Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]

2007-11-30 Thread Garrick Staples
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:58:51AM -0800, Robert - elists alleged: > > Garrick moaned: > > > > Please keep the preaching out of a secular maillist. Thanks. > > Oh sorry Garrick my bad... Apology accepted! > Did they ban Jesus or His Name at USC or other supposed institutions higher > educ

Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]

2007-11-30 Thread centos
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:51:45 -0500 "Ross S. W. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did you mean non-secular? > > Otherwise what sect is it? Miriam-Webster dictionary: Main Entry: sec·u·lar Function: adjective 1 a: of or relating to the worldly or temporal 1 b: not overtly or specifical

Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]

2007-11-30 Thread Garrick Staples
tural. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=secular > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Fri Nov 30 14:22:04 2007 > Subject: Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for > developersboxon centos 5] > >

RE: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]

2007-11-30 Thread Robert - elists
> Garrick moaned: > > Please keep the preaching out of a secular maillist. Thanks. Oh sorry Garrick my bad... Did they ban Jesus or His Name at USC or other supposed institutions higher education and learning? Should I put it in a .signature instead? Is that protocol? - rh _

Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]

2007-11-30 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Fri Nov 30 14:22:04 2007 Subject: Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5] On Fri, Nov 30