Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 08:54 +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> >> Is there any way to get this status, maybe under /proc/ or by some
> >> command?
> > Look under /proc/acpi/button/lid/. On one of my notebooks, this
> > works:
> /proc/a
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Hello.
> Olaf Mueller wrote:
>> /proc/acpi doesn't here exists, acpid is installed. Is my notebook
>> too old?
> That is entirely possible, yes. The 8000 is from ~1999?
Yes, it is. I use it as a thin client (X -ac -port 177 -query ).
> Might be that
> the acpi bios is bla
Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Might be that
>> the acpi bios is blacklisted. Searching for acpi in dmesg should give
>> more hints.
> # grep ACPI /var/log/dmesg
>
> ACPI: Disabling ACPI support
> ACPI Exception (utmutex-0262): AE_BAD_PARAMETER, Thread C1257AA0 could
> not acquire
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...snip...
>
> and now the problem
>
> after kernel load i will get info that GroupVol00 (which was lvm group on
> old disk does not exist)
> info about boss group fonded
> and then i will get an error that /dev/root does
Hi to all, i am facing a really strange problem ,and i am not able to find a
solution by myself and it is really critical for me to solve it asap :(
I have replaced old sata disk with new one on centos , i did a whole cp -a
copy from single mode do new disk.
What i have done?
1) using fdisk creat
Hi Thim, thanks a lot you are a genius! , i dont know how could i forgot
about that , maybe i am little overworked.
Thanks, and nice day to all!
D.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before you get involved into drivers have you changed or upgraded VNC?
to the next level? As that when Lauched caused the crashing?
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 06:42 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >
> > What binary drivers do you have and where did you get them from and what
> > version are they?
> > Give
It was a hardware problem with my DVD recorder. I got a new one and now
everything works OK.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 15:53:36 Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> It was a hardware problem with my DVD recorder. I got a new one and now
> everything works OK.
>
When something that previously worked starts giving you problems it can be
hard to spot. Glad you got it sorted.
Anne
signature.asc
Desc
After extracting the spec file out an srpm and editing it, how does one execute
$rpmbuild --rebuild package.srpm and use the new spec file as a non-root user
inside a home dir build root?
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
I'm trying out aide since tripwire doesn't seem to be in the 5. releases
anymore. I do not have Selinux on the server (no at installation), and I
just yum installed the aide rpms, so I should have the latest.
When I run my aide --init, I get all of these lines for all the files:
lgetfilecon_ra
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying out aide since tripwire doesn't seem to be in the 5. releases
> anymore. I do not have Selinux on the server (no at installation), and I
> just yum installed the aide rpms, so I should have the latest.
>
> When
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After extracting the spec file out an srpm and editing it, how does one
> execute $rpmbuild --rebuild package.srpm and use the new spec file as a
> non-root user inside a home dir build root?
You don't. You do "rpmbuil
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying out aide since tripwire doesn't seem to be in the 5. releases
anymore. I do not have Selinux on the server (no at installation), and I
just yum installed the aide rpms, so I should have t
>You don't. You do "rpmbuild -ba "
>
>Regards,
>Tim
Hi,
I read that, but I assumed it required the source to be unpacked. I tried it
and I recieved the following error while trying to compile xen 3.2 srpm under
CentOS 5.1x64:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42788 (%build)
Cleanin
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Jim,
Believe it or not, that's what I started out with.
After running the entire --init/--check scenario again, I see in the log
files and the output, that all files get this message, an
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Jim,
>
> Believe it or not, that's what I started out with.
>
> After running the entire --init/--check scenario again, I see in the log
> files and the output, that all files get this message, and a normal outpu
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >You don't. You do "rpmbuild -ba "
> >
> >Regards,
> >Tim
>
> Hi,
> I read that, but I assumed it required the source to be unpacked. I tried it
> and I recieved the following error while trying to compile xen 3.
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Hello,
> Olaf Mueller wrote:
>> ACPI: Interpreter disabled.
>> Is this also blacklisted under CentOS 4, or better, would CentOS 4
>> be a solution for my problem?
> You can try with the live CD. But I'd think that it also is disabled
> there.
thank you very much for your h
How does one do this? Reading through the man pages for yum it doesn't look
like its possible? I could use rpm, but I was hoping to pull down deps through
yum automagically.
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
I get these two errors when I upgrade to the current 5 base.
centos-release-5-0.0.el5.centos.2
CentOS release 5 (Final)
file /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo from install of centos-release-5
-1.0.el5.centos.1 conflicts with file from package centos-yumconf-4-4.5
file /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sourc
On 4/9/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran the --init/--check with the default config originally, get the same
> output. I then tried "-selinux" on the options that included "+selinux" just
> for the hell of it. I don't know if that's ok or not. --check-config doesn't
> burp on i
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:11:29 +0200:
> Maybe I should just remove both packages before update
Yes, this did it. There's no easy way to find out the few packages left
over from CentOS 4, isn't it?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services
>May I ask one question? If you do not edit the spec file and run the
>same rpmbuild -ba command against the original spec, would it build
>without errors?
>
>Akemi
Good question :) It does need an edit though to build regardless under x64 so I
would assume the build would simply error out on th
Jim Perrin wrote:
On 4/9/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ran the --init/--check with the default config originally, get the same
output. I then tried "-selinux" on the options that included "+selinux" just
for the hell of it. I don't know if that's ok or not. --check-config
I recently aquired a Verisign SSL certificate for my web server on
Centos 4, with apache 2.0.59 from centosplus.
It however doesn't seem to be working the way I've set it up,
browsers connect but are told the certiticate is not recognized.
Showing more info, the information looks correct.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tony Schreiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nameprotected.domain.edu is a DNS CNAME to the actual host.
>
> How do folks do SSL and virtual hosts? multiple IP addresses is not an
> option for me.
It better be, because for apache 2.0, it's the ONLY way you can do
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:11:29 +0200:
Maybe I should just remove both packages before update
Yes, this did it. There's no easy way to find out the few packages left
over from CentOS 4, isn't it?
Kai
"yum list extras" will give you a list of everythin
Tony Schreiner wrote:
I recently aquired a Verisign SSL certificate for my web server on
Centos 4, with apache 2.0.59 from centosplus.
It however doesn't seem to be working the way I've set it up, browsers
connect but are told the certiticate is not recognized. Showing more
info, the informat
I think those errors are because selinux is off.
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 12:12 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Jim,
> >
> > Believe it or not, that's what I started out with.
> >
> > After running the entire --init/
On Apr 9, 2008, at 2:37 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tony Schreiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
nameprotected.domain.edu is a DNS CNAME to the actual host.
How do folks do SSL and virtual hosts? multiple IP addresses is
not an
option for me.
It better be, be
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:22:22 -0400:
> It however doesn't seem to be working the way I've set it up,
> browsers connect but are told the certiticate is not recognized.
Unfortunately, the most important information is missing from your
explanation: please give the exact URL,
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marc Wiatrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think those errors are because selinux is off.
Hmm, I don't ever really turn selinux off, but I had always thought
aide treated it as optional.
Could test by setting it to permissive and trying again. This would be
Tony Schreiner wrote:
I recently aquired a Verisign SSL certificate for my web server on
Centos 4, with apache 2.0.59 from centosplus.
It however doesn't seem to be working the way I've set it up, browsers
connect but are told the certiticate is not recognized. Showing more
info, the informat
On Apr 9, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:22:22 -0400:
It however doesn't seem to be working the way I've set it up,
browsers connect but are told the certiticate is not recognized.
Unfortunately, the most important information is missing fro
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Tony Schreiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> crud...
Well, as Kai brings up, you get one cert per IP. If you're using
subdomains you *might* be able to get away with this.
*.example.com as a cert common name will work for foo.example.com, and
bar.example.com. etc.
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marc Wiatrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think those errors are because selinux is off.
Hmm, I don't ever really turn selinux off, but I had always thought
aide treated it as optional.
Could test by setting it to permissive and
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:08:15AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> How does one do this? Reading through the man pages for yum it doesn't look
> like its possible? I could use rpm, but I was hoping to pull down deps
> through yum automagically.
>
> Thanks!
> jlc
For CentOS5, you could use yum-d
>For CentOS5, you could use yum-downloadonly plugin :
Wojtek,
Will this still allow rpm to "--test" the install of a local rpm and pull in
the deps and simulate the install?
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
Jim Perrin napsal(a):
"Name-based virtual hosting cannot be used with SSL secure servers
because of the nature of the SSL protocol."
See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html for more info
Jim, you are not right... SSL 3.0 support Server Name Indication and of
course TLS 1.0
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, David Hrbác( <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim, you are not right... SSL 3.0 support Server Name Indication and of
> course TLS 1.0. For those who are interested there are repos for C{4,5}
> located here:
My comments were/are based on the apache documentation (link
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, David Hrbác( <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim, you are not right... SSL 3.0 support Server Name Indication and of
> course TLS 1.0. For those who are interested there are repos for C{4,5}
> located here:
Since I should have included this in my previous reply... I
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, David Hrbác( <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim, you are not right... SSL 3.0 support Server Name Indication and of
course TLS 1.0. For those who are interested there are repos for C{4,5}
located here:
Since I should have included this in my prev
Ed Morrison wrote on Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:36:31 -0700:
> http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/x86_64/dag/repodata/repomd.xml: [
you should always use the mirrors.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
_
Jim Perrin wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:37:11 -0400:
> It better be, because for apache 2.0, it's the ONLY way you can do vhosts.
> You have to have 1 ip per vhost for ssl. This is in the apache documentation
>
> For httpd 2.2, you can do name based vhosts, but not with standard ssl
> certs like v
Johnny Hughes wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:37:12 -0500:
> "yum list extras" will give you a list of everything installed that is
> not in your currently defined repos.
Thanks. This is helpful, although it lists CentOS 5 packages as well, so
one has to be careful. For instance it lists kernel.i6
Jim Perrin wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:24:09 -0400:
> "Name-based virtual hosting cannot be used with SSL secure servers
> because of the nature of the SSL protocol."
that documentation (also in the 2.2 one) in the way that they have written
it as an exclusive truth is simply not true. One just
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:16 -0400:
> I was under the (obviously mistaken) impression that one certificate
> per hostname was the rule. and I created the certificate with the
> hostname I want to use; which is resolvable; and reachable with
> regular http over port 80. An
Does anyone know of a way to specify a CustomLog file name in apache
based on the vhost? for example, I have 10 vhosts and instead of giving
each one a CustomLog directive and specifying a different log file I'd
like to do something in global that does the same thing, ala
vhost elvis
customlog el
Jim Perrin wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:40:24 -0400:
> Your
> packages work, yes, but do they function with the verisign cert he's
> already got?
More important: do they work with most browsers? There is a test page for
this (don't recall URL, but can be found on apache bugzilla) and last time
I
Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:06:59 -0500:
> Do browsers do TLS these days?
IE does and I think FF does as well. But IE doesn't support this specific
extension.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
Kai Schaetzl napsal(a):
IE does and I think FF does as well. But IE doesn't support this specific
extension.
Kai
Both support TLS. FF supports server name indication, only IE7 on Vista
supports server name indication. IE7 on XP doesn't. :o(
D.
__
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:16 -0400:
I was under the (obviously mistaken) impression that one certificate
per hostname was the rule. and I created the certificate with the
hostname I want to use; which is resolvable; and reachable with
regular http
Jason wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:21:14 -0500:
> customlog $VHOST.log
not with "fixed" vhosts. There is something called mass virtual hosting or
so. That uses a different way of specifying virtual hosts and might be
able do something like this with the logs as well. However, I don't think
it
I'm try to bond a few interfaces together with the hopes of getting
increased throughput, and I'm using a cisco Catalyst 2900 as the switch.
I've tried using mode 0, 5, and 6 with nothing special on the switch,
and mode 4 with some ports "trunked" together (I have a feeling that the
"trunking" that
Alain,
On 09/04/2008, at 20:51 , Alain Terriault, Mr. wrote:
Bonjour,
I will be very happy to give your rpm a try, I was able to compile and
install the most recent version of ssh .. but, will sure like to
keep my
rpm database in sync.
I have no rpm building experience, so you will give me
>I'm try to bond a few interfaces together with the hopes of getting
>increased throughput, and I'm using a cisco Catalyst 2900 as the switch.
>I've tried using mode 0, 5, and 6 with nothing special on the switch,
>and mode 4 with some ports "trunked" together (I have a feeling that the
>"trunking"
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:25:55 -0400:
> https://bioinformatics.bc.edu
That is just fine, as expected. If a browser doesn't like it, it's a
problem in the browser. Probably it hasn't updated it's root CA list for
some time and is missing the intermediary certificate (which is
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 15:47 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> I'm try to bond a few interfaces together with the hopes of getting
> increased throughput, and I'm using a cisco Catalyst 2900 as the switch.
> I've tried using mode 0, 5, and 6 with nothing special on the switch,
> and mode 4 with some
Hi all,
Is there any more exhaustive explanation on this command?
find / -type f -perm -2.
Someone said that it means to find all files which have 'other' write access.
From the man page it only says:
-perm mode
File’s permission bits are exactly mode (octal or symbolic). Symbolic modes
use mod
Tony Schreiner wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:16 -0400:
However, you didn't provide any of the information I asked for. You
are not talking of www.bc.edu, do you?
Kai
ok, ok.
https://bioinformatics.bc.edu
Tony
I could be full of cheese here,
Jay Leafey wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:16 -0400:
However, you didn't provide any of the information I asked for. You
are not talking of www.bc.edu, do you?
Kai
ok, ok.
https://bioinformatics.bc.edu
Tony
I could be f
Rick Barnes wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote:
I recently aquired a Verisign SSL certificate for my web server on
Centos 4, with apache 2.0.59 from centosplus.
It however doesn't seem to be working the way I've set it up,
browsers connect but are told the certiticate is not recognized.
Showing mor
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 07:49 +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there any more exhaustive explanation on this command?
> find / -type f -perm -2.
> Someone said that it means to find all files which have 'other' write access.
>
> From the man page it only says:
> -perm mode
> File’s permi
Hello All,
Ive searched the arqchives, but didnt find anything like this.. Maybe im
missing some trick here...
The problem:
I've instaled snmpd and snmp-utils packages with yum.
Im using and old simple .conf file, i've been using on my fedora 1 box,
but when I try to start snmpd, it just says OK,
CentOS 4.6
Hi All:
Is it possible to force sendmail to use a specified host name for
outbound email to a selected domain name instead of the host name
that can be found by looking up the DNS entry?
The problem is that we have a client that uses the same ISP as we
do and the IP addresses assigned
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:54:28 -0700
Hugh E Cruickshank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to force sendmail to use a specified host name for
> outbound email to a selected domain name instead of the host name
> that can be found by looking up the DNS entry?
I'm not entirely sure that I un
From: Frank Cox Sent: April 9, 2008 20:01
>
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:54:28 -0700
> Hugh E Cruickshank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to force sendmail to use a specified host name for
> > outbound email to a selected domain name instead of the host name
> > that can be found by l
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Frank Cox Sent: April 9, 2008 20:01
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:54:28 -0700
Hugh E Cruickshank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to force sendmail to use a specified host name for
outbound email to a selected domain name instead of the host name
that
From: lists-centos Sent: April 9, 2008 20:29
>
> you could use the sendmail "smarthost" setting to dump all your
> outbound mail on your isp's mail server.
We used to do that on our old SCO OSR5 box but I stopped doing that
when I switched over to the new CentOS4 system. For the life of me
I can
From: Clint Dilks Sent: April 9, 2008 20:32
>
> Hi, It has been some time since I have had to do anything with
> Sendmail
> like this, but I believe mailertable is what you need. See
> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
Give the man a cigar! That looks like precisely what I need.
> H
on 4-9-2008 6:14 PM Tony Schreiner spake the following:
Jay Leafey wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote on Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:16 -0400:
However, you didn't provide any of the information I asked for. You
are not talking of www.bc.edu, do you?
Kai
ok
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: April 9, 2008 20:43
>
> From: Clint Dilks Sent: April 9, 2008 20:32
> >
> > Hi, It has been some time since I have had to do anything with
> > Sendmail
> > like this, but I believe mailertable is what you need. See
> > http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Clint Dilks Sent: April 9, 2008 20:32
Hi, It has been some time since I have had to do anything with
Sendmail
like this, but I believe mailertable is what you need. See
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
Give the man a cigar! That looks like precisel
From: Les Mikesell Sent: April 9, 2008 21:10
>
> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > From: Clint Dilks Sent: April 9, 2008 20:32
> >> Hi, It has been some time since I have had to do anything with
> >> Sendmail
> >> like this, but I believe mailertable is what you need. See
> >> http://www.sendmail.or
75 matches
Mail list logo
