Re: [CentOS] firewalled NFS

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:54:05AM +0200, Jordi Prats wrote: > of course... please delete the unneeded lines when you reply as a courtesy to the other subscribers. Thanks, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB

Re: [CentOS] kernels and irc

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, James Bunnell wrote: On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: James Bunnell wrote: If this is a problem, I suggest that you find a paid for service contract where you can be rude to the people with whom you interact. i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake o

Re: [CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

On 6/5/08, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: > > > on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following: > > > > > > i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is > > > done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not >

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 40, Issue 3

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:51 -0700, MHR wrote: > I just used a Live CD for the first time today, in part to show what > CentOS can do for a co-worker who is looking at using it at work and > home, but I got the strangest result. Mark: First, I believe that you should always TYS (Test Your Stuff).

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

On Friday 06 June 2008 13:20:02 Lanny Marcus wrote: > Drives that we have had good > luck with include: Samsung, SONY & LG. Other's probably work just as > well. We have other TEAC drives, but they are the last TEAC drives we > will purchase. > I would add Lite-On to the list. I've had several, in

[CentOS] enter run level

I have a centos 4 x86_64 machine that has been working fine. It has software RAID-1. Now when it boots I get the GRUB screen, I get the very first screen about loading Init then I get a prompt about: Enter Run Level: When I enter 3 nothing happens... This is obviously not a normal boot situatio

[CentOS] Re: enter run level

Jerry Geis wrote: I have a centos 4 x86_64 machine that has been working fine. It has software RAID-1. Now when it boots I get the GRUB screen, I get the very first screen about loading Init then I get a prompt about: Enter Run Level: When I enter 3 nothing happens... This is obviously not a n

[CentOS] INN with auth hook

Hello, i am looking for someone who is using INN news server with python_auth hook . Thanks! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

We are currently running CentOS 4.5 on older Dell Systems. We are upgrading to Dell PowerEdge 1950 with a PERC 6/i raid controller. CentOS 4.5 installation does not see the PERC 6/i controller. Dell and LSI Logic only support RHEL 4U6 and higher and SuSe. I've tried building the boot image

Re: [CentOS] Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Stephen Moccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are currently running CentOS 4.5 on older Dell Systems. We are upgrading > to Dell PowerEdge 1950 with a PERC 6/i raid controller. > > > > CentOS 4.5 installation does not see the PERC 6/i controller. Dell and LSI > Log

Re: [CentOS] Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

Tim Verhoeven wrote: > Well, if RHEL 4U6 is supported, then just use CentOS 4.6 instead of > 4.5 and the install will work. Yes this is the case..and if for some reason you need more evidence: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lspci -v | grep -i perc Subsystem: Dell PERC 6/i Integrated RAID Controll

[CentOS] Re: Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

on 6-6-2008 8:43 AM Tim Verhoeven spake the following: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Stephen Moccio wrote: We are currently running CentOS 4.5 on older Dell Systems. We are upgrading to Dell PowerEdge 1950 with a PERC 6/i raid controller. CentOS 4.5 installation does not see the PERC 6/i

[CentOS] 3Ware 9690SA

I successfully installed CentOS on 3ware 9650SE controller. Due to some issues with compatibility with my motherboard, I replaced it with a 9690SA. Now the system won't boot (although interestingly enough, it find the boot menu fine, just won't boot past a certain point in the bootup phase.

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9690SA

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I successfully installed CentOS on 3ware 9650SE controller. Due to some > issues with compatibility with my motherboard, I replaced it with a 9690SA. > Now the system won't boot (although interestingly enough, it find the bo

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9690SA

Tim Verhoeven wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I successfully installed CentOS on 3ware 9650SE controller. Due to some issues with compatibility with my motherboard, I replaced it with a 9690SA. Now the system won't boot (although interestingly e

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9690SA

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Verhoeven wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I successfully installed CentOS on 3ware 9650SE controller. Due to some >>> issues with compatibility with my mot

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9690SA

Jeff wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tim Verhoeven wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I successfully installed CentOS on 3ware 9650SE controller. Due to some issues with compatibility w

[CentOS] usb thumbdrive

I have a bootable usb thumbdrive now... three partions, msdos for syslinux booting, ext3 and swap. How can I grab my QEMU installed centos 4 image and put it on the ext3 /dev/sdc2 partition on my thumbdrive? THanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list Cen

Re: Re: [CentOS] Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

Yes, Thanks. What I forgot to mention was that I need to run CentOS 4.5 and not CentOS 4.6 if at all possible. On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, nate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Tim Verhoeven wrote: > Well, if RHEL 4U6 is supported, then just use CentOS 4.6 instead of > 4.5 and the install will work.

[CentOS] Re: Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

on 6-6-2008 10:31 AM Steve Moccio spake the following: Yes, Thanks. What I forgot to mention was that I need to run CentOS 4.5 and not CentOS 4.6 if at all possible. As soon as it yum updates, it will be 4.6 anyway. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you noti

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9690SA

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeff wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Tim Verhoeven wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>

Re: [CentOS] Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

Steve Moccio wrote: Yes, Thanks. What I forgot to mention was that I need to run CentOS 4.5 and not CentOS 4.6 if at all possible. its just CentOS 4, with the 6th quarterly patch rollup, as others said, as soon as you yum update (or, on RHEL, up2date -u), you'll have the same thing. __

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9690SA

Victor Padro wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Jeff wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Tim Verhoeven w

Re: [CentOS] Dell 1950 Perc 6/i with centos 4.5

Steve Moccio wrote: Yes, Thanks. What I forgot to mention was that I need to run CentOS 4.5 and not CentOS 4.6 if at all possible. I suppose you could just # yum update kernel this should bring in whatever it is that is needed to support the newer controller, without patching anything

Re: [CentOS] usb thumbdrive

Jerry Geis wrote: I have a bootable usb thumbdrive now... three partions, msdos for syslinux booting, ext3 and swap. I think it's a bad idea to put a swap partition on a flash drive... or is that obsolete knowledge? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@ce

[CentOS] Re: usb thumbdrive

Jerry Geis wrote: >/ I have a bootable usb thumbdrive now... />/ three partions, msdos for syslinux booting, ext3 and swap. / I think it's a bad idea to put a swap partition on a flash drive... or is that obsolete knowledge? Its there by habit - and I hope I dont need it. Just investigating a

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2008 13:20:02 Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Drives that we have had good >> luck with include: Samsung, SONY & LG. Other's probably work just as >> well. We have other TEAC drives, but they are the last TEAC drives

[CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

on 6-6-2008 10:48 AM Ruslan Sivak spake the following: Victor Padro wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Jeff wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

Scott Silva wrote: on 6-6-2008 10:48 AM Ruslan Sivak spake the following: Victor Padro wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Jeff wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

The CD-R media I usually buy are Imation or Verbatim. Never had a problem. There are probably other brands equally good. Memorex to a range that they call "Memorex Professional" - about 10% more expensive than their basic range. I've found that I can let K3B run full-tilt on them, doing

Re: [CentOS] vsftpd and active mode connections causes FTP session to hang

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 20:04 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Timothy Selivanow > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> things like 'put' and 'get', etc.), the connection hangs. If you wait a > >> bit it returns with a "425 Failed to e

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

On Friday 06 June 2008 20:12:57 John R Pierce wrote: > TDK, Memorex, Imation, Verbatim, I don't believe ANY of those actually > make their own disks. I understand that there are only two or three manufacturers and that the 'brands' may well buy from more than one of them. I did quite a lot of r

[CentOS] usb thumbdrive

Hi all, I am soo close. I have have made my custom kernel from a DIFFERENT machine, I have hte USB booting, I have 3 partitions, 1-fat12, 2 - ext3, 3 is swap. on booting it says: VFS cannot open root device NULL please append root= I tried root=/dev/sda2 and still nothing. Is there something

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:12 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TDK, Memorex, Imation, Verbatim, I don't believe ANY of those actually make > their own disks. My TDK's have a media code of "CMC MAG. AM3", which is, I > believe, CMC Magnetics, a middle grade disk, OK but not great.

Re: [CentOS] usb thumbdrive

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Jerry Geis wrote: I am soo close. I have have made my custom kernel from a DIFFERENT machine, I have hte USB booting, I have 3 partitions, 1-fat12, 2 - ext3, 3 is swap. on booting it says: VFS cannot open root device NULL please append root= I tried root=/dev/sda2 and sti

[CentOS] Re: usb thumbdrive

Jerry Geis wrote: On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Jerry Geis wrote: >/ I am soo close. I have have made my custom kernel from a DIFFERENT />/ machine, I have hte USB booting, I have 3 partitions, 1-fat12, 2 - />/ ext3, 3 is swap. on booting it says: />/ />/ VFS cannot open root device NULL please append

[CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

The ones on their standard download page are not compatible with Xen kernels according to the release notes. The ones to be used for Xen kernels on x64 is this one: http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15257 Th

Re: [CentOS] Re: usb thumbdrive

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am soo close. I have have made my custom kernel from a DIFFERENT > machine, I have hte USB booting, I have 3 partitions, 1-fat12, 2 - > ext3, 3 is swap. on booting it says: > > VFS cannot open root device NULL please append root= > > I tried root=/dev/

[CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

The ones on their standard download page are not compatible with Xen kernels according to the release notes. The ones to be used for Xen kernels on x64 is this one: http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15257 That

[CentOS] Re: usb thumbdrive

on 6-6-2008 12:33 PM Jerry Geis spake the following: Hi all, I am soo close. I have have made my custom kernel from a DIFFERENT machine, I have hte USB booting, I have 3 partitions, 1-fat12, 2 - ext3, 3 is swap. on booting it says: VFS cannot open root device NULL please append root= I tried

Re: [CentOS] Mysqlnavigator ?????

yes I have tried there, I have the packeage but when I tried to install it it asked for dependencies, and what I want is to install it by yum. El jue, 05-06-2008 a las 22:56 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger escribió: > 2008/6/5 Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > from wich repo ca

[CentOS] Samba AD valid users issue

I have setup a new server centos 5.1 server as a storage server with over 7TB of storage. The server has been integrated into a large Active Directory network there are 5 primary AD servers and a large number of local AD server at each location (over 20). There are also over 15 trusted domains

Re: [CentOS] Samba AD valid users issue

Hi, On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 17:26 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have setup a new server centos 5.1 server as a storage > server with over 7TB of storage. The server has been > integrated into a large Active Directory network there are > 5 primary AD servers and a large number of local AD se

[CentOS] Samba AD valid users issue

Thanks, The issue dos not seem to be with the separator. It is with the @ as a leading char in the group name. But I will give it a try on Monday Michel van Deventer michel at van.deventer.cx Fri Jun 6 21:34:23 UTC 2008 Having a quick glance at the config I remember I had a sort of same is

Re: [CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

Scott Silva wrote: The ones on their standard download page are not compatible with Xen kernels according to the release notes. The ones to be used for Xen kernels on x64 is this one: http://www.3ware.com/KB/artic

Re: [CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: > >> >> >>> >>> The ones on their standard download page are not compatible with Xen >>> kernels according to the re

Re: [CentOS] Mysqlnavigator ?????

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes I have tried there, I have the packeage but when I tried to install > it it asked for dependencies, and what I want is to install it by yum. # yum localinstall xxx.rpm This will try to pull the dependen

[CentOS] Re: SELinux error message on CentOS 5: "multiple same specifications"

Hi, For the record, I found and fixed the problem. I had some users with their home wrongly set on LDAP. One of them had the home set to /usr/local/whatever and a /bin/sh shell, and another had /colossus/users/herusername as home. The script "genhomedircon" (which apparently is run by RPM every t

[CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

Hi, My boss asked me to harden a CentOS box by removing "hacker" tools, such as nmap, tcpdump, nc (netcat), telnet, etc. I would like to know which list of packages would you remove from a base install. I would appreciate if someone could point me to a "standard" way of doing this. I know there a

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, My boss asked me to harden a CentOS box by removing "hacker" tools, such as nmap, tcpdump, nc (netcat), telnet, etc. I would like to know which list of packages would you remove from a base install. I would appreciate if someone could point me to a "standard" way

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, My boss asked me to harden a CentOS box by removing "hacker" tools, such as nmap, tcpdump, nc (netcat), telnet, etc. I would like to know which list of packages would you remove from a base install. I would appreciate if someone could point me to a "standard" way

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 19:03 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > My boss asked me to harden a CentOS box by removing "hacker" tools, > such as nmap, tcpdump, nc (netcat), telnet, etc. > > I would like to know which list of packages would you remove from a > base install. I would apprecia

RE: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

They basically detect port > scans and add a firewall rule to temporarily block that ip. > Does anyone know what tool that is? > > Also disabling remote login as root should help. > > Russ Fail2ban, is what you are looking for, I think http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page D

[CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

on 6-6-2008 3:32 PM Vidar Normann spake the following: On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Scott Silva wrote: The o

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

Dennis McLeod wrote: They basically detect port scans and add a firewall rule to temporarily block that ip. Does anyone know what tool that is? Also disabling remote login as root should help. Russ Fail2ban, is what you are looking for, I think http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/in

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

Have a search on google for NSA Hardening RHEL5, you will find a very good document (pdf) which will help you start you're hardening. http://www.nsa.gov/snac/downloads_redhat.cfm?MenuID=scg10.3.1.1 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://

[CentOS] Re: Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

on 6-6-2008 4:28 PM Ruslan Sivak spake the following: Dennis McLeod wrote: They basically detect port scans and add a firewall rule to temporarily block that ip. Does anyone know what tool that is? Also disabling remote login as root should help. Russ Fail2ban, is what you are look

Re: [CentOS] Re: Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

Scott Silva wrote: on 6-6-2008 4:28 PM Ruslan Sivak spake the following: Dennis McLeod wrote: They basically detect port scans and add a firewall rule to temporarily block that ip. Does anyone know what tool that is? Also disabling remote login as root should help. Russ Fail2ban, i

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

"Filipe Brandenburger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My boss asked me to harden a CentOS box by removing "hacker" tools, > such as nmap, tcpdump, nc (netcat), telnet, etc. Removing network tools does not make it harder to break into the box, however, it can make it harder to do something with it

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Luke S Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Filipe Brandenburger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> My boss asked me to harden a CentOS box by removing "hacker" tools, >> such as nmap, tcpdump, nc (netcat), telnet, etc. > > Removing network tools does not make it hard

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:50 -0700, MHR wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:12 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > TDK, Memorex, Imation, Verbatim, I don't believe ANY of those actually make > > their own disks. My TDK's have a media code of "CMC MAG. AM3", which is, I > > believe,

[CentOS] Zoneminder

Hello, Does any one have current rpms for Zoneminder-1.23.3? I can't get the source to compile on 4.6. I've looked, googled, etc., but can't find if anyone has made one. Anyone interested in making one? Dag?? TIA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

[CentOS] using /dev/hda system to build initrd for /dev/sda system

I think I have booting issues for my custom kernel on centos 4. the sda system cannot find the disk. I used a qemu image to build a centos 4 MATH_EMULATION kernel. This system has /dev/hda. The system I am putting the vmlinuz and initrd files on is a /dev/sda system. I dont think the initrd i

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, My boss asked me to harden a CentOS box by removing "hacker" tools, such as nmap, tcpdump, nc (netcat), telnet, etc. I would like to know which list of packages would you remove from a base install. I would appreciate if someone could point m

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Luke S Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Removing network tools does not make it harder to break into the box, > however, it can make it harder to do something with it once you are in. That's the idea. > (also, [not] installing the programs just > means that if

Re: [CentOS] Hardening CentOS by removing "hacker" tools

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Jim Wildman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Better, google for "tiny centos" and build a new box with the minimum on it. Hmmm, that looks exactly like what I'm looking for! I'm actually trying to find someone who has already done the tough work and could give me some

[CentOS] Chroot'ed SSH

Hi, Is anyone chrooting users that connect through SSH? I looked for it on Google and I basically saw several methods: - OpenSSH 5 supports ChrootDirectory (FC9 apparently has RPMs that probably could be rebuilt under CentOS 5) - There seem to be several patches for OpenSSH 4.x to do the chroot,

Re: [CentOS] Chroot'ed SSH

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, Is anyone chrooting users that connect through SSH? Just the other week sshd 4.9 enabled chroot for the first time I think. Fairly new stuff. You'll have to roll your own rpm for CentOS as it will be unlikely that they roll it - probably not even for 5.2

Re: [CentOS] Chroot'ed SSH

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Eric Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just the other week sshd 4.9 enabled chroot for the first time I think. > Fairly new stuff. You'll have to roll your own rpm for CentOS as it will > be unlikely that they roll it - probably not even for 5.2 either. Yeah, I w

Re: [CentOS] Zoneminder

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Thomas Dukes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does any one have current rpms for Zoneminder-1.23.3? I can't get the > source to compile on 4.6. FC9 has 1.22.3. It probably shouldn't be hard to extract the specfile, edit it to use the 1.23.3 sources and try to rebuild i

Re: [CentOS] using /dev/hda system to build initrd for /dev/sda system

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What might I look at changing to ensure my initrd is made correctly. Try copying /etc/modprobe.conf from the production machine to the machine where you built your kernel and then run mkinitrd again. You might also try to pl