Hi everyone,
I have this package installed, and Apache has been sefaulting randomly
on my server. I have tried to locate the fault and believe the problem
may be in mod_php. However there are various posts that say that HTTPD
could have an issues as well.
Is anyone else having similar issues? Any
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
Sooner or later everyone needs to install a package that is not
included on the official installation CDs/DVD. Until now I just used
rpmseek.com and Rpmfind.Net but of course this is far from optimal for
security and compatibility to reasons.
So what is the recommended w
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 10:56 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 20:24 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
repo id repo name status
priority
=== = ==
rpmforgeRed Hat
OK, that worked for me
yum clean all
yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=updates update
Should this be done on a weekly/monthly basis? " yum clean all"
Or are my repos messed up?
repo id repo name status priority
=== =
On Feb 19, 2008 3:30 AM, Ed Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> repo id repo name status priority
> === = ==
> extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled 1
> b
On Feb 18, 2008 10:56 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 20:24 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> repo id repo name status
> priority
> === = ==
>
> rpmforgeRed Hat Enterpri
Anne Wilson wrote:
### Comment all HorizSync and VertSync values to use DDC:
Identifier "Monitor0"
ModelName"Monitor 1280x1024"
### Comment all HorizSync and VertSync values to use DDC:
HorizSync60.0 - 72.0
VertRefresh 60.0 - 72.0
Option
Ed Donahue wrote:
OK, that worked for me
yum clean all
yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=updates update
Should this be done on a weekly/monthly basis? " yum clean all"
Or are my repos messed up?
I run "yum clean headers" daily.
I disabled the yum update daemon and use the following:
ankush grover wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am running samba as domain member of AD 2k3 on Centos 4.4 . Quota of
2GB is set for each user but for 2-3 uers quota or edquota is
showing wrong blocks even though disk space occupied by that user is
very less than the quota specified for ex 810 MB.
quota bh
I've been seeing the below message from yum whenever the repo has an
update (CentOS 5):
/etc/cron.daily/yum.cron:
** Message: sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
Googling a bit, it looks like others have seen this happen as well.
The solutions, when I've found them, have b
I guess I can use the bind-chroot rpm, ill give that a shot
Thanks,
paul
P.A > -Original Message-
P.A > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
P.A > Behalf Of Jim Perrin
P.A > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:47 AM
P.A > To: CentOS mailing list
P.A > Subject: Re: [CentOS]
J. Potter wrote:
I've been seeing the below message from yum whenever the repo has an
update (CentOS 5):
/etc/cron.daily/yum.cron:
** Message: sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
Googling a bit, it looks like others have seen this happen as well. The
solutions, when I've fo
On Feb 19, 2008 10:42 AM, Paul A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi I recently compliled Bind 9.4.2 on
>
> CentOS release 5 (Final) 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 #1 SMP
Why? What's wrong with the bind package that ships with centos?
> I compiled named chroot, I have done this on several other centos 4 se
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:30:38AM -0500, Ed Donahue wrote:
> OK, that worked for me
>
> yum clean all
> yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=updates update
>
> Should this be done on a weekly/monthly basis? " yum clean all"
>
> Or are my repos messed up?
>
>
> repo id repo name
Hi I recently compliled Bind 9.4.2 on
CentOS release 5 (Final) 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 #1 SMP
I compiled named chroot, I have done this on several other centos 4 server
with no issues however on this centos 5 server im seeing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] named]# service named status
named dead but subsys lock
I know acroread is not part of CentOS but many people use it. Thought
forwarding this post on the SciLinux mailing list might help those who
use acroread on CentOS-4.
=== excerpt ===
The "latest" version officially compatible with RHEL4 is acroread-7.0.9,
but this currently has open security hole
Paul A wrote:
Hi I recently compliled Bind 9.4.2 on
CentOS release 5 (Final) 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 #1 SMP
I compiled named chroot, I have done this on several other centos 4
server with no issues however on this centos 5 server im seeing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] named]# service named status
named
** Message: sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
... Is there a general solution to this? Or should we just sit
tight for redhat bug #429689 to be fixed (5.2?).
this is not really a bug ...
it is just verbose output that causes an e-mail to be sent.
It seems to be the default,
On Feb 19, 2008 8:14 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not see how this issue is at all related to RH bug 429689 ???
Maybe it is 429869 ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429869
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 10:42 AM, Paul A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know what im doing wrong?
Other than not using rpms?
Good call.
--
Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
306-717-8737
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Mai
Niki Kovacs ha scritto:
Hi,
I've been using Debian for a few years, and there was one nifty little
app that made installing and updating so much easier: apt-proxy.
Most of the time, I'm taking care of small LANs with an average of five
client PCs. But this is a very remote place in South Fra
On Feb 19, 2008 11:14 AM, Paul A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I can use the bind-chroot rpm, ill give that a shot
>
I didn't mean my previous post to come across as (overly) hostile, but
I don't fully understand why people build from source 90% of the time.
If there's a feature that you ne
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
I've been using Debian for a few years, and there was one nifty little
app that made installing and updating so much easier: apt-proxy.
Most of the time, I'm taking care of small LANs with an average of
five client PCs. But this is a very remote place in South France,
On Feb 19, 2008 6:06 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know acroread is not part of CentOS but many people use it. Thought
> forwarding this post on the SciLinux mailing list might help those who
> use acroread on CentOS-4.
>
> === excerpt ===
> The "latest" version officially compatib
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 23:02 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:56:58PM -0800, Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 20:24 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
[snip]
> Coming in late on this thread, but...
>
> 1. Can you point your repo's at a different URL?
> 2. Have you t
Hi All:
Over the weekend I install all the outstanding updates for our
CentOS 4 based server. Since I had been holding off on these until
I had addressed some disk space issues there were a large number
(300+). I know my bad! After installing the updates I rebooted the
system and it took forever t
Bob Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 23:02 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:56:58PM -0800, Bob Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 20:24 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
[snip]
Coming in late on this thread, but...
1. Can you point your repo's at a different URL?
2.
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> sounds like the mirror you are updating from is not up to date.
I *think* I'm using
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/
I have found that there is no kernel at rpmforge so I have comm
On Feb 19, 2008 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
>
> sounds like the mirror you are updating from is not up to date.
>
> We currently know that one mirror is bad:
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/2008-February/002532.html
>
> Please look at th
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 04:59 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
[snip]
> -=-=-=-=-
> #!/bin/sh
> # /etc/cron.daily/yum.cron
>
> if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/yum ]; then
> /usr/bin/yum clean headers
> /usr/bin/yum -e 0 -d 0 -y update yum
> sleep 300
> /usr/bin/yum -e 0
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:27 -0800, MHR wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 6:06 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> AR 8.1.1 would not print landscape graphic pdfs (on my machine,
> anyway) properly at all. It also had scaling problems (would not
> scale images to fit the printer).
>
> Does any
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:09 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Over the weekend I install all the outstanding updates for our
> CentOS 4 based server. Since I had been holding off on these until
> I had addressed some disk space issues there were a large number
> (300+). I know my bad
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:09 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Over the weekend I install all the outstanding updates for our
> CentOS 4 based server. Since I had been holding off on these until
> I had addressed some disk space issues there were a large number
> (300+). I know my bad!
From: William L. Maltby Sent: February 19, 2008 15:25
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:09 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Over the weekend I install all the outstanding updates for our
> > CentOS 4 based server. Since I had been holding off on these until
> > I had addressed some
From: Craig White Sent: February 19, 2008 15:31
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:09 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> >
> > Feb 17 19:46:18 fisds0 named[23187]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to
> > LDAP server 127.0.0.1: Can't contact LDAP server
> > Feb 17 19:46:18 fisds0 named[23187]: nss_ldap: r
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:05 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Craig White Sent: February 19, 2008 15:31
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:09 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > >
> > > Feb 17 19:46:18 fisds0 named[23187]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to
> > > LDAP server 127.0.0.1: Can't
From: Craig White Sent: February 19, 2008 16:08
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:05 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > From: Craig White Sent: February 19, 2008 15:31
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:09 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Feb 17 19:46:18 fisds0 named[23187]: nss_ld
on 2/19/2008 2:09 PM Hugh E Cruickshank spake the following:
Hi All:
Over the weekend I install all the outstanding updates for our
CentOS 4 based server. Since I had been holding off on these until
I had addressed some disk space issues there were a large number
(300+). I know my bad! After ins
From: Stephen Harris Sent: February 19, 2008 16:56
>
> In other words you _had_ the right answer already!
>
Thanks muchly for the confirmation. I have made the necessary
changes and I am just in the process of kicking people off so that
I can reboot. I know the reboot may not be entirely require
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:24:59PM -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
> The errors are valid as we do not have an LDAP server. What I am
> trying to figure out is why it is looking for one. I have done some
> passwd: files ldap
That means "look in /etc/passwd and if it's not found THEN l
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:24 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Craig White Sent: February 19, 2008 16:08
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:05 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > > From: Craig White Sent: February 19, 2008 15:31
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:09 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshan
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: February 19, 2008 17:10
>
> From: Stephen Harris Sent: February 19, 2008 16:56
> >
> > In other words you _had_ the right answer already!
> >
>
> Thanks muchly for the confirmation. I have made the necessary
> changes and I am just in the process of kicking people
From: Ross S. W. Walker Sent: February 19, 2008 17:22
>
> A short-cut to disable ldap name service:
>
> # authconfig --kickstart --disableldap
>
> And to disable ldap authentication:
>
> # authconfig --kickstart --disableldapauth
>
> Now I believe it only does something if /etc/sysconfig/authc
A short-cut to disable ldap name service:
# authconfig --kickstart --disableldap
And to disable ldap authentication:
# authconfig --kickstart --disableldapauth
Now I believe it only does something if /etc/sysconfig/authconfig has these
marked =YES, but if they are turned on there they will au
I've got a Dell Precision Workstation 490 with 64-bit Centos 5, fully
updated, with an on-board Broadcom 57xx gigabit Ethernet controller,
updated BIOS, 1 GB switch, and /var/log/messages and dmesg both claim the
link is 100 Mb, not 1 GB.
I tried setting eth0 to mtu 9000 but got an error in go
I've got a Dell Precision Workstation 490 with 64-bit Centos 5, fully
updated, with an on-board Broadcom 57xx gigabit Ethernet controller, updated
BIOS, 1 GB switch, and /var/log/messages and dmesg both claim the link is 100
Mb, not 1 GB.
I tried setting eth0 to mtu 9000 but got an error in go
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I've got a Dell Precision Workstation 490 with 64-bit Centos 5, fully
> updated, with an on-board Broadcom 57xx gigabit Ethernet controller,
> updated BIOS, 1 GB switch, and /var/log/messages and dmesg both claim the
> link is 100 Mb, not 1 GB.
>
> I tried setting eth0 to mtu
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:27 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bob Taylor wrote:
> >
> > sounds like the mirror you are updating from is not up to date.
> >
> > We currently know that one mirror is bad:
> >
> > http://lists.centos.org/pi
Hm. I just noticed http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/i386/RPMS/
kernel listings are i686.rpm. Could my problem be this is confusing yum
as I use i386 and this is the i386 directory? Doesn't make sense since
no one else seems to have this. Of course their are most likely few
running Pentium
Bob Taylor wrote:
Hm. I just noticed http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/i386/RPMS/
kernel listings are i686.rpm. Could my problem be this is confusing yum
as I use i386 and this is the i386 directory? Doesn't make sense since
no one else seems to have this. Of course their are most likely
51 matches
Mail list logo
