Miark wrote:
I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that
be happening?
that GRC port scanner is not something I'd rely on. use a shell
account somewhere,
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 05:24 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 04:39 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:04 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > > find . -type f -exec chmod 123 {} +
> >
> > Easier to type and more natural (for me). But less efficien
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:46 +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:04 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > > Shad L. Lords wrote:
> > > > find . -type type -print0 | xargs -0 chmod value
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:57:38 +0800, Christopher wrote:
> Miark wrote:
> > I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
> > reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
> > firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that
> > be happening?
>
> Do your firewall
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:47:08 -0800, John wrote:
> Miark wrote:
> > I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
> > reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
> > firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that
> > be happening?
> >
>
>
> that GRC port
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 09:15 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Tueday, 20 November 2007, "Ross S. W. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm an old retired
> Assembly Language programmer (started with IBM 360/65) and I never
> worked with Unix, so this is a brand new world for me and one that
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 13:26 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have a 100G disk on an old redhat 7.3 system.
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda1 9.6G 2.4G 6.7G 27% /
> /dev/hda3 99G 6.1G 88G 7% /home
> hda2 is 2G swap
>
> I am trying t
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 13:26 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
OOPS! Source is RH 7.3 100GB. Still, some of the thoughts I mentioned
could still be useful.
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I will probably have to migrate a few servers running Red Hat 9 to
CentOS and I'd like to have opinions. One server to migrate is running
Fedora core 4.
Anyone has experience with that? I'm not too scared about sendmail,
Bind, apache/PHP (except that maybe th
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 09:51 -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will probably have to migrate a few servers running Red Hat 9 to
> > CentOS and I'd like to have opinions. One server to migrate is running
> > Fedora core 4.
> >
> > Anyone has experience wi
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will probably have to migrate a few servers running Red Hat 9 to
>> CentOS and I'd like to have opinions. One server to migrate is running
>> Fedora core 4.
>>
>> Anyone has experience with that? I'm not too scared about sendmail,
>> Bind, apache/PHP (ex
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 02:48 -0500, Miark wrote:
> I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
> reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
> firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that
> be happening?
The cups service opens port 631, regardless of your
Leonel Nunez wrote:
Just like any other migration do you tests in other machines and do
parallel tests
every migration needs fixes
Leonel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I can second this
I'm trying to wget some very specific files off a web page, but some of the
paths are relative paths (e.g. ../path/to/file) rather than abosolute
(e.g. http://direct/path/to/file
). Obviously, when wget gets to that part, it craps out...
Is there a switch in wget (in CentOS 5 - latest wget package)
Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 09:51 -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
questions were far to general to get specific responses
That is what I thought.
There is no supported upgrade path for either RHL 9 or Fedora 4 to
CentOS but you certainly can use anaconda to do that by appe
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Leonel Nunez wrote:
I can second this. I am in the process of migrating 5 research labs
from Suse 10.0 to CentOS 5 (for various reasons). The migration has
been in testing phase for over 3 months and a lot of bugs have been
found and corrected
James A. Peltier wrote:
Leonel Nunez wrote:
I can second this. I am in the process of migrating 5 research labs
from Suse 10.0 to CentOS 5 (for various reasons). The migration has
been in testing phase for over 3 months and a lot of bugs have been
found and corrected in that time.
A migra
Happy gobble gobble day!
Server is a mail and web box with latest centos 4 upgrades and has been
running and stable for probably over two years
Machine has perl 5.8.8 on it.
For a coupla days I have been trying to follow these basic instructions so
that I can run a test.
http://wiki.apache.org/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rogelio
Sent: November 22, 2007 12:08 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] wget'ing files relative paths?
I'm trying to wget some ve
I'm trying to install the driver for an HP Colour Laserjet 3500 in
CentOS 5. I've installed the kde.repo (with appropriate priorities set
up), but when I try yum install pxljr-1.1-1.i386.rpm, I get the above
message that 'the package is not signed'. I've previously tried running
yum localinstall on
On Thursday 22 November 2007 21:13:00 Miark wrote:
> > Do your firewall rules DROP or REJECT?
>
> I assume drop, but I don't know for certain. I'm just using
> system-config-securitylevel to configure it.
We can see all the rules with:
iptables -nL
HTH
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #32784
On 11/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"I am a little unsure on what you are trying to do...are you mirroring a
certain section of a website, and the relative paths are causing problems?
that would be pretty strange, because I am pretty sure that i have done that
before and not
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 02:48 -0500, Miark wrote:
I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that
be happening?
The cups service opens po
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 10:17 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 02:48 -0500, Miark wrote:
> >> I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is
> >> reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the
> >> firewall isn't configured
24 matches
Mail list logo
