Il 2021-06-22 02:34 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
CentOS Stream is not a rolling release. It gets "rolling updates,"
but that just means that there are no point releases within a major
release, and that updates aren't delayed in order to group rebased
packages together at 6 month intervals.
Hi Go
On 6/21/21 4:53 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Historically the CentOS team refused to provide such metadata due to
the added work required. Now with Stream, and the demise of classic
CentOS, security updates are even less probable (ie: a rolling release
is often wholly updated).
CentOS Stream i
If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and
> then delete it.
>
>
>
> From: CentOS on behalf of Gionatan Danti
>
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 01:53 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security Updates not proper
Hi,
freely does not imply free to redistribute. Of course these
informations are available from various sources which allow
redistribution, but it takes time to aggregate them - time that someone
need to spend doing the necessary research.
best regards,
Markus
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 13:53 +0200,
then delete it.
From: CentOS on behalf of Gionatan Danti
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 01:53 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security Updates not properly flagged
Il 2021-06-21 13:34 Pete Biggs ha scritto:
> CentOS does not provide
Il 2021-06-21 13:34 Pete Biggs ha scritto:
CentOS does not provide the metadata to allow the --security flag to
work.
Right.
It doesn't provide it because that information from Redhat is
proprietary and not open source.
This is not my understanding. From what I can see, updates which patche
>
> There are probably more security updates which should be installed by
> yum --security but those are the packages I am most interested in.
>
> Please change as necessary to allow yum --security to work.
>
CentOS does not provide the metadata to allow the --security flag to
work.
It doesn't
Le 18/03/2011 01:32, Timothy Murphy a écrit :
> I don't think the OP did ask when 5.6 would be ready.
> What he/she said, IIRC, was that Karanbir had suggested
> that 5.6 would be out last week,
> and he/she was asking if there had been a problem.
This is exactly the point. I can add that all my C
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Timothy Murphy
>Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:33 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>However, I don't think people who ask
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> V5.6 will be done when it's done, okay?
>
> I don't think the OP did ask when 5.6 would be ready.
> What he/she said, IIRC, was that Karanbir had suggested
> that 5.6 would be out last week,
> and he/she was asking if there had be
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Can we please, please, pretty please with a cherry on top, not start this
> dance again?
Don't you think there is something slightly farcical
about posting messages suggesting people should stop posting messages?
> V5.6 will be done when it's done, okay?
I don't think the O
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
> I really appreciate all the people involved with the building and rebranding
> of redhat to create the centos distribution. If i had the time and
> dedication, I would definitely put forth the effort to help, but I cant, and
> therefore
--- On Thu, 3/17/11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 11:35 AM
> Alain Péan wrote:
> > Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
> &g
Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
>> Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
>>> Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>> With all due respect
Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglienowrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready l
Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
> Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
and planned for the
Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>>> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
>>> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
>>>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>>
>> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
>> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
>> anything. I think having some news once
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
> anything. I think having some news once a week is something feasible,
> and I don' want to start a da
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:34 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>With all due respect, the release was an
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:25 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>You beat me to it: *PLEASE* don'
Le 17/03/2011 16:25, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>>> Behalf
>>> Of Alain Péan
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf
>>Of Alain Péan
>>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>>To: CentOS mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>May I ask the develloppers if we can ha
Le 17/03/2011 16:02, Hendrik a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> There are several important security updates available:
>
> Critical: firefox security and bug fix update
> Important: tomcat5 security update
> Important: vsftpd security update
> Moderate: subversion security and bug fix update
> Important: logw
On 3/9/11 5:45 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
> updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
> outstanding issues.
> Thanks.
My solution at least for the kernel, was to g
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 05:45:22 pm Mark Foster wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
> updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
> outstanding issues.
> Thanks.
See the on-going threa
On 03/09/2011 04:45 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
> updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
> outstanding issues.
> Thanks.
All of those apply to 5.6 ( where apply
Keith Keller wrote on 10/12/2010 06:35 PM:
> Somewhat related to this, does anybody know (or have links to) what
> work, if any, is happening with the yum security plugin? The only
> information I could find was some posts from Karanbir from last year,
> basically saying it was a low priority beca
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:11:49PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
>
> Secure? Yes, as long as you apply the updates as needed. You can always
> read about why there is a patch and decide if it is applicable to your
> situation.
Somewhat related to this, does anybody know (or have links to) what
work
On 10/11/2010 9:17 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Giles Coochey
>
>> On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
>>> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
>>> need to have a security update?
>> What is your IP? :-D
> Keep this information secret, but I t
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync wrote:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide.
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
From: Giles Coochey
> On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
> > I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> > need to have a security update?
> What is your IP? :-D
Keep this information secret, but I think his IP is 127.0.0.1 ...
And there's no fi
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:30:04 +0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
If you apply ALL of the security updates as they become available. ALL
O/Ss have security updates from time-to-time (what do you think those
MS-Windows 'Service
On 11/10/10 11:30 PM, sync wrote:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
*Sigh*
If you don't update it then it won't remain so. It's like buying a
brand new deadlock for the door to your house and then leaving the door
wide open when you go out. Chances are that sooner or
Am 11.10.10 14:30, schrieb sync:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
Okay, I'll bite.
>From time to time there are bugs found in the software which CentOS
ships. These bugs can lead your code to crash, your machine to be denied
of service as the process which has the bug
I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> need to have a security update?
> ___
What is your IP? :-D
___
CentOS mailing li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Ritika Garg spake:
> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> need to have a security update?
YMMD.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMswD6fg746kcGBOwRAtvVAJ9HWjA7ZOMw2TdtFE
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> nate wrote:
>> slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
>>> 5.3 x_64.
>>
>> Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
>> you need that are
bed...
URL:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091021/bdc2b5a9/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: "nate"
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security updates for Centos 5.3
To: centos@c
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Torkil Zachariassen
>Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:39 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security updates for Centos 5.3
>
>On Wed, 2
On 10/21/2009 11:08 PM, Torkil Zachariassen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:11 -0500, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
>> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with
>> Centos 5.3 x_64.
>
> Yum knows :)
>$ yum --security check-update
>
> You may have to install yum-s
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:11 -0500, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with
> Centos 5.3 x_64.
Yum knows :)
$ yum --security check-update
You may have to install yum-security first:
# yum install yum-security
.t.
___
On Wednesday 21 October 2009, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
> 5.3 x_64.
All, that is "yum update" with a standard configuration (note that "All" here
includes updates all the way to 5.x latest (which, as
nate wrote:
> slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
>> 5.3 x_64.
>
> Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
> you need that are available.
Except that you'll probably end up with 5.4 or may
slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
> 5.3 x_64.
Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
you need that are available.
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
47 matches
Mail list logo
