Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-21 Thread Tris Hoar
Jon, Its worth noting in C6 that you really should avoid using RPM to add/remove stuff and stick with yum. Yum now supports rolling back and forward package changes, but this is broken if you do things with RPM. Tris On 20/09/2011 18:48, Jon Detert wrote: > I installed CentOS 6.0 on 2 differe

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 09/20/2011 12:48 PM, Jon Detert wrote: > I installed CentOS 6.0 on 2 different x86_64 boxen. Both originally had > selinux installed and enabled. I never touched selinux other than to remove > as much of it as I could via rpm -e. As far as I can tell, here are the > remaining packages that

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread James Edwards
On 9/20/2011 2:14 PM, Jon Detert wrote: >> Did you disable SELinux by changing 'SELINUX=disabled' in >> /etc/sysconfig/selinux? Wouldn't that be easier than removing all > I did not do so explicitly. But it is set to disabled as described above. > I assume the rpm -e did that. So, there must be

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread Jon Detert
- Original Message - > From: "James Edwards" > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:52:34 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS > 6.0 box > > On 9/20/2011 1:48 PM, Jon Detert wrote:

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy remnant according to /bin/ls on CentOS 6.0 box

2011-09-20 Thread James Edwards
On 9/20/2011 1:48 PM, Jon Detert wrote: > I installed CentOS 6.0 on 2 different x86_64 boxen. Both originally had > selinux installed and enabled. I never touched selinux other than to remove > as much of it as I could via rpm -e. As far as I can tell, here are the > remaining packages that h