Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# mount
...
st0 on status type unknown (rw)
/dev/st0 on status type unknown (rw)
Well, obviously these are the two that are causing the problem. st0
seems to be tape drive, but
Sendmail used to automatically compare creation dates of the text and
database aliases files and when the text one was newer than the database one,
sendmail would automatically update the database file at a convenient time.
This made a lot of sense. However, the powers that be decided to bre
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Does anyone know if upstream ever plans on updating the dovecot package to a
non RC version or to even one of the RC versions that isn't so insecure,
And by insecure, I of course refer to the recent rash of bugs which have been
found.
Thanks,
-Drew
___
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:13:06AM -0400, Drew Weaver enlightened us:
> Does anyone know if upstream ever plans on updating the dovecot package to a
> non RC version or to even one of the RC versions that isn't so insecure,
>
> And by insecure, I of course refer to the recent rash of bugs which ha
Brent L. Bates wrote:
Sendmail used to automatically compare creation dates of the text and
database aliases files and when the text one was newer than the database one,
sendmail would automatically update the database file at a convenient time.
This made a lot of sense. However, the power
Actually it *IS* a source change. The `confAUTO_REBUILD' option has been
deleted from the sendmail source files for some time now. One can put that
option in the sendmail.mc configuration file, but it will not be used because
it isn't in the source any more. I've double checked this and hav
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 01:07, Les Mikesell wrote:
> First cut - in your recovery shell, comment out /home from /etc/fstab
> and see if you can come up without it (log in as root, of course). That
> will at least give you a fairly normal environment to try to figure out
> why the md1 device is
Hello all,
I wanted to create a Raid0 partition using LVM based on 2 LUNs
available; I was unable to find an LVM GUI selection in the
System->Adminsitration selection in the gui system-config-lvm is
not available.
What am I missing during the installation?
thanks in advance,
--
best,
Vi
> I wanted to create a Raid0 partition using LVM based on 2 LUNs
> available; I was unable to find an LVM GUI selection in the
> System->Adminsitration selection in the gui system-config-lvm is
> not available.
>
> What am I missing during the installation?
>
> Vince
You need to set up a s
>> I wanted to create a Raid0 partition using LVM based on 2 LUNs
>> available; I was unable to find an LVM GUI selection in the
>> System->Adminsitration selection in the gui system-config-lvm is
>> not available.
>>
>> What am I missing during the installation?
>>
>> Vince
>You need to s
on 4-2-2008 4:41 AM Brent L. Bates spake the following:
Sendmail used to automatically compare creation dates of the text and
database aliases files and when the text one was newer than the database one,
sendmail would automatically update the database file at a convenient time.
This made a
Real simple answer, switch to Postfix and dump sendmail. Then edit your
alias file to add the aliases, run newaliases and you're done...
john
.
Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-2-2008 4:41 AM Brent L. Bates spake the following:
Sendmail used to automatically compare creation dates of t
The excuse given for removing the automatic update of the aliases
database file was that it was a security issue. The thought was that someone
could tapper with the file and cause problems. However, all these files are
checked for proper file permissions and if they are not set correctly,
se
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
The wiki explains how to create a dvd with the updates previously downloaded,
but how does one integrate these into a freshly authored DVD? Is such a task
possible?
We put out a new dvd every 3-6 months ... do you really need one more
often than that?
signature.a
Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-2-2008 4:41 AM Brent L. Bates spake the following:
Sendmail used to automatically compare creation dates of the text
and
database aliases files and when the text one was newer than the
database one,
sendmail would automatically update the database file at a convenie
>We put out a new dvd every 3-6 months ... do you really need one more
>often than that?
Heh, I don't "need" one more often, but it makes bandwidth easier to manage
when doing test's and mock installs for example aside from the obvious time
needed to run the update's.
I created a local mirror w
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >We put out a new dvd every 3-6 months ... do you really need one more
> >often than that?
>
> Heh, I don't "need" one more often, but it makes bandwidth easier to manage
> when doing test's and mock installs for examp
Anyone out there using Centos 5.1 asterisk (ztdummy) x86_64,
2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 kernel?
I seem to be having problems with simple playback on asterisk().
If I do the normal service zaptel start (my configs have 0 hardware
cards for asterisk)
ztdummy is loaded and when doing a playback() I head
A. Before I upgrade the nvidia Linux driver, everything was normal.
All programs worked fine. Desktop display was OK.
B. After I upgraded the nvidia Linux driver, the icon display on the desktop
was not correct. All icons on the panel and menu bars became small
empty boxes.
Error message dialog
thank you again, more clarification, if anyone can pls shed light ...
>
> That happens anyway if the forwarder is not authoritative - that is, the
> forwarder will act as a caching proxy.
ok - so my lab.company.com is authoritative, so it should keep a copy
of company.com's information then and
John Plemons wrote:
Real simple answer, switch to Postfix and dump sendmail. Then edit your
alias file to add the aliases, run newaliases and you're done...
I just don't understand why people still gripe about Sendmail. Yeah,
it was a force to be reckoned with in the early days, but it's
stu
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Chris Miller wrote:
John Plemons wrote:
Real simple answer, switch to Postfix and dump sendmail. Then
edit your alias file to add the aliases, run newaliases and you're
done...
I just don't understand why people still gripe about Sendmail. Yeah,
it was a force to be r
Jerry Geis wrote:
This version of asterisk has always worked for me before on centos 5.1
but now there is a newer kernel.
Any one know anything about this?
I don't run x86_64 on my Asterisk boxes, but I did see an issue like
this under Fedora where multiple drivers were loaded. This was in
on 4-2-2008 1:46 PM Chris Miller spake the following:
John Plemons wrote:
Real simple answer, switch to Postfix and dump sendmail. Then edit
your alias file to add the aliases, run newaliases and you're done...
I just don't understand why people still gripe about Sendmail. Yeah, it
was a for
Having used and configured both Send mail and Postfix, sendmail was and
had it's issues. I found it much easier to work with on Open Relays for
example, the draw back with Sendmail and Postfix may be along the lines
of Windows and a Mac, there are bunches of Windows machines in the world
so eve
John Plemons wrote:
Having used and configured both Send mail and Postfix, sendmail was and
had it's issues. I found it much easier to work with on Open Relays for
example, the draw back with Sendmail and Postfix may be along the lines
of Windows and a Mac, there are bunches of Windows machines
On 02/04/2008, at 10:43 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Does anyone know if upstream ever plans on updating the dovecot
package to a non RC version or to even one of the RC versions that
isn’t so insecure,
And by insecure, I of course refer to the recent rash of bugs which
have been found.
I don
on 4-2-2008 3:56 PM Michael Kratz spake the following:
On 02/04/2008, at 10:43 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Does anyone know if upstream ever plans on updating the dovecot
package to a non RC version or to even one of the RC versions that
isn�t so insecure,
And by insecure, I of course refer to th
Drew Weaver wrote:
Does anyone know if upstream ever plans on updating the dovecot package
to a non RC version or to even one of the RC versions that isn’t so
insecure,
And by insecure, I of course refer to the recent rash of bugs which have
been found.
Thanks,
-Drew
Drew,
Upstr
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:04:14PM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-2-2008 3:56 PM Michael Kratz spake the following:
>>
>> On 02/04/2008, at 10:43 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if upstream ever plans on updating the dovecot package
>>> to a non RC version or to even one of the
31 matches
Mail list logo
