Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

--On Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:40 PM -0700 Timothy Selivanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a way. Make a custom RPM, or even an advanced script (ala gentoo ebuild system). That isn't the problem, it's the name space. There is no guarantee that what ever you choose it going to be uniq

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Repo priorities and includes But wouldn't it be easier if the packages had different names so you could just install the one(s) you want from the command line? Try your own custom postfix with a different name and see what breaks. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] virtual hdd problems when CentOS is guest OS

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Rogelio Bastardo wrote: Interestingly, I can create virtual Debian boxes ok, but I can't create virtual CentOS boxes. What might I be missing? As soon as I boot to the iso, it says something about not being able to find the drive. (I didn't have this problem with CentOS whe

Re: [CentOS] yum-updatesd.conf on centos 5

> > On this URL: http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories it says: > > > Note: You should seriously consider using the Priorities (or > > ProtectBase) yum plugin if you are going to use a 3rd Party > > Repository. (The Priorities and ProtectBase plugins both prevent 3rd > > party repos replacing base pa

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Petr "Qaxi" Klíma wrote: Diversity adds a lot of value. If EPEL will be only repo nobody on RHEL workstation can see/listen MP3, WMA, DVD playing, because of interesting US software patent and millenium act law. That's not what I meant. Obviously we need additional packages in other reposi

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

(this is example, has no reflection to current state ...) EPEL provides xmms-1.2.10-1.i586.rpm- but without MP3, WMA, AAC ... DAG provides xmms-1.2.9-1.rf.i586.rpm - with all those beasts ATRPM provides xmms-1.2.10-1.at.i586.rpm - with all those beasts Which you installs? Who knows, p

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Kenneth Porter napsal(a): --On Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:40 PM -0700 Timothy Selivanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a way. Make a custom RPM, or even an advanced script (ala gentoo ebuild system). That isn't the problem, it's the name space. There is no guarantee that what ever you

[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > You'll have to remind me why anyone wants different same-named packages > with differences the end user doesn't understand and can't control to > exist at all before I can comment on a solution about managing them. Let's assume no o

[CentOS] usb 1-2: device not accepting address 2, error -71 - CENTOS 5

Hi all, I installed CentOS 5 on DELL machine. Then, When the system comes up, I always get below erros. Could you pls help me to solve this out before I setup this box for productiuon use ? these are errors. usb 1-2: device not accepting address 2, error -71 ata2: port failed to respond (30 se

Re: [CentOS] xorg version

On 8/2/07, beast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A quick question. how do i know the version of xorg server? rpm -qa | grep > xorg-x11-server gives 1.1.x which is not correct. If X is not running look thru the last X log file in /var/log. The version should be near the beginning of the file. Else xdpy

[CentOS] Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one LAN behing firewall

Hi, We have a 256 kbits/s (kilobits per second) link to the internet. it is a router running Linux that belongs to our ISP. They have given us 8 internet ips. (i.e- subnet is 255.255.255.248). one has been given to this router. I have given another internet ip to the firewall running CentOS 4.5.

[CentOS] kmod-xfs disappear!

hi, it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositories. what happens? why did you do so? is there any announcement about it? thanks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" ___

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs disappear!

On 8/2/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non > centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositories. > what happens? why did you do so? is there any announcement about it? > thanks. They (non centosplus

Re: [CentOS] Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one LAN behing firewall

Is it possible to acheive this task on firewall running iptables and iproute2 (CentOS 4.5) ? If so, How can I do such thing? If I do such thing, what will happen to the people behind LAN1 ? Will they get whole 256 kbits/s as before or will they get 256 kbit/s - 64 kbit/s for their internet

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs disappear!

Akemi Yagi wrote: > On 8/2/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> hi, >> it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non >> centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositories. >> what happens? why did you do so? is there any announcement about it? >> than

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:34:17PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > >On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:02:08PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >>Question: how many levels of symlinks-pointing-to-symlinks does it take > >>to get to the right place? And having supplied this number of s

Re: [CentOS] usb 1-2: device not accepting address 2, error -71 - CENTOS 5

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Hi all, I installed CentOS 5 on DELL machine. Then, When the system comes up, I always get below erros. Could you pls help me to solve this out before I setup this box for productiuon use ? these are errors. usb 1-2: device not accepting address 2, error -71 at

Re: [CentOS] Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Okay folks, I think we've just about beaten this horse long enough. Lets all agree that the whole mess needs some clarity, and that any griping on this list is not likely to resolve the issue. Can we please let this thread die now and get back to some centos related help/business? -- During time

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Les Mikesell wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: > > > > > > I think you are making too much out of name differences for things > > > > > that > > > > > can clobber each other and not enough about ways to let the different > > > > > things co-exist - on the same machines if you want th

[CentOS] Pam module for freeradius

Hi everyone, Does the default installation of pam support authenticating against radius. Or do I need the module available from the freeradius site. If yes, then is the freeradius pam module available via rpm? Thanks -- "I never look back darling, it distracts from the now", Edna Mode (The I

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Les Mikesell wrote: > Petr "Qaxi" Klíma wrote: >> Diversity adds a lot of value. If EPEL will be only repo nobody on RHEL workstation can see/listen MP3, WMA, DVD playing, because of interesting US software patent and millenium act law. >>> >>> That's not what I meant. Obviously we

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 30, Issue 2

ates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-latex-1.0.7-67.10.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-xdvi-1.0.7-67.10.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs disappear!

On 8/2/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On 8/2/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> hi, > >> it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non > >> centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositories. > >> what happen

Re: [CentOS] yum-updatesd.conf on centos 5

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > > > On this URL: http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories > it says: > > > Note: You should seriously consider using the Priorities (or > > ProtectBase) yum plugin if you are going to use a 3rd Party > > Repository

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Axel Thimm wrote: On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: You'll have to remind me why anyone wants different same-named packages with differences the end user doesn't understand and can't control to exist at all before I can comment on a solution about managing them. Le

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs disappear!

Akemi Yagi wrote: > On 8/2/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On 8/2/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositor

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Johnny Hughes wrote: Solution? Repo priorities and includes But wouldn't it be easier if the packages had different names so you could just install the one(s) you want from the command line? NO ... because many other packages might depend on xmms (to use your example). xmms-devel might be n

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

I thought once upon a time some repo had a package named xmms-mp3 which was different from the core version for obvious reasons. I can't recall a problem and I didn't have to know which repo I had to manage to get or exclude it. How are we supposed to know whether or not that is a sub-packa

[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:47:02AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >>You'll have to remind me why anyone wants different same-named packages > >>with differences the end user doesn't understand and can't control to

Re: [CentOS] about add/remove software

beast wrote: > In the documentation, it says that add/remove software is use only to > install > from CD drive[1]. However this program refuse to run when no internet > connection, why not just prompt for the installation media? assuming > everybody has fast internet connection was too optimistic.

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Stephen Harris wrote: Now what happens if Fred creates a tin1.8.2 and John creates a tin1.8.2 but with different compile options? That's really not a big problem and anyone who does development on a multiuser machine will be doing it all the time. In fact even a single developer will likely

[CentOS] recovery data

hi all, how do i mount usb laptop hard drive to a centos 4 box? this hard drive has 2 partitions: NT (winxp os) and fat32 for data. i'm unable to boot from it and i think NT partition is corrupted. i did try to connect to windows box, but i still can't get to fat32. any idea how to do this

[CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Hi folks, As a breather from the "thread-now-wider-than-my-headers-window-in-thunderbird" conversation re: mixing repos, I have a question regarding a machine I'm about to put online. :) I run a web hosting company and my secondary (primary to the world) DNS box died from a massive rootkit/hack l

Re: [CentOS] recovery data

and when i typed dmesg | tail and i got this: Additional sense: Write error end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 39776936 Buffer I/O error on device sda, logical block 4972117 scsi0: ERROR on channel 0, id 0, lun 0, CDB: Read (10) 00 02 5e f2 a8 00 00 08 00 Info fld=0x0, Current sda: sense k

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

If we can't even get all the repostories to use a simple repotag, we'd never get them to compile with non-standard paths! If everyone is going to fight over the same space it again becomes a matter of authority - or a free-for-all. So adding a tag to indicate where the claim comes from s

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

As it will be a production server and this is my first foray into CentOS/SELinux in a production environment I was hoping to get a recommended list of what to include and, more specifically, what *not* to include from the distro CDs I will be doing a text based install, hoping to avoid the inst

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Feizhou wrote: > >> As it will be a production server and this is my first foray into >> CentOS/SELinux in a production environment I was hoping to get a >> recommended list of what to include and, more specifically, what *not* >> to include from the distro CDs >> >> I will be doing a text based in

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

On 8/2/07, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm dilligently R`ingTFMs, and will continue to I'd sure be > appreciative of any jumpstart help and/or any pitfalls of which to be > cognizant. 2 recent pitfalls for bind on RHEL5. 1st being that upstream has removed the default configs f

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Ray Leventhal wrote: Feizhou wrote: As it will be a production server and this is my first foray into CentOS/SELinux in a production environment I was hoping to get a recommended list of what to include and, more specifically, what *not* to include from the distro CDs I will be doing a text bas

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Jim Perrin wrote: > 2 recent pitfalls for bind on RHEL5. > 1st being that upstream has removed the default configs for bind. This > was apparently intentional. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234508 for more > information > > also, the last bind update modified some file

Re: [CentOS] Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one LAN behing firewall

Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Now, I want put about 5 people (5 PCs) behind this LAN2 and give internet access to them. But, I do not want them to use my whole bandwidth ( i.e - 256 kbit/s), But Instead, I want peple behind this LAN2 to allocate  64 kbits/s (kilo bits per second) for their interne

[CentOS] Re: recovery data

Hiep Nguyen spake the following on 8/2/2007 7:33 AM: > and when i typed dmesg | tail and i got this: > > Additional sense: Write error > end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 39776936 > Buffer I/O error on device sda, logical block 4972117 > scsi0: ERROR on channel 0, id 0, lun 0, CDB: Read (10)

Re: [CentOS] Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On 8/1/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/1/07, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Against the chance you have a bad .pdf, as someone suggested, I've > > attached one that successfully printed on my Brother HL-5250DN. The > > file was produced by OOo > > (openoffice.org-cal

Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On 8/1/07, John Plemons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you checked for driver up dates for the printer?? Could be the issue... > According to most of the sites I found in Google, the last update to the Linux printer driver was on August 12, 2004. I am using the latest RedHat drivers for RH

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Ray Leventhal wrote: As a breather from the "thread-now-wider-than-my-headers-window-in-thunderbird" conversation re: mixing repos, I have a question regarding a machine I'm about to put online. :) I run a web hosting company and my secondary (primary to the world) DNS box died from a massive ro

[CentOS] CentOS - HP

Hi Does anyone have experience of running CentOS on HP hardware, both rack mount kit and blades? How are things like hardware monitoring etc? We may be moving from Dell to HP and i get on really well with OMSA and Nagios etc so ideally would like to monitor using similar tools rather than some

[CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

Mark Hull-Richter spake the following on 8/2/2007 9:53 AM: > On 8/1/07, John Plemons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Have you checked for driver up dates for the printer?? Could be the >> issue... >> > > According to most of the sites I found in Google, the last update to > the Linux printer driv

Re: [CentOS] CentOS - HP

Quoting Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi > > Does anyone have experience of running CentOS on HP hardware, both rack > mount kit and blades? How are things like hardware monitoring etc? > We may be moving from Dell to HP and i get on really well with OMSA and > Nagios etc so ideally would like

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 07:47 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:29:25AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> You'll have to remind me why anyone wants different same-named packages > >> with differences the end user doesn't understand and can't control to > >>

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Brian Mathis wrote: On 8/2/07, Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] CentOS 5 is a .0 release, you might be better served using CentOS 4.5 which has had much more tme to prove itself as a DNS Server. [...] Jay Please don't propagate this idea. That is very "Windows wait for service pack

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

On 8/2/07, Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > CentOS 5 is a .0 release, you might be better served using CentOS 4.5 > which has had much more tme to prove itself as a DNS Server. [...] > Jay Please don't propagate this idea. That is very "Windows wait for service pack 1" way of thinking.

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Hi Jay, et al, > > > > CentOS 5 is a .0 release, you might be better served using CentOS 4.5 > > which has had much more tme to prove itself as a DNS Server. 4.5 also > > has a good bit of time left on updates to (till Feb 29th, 2012) so you > > shouldn't worry to much about it becoming obsolet

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

On 8/2/07, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is certainly something to consider. Myself and one other will be > the only folks using this machine for storage that will require ftp > access so your point is taken. SFTP is my likely choice after a bit of > reading to ensure compatibi

Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On 8/2/07, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try a lower resolution as a test for a printer memory issue. > Same problem at 600dpi and 300dpi (lowest setting available). Still, if that were the problem, would it not also occur when printing from a Wndows guest under VMWare to the same prin

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Timothy Selivanow wrote: The LFHS is the problem here, although putting applications where you want them in the filesystem would make Linux as hard to use as the Mac. Oh wait... That compromises one of GNU/Linux's biggest strengths, that of shared libraries. So instead of just upgrading Open

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 as DNS server

Jim Perrin wrote: On 8/2/07, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is certainly something to consider. Myself and one other will be the only folks using this machine for storage that will require ftp access so your point is taken. SFTP is my likely choice after a bit of reading to ens

[CentOS] Debian DomU on Centos 4.4 Dom0

Hello, Can somebody point some docs on how to do this? Has anyone done it --known pitfalls? TIA -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/

[CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

Mark Hull-Richter spake the following on 8/2/2007 11:11 AM: > On 8/2/07, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Try a lower resolution as a test for a printer memory issue. >> > > Same problem at 600dpi and 300dpi (lowest setting available). > > Still, if that were the problem, would it not al

RE: [CentOS] CentOS - HP

> > Does anyone have experience of running CentOS on HP hardware, both rack > mount kit and blades? How are things like hardware monitoring etc? > We may be moving from Dell to HP and i get on really well with OMSA and > Nagios etc so ideally would like to monitor using similar tools rather > than

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 13:26 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > >> The LFHS is the problem here, although putting applications where you > >> want them in the filesystem would make Linux as hard to use as the Mac. > >> Oh wait... > > > > That compromises one of GNU/Linux's

[CentOS] Full server restore-point image

Hi, After some months of configuring and testing a small server, think that would be nice to make a full server restore-point image in order to recover it if something goes wrong in the future, just restoring the image back and not making the full install and configure process all over again. The

Re: [CentOS] Full server restore-point image

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: > I was thinking on using the CentOS LiveCD and then use dd command to > clone all partitions to another storage device. But I have no > experience on this. You could also check out Ghost 4 Linux. I've used it to clone ha

Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On 8/2/07, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It could have been that the windows driver sent the images compressed or some > other optimizations. > Open printing recommends the pxlmono driver. Maybe theirs is more up to date. > That's the one I'm using Thanks. mhr

[CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) on latest update from CentOS 5.0

The subject pretty much says it all. My ftp comes back with "ftp: ftp/tcp: unknown service" - unless I run it as root, in which case it works just fine. What's going on here? Did I screw up a setting of mine or something? Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] Full server restore-point image

Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Hi, After some months of configuring and testing a small server, think that would be nice to make a full server restore-point image in order to recover it if something goes wrong in the future, just restoring the image back and not making the full install and configu

RE: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:53 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0 > > On 8/1/07, John Plemons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[CentOS] Chmod Explaination

Howdy list, I can't seem to find any doc's explaining what's really going on behind this scenario: A user home directory had been reset to : d--- --- --- user group user_dir As root i tried to : chmod -R 750 user_dir got permission denied, my friend tried with as user that owns the director

RE: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) on latestupdate from CentOS 5.0

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:27 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) > on latestupdate from CentOS 5.0 > > The subject

RE: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joseph blase > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:33 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination > > Howdy list, > > I can't seem to find any doc's explaining what's really >

[CentOS] automated response

I am currently out of the office, returning Monday, August 6. Regards, Jorge Prado ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By the looks of it it appears to be a problem with printing postscript. > > Is the ghostscript package and it's fonts properly installed? > Here's what I show (that I know to looks for, although I presume that if this shows, other dependen

Re: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination

On 8/3/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joseph blase > > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:33 PM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination > > > > Howdy

Re: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) on latestupdate from CentOS 5.0

On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did the permissions on /etc/services get messed up? > # ll /etc/services -rw-r- 1 root root 362154 Aug 1 10:23 /etc/services mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cent

RE: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:44 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0 > > On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joseph blase > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:45 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination > > > > On 8/3/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

RE: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:47 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no > ftpd) onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0 > > On 8/2/07

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

--On Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:33 AM +0200 "\"Petr \\\"Qaxi\\\" Klíma\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Form my point of view (FMPOV) is placing everithing to /usr/bin bad too over there FMPOV everithing what is not core system should by in /usr/local/bin or bigger packages in /opt /usr/local i

Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, so it's not a general postscript failure, but maybe just EPS... > EPS? > If the printer needs a hard-reset to recover then it is probably > because the printer isn't fully PCL compatible as it advertises, > can you try using an HP De

Re: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0

On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah... it should be 644 > Ah, a light goes on. I have the root umask set to 027. I take it from this that it should be 022 or 002 - which is better/correct? Thanks (mucho). mhr ___ CentOS m

Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On Thu, August 2, 2007 6:02 pm, Mark Hull-Richter wrote: > On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ok, so it's not a general postscript failure, but maybe just EPS... >> > > EPS? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encapsulated_PostScript ___

[CentOS] how to export and import VMware servers

I recently build a CentOS-based VMware server (the free ver) and now need to move all of the virtual machines off my old Windows-based VMware server (also the free ver) to this next CentOS-based one. I have successfully FTP'd all of the files to the new CentOS box and have even opened the server i

Re: [CentOS] how to export and import VMware servers

On Thu, August 2, 2007 6:27 pm, Rogelio Bastardo wrote: > I recently build a CentOS-based VMware server (the free ver) and now > need to move all of the virtual machines off my old Windows-based > VMware server (also the free ver) to this next CentOS-based one. > > I have successfully FTP'd all of

Re: [CentOS] how to export and import VMware servers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rogelio Bastardo wrote: > I recently build a CentOS-based VMware server (the free ver) and now > need to move all of the virtual machines off my old Windows-based > VMware server (also the free ver) to this next CentOS-based one. > > I have successful

Re: [CentOS] how to export and import VMware servers

Rogelio Bastardo wrote: I recently build a CentOS-based VMware server (the free ver) and now need to move all of the virtual machines off my old Windows-based VMware server (also the free ver) to this next CentOS-based one. I have successfully FTP'd all of the files to the new CentOS box and hav

Re: [CentOS] how to export and import VMware servers

> Also, check your permissions. Make sure that they are the same as they > were before, or that the current user is allowed to access them. I feel stupid b/c that was actually it. Thanks, Max! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

Re: [CentOS] Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

--- Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay folks, I think we've just about beaten this > horse long enough. > Lets all agree that the whole mess needs some > clarity, and that any > griping on this list is not likely to resolve the > issue. > > Can we please let this thread die now and get

Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 02:18:41PM -0700, Mark Hull-Richter wrote: > On 8/2/07, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It could have been that the windows driver sent the images compressed or > > some > > other optimizations. > > Open printing recommends the pxlmono driver. Maybe theirs is mor

[CentOS] Re: Full server restore-point image

Thank you very much guys, I'll try those liveCDs. Cheers, al. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Full server restore-point image

On 03/08/2007, at 7:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Hi, After some months of configuring and testing a small server, think that would be nice to make a full server restore-point image in order to recover it if something goes wrong in the future, just restoring the image

[CentOS] proxy arp on CentOS 5?

Anybody implemented a working proxy ARP with CentOS 5? I am trying to implement DNAT on a dual-homed firewall (servers behind firewall are on private IPs) and that requires proxy ARP. I've tried several different methods but nothing seems to work. Any advice? Is proxy ARP broken on v5? -- Fl

Re: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination

On Aug 2, 2007, at 5:58 PM, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: As far as root not being able to, do you have selinux running? No, I don't have. Then I dunno why root didn't, as with selinux disabled root also has implicit rights to all files/folders, but with selinux enabled security context c

Re: [CentOS] Full server restore-point image

On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 16:26 -0400, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: > Hi, > > After some months of configuring and testing a small server, think > that would be nice to make a full server restore-point image in order > to recover it if something goes wrong in the future, just restoring > the image bac

RE: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:02 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: Can't print PDFs or PSs in CentOS 5.0 > > On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd)onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:05 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no > ftpd)onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0 > > On 8/2/07,