Hello Phil,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 08:21:37 +0100 Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 07:37 +0200, wwp wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> >
> > I'm encountering blocking issues with VMWare Workstation v14/v12 on
> > CentOS 7.
> >
> > The issue is that any Linux guestsystem will get network-dis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 07:37 +0200, wwp wrote:
> Hello there,
>
>
> I'm encountering blocking issues with VMWare Workstation v14/v12 on
> CentOS 7.
>
> The issue is that any Linux guestsystem will get network-disconnected
> after a short while. I tri
Packer FTW
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
>
> As an amateur to VMware - I thought - great I can get VMplayer and ESX
> should be able to import my image... Wrong... I even went through the
> troubl
On 04/24/2018 01:26 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
...
I just want to be able to provide a pre-built image with CentOS 7 and my
other programs on a bootable VMware image that is easily imported into any
VMware platform - Workstation,
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS On Behalf Of Steven Tardy
> Sent: den 25 april 2018 02:26
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Vmware - Slightly off topic
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:27 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> > What is the cor
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
>>> What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
>>
>>
>> You are probably looking for VMware Converter which can p2v or v2v.
>>
>> IMO: if you are creating a VM image which is a binary blob or image then
>> you are doi
What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
You are probably looking for VMware Converter which can p2v or v2v.
IMO: if you are creating a VM image which is a binary blob or image then
you are doing it wrong. Have the VM/server/desktop be a simple
next/next/next insta
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:27 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
You are probably looking for VMware Converter which can p2v or v2v.
IMO: if you are creating a VM image which is a binary blob or image then
you are doing it wrong. Have t
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:02:19PM +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Jerry Geis wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
> >
> > As an amateur to VMware - I thought - great I can get VMplayer and ESX
> > should be able to
In article ,
Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
>
> As an amateur to VMware - I thought - great I can get VMplayer and ESX
> should be able to import my image... Wrong... I even went through the
> trouble of "converting" to VMWa
Hello Jerry,
This message is typical. No Problem same on other linux distros.
Sincerely
Andy
> Am 14.09.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Jerry Geis :
>
> hi all - anyone find a way to get vmware player 12.5.7 working with 7.4?
>
> Thanks - everything good with the upgrade except that.
>
> Great job Cen
>Build error "Failed to build vmnet. Failed to execute the build
command."
>when trying to compile vmnet.Not one other shred of data in the logs
>telling me WHY it failed to build.
>I have rolled back to the last 514 kernel to use vmware but I
>don't want to recompile vmware because of the liabil
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 09:39 AM, Allart Pieters wrote:
>> I need to convert a VMWare Server 2 disk image to QEMU. I've read that
>> QEMU supports VMWare disk formats. I just want to be sure it also
>> supports the old VMWare Server 2 format. Anyone h
On 02/11/2015 09:39 AM, Allart Pieters wrote:
> I need to convert a VMWare Server 2 disk image to QEMU. I've read that
> QEMU supports VMWare disk formats. I just want to be sure it also
> supports the old VMWare Server 2 format. Anyone has any experience
> with/knowledge about this?
take a look a
On 02/17/2014 02:12 AM, Yawei Guo wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> It is surprised that VMware-tools gives 4 options only for resolutin after
> I install VMware-tools for CentOS release 5.10 (Final), a guest OS running
> with VMware player 6.0.1 build-1379776. The kernal is 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5
> x86_64 x86_64.
Hi All,
Thanks for your comments. Finally figured out the way. Upgrading VMwaretools
did the trick.
Regards
Hersh
On Monday, 20 January 2014 3:07 PM, Fabrizio Di Carlo
wrote:
Hi Hersh,
to know hardware version you can use this table:
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.d
Hi Hersh,
to know hardware version you can use this table:
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1003746
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Hersh Parikh wrote:
>
>
>
> Host has 128GB RAM and its running CentOS 5.4 64 bit architect,
> Guest i
Host has 128GB RAM and its running CentOS 5.4 64 bit architect,
Guest is 64 bit ubuntu 12.04,
VMware Player I am using is 6.1
@Luigi- I have seen this thread and I have a Q around this. How do I know what
hardware(e.g. 10/9/8) do I have?
Regards
Hersh
On Monday, 20 January 2014 12:16 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hersh Parikh said the following on 20/01/2014 07:17:
> I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it
> does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing
> error stating- "Requested memory size is great
On 01/20/2014 09:17 AM, Hersh Parikh wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine.
> However it does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It
> keeps throwing error stating- "Requested memory size is greater than
> allowed maximum of 3072 MB. Could n
On 1/19/2014 10:17 PM, Hersh Parikh wrote:
> I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it
> does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing error
> stating- "Requested memory size is greater than allowed maximum of 3072 MB.
> Could not initiat
Rhugga Harper wrote on 05/17/2012 03:58 PM:
> I just installed CentOS 5.6 32-bit
Have you tried installing the current/supported CentOS-5 release 5.8?
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Rhugga Harper wrote:
> Ok. I run several linux distro's via vmware on top of my windows 7
> machine.
Ew (cooties! ugh!) (That should be the other way 'round.)
> I just installed CentOS 5.6 32-bit and I can't get the display to work
> right. When it first boots, the screen is very small an
On Monday 09 January 2012 23:36:53 Igor Furlan wrote:
> Is there a way to revert the 'copy&paste' functionality back to the
> traditional UNIX way of doing it,
> highlight the text with left mouse/touchpad button and paste it with
> the middle mouse/touchpad button.
AFAIK, it *should* work while i
Hi Monty,
> Which repository did you get the above drivers from? I have base and cr
> enabled on my box.
they are from @base.
I doubt that the VMware Tools installer installs them at all. Possibly without
a current version of the VMware tools the CentOS installation process doesn't
recogni
On 1/4/12 9:08 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Which repository did you get the above drivers from? I have base and cr
>> enabled on my box.
> http://packages.vmware.com
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
On 1/4/12 9:08 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Which repository did you get the above drivers from? I have base and cr
>> enabled on my box.
> http://packages.vmware.com
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis
>Which repository did you get the above drivers from? I have base and cr
>enabled on my box.
http://packages.vmware.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 1/4/12 7:03 AM, Peter Eckel wrote:
>
> My current versions are:
>
>xorg-x11-drv-vmware.x86_64 11.0.3-1.el6
>xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse.x86_6412.7.0-1.el6
>xorg-x11-drv-vmware.x86_64 11.0.3-1.el6
>
> HTH,
>
>Peter.
>
Peter,
Which repository did you get the abo
Hi Monty,
> I am running vmware fusion 4.1.1 on a OSX host.
Same here.
> Centos6.2 is a guest.
Same here.
> The box is a macbook laptop running leopard.
OK, there's a difference - I have a Mac Pro running Snow Leopard. But that
shouldn't make a difference.
> Before upgrading to 6.2, the d
>Hi,
>
>nothing in there I had checked.
>
>Cheers.
Why not make this easy, install from an rpm from their repo...
http://packages.vmware.com/tools/esx/index.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent
Hi,
nothing in there I had checked.
Cheers.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:25 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Brian McKerr
>
> > Running vSphere 5.0 and I install tools from the VMware tar.gz file with
> '
> > vmware-install-tools.pl -d' it seems to do all the usual/right things.
> Once
> > compl
From: Brian McKerr
> Running vSphere 5.0 and I install tools from the VMware tar.gz file with '
> vmware-install-tools.pl -d' it seems to do all the usual/right things. Once
> completed there is no 'vmware-tools' listed in 'chkconfig
> --list'. A reboot
> of the box leaves vmware tools not runni
On 09/03/2011 12:09 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In
> article,
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>>
And another problem: why do you use vmware server?? It is EOL and not
supported for vmware anymore.
>>>
>>> Mainly because it's a test sys
In article ,
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>
> >> And another problem: why do you use vmware server?? It is EOL and not
> >> supported for vmware anymore.
> >
> > Mainly because it's a test system at home on which I've had VMware server
> > install
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>> And another problem: why do you use vmware server?? It is EOL and not
>> supported for vmware anymore.
>
> Mainly because it's a test system at home on which I've had VMware server
> installed for a couple of years already, and have had n
In article <4e611015.2030...@gmail.com>,
carlopmart wrote:
> On 09/02/2011 07:12 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> > I have an instance of VMware server 1.0.10 hosted on CentOS 5, and it
> > runs fine, with guests of CentOS 4, CentOS5 or Win2000.
> >
> > I have just created a new VM and installed Cent
carlopmart said the following on 02/09/11 19:44:
> OOps, my fault: vmware tools 7.x works for CentOS 6.0, but not for
> RHEL/SL 6.1 ...
"works" with some ceveats.
If I fire up X on a CentOS 6 VM running inside a WMware Workstation 7.1.4 64
bit
running on Ubuntu, sometimes the mouse status is s
On 09/02/2011 07:33 PM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 09/02/2011 07:28 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
>> carlopmart said the following on 02/09/11 19:19:
>>
>>> Only vmware tools from ESXi 5 works for CentOS/RHEL/SL 6.x ...
>>
>> Installed successfully VMware tools of VMware Workstation 7.1.4 (the
>> same level
>>
On 09/02/2011 07:28 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
> carlopmart said the following on 02/09/11 19:19:
>
>> Only vmware tools from ESXi 5 works for CentOS/RHEL/SL 6.x ...
>
> Installed successfully VMware tools of VMware Workstation 7.1.4 (the same
> level
> as ESXi 4.1 AFIK) on CentOS 6
>
>
> Ciao,
> luigi
carlopmart said the following on 02/09/11 19:19:
> Only vmware tools from ESXi 5 works for CentOS/RHEL/SL 6.x ...
Installed successfully VMware tools of VMware Workstation 7.1.4 (the same level
as ESXi 4.1 AFIK) on CentOS 6
Ciao,
luigi
--
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
To take a photograph is to ali
On 09/02/2011 07:12 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> I have an instance of VMware server 1.0.10 hosted on CentOS 5, and it
> runs fine, with guests of CentOS 4, CentOS5 or Win2000.
>
> I have just created a new VM and installed CentOS6 on it, which also runs
> fine, except that I can't build the VMwar
On 3/29/11 5:12 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Can I combine VMWare ESXi (free version) virtualization and CentOS
mdraid level 1? Any pointers how to do it? I never used VMWare before.
>
> On 29.3.2011 11.58, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
>> ES
> Can I combine VMWare ESXi (free version) virtualization and CentOS
> mdraid level 1? Any pointers how to do it? I never used VMWare before.
Not if you want to run ESXi on bare metal; ESXi is an OS in it's own
right. VMware Player/Server/Workstation OTOH will run on top of mdadm
as it needs a hos
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> > Can I combine VMWare ESXi (free version) virtualization and CentOS
>> > mdraid level 1? Any pointers how to do it? I never used VMWare before.
On 29.3.2011 11.58, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> ESXi itself is the OS. No need Centos anymore to
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 11:47 +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Can I combine VMWare ESXi (free version) virtualization
No, ESXi is an OS.
> and CentOS mdraid level 1? Any pointers how to do it? I never used VMWare
> before.
VMware supports NFS for VM storage. So export your MD-RAID volume to
the ESX
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Can I combine VMWare ESXi (free version) virtualization and CentOS
> mdraid level 1? Any pointers how to do it? I never used VMWare before.
ESXi itself is the OS. No need Centos anymore to install it.
(if I'm getting what you mean correctly ^^
On 03/29/2011 10:47 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Can I combine VMWare ESXi (free version) virtualization and CentOS
> mdraid level 1? Any pointers how to do it? I never used VMWare before.
>
> - Jussi
>
Why?? What do you want to do?? Do you need to install a CentOS virtual
guest with a mdraid-1?? IMH
> You may want to try VMware-player if you, (like almost everyone else)
> preferred 1.x to 2.x. The later versions of player are more like 1.x,
> allowing you to install an operating system from ISO or whatever, and
> work quite well with 64 bit CentOS.
If you want automation, forget player.
On 02/25/11 8:04 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Windows-hosted version of Server 2.x didn't have those problems.
>
I found all versions of VMware Server 2.0.x to be unstable under load on
multiple different platforms and essentially unusable. That was when I
switched those systems over to VBox
_
On 2/25/2011 11:24 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:11 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
>>> VMware Workstation has no issues with the glibc update; VMware is just not
>>> properly supporting VMware Server, has nothing to do with Red Hat (Ubuntu
>>> is also listed as a supported OS,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:11 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
>> VMware Workstation has no issues with the glibc update; VMware is just not
>> properly supporting VMware Server, has nothing to do with Red Hat (Ubuntu is
>> also listed as a supported OS, yet when you do the glibc update that matches
> VMware Workstation has no issues with the glibc update; VMware is just not
> properly supporting VMware Server, has nothing to do with Red Hat (Ubuntu is
> also listed as a supported OS, yet when you do the glibc update that matches
> > > the one that causes the issues on RHEL, the same thing
On Friday, February 25, 2011 11:04:23 am Les Mikesell wrote:
> RHEL5 was never a 'supported'
> platform, so a stable module wasn't included.
According to VMware's documentation, RHEL5 was and is a fully supported
platform for VMware Server 2.0 (see page 26 of the current 'VMware Server
User's
On 2/25/2011 8:36 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>
> Also, VMware could have made their module load across kernel updates without
> recompile if they had set their kernel module up to support KABI (kernel ABI)
> tracking, but they didn't.
That was the other strange thing. RHEL5 was never a 'supported'
On 25/02/11 14:52, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/25/11 4:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> >
>>> >> Anyway, my point was that the fabled library ABI stability of RHEL
>>> >> turned out
>>> >> not to work for VMware Server 2.0. But CentOS did come through with
>>> >> bug-for-bug compatibility as promis
On Feb 25, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/25/11 7:33 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:36:28PM -0800, David Brian Chait wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you need to download the VI3 rather than 4.1 to use 32 bit support,
>>> but it does work. I have it in production on
On Feb 25, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 10:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 2/24/11 8:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
up and running quickly. If your h
On 2/25/11 7:33 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:36:28PM -0800, David Brian Chait wrote:
>>
>> I think you need to download the VI3 rather than 4.1 to use 32 bit support,
>> but it does work. I have it in production on some older hardware and it has
>> not let me down yet.
>
On 2/25/11 4:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> Anyway, my point was that the fabled library ABI stability of RHEL turned out
>> not to work for VMware Server 2.0. But CentOS did come through with
>> bug-for-bug compatibility as promised, causing the same crashing behavior
>> after
>> the same min
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:36:28PM -0800, David Brian Chait wrote:
>
> I think you need to download the VI3 rather than 4.1 to use 32 bit support,
> but it does work. I have it in production on some older hardware and it has
> not let me down yet.
I believe David is correct. We had some old ma
On 02/24/2011 10:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/24/11 8:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
>>> up and running quickly. If your hardware is not on the supported list
>>> there are other lists of
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:47 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Player isn't good for most of my usage because most of the time I don't want
> the
> console display at all - I just connect to the guests remotely with
> freenx/ssh/vnc when necessary. And I have Server 1.x setups that have run
> for
>
> Thanks, I did not know that. I could've swarn I had tested it on some
> old IBM x306. Will have to take a look into that.
> I still like that automation that I get with CentOS, puppet and VirtualBox.
> Ben
I think you need to download the VI3 rather than 4.1 to use 32 bit support, but
it d
On 25/02/2011 4:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/24/11 9:18 PM, Ben wrote:
>> I have begun to switch all my hosts without hardware virtualization, so
>> can't use ESXi, to VirtualBox.
> ESXi only needs hardware virtualization support for 64bit guest VMs.
> as long as you can live with 32bit VMs,
On 02/24/11 9:18 PM, Ben wrote:
> I have begun to switch all my hosts without hardware virtualization, so
> can't use ESXi, to VirtualBox.
ESXi only needs hardware virtualization support for 64bit guest VMs.
as long as you can live with 32bit VMs, you're good with older CPUs. I
have it runnin
On 2/24/11 8:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
>> up and running quickly. If your hardware is not on the supported list
>> there are other lists of tested hardware where people have it running on
>> "
On 25/02/2011 1:13 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:04:08PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Can someone remind me why VMware server 2.x broke with a RHEL/CentOS 5.x
>> glibc
>> update? I switched back to 1.x which I like better anyway, but if the reason
>> for putting up with o
On 2/24/11 8:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
>> up and running quickly. If your hardware is not on the supported list
>> there are other lists of tested hardware where people have it running on
>> "U
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
> Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
> up and running quickly. If your hardware is not on the supported list
> there are other lists of tested hardware where people have it running on
> "Unsupported" hardware.
>
> Player is not a solution
I have always had issues with VMware server and compiling of kernel
modules, normally ended up costing a couple of days effort .. I have
found 2 is more resource intensive than 1. Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
up and running quickly. If your hardware is not on the supported list
there are other lists
On 01/21/11 1:07 PM, mattias wrote:
> ok
part of the etiquette of bottom posting is to trim the superfluous parts
of teh original message, including signatures, and just quote the part
you are replying to.
but you seem to revel in being a twit, and are going on my auto-delete
list real soon n
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of aurfal...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:05 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware
On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:57 PM, mattias wrote:
> 5.5
> But that has
:51 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware
>
> Am 21.01.2011 21:40, schrieb mattias:
>> Bad
>> Because
>> My nic will only pic a ip when xen kernel are loaded If I try a no
>> xen
>> kernel The dhclient reply No link check your cable But a
try to help.
mark
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Alexander Dalloz
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:51 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware
>
> Am 21
5.5
But that has worked before
A intel card
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Alexander Dalloz
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:51 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware
Am 21.01.2011 21:40, schrieb
Am 21.01.2011 21:40, schrieb mattias:
> Bad
> Because
> My nic will only pic a ip when xen kernel are loaded
> If I try a no xen kernel
> The dhclient reply
> No link check your cable
> But all cables are connected
Which NIC is that (lspci -v output for the Ethernet Controller)?
Which release of
ge-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> Of aurfal...@gmail.com
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:31 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware
>
> On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:38 AM, mattias wrote:
>
> > Can i run x
Am 21.01.2011 22:31, schrieb aurfal...@gmail.com:
> On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:38 AM, mattias wrote:
>
>> Can i run xen and vmware on the same machine?
Not meant to be nitpicking, but VMware is a company and not any specific
application or software solution. And you can get very different
virtualizat
: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:31 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware
On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:38 AM, mattias wrote:
> Can i run xen and vmware on the same machine?
No, once you have the Xen kernel loaded on your dom0, then no VMPlayer,
etc...
- a
On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:38 AM, mattias wrote:
> Can i run xen and vmware on the same machine?
No, once you have the Xen kernel loaded on your dom0, then no
VMPlayer, etc...
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mail
What do you meen?
abandoned ?
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Mark
Skickat: den 10 juli 2010 02:56
Till: CentOS mailing list
Ämne: Re: [CentOS] vmware
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>
> I
So ubuntu is not supported?
Ok but you can insstall it
But i understand how you meen
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För
Alexander Dalloz
Skickat: den 10 juli 2010 02:14
Till: CentOS mailing list
Ämne: Re: [CentOS] vmware
Am
>
> I think it is specific to RHEL/Centos. Server 2.x was broken by an update to
> RHEL 5.x and neither RHEL nor VMware have done anything to fix it. I don't
> think other supported distros were affected.
>
There is also some unfixed security issues with 2.x.
> I don't think anyone likes the we
>
> Can you expand on that? Did they abandon VMWare Server altogether, or
> just version 2?
>
> I'm still using version 1.08, and it works fine, except that Win XP
> SP3 won't Hibernate or Stand-by due to an incompatibility with one of
> the VMWare drivers. I was using the VMWare save machine sta
Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>> I'm not talking about VMware Server 2.x because VMware has abandoned it,
>> although I use it on CentOS 5.5 with some workarounds.
>>
>
> Can you expand on that? Did they abandon VMWare Server altogether, or
> just version
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>
> I'm not talking about VMware Server 2.x because VMware has abandoned it,
> although I use it on CentOS 5.5 with some workarounds.
>
Can you expand on that? Did they abandon VMWare Server altogether, or
just version 2?
I'm still using v
Am 10.07.2010 01:59, schrieb mattias:
> How can vmware run more stable on centos and not on ubuntu?
> I meen
> Usb works fine on centos but not on ubuntu
VMware is a company, not a specific product.
One (CentOS) may be supprted, the other (Ubuntu) not.
Alexander
On 07/10/2010 12:59 AM, mattias wrote:
> How can vmware run more stable on centos and not on ubuntu?
> I meen
> Usb works fine on centos but not on ubuntu
>
>
I suppose that you mean VMware Workstation 7.1 / Player 3.1.
VMware officially supports their desktop products on RHEL 5.x, OpenSuSE,
Ubu
On 4/28/2010 1:28 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
>>>
Running the VMware converter
tool from an old Dell Win2k server with an IDE disk to produce an ESXi
image went through the motions but the image wouldn't boot - but doing
the same thing to a vmware server (v1) image file over a network sh
On 4/28/2010 1:16 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Running the VMware converter
>> tool from an old Dell Win2k server with an IDE disk to produce an ESXi
>> image went through the motions but the image wouldn't boot - but doing
>> the same thing to a vmware server (v1) image file over a network share
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 13:17 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/28/2010 12:55 PM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 12:39 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >
> >> Running the VMware converter
> >> tool from an old Dell Win2k server with an IDE disk to produce an ESXi
> >> image went through the
On 4/28/2010 12:55 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 12:39 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Running the VMware converter
>> tool from an old Dell Win2k server with an IDE disk to produce an ESXi
>> image went through the motions but the image wouldn't boot - but doing
>> the same thing to a
>Running the VMware converter
>tool from an old Dell Win2k server with an IDE disk to produce an ESXi
>image went through the motions but the image wouldn't boot - but doing
>the same thing to a vmware server (v1) image file over a network share
>worked. Has anyone seen that before?
Never use
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 12:39 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Running the VMware converter
> tool from an old Dell Win2k server with an IDE disk to produce an ESXi
> image went through the motions but the image wouldn't boot - but doing
> the same thing to a vmware server (v1) image file over a net
On 4/26/2010 1:01 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>> There's the glibc issue that's still unresolved. There's another
>> issue with using Firefox as the admin client. It *might* let you in,
>> but the console plugin doesn't appear to be working again. Only client
>> that works for me is InternetExplode
On 4/27/2010 2:48 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>
You don't need to downgrade for the whole OS, you can just do it for
VMware. See the procedure in the first comment in this bug
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3884. I have done that and it
works fine. Just remember that if y
on 4-27-2010 8:46 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
> On 4/27/2010 10:29 AM, Gary Greene wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You don't need to downgrade for the whole OS, you can just do it for
>>> VMware. See the procedure in the first comment in this bug
>>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3884. I have don
Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>> VMware appears to be intentionally slow-motion killing their VMware
>> Server product in favor of ESX/ESXi. They declined to publish needed
>> security updates for Server in the latest round and if you check the
onday, April 26, 2010 7:06 PM
>>> To: CentOS mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware-server-console not installed
> [...]
>>>
>>> You don't need to downgrade for the whole OS, you can just do it for
>>> VMware. See the procedure in the first
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
