>Christopher Thorjussen wrote:
>> I just installed CentOS 5.1 on a Dell Vostro 200 (Intel G33) which
has a
>> Sunix PCI-Express (x1) 8-port RS-232 card installed. For me it looks
>> like only 4 ports are recognized, but I'm not sure if it's even
working
>> with those 4.
>
>
>
>> How can I get the
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all - looks like I have a kernel dieing on me.
This is an AMD 6400+ with 4 GIG ram. I am using ext3 and software raid
on 500G drives. (2) of them.
I have an external 1T usb disk connected for backup.
This is running 2.6.23.9 as I wanted to use kvm-amd.
It has died on me t
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
CentOS v5.1 insists on loading about a dozen audio-related drivers at boot
time. Since this is a server machine, it will never run applications
that require sound output.
I tried setting "alias snd_cs46xx off" in modprobe.conf. Yet the system
still loads that driver and the many, many other a
On Monday 10 December 2007 00:23:27 Saurabh Sharma wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# tail -10 dmesg
> EXT3 FS on hdc9, internal journal
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> FAT: Unrecognized mount option "rw.defaults" or missing value
> FAT: Unrecognized mount option "rw.defa
On Saturday I finally upgraded a machine from CentOS 4.3 (I think)
to 4.5 via yum. Seemed to went fine. However, during the following
night /home got mounted read-only because of an EXT3-fs error. The
next night happened the same. Also, today, I saw the first-ever
kernel crash on this machine.
The
Kai:
Dec 9 04:30:35 nx10 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda3):
htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory
#1330023: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offset=10264, inode=808542775,
rec_len=13621, name_len=100
Dec 9 04:30:35 nx10 kernel: Aborting journal on device hda3.
Dec 9 04:30:35 nx10 kernel: ext
Steve Snyder schrieb:
CentOS v5.1 insists on loading about a dozen audio-related drivers at boot
time. Since this is a server machine, it will never run applications
that require sound output.
I tried setting "alias snd_cs46xx off" in modprobe.conf. Yet the system
still loads that driver an
Ftnx wrote on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:25:16 -0500:
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/man/man3/File::Temp.3pm.gz from install of
> perl-File-Temp-0.19-1.el5.rf conflicts with file from package
> perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2
I'm not sure, but I think this means that your *attempted* install of t
Hi,
configuration of PPTP for windows clients , using MPPE causes kernel crash.
It is a known bug which is in bugzilla on RedHat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248716
I was thinking that CentOS 5.1 has allready a kernel patched , but as it
seems NOT. Or am i wrong?
Thanks
David Hl
I've looked over the man page for `ssh' and `ssh_config' on several
systems and I think people have it backwards. The pages I read indicate that
`-X' is more secure than `-Y'. Under the `-X' part on several systems I have
access to says:
"For this reason, X11 forwarding is subjected
Monday 10 December 2007 04:50:04 Amos Shapira napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could follow more or
> less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
> advantage of this approach is that it allows me to setup the Xen guest
> directly on th
Alfred von Campe wrote:
Kai:
Dec 9 04:30:35 nx10 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda3):
htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory
#1330023: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offset=10264, inode=808542775,
rec_len=13621, name_len=100
Dec 9 04:30:35 nx10 kernel: Aborting journal on device hda3.
Dec 9 0
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:25:04 +0100:
> smartctl -t short /dev/hda (perform short test)
> smartctl -l selftest /dev/hda (check SMART selftest log)
Nicolas, thanks for the suggestion. The short test completed without any
error and all smart values shown with smartctl -a
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 8:59 PM
Subject: [CentOS] Re: yum freezing when removing old kernel
on 12/9/2007 4:21 PM David Evennou spake the following:
Hi Karanbir,
Thanks for the tip. Are you using an email reader
On Dec 10, 2007 7:14 AM, Steve Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS v5.1 insists on loading about a dozen audio-related drivers at boot
> time. Since this is a server machine, it will never run applications
> that require sound output.
>
> I tried setting "alias snd_cs46xx off" in modprobe.c
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:25:04 +0100:
smartctl -t short /dev/hda (perform short test)
smartctl -l selftest /dev/hda (check SMART selftest log)
Nicolas, thanks for the suggestion. The short test completed without any
error an
Benjamin Franz wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:21:35 -0800 (PST):
> That would be number of hours the drive has _already_ been running. IOW,
> it is telling you that the drive has been on for about two years.
Ah, so the opposite of what I thought? Don't confuse the value from the
selftest log with
I have a local mirror of CentOS5 base and updates. Now with 5 having
become 5.1 and in case I just want to keep on updating (at the moment) is
it enough that I update the mirror of updates or do I also need an update
of the base repo?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conact
So both "yum upgrade" and "yum update" now are complete and there's no
new packages. However, when I attempt to check my version, I'm still
showing 5.
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5 (Final)
I remember seeing 5.1 repositories being access for the upgrades. Is
it possible my system di
On Dec 10, 2007 11:11 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a local mirror of CentOS5 base and updates. Now with 5 having
> become 5.1 and in case I just want to keep on updating (at the moment) is
> it enough that I update the mirror of updates or do I also need an update
> of the b
On Dec 10, 2007 5:18 PM, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So both "yum upgrade" and "yum update" now are complete and there's no
> new packages. However, when I attempt to check my version, I'm still
> showing 5.
>
> # cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
>
> I remember see
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:37AM -0600, Scott Moseman wrote:
> So both "yum upgrade" and "yum update" now are complete and there's no
> new packages. However, when I attempt to check my version, I'm still
> showing 5.
>
> # cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
>
> I remember seei
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I have a local mirror of CentOS5 base and updates. Now with 5 having
become 5.1 and in case I just want to keep on updating (at the moment) is
it enough that I update the mirror of updates or do I also need an update
of the base repo?
Kai
I loop automount the 5.1 isos
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Monday 10 December 2007 00:23:27 Saurabh Sharma wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# tail -10 dmesg
EXT3 FS on hdc9, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
FAT: Unrecognized mount option "rw.defaults" or missing value
FAT: Unrec
On Dec 10, 2007 10:24 AM, Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So both "yum upgrade" and "yum update" now are complete and there's
> > no new packages. However, when I attempt to check my version, I'm still
> > showing 5.
> >
> > # cat /etc/redhat-release
> > CentOS release 5 (Final)
> >
On Dec 10, 2007 10:24 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > # cat /etc/redhat-release
> > CentOS release 5 (Final)
>
> Check the output of rpm -q centos-release. /etc/redhat-release
> isn't updated as in previous releases.
>
# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
Scott Moseman wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 10:24 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Check the output of rpm -q centos-release. /etc/redhat-release
isn't updated as in previous releases.
# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.
Scott Moseman wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:00:54 -0600:
> That explanation does not make any sense to me. "CentOS release 5
> (final)" means I'm current? There's not going to be any distinction
> between update versions anymore?
5.1 (final) means you *won*t go automatically to 5.2 once availabl
Hi all, we're trying to install CentOS 5.1 on a Sun Ultra 40. This is
an AMD-powered machine and we're using the x86_64 version of CentOS
5.1. The machine is using the NVidia CK804 chipset and has SATA disks.
It also has 16GB's of memory which prompted us to upgrade the BIOS on
the machine from 1
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Hi all, we're trying to install CentOS 5.1 on a Sun Ultra 40. This is
an AMD-powered machine and we're using the x86_64 version of CentOS
5.1. The machine is using the NVidia CK804 chipset and has SATA disks.
It also has 16GB's of memory which prompted us to upgrade the BI
> Try booting while disabling ACPI and APIC.
>
> linux noapic noacpi
>
> at the boot menu.
We'll give that a try.
In addition, error message output:
An error occurred trying to format VolGroup00/LogVol00. This problem is
serious, and the install cannot continue.
Press to reboot your system.
d
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Try booting while disabling ACPI and APIC.
linux noapic noacpi
at the boot menu.
We'll give that a try.
In addition, error message output:
An error occurred trying to format VolGroup00/LogVol00. This problem is
serious, and the install cannot continue.
Press to reboo
FYI, no difference with noacpi and noapic. Errors this time indicated
a different sector, but we'll try with a different SATA disk just to
eliminate that as a possibility.
Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
> Hi all, we're trying to install CentOS 5.1 on a Sun Ultra 40. This is
> an AMD-powered machine and we're using the x86_64 version of CentOS
> 5.1. The machine is using the NVidia CK804 chipset and has
> SATA disks.
> It also has 16GB's of memory which prompted us to up
on 12/10/2007 7:18 AM David Evennou spake the following:
- Original Message - From: "Scott Silva"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 8:59 PM
Subject: [CentOS] Re: yum freezing when removing old kernel
on 12/9/2007 4:21 PM David Evennou spake the following:
Hi Ka
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >
> > Hi all, we're trying to install CentOS 5.1 on a Sun Ultra
> 40. This is
> > an AMD-powered machine and we're using the x86_64 version of CentOS
> > 5.1. The machine is using the NVidia CK804 chipset and has
> > SATA disks.
> > It also
on 12/10/2007 5:06 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
Ftnx wrote on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:25:16 -0500:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man3/File::Temp.3pm.gz from install of
perl-File-Temp-0.19-1.el5.rf conflicts with file from package
perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2
I'm not sure, but I
>> bugzilla.redhat.com and provide us with the bug number there?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>
>Red Hat Bug 389021 opened on 11-17-07.
RedHat released updates for samba late last week:
samba-2.2.12-1.21as.8.2
samba-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3
samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4
samba-3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4
They fixed
> > Try "acpi=noirq" as a kernel argument. Some AMD chipsets have problems
> > letting the OS know what irq the 8250 timer is on, the nvidia one is
> > definitely a problem, I have the same chipset in a couple of Dell
> > Dimension e521 desktops :-(
>
> My explaination wasn't totally accurate. The
on 12/10/2007 8:59 AM Saurabh Sharma spake the following:
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Monday 10 December 2007 00:23:27 Saurabh Sharma wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# tail -10 dmesg
EXT3 FS on hdc9, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
FAT: Unrecognized mount o
Is there anything new on installing centos 5.1 on a 4G thumbdrive?
What about the number of writes to the flash? Is that still a problem?
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:02 PM
Subject: [CentOS] Re: yum freezing when removing old kernel
on 12/10/2007 7:18 AM David Evennou spake the following:
- Original Message - From: "Scott Silva" <[EMAIL PROTE
on 12/10/2007 12:37 PM David Evennou spake the following:
- Original Message - From: "Scott Silva"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:02 PM
Subject: [CentOS] Re: yum freezing when removing old kernel
on 12/10/2007 7:18 AM David Evennou spake the following:
Thanks, ok.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Amos Shapira wrote:
When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could follow more or
less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
advantage of this approach is that it allows me to setup the Xen guest
directly on the LVM partition without making it consider the LVM
part
David Evennou wrote:
No problem . I was looking for a reader that would work with just
"reply" and also remove the text that is automatically inserted from
previous posts. I noticed that some posts had the CentOS mailing list
removed and did not know if that was manually deleted.
many m
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:37:20 -0500
David Evennou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No problem . I was looking for a reader that would work with just
> "reply" and also remove the text that is automatically inserted from
> previous posts. I noticed that some posts had the CentOS mailing list
> re
I have a webpage feedback form that uses a Perl script to
send e-mails with "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -t". It works
just fine, but SELinux is complaining about it:
SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/postdrop (postfix_postdrop_t)
"getattr" to pipe:[41117] (httpd_t)
I'm a SELinux newb so I don't know wh
Johnny Tan wrote:
>
> Amos Shapira wrote:
> > When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could
> follow more or
> > less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
> > advantage of this approach is that it allows me to setup
> the Xen guest
> > directly on the LVM partit
Miark wrote:
I have a webpage feedback form that uses a Perl script to
send e-mails with "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -t". It works
just fine, but SELinux is complaining about it:
SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/postdrop (postfix_postdrop_t)
"getattr" to pipe:[41117] (httpd_t)
I'm a SELinux newb so
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>
> Johnny Tan wrote:
> >
> > Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could
> > follow more or
> > > less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
> > > advantage of this approach is that it allows me to setup
> >
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Johnny Tan wrote:
Amos Shapira wrote:
When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could
follow more or
less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
advantage of this approach is that it allows me to setup
the Xen guest
directly on the LVM
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:23:26 +0100:
> Dec 9 04:30:35 nx10 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda3):
> htree_dirblock_to_tree: bad entry in directory
> #1330023: rec_len % 4 != 0 - offset=10264, inode=808542775, rec_len=13621,
> name_len=100
I checked the filesystem in the evenin
Johnny Tan wrote:
>
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > Johnny Tan wrote:
> >> Amos Shapira wrote:
> >>> When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could
> >> follow more or
> >>> less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
> >>> advantage of this approach is that it allow
> Try "acpi=noirq" as a kernel argument. Some AMD chipsets have problems
> letting the OS know what irq the 8250 timer is on, the nvidia one is
> definitely a problem, I have the same chipset in a couple of Dell
> Dimension e521 desktops :-(
Alright, this didn't solve the issue either. So far:
--- Jeff Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2007 6:21 PM, Steven Vishoot
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So in general is there a way i can do multiple
> > directories in one command or am i left with doing
> > them each individual as in rsync -av server:/dir1/
> > /dir1/
> > and repe
--- Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything new on installing centos 5.1 on a
> 4G thumbdrive?
>
> What about the number of writes to the flash? Is
> that still a problem?
>
Jerry,
Have you tried one of the live Distros on USB flash?
A live, or aka "portable executable", OS
It has been suggested (elsewhere) that, to track down the nautilus problem I
reported a while back, I need to install the nautilus debuginfo rpm.
However, my yum can't find it. The only repositories I have set up on my
machine are these:
CentOS-Base.repo
CentOS-Media.repo
kbs-CentOS-Extras.repo
MHR napsal(a):
> It has been suggested (elsewhere) that, to track down the nautilus problem I
> reported a while back, I need to install the nautilus debuginfo rpm.
>
> However, my yum can't find it. The only repositories I have set up on my
> machine are these:
>
> CentOS-Base.repo
> CentOS-Med
On 11/12/2007, Johnny Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amos Shapira wrote:
> > When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could follow more or
> > less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
> > advantage of this approach is that it allows me to setup the Xen guest
> >
On 11/12/2007, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johnny Tan wrote:
> >
> > Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > When I needed to build Xen guests under Debian I could
> > follow more or
> > > less the instructions in http://preview.tinyurl.com/2oc48r and the
> > > advantage of this approach is th
On 11/12/2007, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a good link: http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Xen_DomU_Guide
Ah and forgot to say "thank you" for the link. Looks useful.
Cheers,
--Amos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
63 matches
Mail list logo
