J wrote:
Stupid question... How does one upgrade to ff 3? Would that require
installing via rpm off of ff's site?
It's probably best to leave the RPM version alone.
Just get the beta tarball from here:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html
Unpack it. Move .mozilla to .mozilla.
Nancy Rudins wrote:
I too noticed this problem. Went right to Firefox 3 and the problem
miraculously disappeared.
I'm running 2 and have experienced the problem, but I noticed that by
installing the NoScript extension - it doesn't happen nearly as often.
My guess is the problem (or one of se
Florin Andrei wrote:
I've heard a lot of complaints from Firefox/CentOS users. I never used
CentOS as a desktop OS, so I can't confirm those issues from my own
experience.
I experienced a LOT of crashing with FireFox 2 in Fedora 8 but almost
none using the tarball version in Fedora Core 6 - in
J wrote:
I have a file server that runs a virtual machine that suddenly blanked
its display. I can switch to , but switching back to
just gives me a blank screen (no cursor). There are
no entries in /var/log/messages or in /var/log/Xorg.0.log that might
explain what happened. I was running
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 at 12:21pm, Joseph L. Casale wrote
...
I use a simple script with tar.
The core is:
cd /
tar cvlbf 512 /dev/nst0 \
--multi-volume --new-volume-script /usr/local/bin/mtxnext \
--ignore-failed-read \
. >$LOGDIR/root_$BACKUPDATE.log 2>
s-4.3.0-125.EL.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
ht
Miark wrote on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:55:32 -0500:
> The winning solution
Nevertheless, Bowie's solution is the correct one.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing
Joe Greenseid wrote on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:57:39 -0500:
> I don't understand why it's not using the search field from
> /etc/resolv.conf for the second short name (proteome.vlan88). Any
> idea what can I do to get this working?
1. nslookup is deprecated, use host
2. it interprets any hostnam
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:04:23 -0500:
> What I
> can't access is the new one I put there recently (weeks ago).
You need to explain that.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
__
Quoting Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. nslookup is deprecated, use host
2. it interprets any hostname with a dot in it like an FQDN, e.g. it
transforms abc.def -> abc.def.
Host returns the same results.
So there is no way to do name completion on any partial name that has
a dot in it
Joe Greenseid wrote on Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:25:28 -0500:
> So there is no way to do name completion on any partial name that has
> a dot in it?
Don't know, man host may reveal a parameter that could change this.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Joe Greenseid wrote:
Quoting Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. nslookup is deprecated, use host
2. it interprets any hostname with a dot in it like an FQDN, e.g. it
transforms abc.def -> abc.def.
Host returns the same results.
So there is no way to do name completion on any partial name
Hello,
I have installed CentOS 5 (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5) on my new Acer Extensa
5220 notebook and everything seems to work fine except of the
following:
1)
Display is ok, but could maybe be better? The driver is set to 'vesa'
but should be 'intel', in my opinion. But 'intel' isn't working in
xorg.conf
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:09:40 -0500, I Beartooth wrote:
> ... I want to install CentOS 5.1 again, Ubuntu 7.10, and Fedora 8.
> (If I were doing it all over, perhaps I should do the partitioning first
> and separately, with knoppix or gparted, or with qtparted if that has a
> live cd. Maybe I shoul
If this is too far off topic please let me know and I'll send this
to the Gnome list or something.
Today I recently had a thai friend want to experience linux. Their
limitation is language of course. I set up an account for my friend
and had them log in after changing through GDM their language
pr
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:22:52 -0600
Nancy Rudins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wondered why I wasn't having any problems, so I checked my
> version of Firefox and I'm still using 1.5. I'll upgrade to
> Firefox 3 and just jump over the Firefox 2.0.0 version.
>
> Kind regards,
> Nancy
>
I'm real
Yeah, I resolved that problem when I switched ISPs recently by using
something like this:
> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
> -o
smtpd
Hello,
I upgraded to CentOS 5.1 and everything went smoothly (Thanks for the
awesome work!). But after rebooting, I get the following error:
EDAC MC: Ver: 2.0.1 Nov 30 2007
EDAC e7xxx: error reporting device not found:vendor 8086 device
0x2541 (broken BIOS?)
I found http://edacbugs.butter
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Miark wrote on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:55:32 -0500:
The winning solution
Nevertheless, Bowie's solution is the correct one.
Indeed, 587 is the standard port for mail submission.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2476.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5068.txt
and since "s
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:31 -0500, Rich Huff wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 14:11 -0700, Miark wrote:
> > Having been accomodating about it in the past, the technical
> > geniuses at Comcast have permanently blocked port 25, separating
> > me (at my home office) from my employer's e-mail server.
>
OS: CentOS 5.1 x86.
Hi, after applying the latest X.Org updates, applications have stopped
running with an error message:
"The program 'multiget' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'.
(
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:04:30PM +0200, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> OS: CentOS 5.1 x86.
...
>
> and it says:
>
> "[Updated 18th January 2008]
> The original packages distributed with this errata had a bug which could
> cause some X applications to fail on 32-bit platforms. We have updated
> the pa
Olaf Mueller wrote:
Hello.
> I have installed CentOS 5 (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5) on my new Acer Extensa
> The 5-in-1 Card Reader isn't working.
One step more:
I have installed tifm-0.6b.tar.bz2 from
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/tifmxx and load the following
modules:
modprobe tifm_core
modprob
# yum install foobar
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Nothing to do
Here is the output of my centos 4
# yum install foobar
Setting up Install Process
Setting up reposi
Is foobar an existing program or just an example?
try:
yum install "foobar*"
with the quotes included.
Alain Spineux wrote:
# yum install foobar
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package in
On Jan 20, 2008 1:05 AM, Ioannis Vranos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is foobar an existing program or just an example?
:-)
some more sample
# yum install somba postfox closedvpn cvsversion unzop GCC binuseless
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Readi
Yes I checked it. I suppose you must get used to the message "Nothing to
do" when the package requested is not available.
If you are on X.Org you can use yumex.
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 1:05 AM, Ioannis Vranos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is foobar an existing program or just an e
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:14, ann kok wrote:
> ICMP: 62.x.x.x: Source Route Failed
Literally, it means that you send packet with "IP source and record route
option" it was routed via router 62.x.x.x and was rejected by it.
ICMP reason subcode 0x5, used with ICMP reason code 0x3 to expla
On Friday 18 January 2008 17:57, Joe Greenseid wrote:
> Can anyone explain the following behavior to me?
What does your resolve.conf and hosts look like?
--
Regards
Robert
Smile... it increases your face value!
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
___
On Thursday 17 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Notice the '*' next to centos 4 and 5 and then the footnote ? Obviously
> they are sadly mistaken, 'cause as we all know they are almost identical to
> the Redhat EL 4 and 5 and therefore have almost identical frequency of
> updates.
They alr
Hi there...
Foolish me all was going sooo well and then I got a wild hair and
updated to the latest clamav .92 today.
It is possible I should have just done an rpm update install yet there were
some changes in ClamAV lately and I didn't know how well that would go.
up till now I spec'd a
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 10:21:48PM -0800, Robert - elists alleged:
> Anyways, would some kind soul point me in the right direction or help me
> create a script that will traverse the proper parts of the filesystem and
> grep for files with UID and/or GID 46 please?
find / \( -uid 46 -o -gid 46 \)
Started looking what services I actually having on and found
this "jexec". Tried to google it and found some info, but do not
understand its meaninig. Is it necessary and what does it do?
Please, short explanation for "dummie" :D
Jarmo
___
CentOS mailin
>
> find / \( -uid 46 -o -gid 46 \) -print0 | xargs -0 chown clamav:clamav
Garrick,
Thank you, that is pretty slick
I haven't checked the man page for find like forever...
Didn't recall ever seeing find via uid or gid
Thanks again!
- rh
___
CentO
34 matches
Mail list logo
