Johnny Hughes wrote:
First thing is that building on x86_64 is quite a PITA.
You will need to either use mock with the appropriate configuration file
or you will need to create a build machine that has only x86_64 RPMS
(otherwise you will either try (and fail) to link to i386 libraries ..
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
How can I have vi with syntax hilghting for root ?
Regular users have it, but not root's.
I've seen the hidden files of a regular user home, but found nothing.
And one last way if vim-enhanced is installed ...
put this in the /root/.bashrc
alias vi='vim'
signatur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, we run approximately 400 Centos servers at our company. We use
cfengine for configuration management.
I am looking for some documentation to do patching including kernel
patches. I was thinking of just having each host run yum update via
cfengine but not sure if t
I was hoping that either via kernel capabilities or SE Linux that
we
could avoid this. Both seem to offer exactly the feature we want,
opening raw sockets from unprivileged accounts. But it's really
unclear from all the doc's online how these two interact. Best we
could do was try all the exampl
> Sure I'll give that a try. I thought I had the latest
> release, just downloaded it a few days ago - did they just
> come out with a new one?
>
> If I install the latest, does the script un-install the
> previous version I just installed?
>
> I'm also wo
>> I'll study up on it. Can you reccomend a good URL or reading material for
>> setroubleshoot?
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux
Thanks, I'll check it out.
_
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.wi
>> So is there a way I can set SELinux to permissive, and still
>> be secure while using Calc to connect remotely to a MySQL
>> database? Or is there a way to
>> leave SELinux enforced while also using Calc to connect
>> remotely to a MySQL database?
>
> Sure, there is iptables (firewall).
>
>>> Therese, the setroubleshoot package mentioned here was installed by
>>> default on my system. If you go to that after you have had a failure it
>>> generally tells you what it saw as a threat, and what to do about it if
>>> it should be allowed. Usually it's just a matter of copy and paste a
S Roderick wrote:
> I was hoping that either via kernel capabilities or SE
> Linux that
> we
> could avoid this. Both seem to offer exactly the feature we want,
> opening raw sockets from unprivileged accounts. But it's really
> unclear from all the doc's online how thes
Hi,
I'm considering setting up my Centos Desktop machine for RAID 1. I read a lot
of good info at this
site:http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Hardware/sata.html#intel-vitesse about
differences in fakeraid and real raid cards.
The hardware I plan on installing this RAID card into is an Intel DP35DP
R P Herrold a écrit :
As you are probably aware, at XFCE 4 became an 'early adopter' of those
standards.
http://www.xfce.org/about/
and 'aims to be fast and lightweight' unlike, say, evince, which tries
to be a universal 'Swiss Army' document 'knife' ;)
XFCE forever
I second that. I'v
Hello,
if compiling the driver for my ralink wlan card or compiling the driver
for my 5-1 card reader, I get the following error message.
./include/linux/kernel.h:10:20: error: stdarg.h: No such file or
directory
Is there something broken on my system?
# rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-devel-2.6.1
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> Do such cards exist? If so which model /manufacturers do you recommend?
> Any experiences/info/insights on hardware RAID cards good or bad on centos
> boxes would be appreciated.
3Ware 8000-series cards are probably the most compatible going back
at least 3 years. 9000-
Olaf Mueller wrote:
Hello,
if compiling the driver for my ralink wlan card or compiling the driver
for my 5-1 card reader, I get the following error message.
./include/linux/kernel.h:10:20: error: stdarg.h: No such file or
directory
Is there something broken on my system?
# rpm -qa | grep ker
On Friday 07 March 2008 22:53:03 Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:38:06 +
>
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Interesting. Is it still valid? I see the copyright notice is
> > 2002-2004.
>
> Since it's included in the documentation on the program's development
> website an
Just tried to install the Amazon-downloader on Centos 5.1 (the Fedora 8
version, which seems the closest match of any they offer).
Of course it gets a bazillion unfulfilled dependencies. so I tried
"yum localinstall ./a*m" and it trundles along for a while finding several
of the packages availabl
>> Do such cards exist? If so which model /manufacturers do you recommend?
>> Any experiences/info/insights on hardware RAID cards good or bad on centos
>> boxes would be appreciated.
>
> 3Ware 8000-series cards are probably the most compatible going back
> at least 3 years. 9000-series cards a
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> So these cards are just plug n play? Just plug them in, no software or
> drivers required,
> all mirroring is managed by firmware built into the card RAID card itself?
Drivers are required for all storage adapters(RAID or not). 3Ware
handles raid in hardware, not in soft
Most of the things in this email, from me are a personal opinoin, but I
do spend a fair bit of time with these sort of things, these days.
Therese Trudeau wrote:
>> 3Ware 8000-series cards are probably the most compatible going back
>> at least 3 years. 9000-series cards are faster/better and Cent
>> So these cards are just plug n play? Just plug them in, no software or
>> drivers required,
>> all mirroring is managed by firmware built into the card RAID card itself?
>
> Drivers are required for all storage adapters(RAID or not). 3Ware
> handles raid in hardware, not in software, it has a
> I would'nt bother with a 3ware 8000 or a 3ware 9000 card these days, if
> you really do want to get 3ware, get atleast a 9650. And anything less
> than a 9550 should be considered only if you get a really good deal off
> ebay. And remember that battery backup unit.
I'm just really looking for a
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> I'm just really looking for a RAID card that will do RAID 1, with four drive
> capacity, i.e.,
> a master drive with the OS and applications installed and mirrored, and a
> slave drive for data and
> photos, graphic design, video, etc also mirrored. What would battery bu
>> I'm just really looking for a RAID card that will do RAID 1, with four drive
>> capacity, i.e.,
>> a master drive with the OS and applications installed and mirrored, and a
>> slave drive for data and
>> photos, graphic design, video, etc also mirrored. What would battery built
>> into a R
On Mar 9, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Therese Trudeau wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering setting up my Centos Desktop machine for RAID 1. I
read a lot of good info at this site:http://linuxmafia.com/faq/
Hardware/sata.html#intel-vitesse about differences in fakeraid and
real raid cards.
Discontinued
>> I'm considering setting up my Centos Desktop machine for RAID 1. I
>> read a lot of good info at this site:http://linuxmafia.com/faq/
>> Hardware/sata.html#intel-vitesse about differences in fakeraid and
>> real raid cards.
>>
>
> Discontinued chipset but works fine:
>
> http://www.new
Therese Trudeau wrote:
the whole point of a BBU is that you can turn on write back caching -
and get a fair win in write performance on regular tasks.
Pardon my ignorance, what is write back caching and BBU?
Write Back Caching means the card will cache writes in its onboard
storage,
>>> the whole point of a BBU is that you can turn on write back caching -
>>> and get a fair win in write performance on regular tasks.
>>>
>>
>> Pardon my ignorance, what is write back caching and BBU?
>>
>
> Write Back Caching means the card will cache writes in its onboard
> storage,
Hello,
I've got a FreeBSD openldap server set up and i'd like to authenticate
to it with a centos 5.1 client. The server is also acting as a client itself
and user access works fine from it.
On the clientside I'm getting an error can not search ldap server,
server is unavailable. This is
What is the maximum number of nameservers mentioned in /etc/resolv.conf
which will be queried while looking up a hostname or IP address in the
present version ? Earlier implementations had a ceiling of 3 name
servers which could be queried. Has there been any increase ?
Thanks,
Manish
__
Therese Trudeau wrote:
Ah that makes total sense now, thanks. Do the 3wire and the Areca cards
allow you to remove battery/cache/disk and install into similar motherboard? Also
when you say remove battery and cache, do you mean remove the entire RAID
card with battery attached to it as complete
>> Ah that makes total sense now, thanks. Do the 3wire and the Areca cards
>> allow you to remove battery/cache/disk and install into similar motherboard?
>> Also
>> when you say remove battery and cache, do you mean remove the entire RAID
>> card with battery attached to it as complete assembl
Manish Kathuria wrote:
What is the maximum number of nameservers mentioned in /etc/resolv.conf
which will be queried while looking up a hostname or IP address in the
present version ? Earlier implementations had a ceiling of 3 name
servers which could be queried. Has there been any increase ?
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 22:02 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Manish Kathuria wrote:
> > What is the maximum number of nameservers mentioned in /etc/resolv.conf
> > which will be queried while looking up a hostname or IP address in the
> > present version ? Earlier implementations had a ceiling of 3
33 matches
Mail list logo
