Hello Karanbir,
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:43 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/18/2012 05:21 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > Anyway, I'm afraid most of the missing updates and packages I reported
> > just now are actual issues.
> >
>
> what missing updates are you talking about ? your la
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:47 A
On 08/18/2012 05:21 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Anyway, I'm afraid most of the missing updates and packages I reported
> just now are actual issues.
>
what missing updates are you talking about ? your last few emails about
missing packages was down to your script not working and you not
c
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:47 A
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:47 A
Hello Akemi,
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 08:59 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> That srpm is dated 06/13/2011 (from year 2011). The latest/current
> (tigervnc-1.0.90-0.17.20110314svn4359.el6.src.rpm) is dated 11/09/2011
> (also from year 2011). Note also the difference between -0.15 and
> -0.17. :-)
Right, m
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/tigervnc-1.0.90-0.15.20110314svn4359.el6_1.1.src.rpm
>
> Seems like this update wasn't picked up even though it's two months old,
> and the previ
Hi guys,
Could you be so kind to trim those quotes a little?
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:40 -0400, Cal Webster wrote:
> Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems
> here.
> As with all the other tests, I only replaced the
> tigervnc-server-module
> package on each host.
Some
On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Joh
On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Joh
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 05:23 P
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 05:23 P
On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> We began experiencing failed vnc conne
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on
> >>> servers
On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
>>> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on
>>> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on
> > servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred
> > on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers.
On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on
> servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred
> on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers.
>
> On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears wit
17 matches
Mail list logo
