Do you really need to use nfs?
--
Eero
2013/7/13 Helmut Drodofsky
> Thank you.
>
> I have made:
>
> service nfslock stop
> service xinetd restart
> service nfslock start
>
> Then both is possible.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Viele Grüße
> i.V. Helmut Drodofsky
>
>
>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Helmut Drodofsky
wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I have made:
>
> service nfslock stop
> service xinetd restart
> service nfslock start
>
> Then both is possible.
>
>
RPC dynamically assigns ports for nfs unless it's told not to. If you
configure it with specific ports def
Thank you.
I have made:
service nfslock stop
service xinetd restart
service nfslock start
Then both is possible.
Best regards.
Viele Grüße
i.V. Helmut Drodofsky
Internet XS Service GmbH
Heßbrühlstraße 15
D-70565 Stuttgart
Fon : 0711/781941-0
Fax : 0711/781941-
how about running rsync via ssh as normal way? you can also disable rpc* if
you are not using nfs..
On Jul 13, 2013 12:24 AM, "Helmut Drodofsky"
wrote:
> I have searched now:
>
> port 837 is used by rpc.statd
>
> And now rsync daemaon can not start.
>
> No I am searching what to do wtith rpc.stat
I have searched now:
port 837 is used by rpc.statd
And now rsync daemaon can not start.
No I am searching what to do wtith rpc.statd
Viele Grüße
i.V. Helmut Drodofsky
Internet XS Service GmbH
Heßbrühlstraße 15
D-70565 Stuttgart
Fon : 0711/781941-0
Fax : 0711/7
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:56:02 +0200
Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver]
> rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(600)
> [receiver=3.0.6]
I do remote backups from other computers using rsync and occasionall
Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use procedures for backup with rsync. The data where "pulled" by the
> backup server.
>
> Sender: Now CentOS 5.9, receiver CentOS 6 updated on July 3.
>
> Up to yesterday it run OK.
>
> Today morning I made yum update to sender CentOS 5
>
> Now I get
>
> rsync
7 matches
Mail list logo
