In article <201911071633.27771.gary.stainb...@ringways.co.uk>,
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi Paddy,
>
> I was suspecting the same, and from the output below I think you're right.
> However, I was hoping I could just repair
> this problem for now, and worry about replacing the HDD later. I need to
Hi Paddy,
I was suspecting the same, and from the output below I think you're right.
However, I was hoping I could just repair this problem for now, and worry about
replacing the HDD later. I need to resume some services that also seem to
generate this same error.
Gary
[root@zeppo services]#
Hi Gary,
That "Input/output error" suggests a disk problem to me. Does that file
/usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/itertoolsmodule.so actually exist and is
it readable?
Also look the the output of 'rpm -V python-libs' to see if rpm considers
the installed files to be corrupt.
If it's not that, th
On 2 Jun 2017 1:28 pm, "Mark Haney" wrote:
Personally, I would do one of three things:
1. Use the -m command to run 'yum install ' which /might/ work.
2. Uninstall the newer package and install the version you want. (Check the
'state' directive to do this.)
3. Pin that package version when cre
Personally, I would do one of three things:
1. Use the -m command to run 'yum install ' which /might/ work.
2. Uninstall the newer package and install the version you want. (Check
the 'state' directive to do this.)
3. Pin that package version when creating the server/VM so as not to be
updat
On 01/06/2017 22:29, Tate Belden wrote:
> Use the 'downgrade' option.
Thanks Tate. I know the "downgrade" option well. I wouldn't have posted
my question if it were that simple.
As I said previously, we use ansible, and its "yum" module invokes:
yum install package-version-release
I expect yum
Use the 'downgrade' option.
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/29617
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> We're using ansible to configure our CentOS 6 servers, and we have a
> task to install a specific version of a package:
>
> - name: install thrift2
> yum: name=ripencc
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:38:01PM +0800, 李明伟 wrote:
> I will hit errors like:
>
>
> # yum install httpd
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
>
> http://centos-distro.1gservers.com/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml:
> [Errno 14] HTTP Error 403 - Forbidden
> Trying other mirror.
Do you have direct internet connection without proxy? if not, you need to
set proxy= variable in yum.conf. In any other case try running 'yum clean
all' and try again..
Eero
2016-07-19 8:38 GMT+03:00 李明伟 :
> Hi
>
>
> When I install package on CentOS7 with below command :
>
>
> yum install
>
Thank you very much, i got it now :-)
i ve copied those command to enter the chroot environment:
sudo setarch i386 /usr/sbin/chroot $CHROOT_DIR/ /bin/bash -l
now i changed it to the right architecture and everything is good :-)
thanks again for ur hint...
_
Richard writes:
>
>
> Original Message
> > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 18:44:43 +
> > From: Sarogahtyp
> > To: centos@...
> > Subject: [CentOS] yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base
> >
> > I have a running CentOS 6.5 64-bit system running and i like to
> > hav
Original Message
> Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 18:44:43 +
> From: Sarogahtyp
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base
>
> I have a running CentOS 6.5 64-bit system running and i like to
> have a CentOS 7 chrooted system i
Hi Dan,
Chroot gets you a space that "looks" like it is a separate system. Given
this is R, I assume you are probably wanting this for HPC like
purposes... Could I suggest building your own version of R and
installing into a nfs area? You may also wish to investigate the
facilities provided by
What will chroot get me.
I have root on the server, I have a filesystem mounted on all server.
What I want to do is contain the binaries and dependancies on the nfs
filesystem
On 6/11/2014 11:30 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Can you use chroot?
>
>
> On 11 June 2014 18:26, Dan Hyatt wrote:
>
>> I h
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Dan Hyatt wrote:
> I have googled, read the man page, and such.
>
> What I am trying to do is install applications to a NFS mounted drive,
> where the libraries and everything are locally installed on that
> filesystem so that it is portable across servers (I have
Can you use chroot?
On 11 June 2014 18:26, Dan Hyatt wrote:
> I have googled, read the man page, and such.
>
> What I am trying to do is install applications to a NFS mounted drive,
> where the libraries and everything are locally installed on that
> filesystem so that it is portable across ser
2012/12/19 Theo Band :
> On 12/19/2012 08:34 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:26:58 +0100 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>> Theo: I suggest disabling all repos except os+updates and trying again.
>> He could go to that mirror with a web browser and see if the package
>> actually exists
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
>> If you're going to use priorities, I'd make the CentOS mirrors highest,
>> then work my way down, with epel being *above* repoforge, since the latter
>> contains packages that conflict with some of the s
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
> If you're going to use priorities, I'd make the CentOS mirrors highest,
> then work my way down, with epel being *above* repoforge, since the latter
> contains packages that conflict with some of the standard CentOS base
> packages.
this hasn't been true for more than
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Theo Band wrote:
>
> I have two installations. One that works, and one that does not, so I
> can compare. I want to point to a known good mirror, but haven't figured
> out how to do that. I can probably just download the make rpm and
> install it with rpm. But that
On 12/19/2012 08:34 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:26:58 +0100 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Theo: I suggest disabling all repos except os+updates and trying again.
> He could go to that mirror with a web browser and see if the package
> actually exists there.
I have two install
Marcin Lage wrote:
> I'm not sure, but maybe you have to set priorities among their
> repositories. I
> have also configured repositories "rpmforge" and "EPEL" on my system, and
> to
> avoid conflicts between packages from these repositories with packages
> from
> default repositories, I install th
**yum-plugin-priorities**
2012/12/19 Marcin Lage
> I'm not sure, but maybe you have to set priorities among their
> repositories. I have also configured repositories "rpmforge" and "EPEL" on
> my system, and to avoid conflicts between packages from these repositories
> with packages from default
I'm not sure, but maybe you have to set priorities among their repositories. I
have also configured repositories "rpmforge" and "EPEL" on my system, and to
avoid conflicts between packages from these repositories with packages from
default repositories, I install the "plugin priorities" - yum insta
On 12/19/2012 11:25 AM, Marcin Lage wrote:
> *make.x86_64 1:3.81-20.el6
> @base*
h, man, gotta stop posting before coffee. I was thinking 'base
install', not 'base repository'.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:26:58 +0100
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Theo: I suggest disabling all repos except os+updates and trying again.
He could go to that mirror with a web browser and see if the package actually
exists there.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvillethea
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:25:59 -0200
Marcin Lage wrote:
> $ sudo yum list make
You don't need "sudo" to do that.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!
___
CentOS
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 9:35 AM, Theo Band wrote:
>> I try to install make (should be present in base)...
>
> no, it shouldn't.
>
> A) its not in RHEL base, therefore its not in CentOS base.
>
> B) Base contains NO development tools, is intended for deploying RPM
> packaged software on
$ sudo yum list make
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirror.beyondhosting.net
* centosplus: mirror.ueg.br
* elrepo: jur-linux.org
* epel: mirrors.dmacc.net
* extras: mirror.ueg.br
* remi: remirpm.mirror
On 12/19/2012 9:35 AM, Theo Band wrote:
> I try to install make (should be present in base)...
no, it shouldn't.
A) its not in RHEL base, therefore its not in CentOS base.
B) Base contains NO development tools, is intended for deploying RPM
packaged software only.
if you need make, odds are,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Theo Band wrote:
> I try to install make (should be present in base):
>
> yum install make
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> * base: mirrors.supportex.net
> * epel: mirror.nl.leaseweb.n
Frank Chang wrote on Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:56:31 -0400:
> Kai Schaelzl, I think I underdetstand your email. Yes, I am replying
> to a digest version. Could you suggest another client which we could
> use the emails are arranged by threads.
No, if you are replying to the digest version there is no
Frank Chang wrote:
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg, We followed your instructions to yum install
> oprofile-gui. We were able to install oprofile-guii.i386
> 0:0.9.4-15.el5.centos and oprofile.i386 0.0.9.4.15.el.5.centos.
> I was wondering what our next step should be. I tried ./configure
> --with-kernel-su
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg, We followed your instructions to yum install
oprofile-gui. We were able to install oprofile-guii.i386 0:0.9.4-15.el5.centos
and oprofile.i386 0.0.9.4.15.el.5.centos.
I was wondering what our next step should be. I tried ./configure
--with-kernel-support with oprofi
On 17/06/2010 20:49, Mark Pryor wrote:
> there are 2 solutions here. Try the plugin problem fix first.
> http://just-another.net/2008/11/22/centos-5-upgrade-and-yum/
Dude, that is just random url spamming in irrelevant situations. Whats
on that webpage has nothing to do with Jerry's problem. Jerry
--- On Thu, 6/17/10, Jerry Geis wrote:
> From: Jerry Geis
> Subject: [CentOS] yum install perl-XML-Parser
> To: "CentOS ML"
> Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 11:28 AM
> When I do the following:
> yum install perl-XML-Parser
>
> I get all these errors.
>
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirr
On 6/17/2010 1:28 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> When I do the following: yum install perl-XML-Parser
>
> I get all these errors.
>
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> * addons: mirror.sanctuaryhost.com
> * base: centos.cs.wisc.edu
> * extras: mirr
I edited /etc/yum.repos.d/*
and set enabled=0 on everything except base and updates.
This fixed the issue.
This was stock centos 5.5 x86_64.
I have added no other repos.
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
On 5/19/2010 1:29 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
>> A similar problem was reported recently on the yum list and turned out
>> to be one of the xml libs replaced by a non-distribution openoffice
>> install. Does 'rpm -Vv libxml2' show anything missing or broken?
>>
> rpm -Vv libxml2
>
> S.5./us
>
> A similar problem was reported recently on the yum list and turned out
> to be one of the xml libs replaced by a non-distribution openoffice
> install. Does 'rpm -Vv libxml2' show anything missing or broken?
>
rpm -Vv libxml2
S.5./usr/bin/xmlcatalog
S.5./usr/bin/xmllint
On 5/19/2010 1:04 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have centos 5.4 and trying the command "yum install yum-utils", it
> gives me an error. I tried the "yum clean all"
> and the did the command again with same message.
>
> I only have [base] and [updates] in the repo.
>
> yum install yum-utils
> Loaded
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:34 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: hadi motamedi
> >I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5
> server as the followings :
> >#yum install -y gcc
>
> First, didn't you intend to install compat-gcc-34 ?
> 'yum install gcc' would install gcc 4.
On 14/01/10 09:49, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2010, John Doe wrote:
>> From: hadi motamedi
>>
>>> I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5
>>> server as the followings : #yum install -y gcc
>>
>> First, didn't you intend to install compat-gcc-
On Thursday 14 January 2010, John Doe wrote:
> From: hadi motamedi
>
> >I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5
> > server as the followings : #yum install -y gcc
>
> First, didn't you intend to install compat-gcc-34 ?
> 'yum install gcc' would install gcc 4.x
>
>
wouldn't
rpm -ivh --force gcc
help you? :)
--
Luís Trindade
- "John Doe" wrote:
> From: hadi motamedi
> >I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my
> CentOS 5 server as the followings :
> >#yum install -y gcc
>
> First, didn't you intend to install compat-gcc-34
From: hadi motamedi
>I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5
>server as the followings :
>#yum install -y gcc
First, didn't you intend to install compat-gcc-34 ?
'yum install gcc' would install gcc 4.x
>But in the middle of the installation , my server went dow
Carlos:
There are several other signals you can try
listed on this page:
http://tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/sect_12_01.html
If none of those work, I don't think there is anything else
you can do besides reboot.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will
Carlos:
What about kill -15?
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will your e-commerce site go offline if you have
a DB server failure, fiber cut, flood, or other disaster?
If so, ask me about our geographically redudant database system.
I am newbie, but I know diff in kill and kill -9.
Heres my o/p:
[r...@localhost ~]# ps ax | grep yum
16794 ?S 0:05 /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/yum install lsof
17097 pts/1S+ 0:04 /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/yum install lsof
18082 pts/3S+ 0:00 grep yum
[r...@localhost ~]# kil
Nope.. don't want to do that.
It will screw up some of the other things/processes I want to remain active.
CS.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>> > kill -9 ?
>> As specified in my first message, I have tried that. Its not
>> working.. :(
>
> What about rebooting the machine?
Carlos Santana wrote:
> As specified in my first message, I have tried that. Its not working.. :(
You've specifically tried kill -9 ? That just doesn't make sense,
I have never seen a process in a "S" state that did not die as
a result of a kill -9. "D" state yes, "Z" state yes, "T" state maybe,
b
> > kill -9 ?
> As specified in my first message, I have tried that. Its not
> working.. :(
What about rebooting the machine?
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will your e-commerce site go offline if you have
a DB server failure, fiber cut, flood, or other di
As specified in my first message, I have tried that. Its not working.. :(
-
CS.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM, nate wrote:
> Carlos Santana wrote:
>> - Process are not getting killed
>> - I do not have yum-updatesd service running, status returns
>> unrecognized service
>>
>> Any help?
>
> kill
Carlos Santana wrote:
> - Process are not getting killed
> - I do not have yum-updatesd service running, status returns
> unrecognized service
>
> Any help?
kill -9 ?
since the processes are sleeping kill -9 should work fine
nate
___
CentOS mailing li
- Process are not getting killed
- I do not have yum-updatesd service running, status returns
unrecognized service
Any help?
-
CS.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Carlos Santana a écrit :
>> Thanks Niki.
>>
>> More specifically it hangs after:
>> Downloading Packages:
>> Run
Carlos Santana a écrit :
> Thanks Niki.
>
> More specifically it hangs after:
> Downloading Packages:
> Running rpm_check_debug
> Running Transaction Test
>
> If I did yum clean all while app. is running then I get following message:
> [r...@localhost ~]# yum clean all
> Existing lock /var/run/yu
Carlos Santana wrote:
> Any clues?
kill the processes
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks Niki.
More specifically it hangs after:
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
If I did yum clean all while app. is running then I get following message:
[r...@localhost ~]# yum clean all
Existing lock /var/run/yum.pid: another copy is running as pid 17097.
Carlos Santana a écrit :
> Howdy,
>
> The yum install hangs in between. This happened few days as
> well, but just after doing Ctrl+C it reported error with mirror and
> switched to another one. Today, however, it is not responding to
> Ctrl+C and kill or kill -9 command is also not working. Any
on 4-21-2009 7:24 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
> I am getting the following error when doing "yum -y install openldap-clients".
>
> The machine is still on 5.2 and not 5.3. I dont wish to disturb the machine
> that much at this time. Is there no easy way to install openldap-clients?
>
>
>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am getting the following error when doing "yum -y install openldap-clients".
>
> The machine is still on 5.2 and not 5.3. I dont wish to disturb the machine
> that much at this time. Is there no easy way to install openldap-clients?
It looks
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 13:14 -0800, MHR wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:35 PM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > And this is the same way you done this?
> >
> > johnStanley
> >
>
> I used the method described in the forum to install audacity-nonfree
> (except that for the 32 bit version, there were a coup
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:35 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> And this is the same way you done this?
>
> johnStanley
>
I used the method described in the forum to install audacity-nonfree
(except that for the 32 bit version, there were a couple of libraries
I needed to add - libsample and its -devel, which
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:53 -0800, MHR wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:08 AM, JohnS wrote:
> > ]# yum install audacity --enablerepo=*\rpmforge
> >
> > Was this not going to be fixed for dep resolution. I'm not on the
> > rpmforge list and remember this issue from a while ago.
> We just had
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:08 AM, JohnS wrote:
> ]# yum install audacity --enablerepo=*\rpmforge
>
> Was this not going to be fixed for dep resolution. I'm not on the
> rpmforge list and remember this issue from a while ago.
>
We just had this discussion earlier this week - see
http://lists.cent
Yes I checked it. I suppose you must get used to the message "Nothing to
do" when the package requested is not available.
If you are on X.Org you can use yumex.
Alain Spineux wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 1:05 AM, Ioannis Vranos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is foobar an existing program or just an e
On Jan 20, 2008 1:05 AM, Ioannis Vranos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is foobar an existing program or just an example?
:-)
some more sample
# yum install somba postfox closedvpn cvsversion unzop GCC binuseless
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Readi
Is foobar an existing program or just an example?
try:
yum install "foobar*"
with the quotes included.
Alain Spineux wrote:
# yum install foobar
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package in
On 11/2/07, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yum install slocate
That didn't work either (it usually does, though..and am not sure why not)
Once I installed mlocate, then updatedb worked and I could locate.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
Rogelio wrote:
I did a barebones install and unfortunately don't have "locate" installed.
What do I need to install before this works?
yum install slocate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Tony Schreiner wrote:
On CentOS 4.5 (x86_64); happening on several different machines
with libstdc++ and libstdc++-devel v. 3.4.6-8
only one of the i386 or x86_64 versions of libstc++-devel is installed
if I
yum install libstdc++-devel
it will install the x86_64 versio
Tony Schreiner wrote:
> On CentOS 4.5 (x86_64); happening on several different machines
>
>
> with libstdc++ and libstdc++-devel v. 3.4.6-8
>
> only one of the i386 or x86_64 versions of libstc++-devel is installed
>
> if I
> yum install libstdc++-devel
>
> it will install the x86_64 version
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Kjellstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:34 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum install preferred arch only
>
> On Tuesday 07 August 2007,
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
...
> Maybe it's time for Yet-Another-Yum-Plugin YAYP, I will call it
> yum-arch-affinity and will only select the target arch of a package
> if multiple versions resolve, and if only 1 resolves to allow that
> to go through, this should allow pac
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
...
> Unless you are planning to run only stripped-down systems, that can
> cause trouble. A lot of packages do not have 64-bit versions
Quite a big leap from this (lots of packages, cause trouble, ..)
> and need
> (lots of) 32-bit support pack
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akemi Yagi
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:08 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum install preferred arch only
>
> On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker &
On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a couple 64-bit CentOS 5 installations here and was wondering if
> there was a yum option to have it install only x86_64 arch by default
> if no arch is specified.
>
> I tired of having to append .x86_64 on all package names I onl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:01 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum install preferred arch only
>
> On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker &
On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a couple 64-bit CentOS 5 installations here and was wondering if
> there was a yum option to have it install only x86_64 arch by default
> if no arch is specified.
>
> I tired of having to append .x86_64 on all package names I onl
On 8/7/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a couple 64-bit CentOS 5 installations here and was wondering if
> there was a yum option to have it install only x86_64 arch by default
> if no arch is specified.
>
> I tired of having to append .x86_64 on all package names I
Milind wrote:
Hello Admins,
can i have full steps to install on centos x86_64. Thnx in advance
--
Regards,
Milind
Step 1: Google the above phrase
Step 2: Start the install
Step 3: While it is installing, read
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html, specifically the bit
about asking for help
81 matches
Mail list logo
