Re: [CentOS] Re: Hard disk recomendation for a software raid 5 array. Does Linux Software Raid support/interacts well with TLER enabled disks.

On Saturday 28 July 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Alexander Georgiev wrote: ... > > Ok, and should I mix disks from different vendors? I have read > > somewhere that this augments the reliability of the array, lowering > > the probability of 2 disks and more go down simultaneously? > > Not necessari

Re: [CentOS] typo on a Wiki page

On 28 July 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote: > A nice catch. As you know, typos are a hallmark for some CentOS > developers and an integral part of the CentOS project because they > make this OS stand out. :-) I laughed, when I read that! I believe they want to make it as perfect as they possibly can. Act

Re: [CentOS] memory query

On 28 July 2007, simon wrote: > I have recently installed centOS 5 on DELL pentium 2.7ghz (model > optiplex GX270) and have 512 memory I do not have a CentOS 5 box yet, Below is on a CentOS 4.4 box. A low end Dell Dimension 2400 (Celeron 2.6 GHz, with 512 MB RAM and integrated video and sound). I

[CentOS] Higher memory requirements for 64 bit?

I have a dual Xeon 3.2GHz XDMCP server serving out about 50 Gnome desktops to thin clients. I currently am running 32 bit with 4GB of memory. Performance is fine, normally, and the machine runs with about 3GB in swap. However, if a user app suddenly sucks up the maximum allowed rss and virtual o

Re: [CentOS] Re: Hard disk recomendation for a software raid 5 array. Does Linux Software Raid support/interacts well with TLER enabled disks.

Peter Kjellstrom wrote: On Saturday 28 July 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote: Alexander Georgiev wrote: ... Ok, and should I mix disks from different vendors? I have read somewhere that this augments the reliability of the array, lowering the probability of 2 disks and more go down simulta

[CentOS] typo on a Wiki page

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote: A nice catch. As you know, typos are a hallmark for some CentOS developers and an integral part of the CentOS project because they make this OS stand out. :-) hey -- I resemble that -- Russ Herrold orc_orc on IRC ___

Re: [CentOS] typo on a Wiki page

On 7/29/07, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > A nice catch. As you know, typos are a hallmark for some CentOS > > developers and an integral part of the CentOS project because they > > make this OS stand out. :-) > > hey -- I resemble that > > -

[CentOS] Unsubscribe Me Please

Please unsubscribe me from the Centos mailing list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

Dag Wieers wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, JC Júnior wrote: > >> I received a message about EPEL repository, I would like to know if this >> repo is long term support too. > > Let me add that an effort to make sure EPEL is compatible with RPMforge > failed as EPEL wants to become the only reposito

Re: [CentOS] Unsubscribe Me Please

Robert J. Thompson schrieb: > Please unsubscribe me from the Centos mailing list. Mail header content: List-Unsubscribe: , Your turn to do it yourself in one of the 2 named fashions. Alexander ___

[CentOS] Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

drew einhorn wrote: > Dumb question. > > Can't we identify the source of the package by looking at the signature. Signature, vendor, etc... right. Pretty much why epel (so far) didn't see the need/value in the complexity/overhead of introducing repotags. That said, my personal opinion is/was t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 3.9's up2date missing sources???

On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 07:16:00PM -0400, Lawrence Houston wrote: > CentOS3.9 Users: > > After applying all Updates to Upgrade from CentOS 3.8 CentOS 3.9 I find > up2date no longer works "correctly" (or shall I say NOT as before)... > Missing is the "sources" File!!! Is this how V 4.5.5-7 is su

Re: [CentOS] Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)

On 28 July 2007, Dag Wieers wrote: > Let me add that an effort to make sure EPEL is compatible with > RPMforge failed as EPEL wants to become the only repository for RHEL > and there is no interest to consider current RPMforge users. > > EPEL refused the repotag, so one cannot easily identify whe

[CentOS] MRTG with 14all.cgi on centos 5

Hi, I installed mrtg on centos5 with 14all.cgi script. I downloaded it from below URL. http://my14all.sourceforge.net/14all-1.1.txt and copies it as 14all.cgi @ /var/www/cg-bin I made a few changes to the script. Those changes can be seen in BOLDletteres. # if MRTG_lib.pm (from mrtg) is not i