> Subject: [CentOS] LIMITING NUMBER OF KERNEL VERSIONS RETAINED
>
> Hi
>
> Some time ago there was a discussion on the above subject. I have
> scanned the past few month's mailing list archives and cannot find the
> relevant mail(s).
>
> Could somebody please repost the solution or point me at t
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Some time ago there was a discussion on the above subject. I have
scanned the past few month's mailing list archives and cannot find
the relevant mail(s).
Could somebody please repost the solution or point me at the
correct resource.
What you want is:
# yum instal yum-utils
followed b
Hi
just rebooted my centos server with a zaptel TDM400 card in one of the
PCI slots
when the card is in the machine hangs at "Starting udev"
using either 2.6.18-53.1.4.e15 or 2.6.18-53.e15 kernels, has anyone come
acroos this problem before if so how did you fix it
Thanks in advance for an
Hi,
the last released autofs update for Centos 5 is version
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.1. On 2007-12-20 upstream released version
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.2.
As several other updates were released in the meantime maybe the
autofs update has been overlooked?
Best regards,
Bernd.
__
Did you try today? This can happen when updates are not synced yet (I
think). I have seen this a lot in the past with rpmforge (not for a while
now).
It's nothing wrong with your setup.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Could somebody please repost the solution or point me at the correct
resource.
I would also appreciate advice on how to do this on a RHEL4 server being
updated with up2date.
Is it safe just to delete the old kernel and initrd files from the boot
partition and the grub conf file?
Unless you
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On an ext3 filesystem, what would cause the system to claim it is out of
disk space for a program writing information to disk, when df -h shows
ample GB available and the file is being written to local disk rather
than an nfs-mounted filesystem?
Hi Scott:
I had this exac
On Sunday 13 January 2008 08:14:39 Alfred von Campe wrote:
> > Some time ago there was a discussion on the above subject. I have
> > scanned the past few month's mailing list archives and cannot find
> > the relevant mail(s).
> >
> > Could somebody please repost the solution or point me at the
> >
On 1/13/08, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you want is:
>
># yum instal yum-utils
>
> followed by:
>
># package-cleanup --oldkernels [--count=x]
>
> where x defaults to "2" (i.e., keep two older kernels).
I recently discovered that if you have both the uniprocessor and
Hello,
While doing usual search on sf.net I came across this nice little
utility Fedora Frog to mange packages from multiple repositores.Though
it is written for Fedora it can be used for CentOS as well.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fedorafrog
Joy
_
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:05:56 -0600
Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Santa Claus wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > When (some) expected rpm package for the upgrade php to version
> > 5.2.5(CentOS4) ? Who knows?
>
> ummm ... the answer is probably never.
>
> Red Hat offers a RHWAS ... that has a ph
Hi
Thanks to all who responded.
But I repeat the question:
how to upgrade CentOS4 to PHP 5.2.5 correctly?
1. download form php.net + make ... etc.
2. or go search rpms/rpm in private repositories
?
--
wbr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
Bernd Bartmann wrote:
Hi,
the last released autofs update for Centos 5 is version
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.1. On 2007-12-20 upstream released version
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.2.
As several other updates were released in the meantime maybe the
autofs update has been overlooked?
I am investiga
Bart Schaefer wrote:
On 1/13/08, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What you want is:
# yum instal yum-utils
followed by:
# package-cleanup --oldkernels [--count=x]
where x defaults to "2" (i.e., keep two older kernels).
I recently discovered that if you have both th
Karanbir Singh wrote:
the last released autofs update for Centos 5 is version
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.1. On 2007-12-20 upstream released version
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.2.
As several other updates were released in the meantime maybe the
autofs update has been overlooked?
I am investigating
On Jan 13, 2008 1:53 PM, Santa Claus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all who responded.
> But I repeat the question:
> how to upgrade CentOS4 to PHP 5.2.5 correctly?
There is no "correct" method for this, there are only "less wrong"
ways to do it.
> 1. download form php.net + make ... et
Eric B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been struggling with this problem for the last couple of hours and am
> nowhere near solving the problem. I am trying to run a tftp server in a
> chroot jail. Now perhaps I am being paranoid, but I would like to have it
> launched from within its own jail even if
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 at 8:03am, Mark Weaver wrote
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:05:56 -0600
Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ummm ... the answer is probably never.
Red Hat offers a RHWAS ... that has a php5 for EL4. The version of
php in there (and in our CentOSPlus repo) is php-5.1.6 ... i
On Jan 13, 2008 8:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I've pushed the package manually for now, as I continue to investigate
> why that one update was not pushed. Apologies for the delay in getting
> this one.
>
> Over the next couple of days, I will verify all our tracking setup
Bernd Bartmann wrote:
Thanks a lot for your hard work Karanbir! Would it be possible to get
some more information about how the update creation / pushing process
actually works, e.g. a lot of updates are released by upstream at the
same time for RHEL4 and RHEL5, but not for Centos 4 and Centos5?
Even an exteremely brief search of the archives of this list would turn up
tons of similar questions, and the same answer every time -- Red Hat
backports security fixes to the stable version of packages in their
Enterprise distro. That's why, e.g., for it's entire 5 year supported life,
RHEL5
I have a task to set this up, but don't have access to it until I finally I am
needed to do it.
If anyone is familiar with this server, do you know if the motherboard based
raid is software based (I can't find any real pointer at hp's site)? If so, I
suppose it would be better to install CentOS
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:25:36 -0500 (EST)
Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 at 8:03am, Mark Weaver wrote
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:05:56 -0600
> > Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> ummm ... the answer is probably never.
> >>
> >> Red Hat offers
Mark Weaver wrote:
those patches didn't do much for keeping one of my systems from being
breached via php. from the looks of the web server logs as well as the
messages log file that's where they got in.
I am still waiting for you to post some demonstrate-able exploit in the
distro supplied ph
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Sean Carolan wrote:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On an ext3 filesystem, what would cause the system to claim it is out of
disk space for a program writing information to disk, when df -h shows
ample GB available and the file is being written to local disk rather than
an nfs-mount
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 02:14:04PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
> those patches didn't do much for keeping one of my systems from being
> breached via php. from the looks of the web server logs as well as the
> messages log file that's where they got in.
>
> being the anul sort I am I first thought t
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:15:27 +
Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
> > those patches didn't do much for keeping one of my systems from
> > being breached via php. from the looks of the web server logs as
> > well as the messages log file that's where they got in.
>
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:25:15 -0800
Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 02:14:04PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > those patches didn't do much for keeping one of my systems from
> > being breached via php. from the looks of the web server logs as
> > well as the messa
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:20:08 +0530
"Count Of Dracula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While doing usual search on sf.net I came across this nice little
> utility Fedora Frog to mange packages from multiple repositores.Though
> it is written for Fedora it can be used for CentOS as well.
>
Mark Weaver wrote:
"The only other apps that were on the system at the time was a php web site and
forum."
---
Heh. Yep, those PHP web forums have a squeaky clean track record.
*rolling eyes*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:01:04 +0800
Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ˙ʇsod snoıʌǝɹd ǝɥʇ uı ƃuıʇsod ɯoʇʇoq ɹoɟ sǝıƃolodɐ ǝɹǝɔuıs ʎɯ ʇdǝɔɔɐ
> ǝsɐǝld ˙ʇsod ɯoʇʇoq ʇou ʇsnɯ ǝuo 'uʍop ǝpısdn ƃuıʇsod uǝɥʍ ˙ʇɥƃıɹ ǝɹɐ
> noʎ
>
what really screws with my head is that I can read this stuff ups
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:32:09 -0500 (EST)
"Marko A. Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please take your excitement somewhere else. This list is definitely
> not an appropriate venue for it.
> ___
nsoh...
__
Mark Weaver wrote:
while I understand why you'd like proof of concept for the exploit it's
not something I'd post on a public mailing list. Not to mention the
exploit was trashed when I reloaded the system. At the time it didn't
seem expedient for to save that which killed my server for posterity
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:31:28 +
Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
> > while I understand why you'd like proof of concept for the exploit
> > it's not something I'd post on a public mailing list. Not to
> > mention the exploit was trashed when I reloaded the system.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:22:20 -0500
Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> "The only other apps that were on the system at the time was a php
> web site and forum."
>
> ---
>
> Heh. Yep, those PHP web forums have a squeaky clean track record.
>
> *rolling eyes*
>
y
Mark Weaver wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:01:04 +0800
Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
˙ʇsod snoıʌǝɹd ǝɥʇ uı ƃuıʇsod ɯoʇʇoq ɹoɟ sǝıƃolodɐ ǝɹǝɔuıs ʎɯ ʇdǝɔɔɐ
ǝsɐǝld ˙ʇsod ɯoʇʇoq ʇou ʇsnɯ ǝuo 'uʍop ǝpısdn ƃuıʇsod uǝɥʍ ˙ʇɥƃıɹ ǝɹɐ
noʎ
what really screws with my head is that I can read
robert boardman wrote:
just rebooted my centos server with a zaptel TDM400 card in one of the
PCI slots
try the zaptel / asterisk lists perhaps ?
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mark Weaver wrote:
yeah... and the one that was possibly part of the problem is now gone.
I never restored it from backup after the second breach. The perps were
trying after the second reload, but since that web site wasn't restored
and running on the web server they weren't able to get in.
no
On Jan 13, 2008 9:59 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recommend rsyslog!
Well okay, now you've drawn me out!
I've been playing with rsyslog recently in the hopes of creating the
'one monitoring server to rule them all' with logging, nagios, ibm
director, etc. It seems the fedora
>> I've been struggling with this problem for the last couple of hours and
>> am
>> nowhere near solving the problem. I am trying to run a tftp server in a
>> chroot jail. Now perhaps I am being paranoid, but I would like to have
>> it
>> launched from within its own jail even if it supposedly
Hi,
I've been working at getting a tftp server up an running in a chroot jail,
and I have finally succeed getting almost everything working. The server
itself works fine, however, it is implemented as a tcpwrapper application
(ie: in.tftpd) and I am having trouble getting it to resolve DNS nam
Jim Perrin wrote:
without any of the dual licensing bits. It'll also soon have native
ssl handling for secure log transfer. It's very sexy. I second
Karanbir's recommendation to take a look at rsyslog.
am in the process of bringing that into centosplus :D
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { ht
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:59:38 +
Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Weaver wrote:
> > yeah... and the one that was possibly part of the problem is now
> > gone. I never restored it from backup after the second breach. The
> > perps were trying after the second reload, but since tha
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:19:51 -0500
"Jim Perrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008 9:59 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I recommend rsyslog!
>
> Well okay, now you've drawn me out!
>
> I've been playing with rsyslog recently in the hopes of creating the
> 'one moni
Am Sonntag, den 13.01.2008, 10:16 +0700 schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 23:21:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there a switch in "find" (or some other command besides find) that'll
> > let you find files larger than a specified size?
> >
> > My file system is 88% full and I'
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 1:53 PM, Santa Claus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to all who responded.
But I repeat the question:
how to upgrade CentOS4 to PHP 5.2.5 correctly?
There is no "correct" method for this, there are only "less wrong"
ways to do it.
1. download form php.ne
47 matches
Mail list logo
