Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/12 8:31 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> That said, 'twould be nice to have a clue
>>> what went wrong with the Bingo script.
>>
>> it was written for a specific ubuntu/debian flavor and not tested
>> elsewhere. auto
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/27/12 8:31 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> That said, 'twould be nice to have a clue
>> what went wrong with the Bingo script.
>
> it was written for a specific ubuntu/debian flavor and not tested
> elsewhere. autoconf is a gnarly thing, the scrip
On 11/27/12 8:31 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> That said, 'twould be nice to have a clue
> what went wrong with the Bingo script.
it was written for a specific ubuntu/debian flavor and not tested
elsewhere. autoconf is a gnarly thing, the scripts for it need to be
carefully developed, just bec
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>
>> 'Twould be nice just to know what the messages mean.
>> I get the impression that output like this are indications of a problem
>> that
>> is not specific to the particular software that I was trying to compile:
>> autoco
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> 'Twould be nice just to know what the messages mean.
> I get the impression that output like this are indications of a problem
> that
> is not specific to the particular software that I was trying to compile:
> autoconf wrote:
>> checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes
>> c
*Clawson* wrote:
> You are very unwise to use repo versions of avr-gcc as the maintainers
don't seem skilled enough to know which are the important patches to be
applied when they build.
>
> Far better to get the results of Bingo's build scripts that are hosted on
my website here:
>
> www.wrightfl
On 11/26/12 6:19 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Far better to get the results of Bingo's build scripts that are hosted on my
> website here:
> >
> >www.wrightflyer.co.uk/avr-gcc/
that hasn't been updated in a year, and at the bottom references
http://www.atmel.com/tools/ATMELAVRTOOLCHAINFORLINUX.a
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/26/12 4:46 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
On 11/26/12 3:35 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> The versions of avr-gcc in linux repositories mostly do not work.
really? the avr-gcc-4.
On 11/26/12 4:46 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> >On 11/26/12 3:35 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> >>The versions of avr-gcc in linux repositories mostly do not work.
>> >
>> >
>> >really? the avr-gcc-4.5.x in EPEL for instance?
> So far as I am aware,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/26/12 3:35 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> The versions of avr-gcc in linux repositories mostly do not work.
>
>
> really? the avr-gcc-4.5.x in EPEL for instance?
So far as I am aware, only debian and its package-compatible
relatives have an avr-g
On 11/26/12 3:35 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> The versions of avr-gcc in linux repositories mostly do not work.
really? the avr-gcc-4.5.x in EPEL for instance?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
