On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 13:10 -0700, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 13:10 Sat 12 Mar, Alain Spineux (aspin...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Hi
> > I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k.
> > On a ext4 (fedora 14) the system crawl at 10.000.000 in the same directory.
> > I tried to creat
on 13:10 Sat 12 Mar, Alain Spineux (aspin...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k.
>
> On a ext4 (fedora 14) the system crawl at 10.000.000 in the same directory.
>
> I tried to create hash directories, two level of 4096 dir = 16.000.000
> b
On 3/14/2011 12:33 PM, Alain Spineux wrote:
>
>> File aaa12345 goes in
>>
>>$DIR/a/a/a/12345
>>
>> File abc6789 goes in
>>
>> $DIR/a/b/c/6789
>
> Try to create this king of tree yourself and when done, remove it.
> I took hours on my box and it is even faster to keep all files in the
> same
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Alain Spineux wrote:
>> Thanks to everybody for answering.
>>
>> I thing >250E6 is a lot and keep decent read and write access speed is unreal
>> using mutli-purpose filesystems like ext? and other ?FS.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Alain Spineux wrote:
> Thanks to everybody for answering.
>
> I thing >250E6 is a lot and keep decent read and write access speed is unreal
> using mutli-purpose filesystems like ext? and other ?FS.
> I would need a dedicated filesystem for that.
>
> This problem w
Thanks to everybody for answering.
I thing >250E6 is a lot and keep decent read and write access speed is unreal
using mutli-purpose filesystems like ext? and other ?FS.
I would need a dedicated filesystem for that.
This problem was only a possible solution to another problem.
I will solve the or
> Hi
>
> I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k.
>
> On a ext4 (fedora 14) the system crawl at 10.000.000 in the same
> directory.
>
> I tried to create hash directories, two level of 4096 dir = 16.000.000
> but I had to stop the script to create these dir after hours
> an
I haven't tried it but could you possibly use a database to hold all
those files instead? At less than 4K per "row", performance from an
indexed database might be faster.
On 3/12/11, Alain Spineux wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k.
>
> On a ext4 (fed
8 matches
Mail list logo