[CentOS] [T-dose-announce] Screenshots of your fav opensource software or desktop ( high resolution - 1002-768 ) for slide show on t-dose (fwd)

Hi CentOS users, The centos-promo team is looking for your help. Is anyone interested in creating nice CentOS screenshots ? We can have them on the wiki as well for future articles or presentations. A good screenshot should: + Be clear on what it is showing - applications like eg. inksca

[CentOS] Postgres Config File (eg: PGDATA)

Hi guys, need some clarification on whether there is a config file sourced by the init script to determine where PGDATA is located. Right now, it seems like it's not sourced from anywhere by located on the init file itself. Appreciate if you guys can let me know if this is the correct place for

Re: [CentOS] Postgres Config File (eg: PGDATA)

On Tue, September 25, 2007 3:34 am, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > Hi guys, > > need some clarification on whether there is a config file sourced by the > init script to determine where PGDATA is located. > > Right now, it seems like it's not sourced from anywhere by located on > the init file itself. > > Ap

Re: [CentOS] Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Ken Sedlacek wrote: > Running Centos5 server software. > > Running ALL software except virtualization and server cluster. > > Patched this server software via yum updates as of 9.24.2007 > > Downloaded the webcam software for FC7 from: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buil

Re: [CentOS] Re: Central file server advice please

On Monday 24 September 2007 12:33:39 William Warren wrote: > I mistyped..hardware raid is the way to go. FRIAD will perform worse > than Linux software raid most times..:) > > Feizhou wrote: > > William Warren wrote: > >> actually it'll perform WORSE in many cases than Linux software raid. > > > >

Re: [CentOS] vmware 1.0.4 lock up on install

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:29:52PM -0400, Von Landfried wrote: > > > > > Thanks again for the links, these will be useful. > Hi, I am currently uploading the latest versions. I had to delete the former o

[CentOS] mail server

Hi All, what can you recommend for mail server. I'll be needing mail server with tls,ssl and virtual domains with web ui management, im doing this for a client of mine. Thanks! -- Regards, Mark Quitoriano, CCNA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] Formatting a large disk

On Monday 24 September 2007, Rajeev R Veedu wrote: ... > I got a Gparted live CD and tried to create a partition for 3tb but still > the maximum size of partition I could create is 0.75gb. Just using parted or gparted is not enough, you need to use a gpt, not a traditional "dos"-style, partition

Re: [CentOS] mail server

what can you recommend for mail server. I'll be needing mail server with tls,ssl and virtual domains with web ui management, im doing this for a client of mine. Hi Mark, I would recommed you postfix as MTA and dovecot for POP3 and IMAP. The web ui management software depends on what features

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.5 system doesn't boot after installing latest updates

Out of interest, is this something that is always required when upgrading Grub? i.e. should one always manually run "grub-install" /dev/XXX" after doing so? No, it shouldn't. But in my case, I didn't "upgrade grub". I simply did a "yum update" which installed, among other things, a new

Re: [CentOS] mail server

what can you recommend for mail server. I'll be needing mail server with tls,ssl and virtual domains with web ui management, im doing this for a client of mine. i have been using this for about 3 years now http://www.techie.org/TNMailServer/TNMailServer.php its great and has a gui front

[CentOS] Samba and TCPWrappers

Good Morning, I have a Centos 4.5 (x86_64) server running samba to share data with windows users. We've been going through a security audit and the following log entries were noted: [2007/09/24 09:37:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_alias_user_groups(206) get_alias_user_groups: gid of user

Re: [CentOS] NFS issue

> Good answer but I can't agree on the NIS part.. NIS is plain text over the > network and is deprecated for a long time. Sun is talking about dropping > support, HP the same and even in the Linux camp there is some talk about > taking NIS support out of the standard distributions. > Add to that th

Re: [CentOS] Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?

On 9/25/07, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Look at: > > http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities > http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/RPMForge > > If you have enabled the RPMforge repository, you can simply run: > > yum install perl-Device-SerialPor

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 31, Issue 10

m qt-PostgreSQL-3.3.3-13.RHEL4.i386.rpm src: qt-3.3.3-13.RHEL4.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/c

Re: [CentOS] mail server

On 9/25/07, Mark Quitoriano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > what can you recommend for mail server. I'll be needing mail server with > tls,ssl and virtual domains with web ui management, im doing this for a > client of mine. You should take a look at http://www.kolab.org If you install

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

Do you have multiple disk ? Can you search on all your disk for grub's files ? On 9/25/07, mark pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > > the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was > written into /boot/grub except splash.xbm.gz > > there were no stage* files, nor a

Re: [CentOS] mail server

what can you recommend for mail server. I'll be needing mail server with tls,ssl and virtual domains with web ui management, im doing this for a client of mine. I have been using Qmail. http://www.qmailrocks.org/ This site has everything you will need.

Re: [CentOS] DNAT PREROUTING issue with iptables

Without all the rules, it's not easy to reply. Your NAT rules looks fine but some filter are missing (I thing). FW1 should also accept to FORWARD port 25 If you use rules including --state NEW, you must have other rules like iptables -t filter -A INPUT/FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATE

Re: [CentOS] Zimbra vs. Scalix vs. et. al.

On 9/1/07, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I stumbled onto zimbra > > I have a Scallix system built, but still have some rough edges to try to > smooth. Like the way it works with sendmail, no dnsbl's will work as > sendmail sees all mail as coming from locohost (scalix). Still b

Re: [CentOS] parted - is there a problem

On 9/25/07, Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everyone, > > I recently added a 300gig Seagate sata drive on a Centos 5.0 and have a > couple of questions. > > The drive was recognized with the device as /dev/sdc. The system came > with some SCCI drives that are labeled as /dev/sda and

Re: [CentOS] mail server

On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:16 AM, CentOS List wrote: what can you recommend for mail server. I'll be needing mail server with tls,ssl and virtual domains with web ui management, im doing this for a client of mine. I have been using Qmail. http://www.qmailrocks.org/ This site has everything

RE: [CentOS] NFS issue

Peter Arremann wrote: > > On Monday 24 September 2007, Steven Haigh wrote: > > Quoting Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > NFS uses the user ID of the user (UID) for permissions. You > will need > > to have the correct permissions on each system, and the correct > > username associated with the same UID

RE: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

At 13:35 -0400 24/9/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Ok, so here is the command I would use: Thanks - here are the results (tried CentOS 4.5 and RHEL5, with tests on sdb when configured as both RAID 0 and as RAID 1): Sequential reads: disktest -B 4k -h 1 -I BD -K 4 -p l -P T -T 300 -r /dev/sdX

Re: [CentOS] NFS issue

Thanks for all the suggestions! As this is for a simple home rollout ldap and NIS are a little over the top. If it were a big picture item I would definitely choose ldap. I found in order for this to work I had to cp the /etc/passwd and /etc/group to the local machine that is connecting to the

Re: [CentOS] Zimbra vs. Scalix vs. et. al.

Hi John, On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 16:27 -0400, John Hinton wrote: > Well, I stumbled onto zimbra I tried the demo a long time ago when it was first launched. Quite impressive although it was painfully slow. > I have a Scallix system built, but still have some rough edges to try to > smooth. Li

Re: [CentOS] vmware 1.0.4 lock up on install

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:05:09AM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently uploading the latest versions. done Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpVV8mBNXywG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [CentOS] vmware 1.0.4 lock up on install

On 9/25/07, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:05:09AM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am currently uploading the latest versions. > done > > Tru Thanks, Tru, for all the hard work. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Re: Central file server advice please

John Bowden wrote: What can I use to benchmark the different raid set ups. I could do an all software raid trial and then an all hardware raid set up, (fresh install each time) and find out which is the best for my set up. Bear in mind I still think of myself as a Linux newbie (and a CentOS vir

RE: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: > > At 13:35 -0400 24/9/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > >Ok, so here is the command I would use: > > Thanks - here are the results (tried CentOS 4.5 and RHEL5, with tests > on sdb when configured as both RAID 0 and as RAID 1): > > >Sequential reads: > >disktest -B 4k -h 1 -I

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.5 system doesn't boot after installing latest updates

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:08 +0930, Michael Kratz wrote: > On 25/09/2007, at 6:41 AM, Scott Silva wrote: > > > Alfred von Campe spake the following on 9/24/2007 1:59 PM: > >>> Today I decided to install all the latest updates (including the > >>> -06 kernel). The "yum update" seems to have run j

[CentOS] Re: Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?

umair shakil wrote: Well, i havenot faced such kind of issues. Its about months i am running applications and their performance also seems to be good enough. cpan isnt going to satisfy rpm depends, so isnt really going to help at all. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:13 +0200, Alain Spineux wrote: > Do you have multiple disk ? > Can you search on all your disk for grub's files ? > > On 9/25/07, mark pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hello, > > > > the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was > > written int

Re: [CentOS] NFS issue

Peter Arremann wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007, Steven Haigh wrote: Quoting Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: NFS uses the user ID of the user (UID) for permissions. You will need to have the correct permissions on each system, and the correct username associated with the same UID on each machine.

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

mark pryor wrote: hello, the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was written into /boot/grub except splash.xbm.gz there were no stage* files, nor a menu.lst I know how to fix that. Would I have better luck using a partition mounted as /boot? Anyone succeded with Gr

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

On 9/25/07, Phil Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have installed C5 with/without a /boot partition, but having a /boot > seems to be the safer bet. If / is LVM a /boot is required as GRUB > doesn't seem to be able to deal with LVM My one experience with installing CentOS 5 with / on a USB d

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.5 system doesn't boot after installing latest updates

Phil Schaffner wrote: I have seen this behavior before when the BIOS device order does not match what is seen by the running system. Seems that in such cases, running GRUB from the boot media also sees different device/controller ordering than the running system and can lead to GRUB being conf

RE: [CentOS] mail server

> > I have been using Qmail. http://www.qmailrocks.org/ This site has > everything > you will need. > Maybe a little too general and/or enthusiastic ;-> Qmailrocks has not been maintained for about 1 to 2 years If you use qmailrocks.org, you must also consult http://qmail.jms1.net and severa

Re: [CentOS] Re: Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?

On 9/25/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > umair shakil wrote: > > Well, i havenot faced such kind of issues. Its about months i am running > > applications > > and their performance also seems to be good enough. > > cpan isnt going to satisfy rpm depends, so isnt really going to help

RE: [CentOS] NFS issue

James A. Peltier wrote: > > Peter Arremann wrote: > > On Monday 24 September 2007, Steven Haigh wrote: > > > >> Quoting Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> NFS uses the user ID of the user (UID) for permissions. > You will need > >> to have the correct permissions on each system, and the correct > >

Re: [CentOS] Re: Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?

--- Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/25/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > umair shakil wrote: > > > Well, i havenot faced such kind of issues. Its > about months i am running > > > applications > > > and their performance also seems to be good > enough. > > > > cpan

Re: [CentOS] Re: Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?

On 9/25/07, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/25/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > umair shakil wrote: > > > Well, i havenot faced such kind of issues. Its about months i am running > > > applications > > > and their performance also seems to be good enough. > > > > cpan

[CentOS] Re: parted - is there a problem

on 9/24/2007 3:42 PM Gregory P. Ennis spake the following: Everyone, I recently added a 300gig Seagate sata drive on a Centos 5.0 and have a couple of questions. The drive was recognized with the device as /dev/sdc. The system came with some SCCI drives that are labeled as /dev/sda and /dev/sd

[CentOS] Re: Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?

on 9/25/2007 8:56 AM Jim Perrin spake the following: On 9/25/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: umair shakil wrote: Well, i havenot faced such kind of issues. Its about months i am running applications and their performance also seems to be good enough. cpan isnt going to satisfy rp

[CentOS] Re: /boot partition or not on C5

on 9/24/2007 10:29 PM mark pryor spake the following: hello, the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was written into /boot/grub except splash.xbm.gz there were no stage* files, nor a menu.lst I know how to fix that. Would I have better luck using a partition mount

[CentOS] Re: Samba and TCPWrappers

on 9/25/2007 4:23 AM Bob Chiodini spake the following: Good Morning, I have a Centos 4.5 (x86_64) server running samba to share data with windows users. We've been going through a security audit and the following log entries were noted: [2007/09/24 09:37:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_ali

[CentOS] mdadm problem.

So I'm trying to RAID-1 this system which has two identical disks installed in it, and it isn't working for some reason. I started by doing a CentOS-4 install on /dev/sda1 as root, and with /dev/sda2 as my swap. I finish the install, yum update, and then I want to make the mirrors. I copy the pa

[CentOS] Re: mdadm problem.

on 9/25/2007 9:44 AM David Mackintosh spake the following: So I'm trying to RAID-1 this system which has two identical disks installed in it, and it isn't working for some reason. I started by doing a CentOS-4 install on /dev/sda1 as root, and with /dev/sda2 as my swap. I finish the install, yu

RE: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

At 10:36 -0400 25/9/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Post the modinfo to the list just in case somebody else knows of any issues with the version you are running. This is from RHEL5 - it's the driver that comes built-in: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# modinfo 3w-9xxx filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-8.

Re: [CentOS] Re: mdadm problem.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:56:34AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > The partitions need to be type fd (raid autodetect) to work properly on > boot. It is much easier to set this up in the initial install. /me slaps head That's even in my notes, but I skipped it because I thought "I don't have to me

RE: [CentOS] 3Ware 9550SX and latency/system responsiveness

Simon Banton wrote: > > At 10:36 -0400 25/9/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > >Post the modinfo to the list just in case somebody > >else knows of any issues with the version you are running. > > This is from RHEL5 - it's the driver that comes built-in: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# modinfo 3w-9xxx >

[CentOS] Thermal/Heat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list Can you please say me what this output exactly mean? Anything in relation to fans/cooling? What does "active" and "ok" mean? Which values are healthy? # acpi -tBSc Thermal 1: active[3], 50.0 degrees C Thermal 2: ok, 47.0 degrees C

Re: [CentOS] mdadm problem.

On 9/25/07, David Mackintosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I copy the contents of / over to the one-armed mirror: > > # cd / > # mnt /dev/md1 /mnt/md1 > # tar cfpl - . | ( cd /mnt/md1 ; tar xfp -) ??? you made a copy of /mnt/md1 into /mnt/md1/mnt/md1 ??? use # tar cfpl - --one-file-system . | ..

[CentOS] Re: mdadm problem.

on 9/25/2007 10:25 AM David Mackintosh spake the following: On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:56:34AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote: The partitions need to be type fd (raid autodetect) to work properly on boot. It is much easier to set this up in the initial install. /me slaps head That's even in my no

[CentOS] Network routing

Hi, guys! We need to setup our both network device on centos-4.5 as follow: eth0: IP: 192.168.1.0/24 GW 192.168.1.1 eth1: IP: 192.168.10.0/24 GW 192.168.10.1 We don't know how to create our setup files for both network (eth0, eth1 and their routes)? Help us, please. Thx Adriano _

Re: [CentOS] Network routing

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 15:37 -0300, Hapia IN wrote: > Hi, guys! > > We need to setup our both network device on centos-4.5 as follow: > > eth0: IP: 192.168.1.0/24 GW 192.168.1.1 > > eth1: IP: 192.168.10.0/24 GW 192.168.10.1 > > We don't know how to create our setup files for both network (eth0,

Re: [CentOS] Network routing

First, some light reading: http://lartc.org/howto/ Secondly, take a look at how RedHat/CentOS uses network startup scripts: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/en-US/Reference_Guide/pt-network-services-reference.html Thirdly, READ THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT. Seriously. Not ki

[CentOS] MP3 plugin for XMMS media player - CentOS 4.4

Where can I find the best XMMS player plugin for MP3 files please, compatible with CentOS 4.4? Thanks, Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] MP3 plugin for XMMS media player - CentOS 4.4

--- Andrew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where can I find the best XMMS player plugin for MP3 > files please, > compatible with CentOS 4.4? > > Thanks, > Andy > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list

[CentOS] XMMS on CentOS 5

I would like to know why CentOS doesn't have xmms. -- "Nuestra recompensa se encuentra en el esfuerzo y no en el resultado. Un esfuerzo total es una victoria completa". Mahatma Gandhi (@ @) |--o00o-(_)-o00o--| |Manuel Enrique

Re: [CentOS] MP3 plugin for XMMS media player - CentOS 4.4

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:57 -0700, Barry Schiffman wrote: > eers.com/r Thanks Barry, I've downloaded and installed mpg123 etc i386.rpm for rhel 4 (CentOS 4.4), but still can't play MP3 files - any idea what I have to do next to get it working? Thanks, Andy ___

Re: [CentOS] XMMS on CentOS 5

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:43:04PM -0400, Manuel E. Chavez Manzano wrote: > I would like to know why CentOS doesn't have xmms. Because RHEL doesn't. -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Boston University Linux -->

[CentOS] CentOS-5 Hardware Probe

I installed CentOS-5 on a test machine, a P4 1.8 Ghz Compaq Evo D510 series. This was a clean install onto a new disk drive and everything went well. After updating with YUM and installing Postgresql, Rails for Ruby, Firefox-2 and Thunderbird I shutdown and restarted the system several times with

Re: [CentOS] MP3 plugin for XMMS media player - CentOS 4.4

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:44:37 +0100 Andrew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:57 -0700, Barry Schiffman wrote: > > eers.com/r > > Thanks Barry, > I've downloaded and installed mpg123 etc i386.rpm for rhel 4 > (CentOS 4.4), but still can't play

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.5 system doesn't boot after installing latest updates

Anyways, my suggestion is to check all the drives in your system for said files as mentioned. If they are there, but not where grub is looking for you may have to make changes. My system started its life with one drive and CentOS 4.3, and has been "yum updated" and is now at CentOS 4.5. I

Re: [CentOS] Re: parted - is there a problem

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 09:12 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > on 9/24/2007 3:42 PM Gregory P. Ennis spake the following: > > Everyone, > > > > I recently added a 300gig Seagate sata drive on a Centos 5.0 and have a > > couple of questions. > > > > The drive was recognized with the device as /dev/sdc.

Re: [CentOS] parted - is there a problem

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 15:02 +0200, Alain Spineux wrote: > On 9/25/07, Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Everyone, > > > > I recently added a 300gig Seagate sata drive on a Centos 5.0 and have a > > couple of questions. > > > > The drive was recognized with the device as /dev/sdc. The

[CentOS] Why glibc-profile doesn't show up in Centos 5 ???

Hi, Anyone know what are the reasons behind that glibc-profile packages doesn't come with Centos 5 distribution which has version 2.5 glibc? Some colleagues around have been asking for the glibc profiling functions to be available continuously... I could change the glibc source RPM/spec file t

[CentOS] hosting panel

Hi there, what's your favorite (OS) hosting panel for centos5 ? What's most interesting for me is the usability by others i.e. users who don't know the tool very much, so it has to be very simple. Second is of course security. Greetings & TIA Michael -- Michael Kress, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/

Re: [CentOS] hosting panel

virtualmin pro Michael Kress wrote: Hi there, what's your favorite (OS) hosting panel for centos5 ? What's most interesting for me is the usability by others i.e. users who don't know the tool very much, so it has to be very simple. Second is of course security. Greetings & TIA Michael --

Re: [CentOS] hosting panel

William Warren wrote: virtualmin pro Michael Kress wrote: Hi there, what's your favorite (OS) hosting panel for centos5 ? What's most interesting for me is the usability by others i.e. users who don't know the tool very much, so it has to be very simple. Second is of course security. Greeti

Re: [CentOS] hosting panel

What those types of users need is either a simple curses driven menu (if you want to be elaborate and give them graphics that is) or maybe lynx set to start up at a local html page and all the href's are file:// with lynx set to autorun file:// if you're dealing with users logging in with X the

Re: [CentOS] hosting panel

Important note: I'm talking about users logging in via SSH to get to these menus and not via an external webpage. Geoff Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:55:00 To:"CentOS mailing list" Subject: Re: [CentO

Re: [CentOS] Why glibc-profile doesn't show up in Centos 5 ???

On 9/25/07, Robinson Tiemuqinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone know what are the reasons behind that > glibc-profile packages doesn't come with Centos 5 > distribution which has version 2.5 glibc? Some > colleagues around have been asking for the glibc > profiling functions to be avai

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Plus PHP5 upgrade.

On 9/24/07, David Mackintosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:25:21PM -0400, David Mackintosh wrote: > > I have some users who have a 64-bit CentOS 4.x install (current), > > which was installed with @Everything and then some annoying packages > > strategically removed (mrtg,

Re: [CentOS] hosting panel

> what's your favorite (OS) hosting panel for centos5 ? > What's most interesting for me is the usability by others i.e. users who > don't know the tool very much, so it has to be very simple. Second is of > course security. > Greetings & TIA Michael Directadmin.com Matt _

Re: [CentOS] XMMS on CentOS 5

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 16:52 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:43:04PM -0400, Manuel E. Chavez Manzano wrote: > > I would like to know why CentOS doesn't have xmms. > > Because RHEL doesn't. > Because it uses the GTK 1.x for it's toolkit and it's not really maintained anym

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Plus PHP5 upgrade.

I hate to say this, but when it comes to apache and php I find building them from the source on apache.org and php.net to be a lot less painful because of the dependency problems that seem to plague php. The final straw was when Nessus said one of them was vulnerable and no updates were on the

[CentOS] General question about PHP

Hello, Is that possible to disable running of PHP on certain directories? I am running a server which provides personal homepage service. However, not every user are familiar with security, some may upload some PHP scripts with bugs/holes. I do not want them to be executed on the server. I can ena

Re: [CentOS] General question about PHP

This is just an off the cuff guess, but you can associate the .php file extension so that it's treated like .htm in those select directories. You would have to do this in your httpd.conf and on a specific per directory basis or, if you're using virtual hosts, you can put the assignment in the c

Re: [CentOS] XMMS on CentOS 5

Paul kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 26. syyskuuta 2007 05:35): > Fedora does not have it anymore in core ... it got shoved off to extras. > Other distros have dropped it also as it's gotten so out of date with > requirements for old libs. > > I XMMS was a favorite of mine as I wa

Re: [CentOS] Network routing

Salam!!! Dear the information you are giving is not enough. describe what do u want >From my understanding u have two LAN Cards with two different Subnets... Now what do u want plz explain Regards, Umair Shakil ETD On 9/25/07, Hapia IN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, guys! > > W

RE: [CentOS] General question about PHP

> Hello, > > Is that possible to disable running of PHP on certain directories? > I am running a server which provides personal homepage > service. However, not every user are familiar with security, > some may upload some PHP scripts with bugs/holes. I do not > want them to be executed on th

Re: [CentOS] XMMS on CentOS 5

Dear, Why not u go for xmms source package means tar.gz. i have installed and used xmms once when i used Redhat 9 as desktop. I am suggesting u people to uses UBUNTO (www.ubunto.com) as your desktop. Its apt-get repository is almost have everything Regards, Umair Shakil ETD On 9/26/07,

Re: [CentOS] XMMS on CentOS 5

thanks for the advise but no, I use centos since ever, since I star using linux, I had tried ubuntu and i don really like it. and I have xmms from rpmforge repos I just want to know why it is not in CentOS 5 thanks anyway for all El mié, 26-09-2007 a las 10:31 +0500, umair shakil escribió: > Dea

Re: [CentOS] XMMS on CentOS 5

On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:31 +0500, umair shakil wrote: > I am suggesting u people to uses UBUNTO (www.ubunto.com) as your > desktop. Its apt-get > repository is almost have everything Except ISV support, of course. You know, just in case running business apps actually *matters*... -- Ignacio