Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Alain Péan
Le 20/12/2011 22:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit : > Official announcement onwww.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th. Congratulations to the developpers for this very quick release of CentOS 6.2. It is a very pleasant surprise. I read some posts saying that the framework for this release was in

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/20/2011 09:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše: > On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else. >> >> Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands: >> >> # yum clean all >> # yum update >

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
On 12/20/2011 2:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Official announcement on www.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th. Of course it is. :) How much a difference 24 hours make. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread fred smith
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:58:57PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > >> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a > >> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58: > For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line > in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the > external mirrors are caught up. > > Mirror.ce

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ashley M. Kirchner said the following on 20/12/11 22:10: >> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ > > But did you comment out the one right above it? Yes, of course. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ In every

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:07 PM, Luigi Rosa piše: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58: > >> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line >> in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until a

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
On 12/20/2011 2:07 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: > The line I uncommented is: > > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ But did you comment out the one right above it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:04 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše: > On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= >> line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until >> all the external mirrors are caught up. >> >> Mirror

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58: > For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line > in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the > external mirrors are caught up. > > Mirror.ce

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= > line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until > all the external mirrors are caught up. > > Mirror.centos.org should be ok ... I have verified the file exists

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread m . roth
Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >>> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a >>> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as >>> the latest) and as of t

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a >> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as >> the latest) and as of this morning I can not ins

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 m.r...@5-cent.us said the following on 20/12/11 21:51: > If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has > either an error, or a permission problem. Dunno; from the client point of view, the directory exists (I verified b

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
On 12/20/2011 1:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has > either an error, or a permission problem. I'd say error: > yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors * base: mirrors.tummy.com * extra

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread m . roth
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a >> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as >> the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and >>

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a > fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as > the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and > after running a 'yum clean al

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else. > > Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands: > > # yum clean all > # yum update > > > I get this output > > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refres

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:31: >> Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04: >> >>> Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 >>> updates fine to 6.2. >> >> Confirmed. >> >> Tried a yum clean a

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/20/2011 02:10 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: > Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04: > >> Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 >> updates fine to 6.2. > > Confirmed. > > Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected. > The problem is

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04: > Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 > updates fine to 6.2. Confirmed. Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected. The problem is limited to

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

2011-12-20 Thread Shade.GE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 updates fine to 6.2. Am 20.12.11 20:57, schrieb Luigi Rosa: > Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else. > > Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands: > > # yum cle