Does anybody have any good RHEL3 wireless (802.11) resources?
I'm googling and haven't yet found anything good and am hoping someone
here can point me in the right direction.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/li
===
Thanks,
The CentOS Development Team
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-anno
Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500
Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
> Martin Hamant wrote:
> > Should be clearer now ;)
> >
> > Martin Hamant a écrit :
> >> Hello Johnny,
> >>
> >> I'm looking for the corresponding kernel-module-drbd package to be
> >> able to update some kernel's :)
>
Martin Hamant wrote:
> Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500
> Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
>
>> Martin Hamant wrote:
>>> Should be clearer now ;)
>>>
>>> Martin Hamant a écrit :
Hello Johnny,
I'm looking for the corresponding kernel-module-drbd package to be
able t
Johnny Hughes a écrit :
Martin Hamant wrote:
Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500
Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
Martin Hamant wrote:
Should be clearer now ;)
Martin Hamant a écrit :
Hello Johnny,
I'm looking for the corresponding kernel-module-drbd package to be
able to update
Rogelio Bastardo wrote:
Does anybody have any good RHEL3 wireless (802.11) resources?
When was RHEL3?
Had we any good wireless stuff then? When was RHEL4? There was quite a
bit of effort for wireless starting with FC4. I don't know of anything
for earlier bases.
I'm googling and haven't
Martin Hamant wrote:
> Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>> Martin Hamant wrote:
>>> Le Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:16:24 -0500
>>> Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
>>>
Martin Hamant wrote:
> Should be clearer now ;)
>
> Martin Hamant a écrit :
>> Hello Johnny,
>>
>> I'm looki
CentOS doesn't because RHEL doesn't. If you don't like it, take it up with
them. :-) CentOS realizes that many people will want this, so they rebuild
postfix and put it in centosplus for your convenience (at least they did for
4 - I'm not sure where they are with 5 on this aspect).
Ok Matt; I've
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:01:23PM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent enlightened us:
> >CentOS doesn't because RHEL doesn't. If you don't like it, take it up with
> >them. :-) CentOS realizes that many people will want this, so they rebuild
> >postfix and put it in centosplus for your convenience (at lea
On 7/8/07, Oliver Schulze L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you need a certified platform, install centos4 because RHEL5 is not
yet certified
on vmware-server
HTH
Oliver
WipeOut wrote:
> I am soon going to be setting up a box to run VMware server but have
> to make the choice between Centos 4.x
Tronn Wærdahl wrote:
If you need a certified platform, install centos4 because RHEL5 is not
yet certified
on vmware-server
My experisense is that some x.0 release are a bit unmature, and its its
wise to wait for a x.1 or x.2 release.
I use 4.4 with vmware-server, and it run perf
Hi,
I am trying to set up a CentOS 4 machine with various iSCSI mounts for
Oracle, but devices keep on moving around, causing the mounts to fail
while called by the sd[a-f] names.
We thought about using labels, but, as some of the partitions do not
use EXT3, that was discarded, so we thought abou
On 7/10/07, Tronn Wærdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My experisense is that some x.0 release are a bit unmature, and its its wise to
wait for a x.1 or x.2 release.
I use 4.4 with vmware-server, and it run perfectly, and i dont need any gui. So
I'll wait for a x.2 or x.3 release
I am runnin
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
I am running VMWare Server 1.0.4 on a CentOS 5.0 box with no problems
at all. In fact, I have been using my Windows guest on VMWS 1.0.4 to
create DVDs from some AVIs I downloaded from the web. Maybe I've just
become more comfortable with CentOS over the last few months
On 7/10/07, WipeOut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did go with CentOS5 because it worked with everything I wanted to have
running on the host box..
Where did you get VMware Server 1.0.4? The website only shows 1.0.3..
Brain lapse - it is 1.0.3
mhr
_
I just tried the Centos 5 Live CD on my Thinkpad T41.
It works pretty good but did not recognize my Laptop's
modem or WiFi (I guess no surprise there).
I do have a CardBus modem that is not a Win-modem
that I could try when I get home.
I did not see anyway to configure a PPP dialup call.
Is th
I will install CentOS 5 x86_64 on my home server. Among other things,
that machine will run Asterisk with an analog card connected to my
analog phone line, sort of a home-brewed PBX with VoIP capabilities.
The latest Asterisk version as of now is 1.4.7.1
I am trying to find RPM packages for Cen
On 7/10/07, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will install CentOS 5 x86_64 on my home server. Among other things,
that machine will run Asterisk with an analog card connected to my
analog phone line, sort of a home-brewed PBX with VoIP capabilities.
The latest Asterisk version as of now
I'm having trouble with IBM xseries 345/dual Xeon 2.66GHz showing only
one processor. At boot I see "SMP motherboard not recognized". Using
title CentOS (2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /xen.gz-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5
module /vmlinuz-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen ro
root=/dev/Vo
19 matches
Mail list logo
