Tom Bishop wrote:
Installing a new system using a 3ware card, raid 5 across 4 disks,
partition, format went smothly and loaded the apps that I need, but
for some reason it appears grub was not installed, or not completely.
I am wanting to boot from the array, when installing grub on the
loade
Jimmy Bradley wrote:
I'm just curious if any one else has noticed this. I've bought
hard drives from both Walmart and Best Buy. If I can wait, I order them
from newegg.com. I'm beginning to think that the staff at both Walmart
and Best Buy, somewhere along the supply line must dribble the d
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 18:11 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> >
> >>
> > If you use cpio, it can handle the hard links intelligently, IIRC. That
> > may make this more feasible. Plus you can specify such things as depth
> > to the find command feeding cpio so that even direc
You can install grub loader on MBR which is safer and will mount the linux
partitions whereever the OS is installed
- Original Message -
From: "Jed Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 5.1 install ,
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Its an older system raid 5 - 4 250gb drives for 750gb partition. The
install went fine but grub did not get installed for some reason so I wasn't
sure if I should install grub to the mbr or the first partition
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
Well, easy to solve for non-japaneses
find /usr/share/squirremail/functions/mime.php
if (!$charset_converted) {... <<< line 316
...
} <<< line 323
and do this (comment it out)
/*
if (!$charset_converted) {... <<< line 316
...
}
Centos wrote:
> Hello
>
> unfortunately other users can change to my user name with sudo,
> how I can prevent it ? is there a command to prevent to change to only my
> user name ?
DO NOT HIJACK THREADS ON A MAILING LIST. Post a "fresh" mail to
centos@centos.org, don't just blindly reply to some m
scaglietti amore wrote:
>
>
> that was it plus i had to set /selinux/enforce = 0im greatfull , thanks alot
> Craig
>
> > Subject: RE: [CentOS] SAMBA is driving me crazy> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: centos@centos.org> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:09:24 -0700> > dude, you
> > need to give '
Bob Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 23:44 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Bob Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 12:10 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
[snip]
Well, exactarch=0 might work around this from a yum
standpoint (as far
as downloading the updates), but if RPM is complaining this
Stephen McManus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally got my install working, Centos didn't recognise my m/board NIC
so I had to install another NIC. Now, I've lost the windows install. I
need it for my Walkman and Palm. Never, ever got any distro to see the
Tunsgsten E. I can see the Win in Grub
I had removed Exim and installed Postfix yet Logwatch still shows an empty Exim
section? Why is that still in the output?
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Stephen McManus wrote:
Finally got my install working, Centos didn't recognise my m/board NIC
so I had to install another NIC. Now, I've lost the windows install. I
need it for my Walkman and Palm. Never, ever got any distro to see the
Tunsgsten E. I can see the Win in Grub but it says there's
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had removed Exim and installed Postfix yet Logwatch still shows an empty
> Exim section? Why is that still in the output?
Probably because the package removal does not remove log files. Try
manually deleting the logs.
In bash, given a string assignment as follows, how do I "add slashes"
automagically, so that it can be safely passed to another program? Notice
that the assignment contains spaces, single-quotes and double-quotes, maybe
god-only-knows-what-else. It's untrusted data.
Yet I need to pass it all *
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In bash, given a string assignment as follows, how do I "add slashes"
> automagically, so that it can be safely passed to another program? Notice
> that the assignment contains spaces, single-quotes and double-quotes,
>
On Monday 25 February 2008, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Hmm...it will still build. To really fix it, you need to do one more step:
>
> rpm -e --nodeps sendmail
>
> Now that is a permanent solution.
Like a hand grenade is a "solution". Not likely to help him much, tho. =/
Doesn't even begin to add
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Bob Beers wrote:
> short answer: single quotes will handle all characters, except single
quotes.
>
> long answer: man bash
> the section called QUOTING may help you figure a solution.
I've read the man page. It helps if I already know the input - I don't have a
p
Benjamin Smith wrote:
> There is no mechanism for escaping untrusted input?
Correct. At least there's no magic quoting function.
Ralph
pgp3MLwLhKMwH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
Benjamin Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Bob Beers wrote:
> > short answer: single quotes will handle all characters,
> except single
> quotes.
> >
> > long answer: man bash
> > the section called QUOTING may help you figure a solution.
>
> I've read the man page. It helps if I a
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > There is no mechanism for escaping untrusted input?
>
> Correct. At least there's no magic quoting function.
Ok. So I'm going to have to pull up my sleeves and do this with sed/awk pipes.
Got it. I'll quit looking for a simply solution to t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nate
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 21:47
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Huge mailq
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > Where should we start on preventing this type of problem?
> >
> >
Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
There is no mechanism for escaping untrusted input?
Correct. At least there's no magic quoting function.
WHY THE @!#! NOT?!?!?
Bash is used, extensively in many cases, to deal with untrusted data. This can
include
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:25:54AM -0800, Benjamin Smith alleged:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > > There is no mechanism for escaping untrusted input?
> >
> > Correct. At least there's no magic quoting function.
>
> Ok. So I'm going to have to pull up my sleeves and do
On Feb 26, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
scaglietti amore wrote:
that was it plus i had to set /selinux/enforce = 0im greatfull ,
thanks alot Craig
Subject: RE: [CentOS] SAMBA is driving me crazy> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: centos@centos.org> Date: Sun, 24 Feb
2008 15:09
Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
There is no mechanism for escaping untrusted input?
Correct. At least there's no magic quoting function.
Ok. So I'm going to have to pull up my sleeves and do this with sed/awk pipes.
Got it. I'll quit looking for a si
> Probably because the package removal does not remove log files. Try
> manually deleting the logs.
I missed that obvious point, heh.
Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello everybody
I´m trying to install mono and when i try to install the package libgdiplus
throw the following error dependencies with libexif.so.9 and libungif.so.4.
Im using local packages, i downloaded it from the redhat mono repository, I try
with the bin installer in others distro mono re
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Roilan Cardoso Sánchez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody
>
> I´m trying to install mono and when i try to install the package libgdiplus
> throw the following error dependencies with libexif.so.9 and libungif.so.4.
> Im using local packages, i download
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 22:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 00:19 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >
> >> Bob Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> >>> uname -imp:
> >>>
> >>> i686 i686 i386
> >>>
> >>> Don't know why the kernel says it's
on 2/25/2008 9:25 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
Bob Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 23:44 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Bob Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 12:10 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
[snip]
Well, exactarch=0 might work around this from a yum
standpoint (as far
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:54 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0161
>
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0161.html
>
> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
> syncing to the mirrors:
>
> i386:
> cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.el4_6.
Roilan Cardoso Sánchez wrote:
Hello everybody
I´m trying to install mono and when i try to install the package libgdiplus
throw the following error dependencies with libexif.so.9 and libungif.so.4.
Im using local packages, i downloaded it from the redhat mono repository, I try
with the bin in
I do it, but when i try to install gdiplus it thow and depes error with
libgif.so.4 and i cant find it in centos extras
- Mensaje original
De: Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: CentOS mailing list
Enviado: martes, 26 de febrero, 2008 13:19:18
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] Mono installation
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 13:45 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying this command and I am getting an error of INvalid service.
>
> avahi-publish-service MyServer _tcp 80 "myentry at 192.168.1.8"
>
> What is wrong with _tcp? I also tried tcp.
http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/mod_dnssd/
--
Ig
Garrick Staples wrote:
How many "homebrew" ISP or hosting administration scripts could be compromised
by simply putting a file in your home directory called ";rm -rf /" ?
It's not as bad as you think because of the order of operations.
In all cases, these perform exactly as a string should r
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:54 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0161
>
> Oh wait! I just noticed the repo tag - el4! <*whew*>
>
> Subject line got me.
You know, the whole CentO
Bob Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 22:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> > Bob Taylor wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 00:19 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > >
> > >> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > >>
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > >
> > >>> uname -imp:
> > >>>
> > >>> i686 i686 i386
> >
sorry man :(
but when i pasted those lines to the mail page they were organized
i dont know how they end up like that :)regards
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:04:32 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> centos@centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] SAMBA is driving me crazy> >
> scaglietti amo
Greetings:
i have a pretty stock CentOS 5 machine with ports 80 and 22 exposed, so
my /etc/sysconfig/iptables file is pretty standard/straightforward.
my question is: how is this config file initially generated? i'd
like to
re-create it, and add a couple of rules so i don't want to los
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
[snip]
> what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
>
> i686-redhat-linux
Nothing.
I downloaded the current rpm file this morning and ran rpm -Uvh
--force /home/brtaylor/rpm-4.4.2-47.el5.i386.rpm.
Rpm seems to behave o
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:45:41PM -0600, Les Mikesell alleged:
> Garrick Staples wrote:
>
> >>How many "homebrew" ISP or hosting administration scripts could be
> >>compromised by simply putting a file in your home directory called ";rm
> >>-rf /" ?
> >
> >It's not as bad as you think because
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:19:36AM -0800, Bob Taylor alleged:
> I can not remove it with the command rpm -e kernel-2.6.18-53.1.13 but
> can if I add .el5 to the end it does. Before I deleted it I ran the
That's correct. 53.1.13 is the not same as 53.1.13.el5.
The version is 2.6.18 and the releas
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >
> > WHY THE @!#! NOT?!?!?
>
> The shell is 'supposed' to be run by a user that is allowed to run any
> command he wants, and permission/trust issues are handled by the
> login/authentication process that happens before you get to the shell.
Ray Van Dolson please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:22:55AM -0800, Benjamin Smith alleged:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > >
> > > WHY THE @!#! NOT?!?!?
> >
> > The shell is 'supposed' to be run by a user that is allowed to run any
> > command he wants, and permission/trust issues are handled by t
Are you trying to pass all parameters from one script to another or
just the first one ($1). If it's the former, have you tried using
"$@"? For the latter, "$1" might work.
Alfred
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Here is the cpu info of a more recent quad core Intel.
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3220 @ 2.40GHz
stepping: 7
This model is 10 cpu designs ahead, b
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Probably because the package removal does not remove log files. Try
manually deleting the logs.
I missed that obvious point, heh.
Also remove exim from the list of services in logwatch.conf
___
CentOS mailing list
> I have done the following:
>
> rpm -Uvh --force /home/brtaylor/rpm-4.4.2-47.el5.i386.rpm
> edit /etc/rpm/platform to i686-redhat-linux
> rpm -e kernel-2.6.18-53.1.13.el5
> yum clean all
> yum upgrade kernel
> returned Installed: kernel.i686 0:2.6.18-53.1.13.el5
> Complete!
>
> It looks like the
scaglietti amore wrote:
sorry man :(
but when i pasted those lines to the mail page they were organized
i dont know how they end up like that :)
blame it on hotmail.
your original message was in mime multipart, the HTML version had those
lines seperated by (break) but the plaintext ve
shiii
did anyone notice any failure today to open the hotmail.combefor 5 hours
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:51:50 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> centos@centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] SAMBA is driving me crazy> >
> scaglietti amore wrote:> > > > > > sorry man :(> > > > but when i pas
Bob Taylor wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
[snip]
what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
i686-redhat-linux
Nothing.
I downloaded the current rpm file this morning and ran rpm -Uvh
--force /home/brtaylor/rpm-4.4.2-47.el5.i386.rpm.
Rpm s
Ya know you can set hotmail to send in plain text which helps a lot with these
mailing lists.
-Ross
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
scaglietti amore
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:04 PM
To: CentOS
Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nate
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 21:47
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Huge mailq
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Where should we start on preventing this type of problem?
[EM
Hello.
I need to set up a mail server for a small (~5 people) organization on
CentOS 5.1.
While I am very familiar with CentOS and Linux in general, I have zero
experience in setting up a POP3(s)/SMTP mail server. I suppose
eventually I'd like to do spam/virus filtering, but initially the sim
indeed it would
i will look about it
>Ya know you can set hotmail to send in plain text which helps a lot with these
>mailing lists.
>-Ross
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of scaglietti
amoreSent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:04 PMTo: CentOS mailing
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Garrick Staples wrote:
> > I'm not asking for this. I'm only asking for the option to be able to
trust
> > that a parameter is... a parameter. EG:
> >
> > file: script1.sh
> > #! /bin/bash
> > script2.sh $1
> > exit 0;
> >
> > file: script2.sh
> > #! /bin/bash
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:30:50 -0500
Steve Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone point me to a tutorial on setting up a mail server on CentOS
> 5?
http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
__
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
> >>
> >> i686-redhat-linux
> >
> > Nothing.
> >
> > I downloaded the current rpm file this morning and ran
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:40:06PM -0800, Benjamin Smith alleged:
> I'd like to have a informed discussion, which, apparently, you either aren't
> interested in, or aren't capable of.
*shrug* I thought we were having a discussion. I'll leave you to it and stay
out of your way.
--
Garrick Sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Snyder wrote:
| Can someone point me to a tutorial on setting up a mail server on CentOS
| 5?
|
qmailtoaster + qmailtoaster plus.
http://www.qmailtoaster.org
http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/
> Also remove exim from the list of services in logwatch.conf
Hi,
Maybe I don't understand Logwatch correctly. Doesn't it look for all possible
services defined by the existence of the many service definitions, and if it
finds a log, it reports it?
This is the default behavior from what I gath
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:22:55AM -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> file: script1.sh
> #! /bin/bash
> script2.sh $1
There's your mistake. It should be
script2.sh "$1"
Otherwise $1 is evaluated and passed through as potentially multiple
parameters to script2.sh
For example:
$ cat x
#!/bin/
For someone who apparently has no idea what he's talking about, you
sure say a lot.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Benjamin Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You missed the point.
No, you missed it. You need the quotes *everywhere* that a variable
is referenced.
> In script2.sh, $1 only c
Tom Laramee wrote:
Greetings:
i have a pretty stock CentOS 5 machine with ports 80 and 22 exposed, so
my /etc/sysconfig/iptables file is pretty standard/straightforward.
my question is: how is this config file initially generated? i'd
like to
re-create it, and add a couple of rules so
Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
WHY THE @!#! NOT?!?!?
The shell is 'supposed' to be run by a user that is allowed to run any
command he wants, and permission/trust issues are handled by the
login/authentication process that happens before you get to the s
Actually I recant that, one use to be able to do so, but not any more. One use
to be able to display full headers too, but that is now missing as well.
Oh well, Hotmail now officially sucks.
Can't say I'm surprised, everything eventually sucks given enough time, I guess
Microsoft is just ac
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:40:06PM -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> In script2.sh, $1 only contains the string "this". There is no safe way to
> pass $1 (containing string "this parameter") from script1 to script2 as a
> single, trustable parameter.
The statement is meaningless. Trusted in WHAT
How can I get the mapper device permissions set on reboot?
When I attempted to try this...
# cat /etc/udev/permissions.d/50-udev.permissions | grep mapper
mapper/mpath*:oracle:dba:0660
But it did not seem to work...
# ls -l /dev/mapper/mpath*
brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 2 Feb 26 20:56 /dev/map
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> For someone who apparently has no idea what he's talking about, you
> sure say a lot.
Sorry. It's how I think aloud. Sorry if I offended.
> No, you missed it. You need the quotes *everywhere* that a variable
> is referenced.
Yes, I missed thi
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Bob Taylor wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
[snip]
what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
i686-redhat-linux
Nothing.
The problem was most likely the /etc/rpm/platform
if it is i386 and
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> Bob Taylor wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
>
> i686-redhat-linux
> >>> Nothing.
> Unless I'm terribly mistaken (again?), the only way I've been able to
> see "loop thru a list of files" work reliably is with "find" using
> the "-print0" option, in cahoots with xargs.
>
> Is there any other way?
>
>
> -Ben
> --
If I understand you correctly, you are referring to the prob
Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Unless I'm terribly mistaken (again?), the only way I've been able to
see "loop thru a list of files" work reliably is with "find" using
the "-print0" option, in cahoots with xargs.
Is there any other way?
for $file in wildcard*
do
ls -l "$file"
done
But thi
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > >> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> [snip]
> > >>>
> > what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
> >
> Can someone point me to a tutorial on setting up a mail server on
> CentOS 5?
Howtoforge has many.
I have used their stuff successfully in the past...
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:33:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell alleged:
> Does anyone have a quick reference to the order of operations as the
> shell parses a command line (variable parsing,i/o redirection, wildcard
> and variable expansion, splitting on IFS, quote removal, command
> substitution etc.)
Garrick Staples wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:33:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell alleged:
Does anyone have a quick reference to the order of operations as the
shell parses a command line (variable parsing,i/o redirection, wildcard
and variable expansion, splitting on IFS, quote removal, command
s
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:33:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Benjamin Smith wrote:
> >> Unless I'm terribly mistaken (again?), the only way I've been able to
> >see "loop thru a list of files" work reliably is with "find" using
> >the "-print0" option, in cahoots with xargs.
> >
> >Is there a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:51:28PM -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Unless I'm terribly mistaken (again?), the only way I've been able to
> see "loop thru a list of files" work reliably is with "find" using
> the "-print0" option, in cahoots with xargs.
What is it you're trying to do? You typica
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:30:12PM -0500, Jacques B. wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, you are referring to the problem caused
> by spaces in filenames? Steve mentioned the environment variable IFS
> ("individual field separator" if memory serves me correctly). By
> default it's space, tab
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:33:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Benjamin Smith wrote:
Unless I'm terribly mistaken (again?), the only way I've been able to
see "loop thru a list of files" work reliably is with "find" using
the "-print0" option, in cahoots with xargs.
Is t
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Benjamin Smith wrote:
> > > Unless I'm terribly mistaken (again?), the only way I've been able to
> > see "loop thru a list of files" work reliably is with "find" using
> > the "-print0" option, in cahoots with xargs.
> >
> > Is there any other
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:30:02PM -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Exactly. Here's my example:
>
> $ ls -laFd *
You're doing it wrong:
ls -laFD -- *
> ls -l "$file";
You're doing it wrong:
ls -l -- "$file"
> $ /bin/bash ./script3.sh *
You're doing it wrong:
bash ./script3.sh "*"
on 2/26/2008 1:42 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
Actually I recant that, one use to be able to do so, but not any more.
One use to be able to display full headers too, but that is now missing
as well.
Oh well, Hotmail now officially sucks.
Can't say I'm surprised, everything eve
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:30:02PM -0800, Benjamin Smith alleged:
> File script3.sh contains the following:
> $ cat script3.sh
> #! /bin/sh
> for file in $*
> do
> ls -l "$file";
> done
Use "$@" instead of $*. It will split up the way you want.
pgpniM2ihOWs1.pgp
Desc
Benjamin Smith wrote:
It's obviously getting slipped on on the "-b". Tried again:
$ cat script3.sh
#! /bin/bash
for file in $*
do
ls -l -- "$file";
done
$ /bin/bash ./script3.sh *
-rw-r--r-- 1 bens nobody 5 2008-02-26 12:14 -b
ls: cannot access Disney: No such file or d
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:13:12PM -0600, Les Mikesell alleged:
> Garrick Staples wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:33:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell alleged:
> >>Does anyone have a quick reference to the order of operations as the
> >>shell parses a command line (variable parsing,i/o redirection, wi
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Hi,
Maybe I don't understand Logwatch correctly. Doesn't it look for all possible
services defined by the existence of the many service definitions, and if it
finds a log, it reports it?
This is the default behavior from what I gathered, my silly mistake was not
cleani
Hello all,
I have observed a problem with a diskless PXE client I am attempting
to configure. PXE/NFS/DHCP/TFTPd server is running CentOS5.1 and the
Diskless workstation's root and kernel was extracted from a CentOS5.1
(custom kernel due to setting to enable Root File System support).
Problem: W
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:22 -0800, Garrick Staples wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:19:36AM -0800, Bob Taylor alleged:
> > I can not remove it with the command rpm -e kernel-2.6.18-53.1.13 but
> > can if I add .el5 to the end it does. Before I deleted it I ran the
>
> That's correct. 53.1.13 i
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:51 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
[snip]
> > It looks like the problem may be in rpm after 4.4.2-37. Before I go to
> > the rpm people, I need to confer with Ray Van Dolson who says his is the
> > same as mine and he has no problem updating kernels. After Ray and I
> > reso
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 17:30 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
[snip]
> # rpm -qf /etc/rpm/platform
rpm -qf /etc/rpm/platform
file /etc/rpm/platform is not owned by any package
> On a default environment it should come back that no package owns
> that file. If a package does own it then there is t
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 10:33 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
[snip]
> >>> The contents of,
> >>>
> >>> # cat /etc/rpm/platform
> >> i386-redhat-linux
> >
> > Good
> Shouldn't this be i686-redhat-linux ?
Bingo! Better late than never! :-) That is exactly the problem!
--
Bob Taylor
_
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 14:16 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
> >>
> >> i686-redhat-linux
> >
> > Nothing.
> >
> > I downloaded the cur
Garrick Staples wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:13:12PM -0600, Les Mikesell alleged:
Garrick Staples wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:33:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell alleged:
Does anyone have a quick reference to the order of operations as the
shell parses a command line (variable parsing,i/o r
The problem which began this long an laborious thread has been solved
with an edit of /etc/rpm/platform replacing i386 with i686. Whatever
created this file thinks my cpu is not an i686.
Many thanks to all who helped track this down!
Hitler is dead. End of thread!
--
Bob Taylor
__
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 16:09 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
[snip]
> > Would anaconda even allow C5 to install on such a class cpu?
>
> no ... and we have no i386 kernel ... no idea how that file got changed,
> but the only code to make it happen would be a pentium classic
> processor. C5 would
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:27 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
[snip]
> I think there may be a case or two of bad packages updating that file
> I believe these are some dumb Mozilla plugins though, googling got
> me these:
>
> http://dnmouse.webs.com/playdvdsmore.htm
>
> and here:
>
> http://www.
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
