On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 18:18 +0700, Sobari Tanuwijaya wrote:
> Hi,
> I activate samba on Centos 5, but I always get
> NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE when issuing
>
> smbclient //GIServer/GIApp -usmbuser
>
> after I enter the password to the prompt.
>
> What things should I look for to solve this?
It is
Anyone??
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 10:12 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> I have a 2 node cluster that has been running for a year, and is still
> up and working fine. However, a yum update at some point broke
> system-config-cluster and it cannot load the management tab anymore,
> because it *thinks* the
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 16:54 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > That would be a sensible solution, but how do you set that up?
> >
> > Are you using some sort of GUI to control your firewall or are you
> editing
> > the firewall file by hand?
> >
> > If you are using a GUI then check out how you can a
Thank you Les, John, for the reply.One thing that I noticed is that there are lots of nfs connections in TIME_WAIT. And since I have been facing problems with NFS (ie. taking too much time to cd to a mounting area on client) the problems regarding network appeared.The TIME_WAIT connections does not
Patricia Bittencourt wrote:
Thank you Les, John, for the reply.
One thing that I noticed is that there are lots of nfs connections in
TIME_WAIT. And since I have been facing problems with NFS (ie. taking
too much time to cd to a mounting area on client) the problems regarding
network appeared
on 4-25-2008 11:46 AM John spake the following:
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:13 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-25-2008 8:04 AM John spake the following:
[public]
vfs objects = recycle
recycle:repository = Recycle Bin
--
Just want to be c
On Monday 28 April 2008 10:47, Philip R. Schaffner wrote:
> For relatively simple situations Firestarter may be worth a look as a
> GUI front end:
>
> http://www.fs-security.com/
>
> There is an EL4 binary version on the above site, but it builds OK from
> SRPM on CentOS-5:
>
>
> http://supe
Hi.
Just did a Centos5.1 on a dual-core 64 bit machine, sweet!!!
But would like to turn off the desktop and just about all the programs
started when the X server is fired up. The machine will be driving a
full scale 737NG cockpit flight simulator and we really don't need
anything beyond th
Um, I don't know the answer, but I want one too..(737 Flight
simulator)
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John Wojnaroski
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 10:12 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Turning off Gnome and ot
Dennis McLeod wrote:
Is there a simple way to turn all the applets and such off and start from
the command line? Idea is to come up with a default level of 3 via the
inittab, due a remote login and then a command line entry "startx &"
to start the X server, possibly a minimum window manager, an
2008/4/28 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dennis McLeod wrote:
>
> > Is there a simple way to turn all the applets and such off and start
> > from
> > the command line? Idea is to come up with a default level of 3 via the
> > inittab, due a remote login and then a command line entry "startx
OK! we're building the system for NASA/Ames for their Human Factors
lab. If you have about $85-100K laying around we'ld be happy to build
you one too ;-)
See www.lfstech.com
John
Um, I don't know the answer, but I want one too..(737 Flight
simulator)
Dennis
-Original Messa
I setup a kickstart file that contains only @core and several packages
explicitely listed. postfix is listed, sendmail is not. And there's no
package where I would think it needs cups. Nevertheless, after the install
I now have postfix *and* sendmail on the machine and sendmail even being
enabl
both worked, thanks guys
John
Alan Bartlett wrote:
2008/4/28 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dennis McLeod wrote:
Is there a simple way to turn all the applets and such off and start
from
the command line? Idea is to come up with a default level of 3 via the
inittab, due a remo
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see that you have solved. If for some reason you wish to keep both
> definitions (there may be reasons), just add "noauto" (no quotes) to one
> or both of the entries. This might be useful when you want to mount
>How can I find out what forced them (and probably many other unwanted
>packages) on the installation?
>I thought maybe "rpm -q --whatrequires sendmail" would tell me, but it
>doesn't. Nothing requires it. Same for cups. So, why did it get
installed?
I usually do a rpm -q --provides and have it
I'd like to automate the upgrade from CentOS 4.6 to 5.1 as much as
possible. Since upgrades per se are not really recommended, I'm
planning to do a kickstart installation. However, I want to leave
one of the existing partitions (/scratch) untouched during the
installation. Here is my cur
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I setup a kickstart file that contains only @core and several packages
> explicitely listed. postfix is listed, sendmail is not. And there's no
> package where I would think it needs cups. Nevertheless, after the install
>
MHR wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I see that you have solved. If for some reason you wish to keep both
> > definitions (there may be reasons), just add "noauto" (no quotes) to one
> > or both of the entries. This might be useful
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 13:52 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I see that you have solved. If for some reason you wish to keep both
> > definitions (there may be reasons), just add "noauto" (no quotes) to one
> > or both of
I have yet to get a DVD to read in CentOS 5.
I can install from DVD and then reboot and then the DVD drive is no longer
accessible.
It works with several live CD and DVD images with no problems however.
This is on an HP system.
I think it is an OS problem.
I will test in some other systems and let
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tune2fs -L "" /dev/XXX
>
Thank you!
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 29/04/2008, at 6:27 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
But when I try to install CentOS 5.1 via kickstart, anaconda
complains that "You have not defined a root partition (/), which is
required for installation of CentOS to continue". Has anyone
successfully installed CentOS 5.X via kickstart a
Boot and root should be ok, but misc is probably causing problems with file
managers querying fstab and hal.
-Ross
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Mon Apr 28 18:30:00 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: Extra icons on d
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Boot and root should be ok, but misc is probably causing problems with file
> managers querying fstab and hal.
>
> -Ross
>
Must be something like that - if I su and umount it, both icons go
away. Then I 'mount -a'
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Silva
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:10 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Re: vfs objects = recycle
on 4-25-2008 11:46 AM John spake the following:
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:13 -0700
I see that currently CENTOS is using 4.3p2 which does not support the new
Match command in the sshd_config. I'm not sure, but I think that was added
with 4.4. I was wondering how long it would be before we get to use this
feature?
___
CentOS mailing list
on 4-28-2008 4:24 PM John spake the following:
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Silva
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:10 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Re: vfs objects = recycle
on 4-25-2008 11:46 AM John spake t
on 4-28-2008 4:49 PM Walter Hansen spake the following:
I see that currently CENTOS is using 4.3p2 which does not support the new
Match command in the sshd_config. I'm not sure, but I think that was added
with 4.4. I was wondering how long it would be before we get to use this
feature?
Maybe Cen
What are the ramifications to a large key length when using pub/priv keys
for ssh authentication. I have some remote admin and file transfers to manage
and only have ssh access w/o vpn to use for it.
Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
"Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
What are the ramifications to a large key length when using pub/priv keys
for ssh authentication.
<<
No particular impact, especially for file transfer. The pub/priv keys are
only used for authentication and a symmetric key is used for encrypting
>No particular impact, especially for file transfer. The pub/priv keys are only
>used for authentication and a >symmetric key is used for encrypting traffic
>during the session. I use a 2048-bit RSA key routinely - if it's any >slower
>than a 1048-bit key during the authentication phase, it's no
"Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
I see, how does one manipulate the keys used for data encryption after auth
during file transfers for instance?
<<
One doesn't; the session keys are randomly generated and are automatically
renewed periodically.
Best,
--- Les Bell, RHCE, CISSP
[
33 matches
Mail list logo
