On 02/12/2007, Dave Augustus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are in the middle of migrating to a new colo and I first heard about
> Cluster Suite with the release of 5.
>
> Our old colo used 2 different 2-node clusters using hearbeat version 1. We had
> a 2-node cluster in Active/passive for the LV
Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote:
> --- Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Robinson Tiemuqinke pisze:
> I have had my local 5.0 update repository
> (.../centos/5.0/updates/{SRPMS,i386,x86_64}/...) setup
> and used it for my 900+ boxes's daily upgrade already.
> The repository is synchroniz
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 20:35 -0800, Garrick Staples wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:55:39PM -0800, MHR alleged:
> > Any recommendations for actual genuine, non-winmodem, CHEAP modems?
>
> All external serial modems are real hardware modems.
Quite a few USB ones as well.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Ab
Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there was a message in the list at Fri 26 Oct 2007 21:13:58, that
> beagle was added to centos testing repo. But I could not find it
> there. Please could someone give me an advice. Thank's a lot!
>
> "We have added beagle-0.2.18, tomboy-0.8.1, and mono-1.2.4 to the
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Amos Shapira wrote:
On 30/11/2007, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 9:39 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can access (read/write) NTFS partitions from Linux:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/NTFSPartitions
You can also build the NTFS module that
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
Hi,
A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available in
http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm.
The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later, however, it
shows that the XFS obtained better performance and EXT3 had results that
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Olaf Mueller wrote:
>> there was a message in the list at Fri 26 Oct 2007 21:13:58, that
>> beagle was added to centos testing repo. But I could not find it
>> there. Please could someone give me an advice. Thank's a lot!
> Those have been moved to 5.1 extras ... release is
Amos Shapira wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2007, Dave Augustus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We are in the middle of migrating to a new colo and I first
> heard about
> > Cluster Suite with the release of 5.
> >
> > Our old colo used 2 different 2-node clusters using
> hearbeat version 1. We had
> > a 2-
Christopher Chan wrote:
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
Hi,
A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available in
http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm.
The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later, however, it
shows that the XFS obtained better performance a
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 22:58 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >yum install postfix switch-mail
> >switch-mail #change to postfix
> >then you could probably remove sendmail (never tried)
> >
> >Craig
>
> Am I correct in assuming the latest version of sendmail from the repo is
> 2.3.3-2? I was hopin
>That said, I don't know why one would use CentOS and then compile
>postfix from source packages and then have to assume all responsibility
>for updates.
>
>Craig
Well, mainly because CentOS is the distro I have decided to use while learning
Linux and that version of Postfix is the one I need to
I would like to switch to CENTOS Postfix from sendmail. My current
sendmail, in combination with
the very old obtuse-smtpd, allows me:
1. To control who of the internal users can send mail and
to which domain or accounts
This can be accomplished with smtpd_restrictions_classes
2.
--On Sunday, December 02, 2007 10:06 AM -0700 "Joseph L. Casale"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That said, I don't know why one would use CentOS and then compile
postfix from source packages and then have to assume all responsibility
for updates.
Craig
Well, mainly because CentOS is the distro I
Is it ok to edit the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files manually to add users and
groups or would this circumvent other required system commands from being
executed when adding them at the command line via useradd and groupadd?
In reading the docs @
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Gu
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Is it ok to edit the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files manually to add
users and groups or would this circumvent other required system
commands from being executed when adding them at the command line via
useradd and groupadd?
In reading the docs @
http://www.centos.
On Dec 2, 2007 10:52 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Is it ok to edit the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files manually to add users
> and groups or would this circumvent other required system commands from
> being executed when adding them at the command line via useradd and
>Then take the version of Postfix that's required, the Postfix SRPM from
>CentOS, and adapt the SRPM to use the later Postfix tarball. You might
>check Fedora, as it may have this already done. (An SRPM is a source
>package, so you'd be "building from source" while still using the distro
>package m
Karanbir Singh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.1
for the i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
CentOS-5.1 is based on the upstream release 5.1, and includes packages
from all variants including Server and Client. All upstream
repositories have been combined
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:05:38 +
Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> CentOS-5.1 is based on the upstream release 5.1, and includes
> packages from all variants including Server and Client. All
1. Thank you for the outstanding work. I am downloading now.
2. Is there or will there be t
On 12/1/07, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:04:29PM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> > The problems started occuring when another admin "yum remove" 'd gd
> > and gd-devel, which also removed all Nagios related stuff. I yum
> > installed Nagios, and when I went to
>edit passwd and group is enough but if you need home dir, you need to
>create it manualy, chmod and chown it
>*, mean you can not login as this user (their is no password).
Alain and John,
Thanks! The man didn't provide this last bit of info! So no password makes
since as I have not come across
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:04:36PM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> On 12/1/07, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:04:29PM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> > > The problems started occuring when another admin "yum remove" 'd gd
> > > and gd-devel, which also removed all Nag
- "Nils Toedtmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Am Donnerstag, den 29.11.2007, 15:08 -0200 schrieb Antonio da Silva
> Martins Junior:
> > - "Nils Toedtmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > But, you need windows, then you need VT on your CPU.
>
> I have. That's what i meant with "HV
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:15:16AM -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams alleged:
> On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 20:35 -0800, Garrick Staples wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:55:39PM -0800, MHR alleged:
> > > Any recommendations for actual genuine, non-winmodem, CHEAP modems?
> >
> > All external serial mod
I've never messed with video capture on a linux system, and someone point
me the right direction? I've been googling like crazy, and can't seem to
get any good pointers. I'm trying to get some kind of video capture
working and eventually get a live cam setup and security setup with motion
sensing
Paul wrote:
I've never messed with video capture on a linux system, and someone point
me the right direction? I've been googling like crazy, and can't seem to
get any good pointers. I'm trying to get some kind of video capture
working and eventually get a live cam setup and security setup with
>
> # rpm -e sendmail
>
> error: Failed dependencies:
>
> /usr/sbin/sendmail is needed by (installed)
> redhat-lsb-3.1-12.2.EL.el5.centos.i386
>
> smtpdaemon is needed by (installed) mutt-1.4.2.2-3.el5.i386
>
> smtpdaemon is needed by (installed) fetchmail-6.3.6-1.el5.i386
>
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 07:59 +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>
>
> # rpm -e sendmail
>
> error: Failed dependencies:
>
> /usr/sbin/sendmail is needed by (installed)
> redhat-lsb-3.1-12.2.EL.el5.centos.i386
>
>
>>
>> pls try
>>
>> rpm -e sendmail --nodeps
>>
>sounds like an easy way to kill a perfectly good running server
>
>Craig
Lol, boy oh boy, am I in for long journey ;)
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
pls try
rpm -e sendmail --nodeps
sounds like an easy way to kill a perfectly good running server
Craig
Lol, boy oh boy, am I in for long journey ;)
What is it you are trying to accomplish?
--nodeps is almost always the WRONG answer.
Rega
>What is it you are trying to accomplish?
>
>--nodeps is almost always the WRONG answer.
Well, just starting my adventure in learning Linux. My immediate need is a spam
gateway, and all the how-to's I find are for distributions I either don't want
to use or are very old, not to mention just copy
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 20:33 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >What is it you are trying to accomplish?
> >
> >--nodeps is almost always the WRONG answer.
>
> Well, just starting my adventure in learning Linux. My immediate need is a
> spam gateway, and all the how-to's I find are for distribution
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is it you are trying to accomplish?
--nodeps is almost always the WRONG answer.
Well, just starting my adventure in learning Linux. My immediate need is a spam
gateway, and all the how-to's I find are for distributions I either don't want
to use or are very
>Good luck!
Thanks guys! I'll be back soon :)
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello,
On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we have the option of
installing either x86_64 or the i386 distribution. I would like to
know your experiences with the x86_64 port. How does it compare with
the i386 distribution in terms of stability, reliability and
performance ? How signi
- Original Message -
From: "Manish Kathuria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2007 2:49:32 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: [CentOS] x86_64 versus i386
Hello,
On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we have the option of
install
On 12/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Manish Kathuria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello,
>
> On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we have the option of
> installing either x86_64 or the i386 distribution. I would like to
> know
Manish Kathuria wrote:
Hello,
On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we have the option of
installing either x86_64 or the i386 distribution. I would like to
know your experiences with the x86_64 port. How does it compare with
the i386 distribution in terms of stability, reliability an
On a relatively new Nagios 2.x / CentOS 4.x server (only like a week
old), I am experiencing gd(-devel/-progs) problems and am wondering if
I should just scrape and rebuild. Here is my situation:
I installed LAMP+Nagios+NagiosQL and was going to install PerfParse so
that I could have trending info
On 12/2/07, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than look at config.log? Have fun with that.
I looked at the config.log and didn't really know what I was looking
at since I'm fairly new to autotool-related errors. Since this has to
be in production fairly soon, I'm thinking of cut
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
Hi,
A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available in
http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm.
The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later, however, it
shows that the XFS
Hi all,
Am setting up a internet cyber cafe of roughly 50 or
so boxes running on CentOS 5.0.
Now the question is. Does someone on the list know of
a open source cyber timer/cybermanager which runs on
CentOS(LINUX) and where i can download it? All that am
getting are M$ based.(grrrh).
Thanks.
---
On 02/12/2007, Saurabh Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I worked with it,
> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/NTFSPartitions much
> before i posted this mail,but all in vain.The system shows messages about
> the failure of loading the partition file system at the boot time.
What does googl'
Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote:
> On 03/12/2007, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the first release where we are also publishing a special
>>> netinstall iso that can be used to start a remote install. Its
>>> included in the is
On 03/12/2007, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/12/2007, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the first release where we are also publishing a special
> > > netinstall iso that can be used to start a
Rogelio wrote:
> On a relatively new Nagios 2.x / CentOS 4.x server (only like a week
> old), I am experiencing gd(-devel/-progs) problems and am wondering if
> I should just scrape and rebuild. Here is my situation:
>
> I installed LAMP+Nagios+NagiosQL and was going to install PerfParse so
> that
On 03/12/2007, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > This is the first release where we are also publishing a special
> > netinstall iso that can be used to start a remote install. Its
> > included in the isos/ directory. This iso is in addition to the
> >
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 10:20:56PM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> On 12/2/07, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rather than look at config.log? Have fun with that.
>
> I looked at the config.log and didn't really know what I was looking
> at since I'm fairly new to autotool-related errors
49 matches
Mail list logo
