Hi all
I wanted to expand my motherboard's SATA capabilities, so I got a SUNIX
SATA2100 PCI SATA card, which uses INITIO INI1622 chipsit, as per their
website:
http://www.sunix.com.tw/it/en/Product_Detail.php?class_a_id=0&sid=447
The only drivers available on their website is for Fedora Core
On Thursday 20 March 2008 21:24, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > I see in the repo there are some printer drivers like foomatic and
> > hpijs. I'm just wondering if there are plans to also include hplip in
> > the future?
>
> hplip is included in CentOS-5 but not in CentOS-4.
Any plans to port to Cent
--
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermai
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
the master mirror seems down (apt.sw.be), but you can use one of the
secondary mirrors
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks. I appreciate the help.
_
/etc/fstab:
//machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
Password:
mount error 13 = Permission denied
Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is
granted on the share?
Hi,
i have problem with madwifi driver (ath_pci) version 0.9.4 ,on
CentOs5.1after hibernate wireless devices are not working - i need to
restart them
(ifconfig down/ up or network restart).
Is there any solution?
i am using acpid script which will hibernate on power off button pressed.
It is just
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Ed Morrison wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
the master mirror seems down (apt.sw.be), but you can use one of the
secondary mirrors
Thanks. I appreciate the help.
Also have a look at the new RPMforge website at:
http://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge
for more inform
/etc/fstab:
//machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
Password:
mount error 13 = Permission denied
Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is
granted on the share?
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > /etc/fstab:
> >
> > //machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
> > Password:
> > mount error 13 = Permission denied
> >
> > Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To
> > > on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub
> > > configuration?
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
>
> > > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How
> > To
> > > > on the Wiki and no lu
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
/etc/fstab:
//machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a
Password:
mount error 13 = Permission denied
Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a
password prompt when the share ha
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it?
> Auto mount that is. I searched various How Tos on the net and every
> config I use will not work.
John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To
> > on the Wiki
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> John wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > >
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:43 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >
> > Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it?
> > Auto mount that is. I searched vari
On a centos 4.6 box
rpm -qa | grep glib
glib-1.2.10-15
glibc-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39
dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39
glib2-2.4.7-1
I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server
*** glibc detected ***
Hi Centos Users
Its _really_ nonsense to release RHEL version on file sharing networks.
The only reason why RHEL is so popular on torrent trackers is the lack
of knowledge about Centos :-)
Conclusion: we should do more marketing :-)
cheers
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
Robert - elists wrote:
On a centos 4.6 box
rpm -qa | grep glib
glib-1.2.10-15
glibc-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39
dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39
glib2-2.4.7-1
I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:11 -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
> *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 ***
> ... I am wondering if I
> should be focusing on a certain glib area or in the application providing
> the error in the error logs
Application. This error happens when an ap
>
>
> I'd be looking at the application that triggered that error.
> Apparently, it tried to 'free()' a memory block that wasn't malloc()'d
> in the first place.
> ___
Thank you John and Ignacio and others,
So, since this box has been online for like
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:27 -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
> So, since this box has been online for like 2 or 3 years, since like centos
> 4.0 or 4.1 load with multiple yum updates, I am guessing a recompile of that
> app should make the difference?
No. You need to find out where the memory is bein
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:38:59 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote:
> Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the
> next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for me?
> I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems I
> haven't already seen (
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Tim Alberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the
> next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for
> me? I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems
> I hav
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Centos Users
>
> Its _really_ nonsense to release RHEL version on file sharing networks.
> The only reason why RHEL is so popular on torrent trackers is the lack
> of knowledge about Centos :-)
>
> Conclusion: we s
vincenzo romero wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for
my lab. Brief configuration:
Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from
hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network)
1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the ab
Hi
I am finishing my mail server config and just trying to get the mysql
login working - it fails to connect and thorws the following error
Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 authdaemond: failed to connect to mysql server
(server=localhost, userid=courier): Can't connect to local MySQL server
through so
I am finishing my mail server config and just trying to get the mysql
login working - it fails to connect and thorws the following error
Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 authdaemond: failed to connect to mysql server
(server=localhost, userid=courier): Can't connect to local MySQL
server through soc
Did something change since (at least) CentOS 5.1, kernel 2.6.18-53.1.4
that would affect the CUPS printing system? I am no longer able to
connect to it and that seems to be impacting my ability to use the
newest unreleased beta version of SeaMonkey. (My standard release
SeaMonkey, 1.1.8, works ju
For those of you who have reported here about problems with your
browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey:
Please send me all relevant hardware and software configuration
details about your Mozilla installation as well as your version of
CentOS. I am looking into a theory a
Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no point in that...
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Michael Semcheski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Centos Users
> >
> > Its _really_ nonsense to rel
MHR wrote:
For those of you who have reported here about problems with your
browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey:
Please send me all relevant hardware and software configuration
details about your Mozilla installation as well as your version of
CentOS. I am looking int
I am using Sonic Digital Media Plus v7, on Windows, and I'm trying to
make a bootable RHEL IA 64 bit CD (mostly so I can include a kickstart
file).
So what I did is I grabbed the disk one ISO file, copied the contents
on my hard drive in a folder.
Then I clicked on the Data -> Data Disk. I then
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 19:38 -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
> I am using Sonic Digital Media Plus v7, on Windows, and I'm trying to
> make a bootable RHEL IA 64 bit CD (mostly so I can include a kickstart
> file).
>
> So what I did is I grabbed the disk one ISO file, copied the contents
> on my hard drive
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Primorec wrote:
> > I've checked today here
> >
> > Extras Testing:
> > i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/
> > x86_64
> > Sources
> >
> > Could not find gnumeric (yet).
> >
> > Am I looking into t
MHR a écrit :
For those of you who have reported here about problems with your
browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey:
The solution for me was to upgrade to Firefox3beta4. Just doesn't crash
anymore. I know there are no updates for now, but heck, from a pragmatic
point
Mag Gam a écrit :
Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no point in that...
Maybe there's also illegal customer support on these filesharing
networks :oD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
37 matches
Mail list logo
