Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 01:59 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > So how does one accomplish this if say the snap is now deemed the copy of > > interest? I am hoping dd is not the only answer:) > > > > well, just use it. > > Also, your work flow is broken if your historic s

[CentOS] mysql install

2008-04-13 Thread hamood Iqbal
Hi, when i try to install mysql-server it gives me mirror error and also says package does not match the intended download? what is the issue hear. i already have lampp stack .when i try to install zenoss it still says that it need mysql although its included in lampp stack. Thanks _

[CentOS] Re: Mozilla in centos

2008-04-13 Thread Felix Schwarz
gopinath wrote: how to deny changes to proxy setting in Mozilla firefox . Please help me out. Please elaborate a bit more. Do you want to prevent your users from changing the proxy settings in Firefox? If this is true, then: 1. This is not a CentOS specific question. You're more likely to ge

Re: [CentOS] mysql install

2008-04-13 Thread Ralph Angenendt
hamood Iqbal wrote: > when i try to install mysql-server it gives me mirror error and also > says package does not match the intended download? *SIGH* Is it so hard to include a "copy & paste" of the actual error? There weren't any clairvoyants here last time I looked. > what is the issue hear.

Re: [CentOS] mysql install

2008-04-13 Thread hamood Iqbal
"package does not match the intended download" it is the actual error appearing in yumex apache mysql and php stack from www.apachefriends.org i am installing zenoss form terminal : rpm -i zenoss-verion.rpm it says it needs mysql server Thanks On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Ralph Angenendt

Re: [CentOS] mysql install

2008-04-13 Thread John R Pierce
hamood Iqbal wrote: "package does not match the intended download" it is the actual error appearing in yumex apache mysql and php stack from www.apachefriends.org i am installing zenoss form terminal : rpm -i zenoss-verion.rpm what part of all this is CentOS ?!?Why aren't you using the

Re: [CentOS] mysql install

2008-04-13 Thread Ralph Angenendt
hamood Iqbal wrote: > "package does not match the intended download" I'm sure that there is a more complete error available. > it is the actual error appearing in yumex Yes, the last line. You wroe something about mirror errors also. > apache mysql and php stack from www.apachefriends.org So n

Re: [CentOS] fastrack channel?

2008-04-13 Thread Rainer Traut
Johnny Hughes schrieb: Rainer Traut wrote: Dear all, will there be a fastrack channel for C5? What are the problems inventing one? Thx Rainer There is a centos 5 fast track channel now, however populating it is the problem. We are currently working to get yum-security, RHWAS for c5, openj

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread Karanbir Singh
William L. Maltby wrote: IIRC, you don't have a real snapshot on the LV ATM. The snapshot LV only contains files that were chang(ed/ing) while the snapshot volume was "attached" during the backup. That does not mean you cant use the snapshot, as long as you are ready to live with the fallouts

Re: [CentOS] Centos issues

2008-04-13 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hamood Iqbal wrote: Hi i just swicthed from opensuse and having some issues that were not present in suse. 1. add/remove software (package management)does not work. Opensuse flawless working. 2. how to add dvd as repository. in suse it was automatic. i choose centos b/c

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well, just use it. This implies that "snapshot" is a bit of a misnomer for what LVM creates, because you can modify both the "snapshot" and the "real physical LV," but if you want to be able to revert easily, it's the "r

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread Karanbir Singh
Bart Schaefer wrote: Also, your work flow is broken if your historic snapshots are now production while the real physical LV isnt.( imho ) Seems to me that's exactly the situation he's trying to avoid. He wants to restore the real LV to the state it was in at the time one of the snapshots was

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 15:04 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > IIRC, you don't have a real snapshot on the LV ATM. The snapshot LV only > > contains files that were chang(ed/ing) while the snapshot volume was > > "attached" during the backup. > > That does not mean you can

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 08:47 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well, just use it. > > This implies that "snapshot" is a bit of a misnomer for what LVM > creates, because you can modify both the "snapshot" and the "real > ph

Re: [CentOS] Centos issues

2008-04-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:56 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hamood Iqbal wrote: > > > > > > > but if i cant solve it i will switch back to suse. > > Did you consider it to be unfriendly to compare one project with another > and threaten to go back if you don't get an answer. >

RE: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>He wants to restore the real LV to the state it was in at the time one of >the snapshots was taken. Nah :) I want to sanp a volume, mount the snap, do my `stuff`, if I like it, I can merge into the primary copy and continue or dump the snap and go back... That would be so very usefull! I know I

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread Garrick Staples
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 07:59:20PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale alleged: > >He wants to restore the real LV to the state it was in at the time one of > >the snapshots was taken. > > Nah :) > I want to sanp a volume, mount the snap, do my `stuff`, if I like it, I can > merge into the primary copy and c

RE: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Use rsync to copy the changes to the lv? That would be only be possible if the lv had an fs that rsync and the os under rsync understood:) If these are exported as block devices into xen vm's or as iscsi targets for example it gets trickier. jlc ___

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread Garrick Staples
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:21:28PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale alleged: > >Use rsync to copy the changes to the lv? > > That would be only be possible if the lv had an fs that rsync and the os > under rsync understood:) > If these are exported as block devices into xen vm's or as iscsi targets for >

Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back

2008-04-13 Thread John R Pierce
Garrick Staples wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:21:28PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale alleged: Use rsync to copy the changes to the lv? That would be only be possible if the lv had an fs that rsync and the os under rsync understood:) If these are exported as block devices into xen vm's o