnny and Lorenzo! Much, much appreciated. I do feel silly
just asking for general advice, and not Googling (I am, but time is
restricted) but I need to get up to speed using CentOS instead of Deb
ASAP.. as our servers are deployed next week. Thank you so much aga
hi
wile i am running the command rndc reload
i am getting the error
rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refuse
any one can suggest where i am doing wrong
this is my rndc.conf
key "rndckey" {
algorithm hmac-md5;
secret "fKZfrqGy9VOPOLA3pgDACA==";
};
options {
On Friday 20 June 2008 10:52:49 Matt Harwood wrote:
> Thank you Johnny and Lorenzo! Much, much appreciated. I do feel silly
> just asking for general advice, and not Googling (I am, but time is
> restricted) but I need to get up to speed using CentOS instead of Deb
> ASAP.. as our servers are deplo
Dunc and Anne,
Thanks for your replies! Yes it certainly seems a nice, active list.
As for my mobile number, I've no problems sharing it - it's not my
personal one anyway :-)
Thanks again!
*Matt Harwood*
Designer, NannyGroup Limited
Mob: 07887 817769
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 20 June
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have a look at these pages:
http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759
I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patc
Anyone using ex 90?
I have it running, no problem. Only mouse was little tricky, namely in X.
But jut a little change in xorg.conf and everything works fine (CO 5.1 desktop
install with vanilla kernel).
Now would like to get keyboards extra buttons in use. Question is, anyone
configured it allread
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi
>
>
> wile i am running the command rndc reload
>
> i am getting the error
>
> rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refuse
What was wrong with the answer I gave you at Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:58:05
+0200?
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpGV5VlXEN2q.pgp
Description: PGP
hi
i tried waht u said ,
but i am getting the error
like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# named -g -p 53
20-Jun-2008 13:31:23.669 starting BIND 9.3.3rc2 -g -p 53
20-Jun-2008 13:31:23.669 found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
20-Jun-2008 13:31:23.673 loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
20-Jun-200
Hi,
Is there someone on this mailing list who could/want help me figure out
this issue? We do not know where to look to solve this.
--- Description ---
This is a brand new server, which has been tested for days with FreeBSD
in our office, and a few days with Windows on the site of our hardware
I have been asked to put a club's membership form on their web, but firefox
displays it as scaled to 23% and it prints at that scale. Can anyone tell me
why? Thanks
Anne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin
I am looking for an app that would run from the terminal and would emulate a
bash shell (or pass everything to the shell) that would allow me to set a
log file and then record all my input and the output to the screen from the
commands. As an added bonus if it would allow me to run it from two
ter
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 13:41 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> I have been asked to put a club's membership form on their web, but firefox
> displays it as scaled to 23% and it prints at that scale. Can anyone tell me
> why? Thanks
>
Anne,
Don't know, but it might help to know what format you are us
Hi Anne
Hope you don't mind me butting in on this (as a newbie round here!).
If you would like to provide a URL for the page I'd be more than willing
to take a look at it for you.
Thanks!
*Matt Harwood*
Designer, NannyGroup Limited
Mob: 07887 817769
Anne Wilson wrote:
I have been asked to
Hi!
Rob Lines wrote:
I am looking for an app that would run from the terminal and would
emulate a bash shell (or pass everything to the shell) that would allow
me to set a log file and then record all my input and the output to the
screen from the commands. As an added bonus if it would allow
I have been printing to this printer for years it seems.
Recently, printing from Firefox would hang in the print que, but other
prints would go behind the hung job. Deleting the hung print job would
not seem to change the que until I rebooted.
Now I have an OpenOffice job stuck as well.
I a
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Rob Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for an app that would run from the terminal and would emulate
> a bash shell (or pass everything to the shell) that would allow me to set a
> log file and then record all my input and the output to the screen from
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 14:40 +0200, Alwin Roosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Is there someone on this mailing list who could/want help me figure out
> this issue? We do not know where to look to solve this.
...
> I would be very surprised if this is hardware related.
A google on
"Machine Check Exception
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:54 +0100, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> Hi - daft one for Friday morning coffee break:
>
> I have been trying to mount floppies on a couple of CentOS5 servers -
> the usual "mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy" (yes, /mnt/floppy exists!).
>
> On both servers, the mount command just do
2008/6/20 Rob Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am looking for an app that would run from the terminal and would emulate
> a bash shell (or pass everything to the shell) that would allow me to set a
> log file and then record all my input and the output to the screen from the
> commands. As an added
2008/6/20 Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>
> Is there someone on this mailing list who could/want help me figure out
> this issue? We do not know where to look to solve this.
>
If your installation is standard CentOS with no thirdparty software, and
configurations, I would first run the
I am using autofs for a number of machines connecting nfs shares. All the
mount and unmount log entries on the server are being saved to
/var/log/messages currently. This is becoming a bit of a pain because as
the number of hosts increase and various monitoring scripts check to be sure
that they
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:16 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mounting Floppies
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:54 +0100, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> Hi - daft one for Friday mor
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nigel Kendrick
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:25 AM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] mdbtools on CentOS
>
> Morning everyone,
>
> I was hoping to use mdbtools to extract data from some Access databases
overnight
Rob Lines wrote:
> Anyone know of an app like this or any suggestions that could be added to my
> bashrc to provide the functionality?
I use script for this purpose
from the manpage:
Script makes a typescript of everything printed on your terminal.
It is useful for students who need a hardcopy r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# named -g -p 53
> 20-Jun-2008 13:31:23.669 starting BIND 9.3.3rc2 -g -p 53
> 20-Jun-2008 13:31:23.669 found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
> 20-Jun-2008 13:31:23.673 loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
> 20-Jun-2008 13:31:23.674 /etc/rndc.con
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Walid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> screen as already mentioned, also script, and if you are doing it to
> monitor other activities other than yours ttysnoop
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/ttysnoop/, for putty there is tabbed putty
> btw @ http://put
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:24:52AM -0400, Rob Lines wrote:
...
>
> I will take a look at screen though it will probably take some getting used
> to with how it seems to handle . The main goal was to help keep better
> track of changes made while troubleshooting issues without having to write
> do
On Friday 20 June 2008 13:58:25 Phil Schaffner wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 13:41 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > I have been asked to put a club's membership form on their web, but
> > firefox displays it as scaled to 23% and it prints at that scale. Can
> > anyone tell me why? Thanks
>
> Anne,
On Friday 20 June 2008 13:59:27 Matt Harwood wrote:
> Hi Anne
>
> Hope you don't mind me butting in on this (as a newbie round here!).
>
> If you would like to provide a URL for the page I'd be more than willing
> to take a look at it for you.
>
Thanks for the offer, Matt, but I don't know whether
On Friday 20 June 2008 14:05:16 Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have been printing to this printer for years it seems.
>
> Recently, printing from Firefox would hang in the print que, but other
> prints would go behind the hung job. Deleting the hung print job would
> not seem to change the que until
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've fixed it by uploading a pdf instead of the original jpg, but I'd dearly
> like to know why firefox thought it should be scaled like that.
Apparently the justification for this is that it makes Firefox work
better on PDA
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Bart Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently the justification for this is that it makes Firefox work
> better on PDAs and other small-screen devices. Firefox3 introduced
> "automatic image scaling"
Before someone else corrects me: Yes, I just realized t
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
> Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
>
> ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
> CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
> Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
> Bank 5: f2
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Bart Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Bart Schaefer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Apparently the justification for this is that it makes Firefox work
>> better on PDAs and other small-screen devices. Firefox3 introduced
>> "a
On Friday 20 June 2008 16:04:27 Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I've fixed it by uploading a pdf instead of the original jpg, but I'd
> > dearly like to know why firefox thought it should be scaled like that.
>
> Apparently the jus
On Friday 20 June 2008 16:31:36 Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Bart Schaefer
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Bart Schaefer
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Apparently the justification for this is that it makes Firefox work
> >> bette
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
B
Nigel Kendrick wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ralph Angenendt
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:01 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mounting Floppies
Nigel Kendrick wrote:
So is it me, CentOS 5 or something else? (Idea
Florin Andrei wrote:
Anyway, I did a test with the 2.6.18-93.el5.bz444759 kernel and there's
no difference: 65 minutes, 27 MB/s. Looks like it doesn't matter which
kernel I use, at least for this simple test with dd.
I wonder if a test closer to real life, such as reading/writing stuff
from
Michael wrote:
> But I don't want to get into the situation above, where I purchase NEW
> hardware, and CentOS doesn't like it, and furthermore the resolution is
> elusive.
>
> What is the best HW environment for CentOS?
> Brand, MFG, chipset rev, and so on
Easiest is to buy from a vendor tha
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 at 9:55am, Florin Andrei wrote
Florin Andrei wrote:
Anyway, I did a test with the 2.6.18-93.el5.bz444759 kernel and there's no
difference: 65 minutes, 27 MB/s. Looks like it doesn't matter which kernel
I use, at least for this simple test with dd.
I wonder if a test clo
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway, I did a test with the 2.6.18-93.el5.bz444759 kernel and there's no
>> difference: 65 minutes, 27 MB/s. Looks like it doesn't matter which kernel I
>> use, at least for this simple test with dd.
No. Since you're
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:25 +0100, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
[snip]
If you, or others like you, insist on using HTML for email to this list
please set your font size to 10!
Thank you!
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
Jim Perrin wrote:
Nope. This is just a long-standing performance thing. You can tune
ext3 to perform better, but on a 3ware card xfs will win, hands down.
of course, XFS can also fail spectacularly.ext3fs fully journals all
metadata updates. I'm sure this is a major portion of the per
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 at 10:34am, John R Pierce wrote
Jim Perrin wrote:
Nope. This is just a long-standing performance thing. You can tune
ext3 to perform better, but on a 3ware card xfs will win, hands down.
of course, XFS can also fail spectacularly.ext3fs fully journals all
metadata up
John R Pierce wrote:
of course, XFS can also fail spectacularly.ext3fs fully journals all
metadata updates. I'm sure this is a major portion of the performance
differences on writes.
Actually, I've used XFS since the days it was released as a port to
Linux (and even before that, on Ir
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 14:54 +0100, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of William L. Maltby
>
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:54 +0100, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> > Hi - daft one for Friday morning coffee break:
> >
> >
Florin Andrei wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
> >
> > of course, XFS can also fail spectacularly.ext3fs fully journals all
> > metadata updates. I'm sure this is a major portion of the performance
> > differences on writes.
>
> Actually, I've used XFS since the days it was released as a po
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 11:54 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of Ralph Angenendt
> >
> > Nigel Kendrick wrote:
> >>
> You've tried replacing the drive, and the disk works in your
on 6-20-2008 12:41 AM Luigi Perroti spake the following:
Hello, I'd like to ask a couple of things:
1) I would like to move from Debian to CentOS.
One thing I will probably miss is the debsecan tool.
This utility sends me a mail whenever there is a change regarding the
vulnerabilities' status on
On 6/20/08, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Easiest is to buy from a vendor that can test on your OS of choice,
> there are lots of vendors out there that can do it.
>
> Two such companies I have bought from that do this include
> http://www.siliconmechanics.com/ (HQ in Seattle, WA area)
> http:
on 6-20-2008 8:23 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
Bank 3: f62000
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Matt Harwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dunc and Anne,
>
> Thanks for your replies! Yes it certainly seems a nice, active list.
>
> As for my mobile number, I've no problems sharing it - it's not my personal
> one anyway :-)
>
Okay, everyone, ready to dial?
mhr
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:53 AM, jarmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone using ex 90?
> I have it running, no problem. Only mouse was little tricky, namely in X.
> But jut a little change in xorg.conf and everything works fine (CO 5.1 desktop
> install with vanilla kernel).
> Now would like to ge
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 6-20-2008 12:41 AM Luigi Perroti spake the following:
> >Hello, I'd like to ask a couple of things:
> >
> >1) I would like to move from Debian to CentOS.
> >One thing I will probably miss is the debsecan tool.
> >This utility sends m
On 6/20/08, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As most of us have found out at some time;
> brand new does not always equal OK.
> I have had plenty of hardware that was dead on arrival or dead in days.
> Check
> the obvious of re-seating all removable parts like memory and cards, and
> also
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
> Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
>
> ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
> CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
> Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
> Ban
Richard Karhuse wrote:
> Dag's Repo has the new memtest86+ 2.01 RPM. I'd pull it and
> let it run overnight. While memtest86+ is good, I've recently had
> cases where is didn't find (obvious) memory errors.
My favorite test is cerberus(ctcs). Quite a few OEMs out there
use it to burn in their s
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a brand new server, which has been tested for days with FreeBSD
> in our office, and a few days with Windows on the site of our hardware
> distributor. Now customer wants CentOS, which we installed, but after
> few days we get a kernel
Hi all
I'm trying to get to grips with this one, but just can't figure it out.
I recently acquired some 2nd hand Dell Poweredge 860 servers, and
noticed that they have built in remote management interfaces. So, I have
setup one, and assigned an IP address to it, but have no idea on how to
acc
For those of you that were interested, it is now posted on the wiki
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
Let me know if you have any questions.
Dnk
On 16-Jun-08, at 7:38 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Has a wiki entry been created for this yet? A search of
wiki.centos.org
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I'm looking forward to upgrading to 5.2! If for nothing else, for
the newer version of Mozilla Firefox. The current version (1.5.0.12)
crashes, very frequently, at web sites I use.
You can always put a newer version of FF in /home/${USER}/firefox and
then put that direct
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 15:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
> > CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
> > Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
> > Bank 5: f2
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to get to grips with this one, but just can't figure it
out. I recently acquired some 2nd hand Dell Poweredge 860 servers, and
noticed that they have built in remote management interfaces. So, I
have setup one, and assigned an IP address to it, but have no
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Rob Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to continue to see these messages but I would like to
> see them put else where but looking through the documentation for syslog I
> couldn't find any way to separate just those messages out.
I also have the same
On 6/20/08, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can always put a newer version of FF in /home/${USER}/firefox and
> then put that directory at the beginning of $PATH in your .bash_profile
>
> No other changes are necessary and next time you log in voila! when you
> click the FF icon in
John R Pierce wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to get to grips with this one, but just can't figure it
out. I recently acquired some 2nd hand Dell Poweredge 860 servers,
and noticed that they have built in remote management interfaces. So,
I have setup one, and assigned an IP addr
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a brand new server, which has been tested for days with FreeBSD
> in our office, and a few days with Windows on the site of our hardware
> distributor. Now customer wants CentOS, which we installed, but after
> few days we get a kernel
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 15:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
Bank 3: f6220002010a at 0
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure if there's a DRAC 4 device in. It has 2x NIC's, and I
> can set the IP on the top NIC as the management IP. I haven't been able
> to connect to it via a web browser though, nor can I ping it.
Install the OpenIPMI tools, start ipmi, and try to connect using
i
Is there a method to get a 586 (i586 text) install to a 486 level?
I am looking for information guidance on this.
I have looked into using debian/386 which stinks in my opinion,
slackware doesnt quite have it either.
So I am wishing/hoping there is a NOT TO painful way to get a 586 install
to
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:55:17PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Is there a method to get a 586 (i586 text) install to a 486 level?
> I am looking for information guidance on this.
> I have looked into using debian/386 which stinks in my opinion,
> slackware doesnt quite have it either.
>
> So I am
Jerry Geis wrote:
Is there a method to get a 586 (i586 text) install to a 486 level?
I am looking for information guidance on this.
I have looked into using debian/386 which stinks in my opinion,
slackware doesnt quite have it either.
So I am wishing/hoping there is a NOT TO painful way to ge
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to get to grips with this one, but just can't figure it out.
I recently acquired some 2nd hand Dell Poweredge 860 servers, and
noticed that they have built in remote management interfaces. So, I have
setup one, and assigned an IP address to it, but have no
hi
this is my named.conf
//
// named.conf for Red Hat caching-nameserver
//
options {
directory "/var/named";
dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db";
statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt";
/*
* If there is a firewall between you and nameser
nate wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm not 100% sure if there's a DRAC 4 device in. It has 2x NIC's, and I
can set the IP on the top NIC as the management IP. I haven't been able
to connect to it via a web browser though, nor can I ping it.
Install the OpenIPMI tools, start ipmi, and try
Les Mikesell wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to get to grips with this one, but just can't figure it
out. I recently acquired some 2nd hand Dell Poweredge 860 servers,
and noticed that they have built in remote management interfaces. So,
I have setup one, and assigned an IP addre
91 matches
Mail list logo
