-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Hull-Richter
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:19 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Slightly OT? - How do I set up Win98 to access
aprinter on my CentOS box?
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 15:54 -0600
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eduardo Silvestre
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 9:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB
But... Can i do that just with centos install cd and 3ware drivers? Format
I believe Florin Andrei had a typo in his message. No other file system
will be as reliable as *XFS*. I've had XFS recover from system failures that
Ext3 would/could not recover from. If you want dependability, reliability,
and also large file systems, only use XFS. You'll find none better
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:36:41PM -0500, Monty Shinn wrote:
Greetings.
I am trying to create a 10TB (approx) ext3 filesystem. I am able to
successfully create the partition using parted, but when I try to use
mkfs.ext3, I get an error stating
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Brent L. Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe Florin Andrei had a typo in his message. No other file system
> will be as reliable as *XFS*. I've had XFS recover from system failures that
> Ext3 would/could not recover from. If you want dependability
fred smith wrote:
to use the Centos-released version of wine to run the
software installers for quite a few apps. However, at no time during the
installer do I actually see any text in any of the dialogs that appear.
This makes it a little hard to choose options :)
I had this problem. The so
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Monty Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We basically store video image sequences (edited and source) and
> audio/video files on our servers. We are an editing and broadcast design
> facility, doing mostly HD work. The files are relatively large, and there
> are
Monty Shinn wrote:
>
> Ross,
>
> We basically store video image sequences (edited and source) and
> audio/video files on our servers. We are an editing and broadcast
> design facility, doing mostly HD work. The files are relatively large,
> and there are a lot of them.
>
> I am trying to "m
I wish to change the ownership and access permissions of files and directories
contained on this device. The device is immediately recognized and mounted
when plugged in and I can create and move files on it. However, I cannot
change either the permissions or the owner of any file or directory on
On Mon, 5 May 2008, James B. Byrne wrote:
I wish to change the ownership and access permissions of files and
directories contained on this device. The device is immediately
recognized and mounted when plugged in and I can create and move
files on it. However, I cannot change either the permi
Thank you for this information.
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 06:45:34AM -0700, John Thomas wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > to use the Centos-released version of wine to run the
> >software installers for quite a few apps. However, at no time during the
> >installer do I actually see any text in any of the dialogs that appear.
> >This
Hi.
I'm trying to figure out where the SELinux policy modules shipped with
the system live, and how they work. The modules listed by 'semodule -l'
are the same as those available in
/etc/selinux/targeted/modules/active/modules, but those are not part of
any package, and are presumably added a
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Ingemar Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lots of questions, but the documentation on this subject isn't exactly
> stellar. :)
With CentOS 5, you don't really need the selinux module source
anymore. It's usually enough to clear the logs and in permissive mode
Martyn Drake wrote:
Having worked for a large film and television post-production facility
in London for just over six years, XFS has been the primary filesystem
for all our servers. Much of the data was split across multiple disk
servers - each with around 2-3Tb of data. The whole filesystem
Florin Andrei wrote:
Martyn Drake wrote:
Having worked for a large film and television post-production facility
in London for just over six years, XFS has been the primary filesystem
for all our servers. Much of the data was split across multiple disk
servers - each with around 2-3Tb of data.
Jim Perrin wrote:
Personal experiences may vary.
Yup. Do your own tests, involving your particular situation, then draw
conclusions. The average may just not apply very well in your case.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailin
Jim Perrin wrote:
With CentOS 5, you don't really need the selinux module source
anymore. It's usually enough to clear the logs and in permissive mode,
run the offending application. Then 'grep yourapp
/var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M localmodname'. Check the
module for sanity and make
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
jfs is
supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
mail/news server
Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that
situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
_
Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >
> > jfs is
> > supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
> > mail/news server
>
> Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that
> situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed a bit.
on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
jfs is
supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
mail/news server
Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that
situation. But it's been a while,
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
> > Florin Andrei wrote:
> >> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >>> jfs is
> >>> supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
> >>> mail/news server
> >> Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the bes
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
> > on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
> > > Florin Andrei wrote:
> > >> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > >>> jfs is
> > >>> supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
> > >>> mail/news server
> > >> Hm, last time
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
> > Florin Andrei wrote:
> >> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >>> jfs is
> >>> supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
> >>> mail/news server
> >> Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the bes
fred smith wrote:
Thanks, John, I'll look into htat.
You may also enable the EPEL repository and, this way, install more
recent Wine packages.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#howtouse
Or you can manually download and install the packages from an EPEL
mirror (but that will make it h
on 5-5-2008 2:31 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
jfs is
supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
mail/news server
Hm, last time I tested R
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-5-2008 2:31 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
> > Scott Silva wrote:
> >> on 5-5-2008 11:41 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
> >>> Florin Andrei wrote:
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > jfs is
> > supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small f
I am trying to figure this out and I always seem to have trouble
configuring apache to do more than basic stuff...
I have a web server that has several cnames assigned to it.
I want srv1.tobyhouse.com to be served by apache.
I want to proxy connections to www.tobyhouse.com to cms.tobyhouse.com
(d
Craig White wrote:
I am trying to figure this out and I always seem to have trouble
configuring apache to do more than basic stuff...
I have a web server that has several cnames assigned to it.
I want srv1.tobyhouse.com to be served by apache.
I want to proxy connections to www.tobyhouse.com to
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > I am trying to figure this out and I always seem to have trouble
> > configuring apache to do more than basic stuff...
> >
> > I have a web server that has several cnames assigned to it.
> >
> > I want srv1.tobyhouse
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> > >
> > > ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com
> > > ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com
> > >
> >
> > That should work - but I'd put a tr
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
No doubt!
The worse part is I don't believe it was premeditated. I think she came
over to drop off the kids and told him oh by the way I'm taking the
children to live with me in Russia, at that point he went into a fit of
anger and threw here against the pillar causing a
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Craig White wrote:
ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com
ProxyPassReverse / http://cms.tobyhouse.com
That should work - but I'd put a trailing / on the
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:27 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 17:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >>> Craig White wrote:
>
> ProxyPass / http://cms.tobyhouse.com
> ProxyP
I was basing that on the fact that she had secured Russian citizenship for
her children prior to the divorce, but I cannot get the complete details as I
just don't have the time these days to follow any story in great length.
I still stand behind the idea that it was a case of accidental manslaug
on 5-5-2008 3:24 PM John R Pierce spake the following:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
No doubt!
The worse part is I don't believe it was premeditated. I think she came
over to drop off the kids and told him oh by the way I'm taking the
children to live with me in Russia, at that point he went into a
Ahm, it wasn't money that influenced the OJ case, it was, race, coupled with
incompetence on the side of the prosecution.
Now if Reiser had kept his mouth shut he might have just been acquitted. He
had a good attorney, that attorney gave him sound advise and he chose
to ignore it anyways.
I also
Rogelio wrote:
Has anyone here been able to view Netflix movies on CentOS? (It
requires Internet Explorer, and I'm wondering what the workaround is for
Firefox)
I wonder if IE + Win Media Player under (a recent version of) Wine would
be able to play the Netflix on demand movies.
--
Florin
Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 14:57:05 -0700:
>
this is very old-fashioned and unreliable syntax, use this instead:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html
> RedirectPermanent / http://cms.tobyhouse.com
> It sent ALL traffic over to the other server which is clearly
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 01:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 14:57:05 -0700:
>
> >
>
> this is very old-fashioned and unreliable syntax, use this instead:
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html
that's what I ended up doing...you took the
Hi All,
I'm toying around with Postfix and MySQL on a CentOS 4 server (no longer
using stock postfix and mysql rpms, obviously). I've read several
"How-TOs", and it all looks fairly easy to do.
The one thing that puzzles me is the table structure for the postfix
mysql database: where is everyone
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 01:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 14:57:05 -0700:
this is very old-fashioned and unreliable syntax, use this instead:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html
that's what I ended up doing...you
On Mon, May 05, 2008, Florin Andrei wrote:
>Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>>
>>jfs is
>>supposedly excellent if you have a lot of small files like a
>>mail/news server
>
>Hm, last time I tested ReiseFS turned out to be the best FS for that
>situation. But it's been a while, perhaps things have changed
43 matches
Mail list logo
