Hello,
Have install of centos 4.5 on Xeon 64 bit. Want to copy install DVD to
harddrive and later use this to update the OS.
However I dont know how to ask the install program to look on the
harddrive rather than DVD CD.
TIA
Tony
___
CentOS mailing
Le Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:39:38 -0700
"Akemi Yagi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
> On 7/30/07, Martin Hamant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > # uname -a
> > > Linux *** 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL #1 Tue Jun 26 14:08:18 EDT 2007 i686
> > > i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > # modprobe drbd
> > > FATAL: Error ins
Martin Hamant wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Not very blocking because the smp module loads perfectly.
>
OK ... there was a problem with some of the drbd modules (all except the
smp ones). This problem is now fixed and the changes are syncing to the
mirrors.
The new version is: kmod-drbd-0.7.24-2..
The ol
Trying to get CentOS 5 running under VirtualPC 2007. The installation seems
to go OK until X server runs. After this the screen display goes horribly wrong.
Does anyone know if this is an issue with v5 or something else. Also has anyone
managed to get CentOS running properly (from the install) und
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Le Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:17:08 -0500
Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
> Martin Hamant wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > Not very blocking because the smp module loads perfectly.
> >
>
> OK ... there was a problem with some of the drbd modules (all except
> the smp ones). This problem is now fix
Hi,
I'm preparing a new x86_64 build machine and I'm looking at installed
rpms. I have found a lot of packages are marked i386 or i686. I have
even found I have two version of package installed:
glibc-2.3.4-2.36-i686
glibc-2.3.4-2.36-x86_64
What's the reason in duplicity and why not all packages a
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On CentOS 5, why does 'yum remove tomcat*' remove all of the openoffice
>>> packages?
>>>
>> That would be because openoffice requires tomcat to install it ... if
>> you tell yum that you want to remove tomcat ... since openoffic
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:38:42PM +0200, David Hrbá? enlightened us:
> I'm preparing a new x86_64 build machine and I'm looking at installed
> rpms. I have found a lot of packages are marked i386 or i686. I have
> even found I have two version of package installed:
> glibc-2.3.4-2.36-i686
> glibc-
Matt Hyclak napsal(a):
> Some programs are not available in 64-bit packages (e.g. openoffice). Those
> packages need 32-bit libraries to run, so you are seeing the necessary
> packages for those 32-bit apps.
>
> Matt
>
Thank you, that did not come to my mind.
David
__
I am going to present Linux to my ham radio club at some point in the next few
months, and wanted to collect info on ham radio software, including options for
echolink. Our repeater has an echolink connection, thus if I present the
software available for it, it might perk up people's interests
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On CentOS 5, why does 'yum remove tomcat*' remove all of the openoffice
packages?
That would be because openoffice requires tomcat to install it ... if
you tell yum that you want to remove tomcat ... since openoffice
requires tomcat, it has to also remove openoffice.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Jackson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 7:05 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS Within VirtualPC 2007
>
> Trying to get CentOS 5 running under VirtualPC 2007. The
> installa
> > It seems bizarre for an office suite to depend on a java servlet engine,
> > but OK...
> Now how do I get one that works under Sun java? And is there
> > a way to get eclipse without gcj?
> >
>
> Not from Red Hat (wrt sun java) ... they did use tomcat and gcj. If you
> want sun java, I
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
On CentOS 5, why does 'yum remove tomcat*' remove all of the openoffice
packages?
This is a known issue in that using yum to remove packages is
to use a blunt tool -- use rpm for finer control on package
removals
This question ocurs often in the yum
> >> It seems bizarre for an office suite to depend on a java servlet engine,
> >> but OK...
You can remove some of the tomcat packages without removing openoffice
Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Package tomcat5-webapps.x86_64 0:5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5 set t
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On CentOS 5, why does 'yum remove tomcat*' remove all of the openoffice
packages?
That would be because openoffice requires tomcat to install it ... if
you tell yum that you want to remove tomcat ... since openoffice
requires tomcat, it has to also remo
Hi,
> This is a known issue in that using yum to remove packages is
> to use a blunt tool -- use rpm for finer control on package
> removals
It doesn't work. Taking out the tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5 keeps pulling
out packages until openoffice goes too.
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api is needed by (instal
Scott Ehrlich kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 31. heinäkuuta 2007
16:18):
> I am going to present Linux to my ham radio club at some point in the next
> few months, and wanted to collect info on ham radio software, including
> options for echolink. Our repeater has an echolink connec
On 7/31/07, David Hrbác( <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, that did not come to my mind.
Keep in mind that some of the i386/i686 packages may interfere with
x86_64 builds. Multi-arch gets very interesting when you're building
software. You may have to remove some/all of them, or be very spec
Shawn wrote:
It seems bizarre for an office suite to depend on a java servlet engine,
but OK...
Now how do I get one that works under Sun java? And is there
a way to get eclipse without gcj?
Not from Red Hat (wrt sun java) ... they did use tomcat and gcj. If you
want sun java, I imagine
Helllo,
I'll like to add rpms during a upgrade with kickstart installation.
I specified the name of rpm in "%package" section but the rpm isn't
installed.
This feature isn't supported with CentOS 4.4 ?
# Kickstart
upgrade
# Reboot after install
reboot
#cdrom
lang en_US.UTF-8
langsupport --de
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> On CentOS 5, why does 'yum remove tomcat*' remove all of the
> openoffice
> packages?
>
That would be because openoffice requires tomcat to install it ... if
you tell yum that you want to remove tomcat ... since openoffice
>>
The right place for SELinux logs is /var/log/audit/audit.log and the
auditd daemon must be running.
On 7/27/07, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all, I'm having some trouble getting PHP5 w/ CentOS 5 to connect to
> a remote MySQL server using the standard mysql_connect() call.
>
>
Have you noticed any bad blocks warnings on your /var/log/messages?
The badblocks command can also help you.
On 7/25/07, Centos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, the file system is ext and block size is the default which is 4096,
> so I should be able to have 16 Tera Byte filesystem and 2 Tera Byt
fixing thread hijack in subject line
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
Red Hat fixed their bug:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html I haven't
seen a response to centos bugzilla 0002160 that I filed a
month ago about this.
Did you look at a system before posting? Or jus
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Not from Red Hat (wrt sun java) ... they did use tomcat and gcj. If you
want sun java, I imagine you would have to change the specs and rebuild.
I have no idea how to do that (I have not looked at it at all).
Red Hat fixed their bug:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-20
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
Not from Red Hat (wrt sun java) ... they did use tomcat and gcj. If
you
want sun java, I imagine you would have to change the specs and
rebuild.
I have no idea how to do that (I have not looked at it at all).
>>> Red Hat f
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Not from Red Hat (wrt sun java) ... they did use tomcat and gcj. If
> you
> want sun java, I imagine you would have to change the specs and
> rebuild.
> I have no idea how to do that (I have not looked at it
R P Herrold wrote:
Red Hat fixed their bug:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html I haven't seen a
response to centos bugzilla 0002160 that I filed a month ago about this.
Did you look at a system before posting? Or just shoot from the hip?
No, I installed Sun java on a Centos
Any chance your filesystem is full? That same thing happened to me
awhile back on a different OS and that was the problem.
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
For reasons which escape me, my VMWare Server, which was working
perfectly a week ago when I shut down my machine for vacation, no loner
comes up
I have a server with 6 gigs of memory. CentOS5/Xen sees only half of
it. Could someone advice me how to get it recognize all my memory?
I have installed 32bit CentOS5 and I'm running
kernel-xen-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5. This kernel should have PAE support:
$ grep PAE /boot/config-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen
CONF
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:58:19PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > > Axel Thimm wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I don't know enough about repotags to understand why everyone needs
> > > > > them. Can't any repotag be distinguished from no rep
I used to mount some files via Samba which resided on a windows
machine on a CentOS box. We moved the files to a NetApp filer, and I
was unable to mount those files using either Samba or CIFS. Most of
my problems with Samba were related to the (Windows?) password
encryption scheme that has not be
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > No, I want to understand the effect on an end user when only one repo
> > refuses to add a unique tag. I don't want to fight the war - I want to
> > know which way to duck.
>
> I think the issue now is that other repo's decided to drop their own
>
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > Looking at your requests on this you should realize that repotags are
> > what you are really asking for the minimum level, which is what epel
> > nuked to ashes. So the discussion should probably move away from this
> > list to the epel list. And sin
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:43:31PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > > Rex Dieter wrote:
> > >> It's quite a stetch from "no repotags" to
> > >> conclude "EPEL has no interest" in compatibility.
> >
> > >> In fact, epel (and fedor
On 7/31/07, Adam Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance your filesystem is full? That same thing happened to me
> awhile back on a different OS and that was the problem.
>
>
If you mean the vmware virtual disk, I don't think so - last I looked
it had 8+Gb free (20Gb total). As for the re
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Rex Dieter wrote:
> drew einhorn wrote:
>
> > Dumb question.
> >
> > Can't we identify the source of the package by looking at the signature.
>
> Signature, vendor, etc... right. Pretty much why epel (so far) didn't see
> the need/value in the complexity/overhead of introd
I have a server running some dababases in CentOS4.5 fully updated, but
this morning I read this error in messages log:
Trover st0:Block limits 1- 16777215 bytes
**
172.25.8.236: Servinaves
ATA ABNORMAL DTATUS 0X20DF
ATA ABNORMAL DTATU
Dag Wieers wrote:
My believe is that repotags was not the issue. There was something else
that made it impossible. And I can not undo the thought that it is because
not having repotags makes EPEL authoritative and masks dependency
problems.
Can you explain that? Authoritative over who/what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a server running some dababases in CentOS4.5 fully updated, but
this morning I read this error in messages log:
Trover st0:Block limits 1- 16777215 bytes
**
172.25.8.236: Servinaves
ATA ABNORMAL DTATU
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>> My believe is that repotags was not the issue. There was something
>> else that made it impossible. And I can not undo the thought that it
>> is because not having repotags makes EPEL authoritative and masks
>> dependency problems.
>
> Can you explain
On 7/31/07, Al Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used to mount some files via Samba which resided on a windows
> machine on a CentOS box. We moved the files to a NetApp filer, and I
> was unable to mount those files using either Samba or CIFS. Most of
> my problems with Samba were related to
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:49 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have to work with a long path to a project working directory and I would
like to have a simple script called "current" which would produce the same
effect as issuing this from the shell:
cd ./very/long/path
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:49 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> I have to work with a long path to a project working directory and I would
> like to have a simple script called "current" which would produce the same
> effect as issuing this from the shell:
>
> cd ./very/long/path/to/obscurely/titl
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 17:29 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:49 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> >> I have to work with a long path to a project working directory and I would
> >> like to have a simple script called "current" which wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:07:16PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
> Fine. But now the complaint is that the files are case sensitive, and
> doing searches for a particular file is problematical.
How so ?
find /filesystem -iname blah.exe
Easy enough.
[]s
heartbeat-2.1.2.el5.centos is released for i386/x86_64 for both CentOS-4
and CentOS-5 in the Extras repository.
We have been working very hard with the Linux-HA guys on this one. It
should be working fairly well.
Use this tracker for feedback on this release:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=
For some reason, when I try to print any graphic PDF (or a PS file made
from said graphic), it kills my Minolta 1100 laser printer, and I have
to cancel the job, disable the printer and turn the printer off and on
as many times as it takes to clear its buffer of the trash.
I'm running CentOS 5.0 a
Hola, estoy usando Centos 4.4 con sendmail y me llega demasiado spam... al
menos 50 en el día, que debo hacer para que no me llegue tanto spam... que
debo configurar... gracias.
--
Gracias.
Atentamente,
Carlos Arturo Trujillo Silva
Ingeniero de Sistemas
___
Dag Wieers wrote:
You may argue that that is a good thing. But Fedora is a different beast
than RHEL. People may want stable packages, or current packages and a
single repository (with the tools we have today) cannot provide this.
But people may want _both_ the stable package and the current
And then their are those of us here who don't speak Spanish...
About the only words of that title that I can understand are mucho and spam
which sounds like what taco bell would have on their menu if truth in
advertising laws were enforced. can I get a side order of sour cream with that
to go?
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:14 -0500, Cartman wrote:
> Hola, estoy usando Centos 4.4 con sendmail y me llega demasiado
> spam... al menos 50 en el día, que debo hacer para que no me llegue
> tanto spam... que debo configurar... gracias.
>
> --
> Gracias.
> Atentamente,
> Carlos Arturo Trujillo Silv
sorry, that's means I recive a lot of spam mails, and I want to know what
must I do for this problem.
On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And then their are those of us here who don't speak Spanish...
>
> About the only words of that title that I can understand are mucho a
http://www.mailscanner.info
Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cartman
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:09 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Me llega mucho spam
Hi All,
I am running CentOS5 . Yum pkg was installed by deault fresh installation.
pls see below for installed yum pkgs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa |grep yum
yum-updatesd-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.2
yum-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.2
later, I installed below pkg for protection.
yum-protectbase-1.0.4-2.el5.cen
57 matches
Mail list logo
