[CentOS] Re: apt on Centos 5.1

Scott Silva wrote: And I would assume that apt won't be able to update from the CentOS repos. Your assumption is wrong. As Dag explained on his blog modern apt-rpm supports repomd format and can use the same repositories as yum. -tgc ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access/phpMyAdmin/ on this server.

2008/6/19 Filipe Brandenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Herta Van den Eynde > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Joshua previously suggested SELinux might have something to do with >> it, but being new to it, I didn't know what to do with that info. >> >> I'll need to read

Re: [CentOS] mod perl query

> httpd -M will print a list of both static and loaded modules > > httpd -l only lists modules compiled into httpd > > If mod_perl is installed you should see something like "perl_module" in > the list > > Mick > if it is installed, then there should be a file called >"/etc/httpd/conf.d/perl.conf".

[CentOS] failed dependencies during mplayer installation.

hi i am new to linux while installing mplayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ rpm -ivh mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386.rpm mplayer-fonts-1.1-3.0.rf.noarch.rpm warning: mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 6b8d79e6 error: Failed dependencies: l

Re: [CentOS] failed dependencies during mplayer installation.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 02:10:37PM +0530, Gopinath Achari wrote: > hi > i am new to linux while installing mplayer > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ rpm -ivh > mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386.rpm > mplayer-fonts-1.1-3.0.rf.noarch.rpm > warning: mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386.rpm: Header

Re: [CentOS] failed dependencies during mplayer installation.

Gopinath Achari wrote: hi i am new to linux while installing mplayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ rpm -ivh mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386.rpm mplayer-fonts-1.1-3.0.rf.noarch.rpm warning: mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 6b8d79e6 error: Fail

Re: [CentOS] failed dependencies during mplayer installation.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:48:07AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Gopinath Achari wrote: >> hi i am new to linux while installing mplayer >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ rpm -ivh >> mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386.rpm >> mplayer-fonts-1.1-3.0.rf.noarch.rpm warning: >> mplayer-1.0-0.37.rc1try

Re: [CentOS] remote access info please

John Thomas wrote: Gary wrote: My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high port, but I am sure just about any program will allow

Re: [CentOS] remote access info please

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:52:27AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > John Thomas wrote: >> Gary wrote: >>> My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not >>> just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS >>> program which would do this. Would also want

Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin

Thank you very much. - Original Message From: Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:18:43 Subject: RE: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin ceejay cervantes wrote: > Is it not ok to use both plugins at the s

Re: [CentOS] YUM and installing older versions of software.

James B. Byrne wrote: How does one specify a particular version of a software package to yum to install? Is this even possible? What happens to superceded pacjkages in repos? Are they simple removed/discarded? yum install package-X.Y.Z-A.el5 ??? The reason I ask is if a yum update goes awry f

Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

Chuck wrote: > I am using the CPAN version of CGI: But why? The perl package in CentOS provides CGI. And please edit your mails when replying. Cheers, Ralph pgpSO6PMGNAo3.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:

Re: [CentOS] failed dependencies during mplayer installation.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Ryan Lewon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:48:07AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> Gopinath Achari wrote: >> >> I note that package is from the rpmforge repository (since its name >> includes .rf.), so you could add support for rpmforge to you

Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chuck wrote: >> I am using the CPAN version of CGI: > > But why? The perl package in CentOS provides CGI. ...And here is my favorite quote. Jim Perrin explains why CPAN should be avoided: http://lists.centos.org/piperm

Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

Once I build a system and bring it to our defined baseline, I rarely use rpm from that point forward...I custom roll almost everything -- especially apache. (red hat's layout makes my skin crawl) When did CPAN become so bad? It was the defacto standard and source of truth for perl modules 10 years

[CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

I have a few servers that I really have to build already. Got to buckle down and get it done; no more waiting for 5.2 as a 'reason' to put it off for another day. I will be building a local repository for 5.2 as soon as the ISOs are posted (well as soon as my 768Kb DSL link will allow), so wh

Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

Chuck wrote: Once I build a system and bring it to our defined baseline, I rarely use rpm from that point forward...I custom roll almost everything -- especially apache. (red hat's layout makes my skin crawl) When did CPAN become so bad? It was the defacto standard and source of truth for perl mo

Re: [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have a few servers that I really have to build already. Got to buckle down and get it done; no more waiting for 5.2 as a 'reason' to put it off for another day. I will be building a local repository for 5.2 as soon as the ISOs are posted (well as soon as my 768Kb DS

Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin

ceejay cervantes wrote: Hi, Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin. I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter any problems. I used priority=

Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin

Thanks. - Original Message From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 20:54:09 Subject: Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin ceejay cervantes wrote: > Hi, > > Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same tim

Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:14:04 -0500 Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea dude the red hat specific instructions are for a much older version > of twiki. 1. Actually, they still work, the install instructions have not changed. 2. I use them to install twiki about 2 month ago, and it worked. --

[CentOS] centos 5.1 install failure

Greetings. I am attempting to install 5.1 x86_64, but it is dumping out during the post-install section. I was able to send a debug to a remote system. I've never looked through an install debug log before, but everything seems to be in order until after the "tar" install, at which point I

Re: [CentOS] remote access info please

Monty Shinn wrote: Gary wrote: Hi ya'll, I built a new CentOS 5.1 server for a client, housing a Lotus Notes / Domino server, and various other virtualized IBM software server guests, and soon will have to physically move that server to another distant location. My question is that I will n

[CentOS] question about expert install for 4.6

At the boot: install prompt for 4.6 there is a i586 option. there is also an expert option. If you use expert mode can you also specify i586 somehow? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] New to Centos, and linux in general

I've installed DSL linux -- no problem My expertise is in the HP3000 (non windows, non unix) environment. When I boot from Centos CD#1 I get a Panic error. I'm thinking hardware is the issue so I try a different machine, same thing. I've tried 'linux rescue', 'linux mem=256' still the same e

Re: [CentOS] New to Centos, and linux in general

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael wrote: > Or are there other boot options? Have you tried to check the media? At boot: linux mediacheck Check each CD as it prompts you to replace them. If that fails try it with DMA turned off. linux mediacheck ide=nodma If everything p

Re: [CentOS] New to Centos, and linux in general

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Max Hetrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michael wrote: > > > Or are there other boot options? > > > Have you tried to check the media? > > At boot: > > linux mediacheck > > Check each CD as it prompts you to rep

[CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"

Hi all I've just installed CentOS 5.1 x64, from the 1st CD (minimal installation) and then tried to install Apache, but keep on getting this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apache Loading "installonlyn" plugin Repository centosplus is listed more than once in the configuration Settin

[CentOS] struggling with simple webdav

Normally I use authzldap to authenticate LDAP users but in this case, I have a client that wants non-LDAP users to be able to use DAV. The twist is that there are several virtual hosts on this server and perhaps that is confusing things... anyway, my httpd.conf has... Dav On AllowOverride N

Re: [CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apache > Loading "installonlyn" plugin > Repository centosplus is listed more than once in the configuration > Setting up Install Process > Setting up repositories > not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid > rel

Re: [CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:30:29PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all > > I've just installed CentOS 5.1 x64, from the 1st CD (minimal > installation) and then tried to install Apache, but keep on getting this > error: not true, you must have at least added rpmforge in the way since you have: .

Re: [CentOS] YUM and installing older versions of software.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Laurence Alexander Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've spent some time struggling with this issue too. The current version of > yum will let you specify an older version (as detailed in the man page) and > install it - but you then have to be very careful with

Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Once I build a system and bring it to our defined baseline, I rarely use rpm > from that point forward...I custom roll almost everything -- especially > apache. (red hat's layout makes my skin crawl) When did CPAN become so bad?

Re: [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> I have a few servers that I really have to build already. Got to buckle >> down and get it done; no more waiting for 5.2 as a 'reason' to put it off >> for another day. >> >> I will be buildin

Re: [CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"

Ralph Angenendt wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apache Loading "installonlyn" plugin Repository centosplus is listed more than once in the configuration Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is no

Re: [CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > I've just installed CentOS 5.1 x64, from the 1st CD (minimal installation) > and then tried to install Apache, but keep on getting this error: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apache Please try 'yum install h

[CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

Have a look at these pages: http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one posted in the bug report (kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.bz32.x86_64) and I don't qui

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at these pages: > > http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 > > I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one po

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 at 10:55am, Florin Andrei wrote Have a look at these pages: http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one posted in the bug report (kerne

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at these pages: > > http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 > > I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one pos

[CentOS] Re: Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

on 6-19-2008 5:11 AM Chuck spake the following: Once I build a system and bring it to our defined baseline, I rarely use rpm from that point forward...I custom roll almost everything -- especially apache. (red hat's layout makes my skin crawl) I'm curious then... why use it (RedHat)? There a

[CentOS] Re: Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5

on 6-19-2008 6:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:14:04 -0500 Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yea dude the red hat specific instructions are for a much older version of twiki. 1. Actually, they still work, the install instructions have not changed. 2. I use t

[CentOS] Re: What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

on 6-19-2008 5:37 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following: I have a few servers that I really have to build already. Got to buckle down and get it done; no more waiting for 5.2 as a 'reason' to put it off for another day. I will be building a local repository for 5.2 as soon as the ISOs are

[CentOS] lvm with iscsi devices on boot

Hi All, My CentOS 5.1 server is using iSCSI attached disks connecting to a dual controller storage array. I have also configured multipathd to manage the multiple paths. Everything works well, and on boot the dev nodes are automatically created in /dev/mapper. On these devices, I have created lo

Re: [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have a few servers that I really have to build already. Got to buckle > down and get it done; no more waiting for 5.2 as a 'reason' to put it > off for another day. > > I will be building a local repository for 5.2 as soon as the ISOs are > posted (well as soon as my 76

[CentOS] Re: lvm with iscsi devices on boot

on 6-19-2008 11:42 AM Raja Subramanian spake the following: Hi All, My CentOS 5.1 server is using iSCSI attached disks connecting to a dual controller storage array. I have also configured multipathd to manage the multiple paths. Everything works well, and on boot the dev nodes are automatical

Re: [CentOS] failed dependencies during mplayer installation.

On 6/19/08, Gopinath Achari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am new to linux while installing mplayer > i am not knowing to which package thiss files belong to... please help > me out i am using centos 5.1 ES There are step_by_step instructions at the below URLs on how to install MPlayer and other

Re: [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

On 6/19/08, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 5.2 should be here by Monday(6/23) or Tuesday(6/24) I'm looking forward to upgrading to 5.2! If for nothing else, for the newer version of Mozilla Firefox. The current version (1.5.0.12) crashes, very frequently, at web sites I use. The br

RE: [CentOS] lvm with iscsi devices on boot

Raja Subramanian wrote: > Hi All, > > My CentOS 5.1 server is using iSCSI attached disks connecting > to a dual controller storage array. I have also configured multipathd > to manage the multiple paths. Everything works well, and on > boot the dev nodes are automatically created in /dev/mapper

Re: [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

Why do distributions put in very old versions of Firefox - 1.5 when 2.0 has been out for a year or more and 3.0 was just released. On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/19/08, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 5.2 should be here by Monday(

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

Jim Perrin wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have a look at these pages: http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the p

Re: [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

On 6/19/08, Rob Townley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do distributions put in very old versions of Firefox - 1.5 when 2.0 > has been out for a year or more and 3.0 was just released. > Rob: This distribution, is for the Enterprise (where the majority of installations are on Servers) and the pr

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How would I know if I'm affected by this bug? I'm using the 9690SA > controller. > Russ Mostly, if you're using the stock 3w9xxx module that comes in centos, you're affected. If you're using the 3ware driver from 3ware/

Re: [CentOS] What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

Security > Stability when it comes to web browsers and i wonder if 1.5 is more secure than 2.14. i wonder when 1.x will not have security patches anymore. rh must document that somewhere and i will have to find it. On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/

Re: [CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:31:37PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm --verify centos-release > S.5T c /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo Not the orignal version. That is the cause of your problem, see below. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /etc/yum.repos.d/ > total 32 >

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: That's the wrong patched kernel. You'd need to be using one of the kernels in -- kernel-2.6.18-93.el5.bz444759.x86_64.rpm. (facepalm) Thanks for setting me right. Anyway, I did a test with the 2.6.18-93.el5.bz444759 kerne

[CentOS] linux rescue on usb thumbdrive

I believe the same issue I see with running "linux rescue" on a USB drive is the same issue I am having why the thumb drive wont boot. When installing I have to use expert mode I just cant install directly as the USB disk is not seen. What happens extra in expert mode? some delay somewhere???

[CentOS] Re: linux rescue on usb thumbdrive

I am hoping this does the trick wow has this been a long process. http://fungliding.blogspot.com/2005_04_01_fungliding_archive.html Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Need GLIBCXX-3.4.9 for /usr/lib64/libstdc++

I am trying to compile an application on a CentOS 5.0 64-bit machine that gives me the error: /usr/local/bin/myprog: /usr/lib64/libstdc++: version `GLIBXX.3.4.9' not found (required by /usr/local/bin/myprog) I have gcc 4.2.3. I've performed a yum install compat-* and glibc* What am I missin

[CentOS] Re: What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

on 6-19-2008 1:15 PM Rob Townley spake the following: Security > Stability when it comes to web browsers and i wonder if 1.5 is more secure than 2.14. i wonder when 1.x will not have security patches anymore. rh must document that somewhere and i will have to find it. That is probably the r

[CentOS] Re: 3ware performance in CentOS

on 6-19-2008 1:05 PM Ruslan Sivak spake the following: Jim Perrin wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have a look at these pages: http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759

Re: [CentOS] Re: 3ware performance in CentOS

Scott Silva wrote: on 6-19-2008 1:05 PM Ruslan Sivak spake the following: Jim Perrin wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have a look at these pages: http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: [CentOS] remote access info please

Hi Johnny and crew, On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:52:27 -0500 UTC (6/19/2008, 3:52 AM -0500 UTC my time), Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I use NX and find it amazing. I downloaded the RPMs from nomachine.com >> because I had not found that they are built in one of the repos (testing >> if memory serves).

Re: [CentOS] Need GLIBCXX-3.4.9 for /usr/lib64/libstdc++

Scott R. Ehrlich wrote: > /usr/local/bin/myprog: /usr/lib64/libstdc++: version `GLIBXX.3.4.9' not > found (required by /usr/local/bin/myprog) > > I have gcc 4.2.3. Ahemm. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$rpm -q gcc gcc-4.1.2-42.el5.x86_64 > I've performed a yum install compat-* and glibc* > > What am I mi

Re: [CentOS] Re: What will the upgrade to 5.2 be like?

On 6/19/08, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 6-19-2008 1:15 PM Rob Townley spake the following: >> Security > Stability when it comes to web browsers and i wonder if 1.5 >> is more secure than 2.14. i wonder when 1.x will not have security >> patches anymore. rh must document that some

[CentOS] FF3 printing problem on Centos 4.x

I'm using Centos 4.x (fully up to date) on a system at work. I have also been using firefox 2 (directly from mozilla.org) on it for a long time, and it tends to work just fine. yesterday I installed the new FF3 release. It works fine too, with one exception: The print dialog shows no printers! Th

[CentOS] Help with gcc 4.3.x and libfortran errors

I am trying to install gcc 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 on a 64-bit CentOS 5.0 machine, fully patched, and keep getting: make[3]: *** [libgfortran.la] error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory /path/to/source/libgfortran make[2]: *** [all] error 2 make[2]: leaving directory /path/to source/libgfortran make[1]: *** [

Re: [CentOS] Help with gcc 4.3.x and libfortran errors

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Scott R. Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Web searching has yielded a myriad of hits, including various bug reports. > > Is this a known bug with a workaround, or do I need another package to make > it work, or do I need to adjust my configure line to make thin

Re: [CentOS] Desktop Effects -- questions/issues

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, fred smith wrote: Oh, and one other small issue: Now when I grab the edge of a window and drag to resize it, it no longer gives me the little popup that shows the size of the window (i.e., an xterm or similar). I assume it's a function of the window decorator, but have no cl

Re: [CentOS] FF3 printing problem on Centos 4.x

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:29 PM, fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using Centos 4.x (fully up to date) on a system at work. I have also > been using firefox 2 (directly from mozilla.org) on it for a long time, > and it tends to work just fine. > > yesterday I installed the new FF3 release

Re: [CentOS] Re: apt on Centos 5.1

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Scott Silva wrote: on 6-18-2008 5:52 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following: Mike wrote: And I would assume that apt won't be able to update from the CentOS repos. Of course it does. Read the blog article: http://dag.wieers.com/blog/using-apt-in-an-rpm-world You

Re: [CentOS] Help with gcc 4.3.x and libfortran errors

Scott R. Ehrlich wrote: I am trying to install gcc 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 on a 64-bit CentOS 5.0 machine, fully patched, and keep getting: make[3]: *** [libgfortran.la] error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory /path/to/source/libgfortran make[2]: *** [all] error 2 make[2]: leaving directory /path/to source/l

Re: [CentOS] failed dependencies during mplayer installation.

thank you all i successfully installed mplayer and its working fine. On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 03:14 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Ryan Lewon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:48:07AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Gopinath Achari wrote: > >> >

Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin

> Just for the record, basically protectbase is priorities with only 2 > settings (0 and 1) Thanks for this. I was wondering if you could tell me the default priority for the 'priorities' plugin? I've made a point of ensuring that *every* repo gets a priority even if disabled. I'm wondering if it

Re: [CentOS] ClamAV help needed

Hi Anne, I have many servers running clamav, simply use the dag repos http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/ and install it via yum "yum install clamav clamd" then run freshclam, thats it. I presume your configuration is not properly done. -- Cualquier duda o consulta estoy a su disposicion. Atentam

RE: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin

D Steward wrote: > > Just for the record, basically protectbase is priorities with only 2 > > settings (0 and 1) > > Thanks for this. I was wondering if you could tell me the default > priority for the 'priorities' plugin? > I've made a point of ensuring that *every* repo gets a priority > even

[CentOS] rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused

hi wile i am running the command rndc reload i am getting the error rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refuse any one can suggest where i am doing wrong this is my rndc.conf key "rndckey" { algorithm hmac-md5; secret "fKZfrqGy9VOPOLA3pgDACA=="; }; options {