Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>
> Sorry for the top post.
Your mailer breaking references and thus destroying threading for others
is worse than top posting >:)
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpzENf9mbwtx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cen
Doug Tucker wrote:
Tru,
I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated
at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded
with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compi
Linux wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote:
> What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well,
> show me a way to prove.
/var/log/messages ?
Only a small part of it.
> This log
Really?
I thought Outlook does a pretty good job on references.
Maybe it's the BB :-(
I really need RIM to update their mailer app on the BB to allow threading and
preserve references...
Is that so hard RIM?! Is it?
-Ross
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTE
Hello All;
Maybe, because XFS seems to be important, is it possible to build xfs
right after the kernel src build?
Is this far more longer than only build the kernel?
Ok nobody pay you to do Centos, ok.
Centos is a very good project, but i think it's not really constructive
to say "ok, pay
On May 11, 2008, at 9:06, Akemi Yagi wrote
The centosplus kernel update that just came out
(2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.centos.plus) does have vesafb support enabled.
Thank you, Johnny, for the work. :-)
It finally trickled down to my mirror, and a quick install this
morning shows that is indeed fixe
Today a user asked me whether a file on one host can be different on
another host. I was busy composing an answer to tell that the /home
space on all clients are mounted using NFS from the file server. Any
host will therefor see the same file. The user pointed me to his file
and I copied this f
I've finally made the switch to CentOS 5.1 (I had been running 4.6).
So far, so good, but I do have a few issues.
First, I can not find kermit (or ckermit) in any of the repos (base,
extras, centosplus, rpmforge). On my 4.6 systems, /usr/bin/kermit
was provided by the package ckermit in t
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:10 PM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, because XFS seems to be important, is it possible to build xfs right
> after the kernel src build?
>
> Is this far more longer than only build the kernel?
Assuming that you've set it up as a module rather than actually
compi
On May 14, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
Second (and this is probably OT), I use the binary nVidia driver
and the keyboard and mouse sharing utility Synergy (http://
synergy2.sourceforge.net, a fantastic utility without which I would
be so much less productive). Since upgrading
H,
I have 5.1. The other day I was printing and the job crashed. I cleaned
the /var/spool/cups, but I am still getting the:
network 192.168.2.10 host is busy, will retry in 30sec
It's a dlink print server, that has worked very well for the last 3 years.
I have restarted but the print server and
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Martyn Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:10 PM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe, because XFS seems to be important, is it possible to build xfs
> right
> > after the kernel src build?
> >
> > Is this far more longer than on
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Making kernel modules is a bit more involved than that. Please see:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules
>
> if you really feel like building modules yourself.
You're quite right. You can tell I do it of
Greetings,
I've been subscribed to this list for some time and I'd like to start off by
thanking everyone who helps out on it. This is my first post to it, so please
be gentle :-)
I have several offices set up with RedHat and CentOS terminal servers. We are
using CentOS 4.6 and RedHat 4.6 o
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:10 AM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, because XFS seems to be important, is it possible to build xfs
> right after the kernel src build?
>
> Is this far more longer than only build the kernel?
>
> Ok nobody pay you to do Centos, ok.
> Centos is a very good projec
I intend to do that. Kernel's removed from automatic updates.
We'll agree to disagree about the importance of not breaking an
officially supported kernel filesystem on an automated upgrade because
only a "few" of us are affected. Keep in mind this is not an
unsupported XFS that someone hijacked
On May 14, 2008, at 9:50, Steve Huff wrote:
This may well be an upstream issue; I have recently begun to
encounter the same problem on a RHEL 5.1 workstation, using Synergy
and nVidia binary packages from rpmforge (synergy-1.3.1-2.el5.rf,
nvidia-x11-drv-1.0.9755-1.nodist.rf).
I first star
2008/5/14 Ryan Faussett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Everything has been working quite well for some time. However now I seem to
> have hit a 50 thin client/gdm session limit. I've tested this several times
> by powering off all of our thin clients and restarting the terminal server,
> then powering up e
2008/5/14 Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[SNIP]
>> screen, large X cursor -- gray screen of death?) and then it just sits
>> there. The GDM login/greeter is never presented.
>
> Edit /etc/X11/gdm.conf (my be located at some other path as I am using
> debian+kde right now) and increase the number
2008/5/13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>>
>> Even so, thanks for your comments, I'd like more experiences about
>> monitoring systems. Again of topic, I want to avoid Nagios because it
>> looks like over complex but if someone has an actual experience
>> demostrating the opposite, I
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:17 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H,
>
> I have 5.1. The other day I was printing and the job crashed. I cleaned
> the /var/spool/cups, but I am still getting the:
>
> network 192.168.2.10 host is busy, will retry in 30sec
>
> It's a dlink print server, that has worked
Hi,
I have a directory with 18GB worth of files and I would like to tar span and
burn it into a few DVDs after that. How can I do this in command line?
Thanks
Regards
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to do that. Kernel's removed from automatic updates.
>
There you go.
> We'll agree to disagree about the importance of not breaking an
> officially supported kernel filesystem on an automated upgrade because
> only
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:54 AM, CentOS List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a directory with 18GB worth of files and I would like to tar span and
> burn it into a few DVDs after that. How can I do this in command line?
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
>
>
Am I the only one who finds it disturb
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Sergio Belkin wrote:
OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1
x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)?
I'm using the x86_64 version of nagios-2.11-1.el5.rf from rpmforge on
our nagios server. Works like a charm.
--
Paul Hei
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:07 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to do that. Kernel's removed from automatic updates.
> >
> There you go.
>
> > We'll agree to disagree about the importance of not breaking an
> > officially suppor
On May 14, 2008, at 10:58, Alfred von Campe wrote:
In the mean time, anyone have any info on Kermit for CentOS 5? We
have some Kermit scripts sent to us by one of our vendors, so we
can't just easily migrate to another serial communications tool.
I was able to compile the latest Kermit fro
Doug Tucker wrote:
My whole issue is around GFS, which is officially supported (someone
else hijacked this thread with XFS which got more attention), and in my
statement I said: "Keep in mind this is not an unsupported XFS that
someone hijacked my thread with." So I'm agreeing that XFS should ne
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:07 -0700, MHR wrote:
>> 1) You're top posting - please stop it. In this email list, we bottom
>> post as a matter of policy and courtesy. It's not that hard
>
> I'm sorry, that last sentence wa
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:38 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:07 -0700, MHR wrote:
> >> 1) You're top posting - please stop it. In this email list, we bottom
> >> post as a matter of policy and courtesy. It's
Doug Tucker wrote:
Do you honestly, like having to scroll down with the rolly thing on your
mouse 9 times to get to the reply only to find it is not something you
cared to read? I say toss it at the top in my face where I can ignore
it with less effort.
the other key part of bottom posting
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:37 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Doug Tucker wrote:
> > My whole issue is around GFS, which is officially supported (someone
> > else hijacked this thread with XFS which got more attention), and in my
> > statement I said: "Keep in mind this is not an unsupported XFS that
>
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Doug Tucker wrote:
> > Do you honestly, like having to scroll down with the rolly thing on your
> > mouse 9 times to get to the reply only to find it is not something you
> > cared to read? I say toss it at the top in my face where I can ig
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Humor turned off for a minute, completely and honestly, can someone
> explain to me *why* this is the etiquette here? In every fashion, I
> find it sooo much harder to follow. Does it date back to some dead text
> based ma
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "It's not that hard" would have gotten you b**ch slapped even with a
> smile on your face in person. Just stick to polite, it's not that
> hard :D.
>
snicker
> Bad thing about email, it's hard to grasp tongue in cheek
On May 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Doug Tucker wrote:
Humor turned off for a minute, completely and honestly, can someone
explain to me *why* this is the etiquette here? In every fashion, I
find it sooo much harder to follow. Does it date back to some dead
text
based mail client that actually mad
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a matter of agreeing to disagree on the release of a kernel and
> a supported file system. If you had read my thread and subsequent
> paragraph you're taking issue with properly, you would have gotten that.
> My who
> This is linked from the CentOS FAQ:
>
> http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
>
> Akemi
LOL! This is just TOO good.
1. Because it is proper Usenet Etiquette.
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is over 4000...
2.We use a good news reader
Linux wrote:
People who prepare and maintain a distro have (and should have) many
concerns in mind. Security is one of them and integrity is another.
But in this situation, integrity is simply ignored (on the behalf of
GFS situation because I backed down from my XFS related complains)
Disabling
On May 14, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Doug Tucker wrote:
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is over 4000...
Usenet is almost dead but e-mail lists abound (you are using one).
Same concepts.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Doug Tucker wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:37 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Doug Tucker wrote:
My whole issue is around GFS, which is officially supported (someone
else hijacked this thread with XFS which got more attention), and in my
statement I said: "Keep in mind this is not an unsupported X
Doug Tucker wrote:
This is linked from the CentOS FAQ:
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
Akemi
LOL! This is just TOO good.
1. Because it is proper Usenet Etiquette.
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is over 4000...
2.We use a good
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw, what is WITH all these lame gmail addresses? linuxlist ? centoslist
> ?? Do I call you Mr Linux, or Mr List ?
Nothing to do with gmail. About calling me, it's a nice thing but
probably not needed. And I also kn
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK ... you are officially an ass .. I will no longer reply to your mails or
> help you in any way.
Yes. When I signed on with CentOS it was explicitly written into my
requirements that *I* be the only 'official' ass. Yes
on 5-14-2008 1:48 PM Doug Tucker spake the following:
This is linked from the CentOS FAQ:
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
Akemi
LOL! This is just TOO good.
1. Because it is proper Usenet Etiquette.
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 08:53:05 -0400:
> I thought Outlook does a pretty good job on references.
It's okay if used standalone. You may have lost references because of the
way you are connected to Exchange.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Inte
Yes. When I signed on with CentOS it was explicitly written into my
requirements that *I* be the only 'official' ass. Yes, a non-compete
clause is involved, so can all just STEP OFF!
:-P
Haha, thanks for the humorous remark! It has been said that "If you get
too serious, you'll spoil a
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:56 -0500, Scott Nelson wrote:
> On May 14, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Doug Tucker wrote:
>
> > ...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
> > month...user base is over 4000...
>
Usenet is almost dead but e-mail lists abound (you are using one).
Same concept
> All I am saying is that GFS (and any other ADDED repo besides Base or
> Updates) will get updates ... however they are not normally going to be
> as fast as the Base and Updates repos. That is just how it goes.
I can totally live with that, I was just b**ching about RH's approach.
I'm not exp
> OK ... you are officially an ass .. I will no longer reply to your mails
> or help you in any way.
Wow. My apologies, I thought that was actually a productive reply, not
even sure how you got offended, but I will apologize anyway, I don't
intend to ever offend anyone.
___
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Doug Tucker
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 5:49 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Top Posting
>
> On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:56 -0500, Scott Nelson wrote:
> > On May 14, 2008, at
Doug Tucker wrote:
I know, but my point was, since we all use email to read email lists,
let's get off the old usenet etiquette, and use email etiquette, which
you will find yourself in the very minute minority that replies bottom
post.
Not on this or most any other technical list, with th
> I imagine that most of the folks subscribed are System Administrators,
> Engineers and Architects. I'd also leap to the unproven assumption that
> the majority are overworked, underpaid, stressed, and stuff like that.
> If that doesn't make for a bunch of terse, grumpy, and otherwise
> fr
on 5-14-2008 12:34 PM Alfred von Campe spake the following:
On May 14, 2008, at 10:58, Alfred von Campe wrote:
In the mean time, anyone have any info on Kermit for CentOS 5? We
have some Kermit scripts sent to us by one of our vendors, so we can't
just easily migrate to another serial communi
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agreed to all, and I was just having some fun and trying to bring some
> humor to everyone's day. Thanks for having a sense of humor, I'll
> respectfully bow out now.
>
There you go, man
Keep as cool as you can
Face piles
on 5-14-2008 11:16 AM MHR spake the following:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:54 AM, CentOS List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a directory with 18GB worth of files and I would like to tar span and
burn it into a few DVDs after that. How can I do this in command line?
Thanks
Regards
Am
Hi People,
I know this may seem off topic, but I thought for those of us who might
have Debian users generating key pairs that they put on CentOS systems
people should be aware that
everybody who generated a public/private keypair or an SSL
cert request on Debian or Ubuntu from 2006 on is vul
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> People are so afraid that someone will be able to identify them through
> newsgroup postings or harvest their address for spam.
>
> So what if someone googles my name and finds out I help people on a few
> lists!
I'm just
on 5-14-2008 2:48 PM Doug Tucker spake the following:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:56 -0500, Scott Nelson wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Doug Tucker wrote:
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is over 4000...
Usenet is almost dead but e-mail lists
on 5-14-2008 3:20 PM MHR spake the following:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
People are so afraid that someone will be able to identify them through
newsgroup postings or harvest their address for spam.
So what if someone googles my name and finds out I help people on a fe
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You know that the more stupid the rant, or more embarrassing, the higher it
> goes in the page rank! ;-P
>
"I'm the top!"
;^)
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
Jason Pyeron wrote:
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is over 4000...
Usenet is almost dead but e-mail lists abound (you are using one).
Same concepts.
I know, but my point was, since we all use email to read email lists,
let's get off the old u
Clint Dilks wrote:
Hi People,
I know this may seem off topic, but I thought for those of us who might
have Debian users generating key pairs that they put on CentOS systems
people should be aware that
everybody who generated a public/private keypair or an SSL
cert request on Debian or Ubuntu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Les Mikesell
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >
> >
> > I just wish I could configure my outlook ...
>
> Configure it? Don't you know how to move the cursor? The point is that
> you are supposed to delete
Hi,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, I can not find kermit (or ckermit) in any of the repos (base, extras,
> centosplus, rpmforge). On my 4.6 systems, /usr/bin/kermit was provided by
> the package ckermit in the base repo. That package appears
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 21:40:06 Ryan Faussett wrote:
> Everything has been working quite well for some time. However now I seem to
> have hit a 50 thin client/gdm session limit. I've tested this several times
> by powering off all of our thin clients and restarting the terminal server,
> then pow
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Nagios can start very simple, but has the ability to end up very complex.
It's configs take a modular approach, you have monitors, monitors belong
in groups, groups have operators/administrators, etc.
We just finished setting up Nagios at our office. It's not that b
On Thursday 15 May 2008 05:50:02 MHR wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You know that the more stupid the rant, or more embarrassing, the higher
> > it goes in the page rank! ;-P
>
> "I'm the top!"
Googling my own name 'Fajar Priyanto Linux' return
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Googling my own name 'Fajar Priyanto Linux' returns 12,300 hits from Google.
> Maybe someday we can compile a top-ten list for this? :)
Oh hell no. If we go down that road we're doing it RIGHT, with a
winner-take-all br
Sergio Belkin wrote:
2008/5/13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1
x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)?
We're running version 2.11 at the office (on CentOS 5.1 x86_64). I've
looked at some of the things in 3.0, bu
On May 14, 2008, at 18:05, Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS usually creates whatever upstream gives out. You would have
to see why RedHat stopped putting it in, or see if you can convince
CentOS developers to add it to centosplus.
I understand the relationship with the upstream provider. I was
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Googling my own name 'Fajar Priyanto Linux' returns 12,300 hits from Google.
> Maybe someday we can compile a top-ten list for this? :)
How about a bottom list? I only have 77, and a lot of them are from
ten years ago.
On May 14, 2008, at 20:12, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
I don't know why you need kermit, but for serial-based
terminal/console access, minicom may do what you want. I use it to
access Unix/Linux hosts through the serial console and for network
switches and routers as well. It works OK for that.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:13 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Googling my own name 'Fajar Priyanto Linux' returns 12,300 hits from
> Google.
> > Maybe someday we can compile a top-ten list for this? :)
>
> How
> People are so afraid that someone will be able to identify them through
> newsgroup postings or harvest their address
> for spam.
> So what if someone googles my name and finds out I help people on a few lists!
> Makes me look real bad, doesn't it?
No. I am on a few lists and each list with
i'm attempting to rebuild centos51 kernel-xen.
(fwiw, because pciback has NOT been compiled into the kernel,
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2767)
after,
yum install kernel-devel kernel-xen-devel
and usual,
ln -s /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`-`uname -m` /usr/src/linux
On Thursday 15 May 2008 09:31:09 CentOS List wrote:
> No. I am on a few lists and each list with a different email address so
> that I can sort them out correctly. If you people don’t wish to help out,
> its fine, just ignore my mails. It will be nice to stop making fun of me.
Looks like this week
CentOS List wrote:
I have a directory with 18GB worth of files and I would like to tar span and
burn it into a few DVDs after that. How can I do this in command line?
For what it's worth, I usually use rar for this task, because I can
figure out the command line in about 10 seconds by running
>> No. I am on a few lists and each list with a different email address
>> so that I can sort them out correctly. If you people don’t wish to
>> help out, its fine, just ignore my mails. It will be nice to stop making fun
>> of me.
> Looks like this week has been a rough one for many people.
>
Hi all,
My only encounter with tape-backup was with Windows 2000. With it, when we
backup things using windows' backup tool, it will create a 'catalog', then
the catalog contains all the backup operations we do based on date. So, with
this we can "append" many backups into one tape. Next time we
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
My only encounter with tape-backup was with Windows 2000. With it, when we
backup things using windows' backup tool, it will create a 'catalog', then
the catalog contains all the backup operations we do based on date. So, with
this we can "append" many backups int
82 matches
Mail list logo
