Re: [CentOS] rpmforge.repo

2009-08-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Christoph Maser wrote on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:18:26 +0200: > Looks like rpmforge has the same or a higher prio (lower number) than > base maybe base has accidentally none. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___

Re: [CentOS] rpmforge.repo

2009-08-06 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 15:58 +0200 schrieb Sam Drinkard: > Sorry I didn't quote the reply from Christoph Maser... was on another > machine. Anyhow, this is the complete yum output with rpmforge.repo active. Looks like rpmforge has the same or a higher prio (lower number) than base

Re: [CentOS] rpmforge.repo

2009-08-06 Thread Rob Kampen
Sam Drinkard wrote: How come rpmforge.repo wants to install a whole slew of perl modules, yet if I leave rpmforge.repo out of the update process, none of the perl modules shows up? Here's the rpmforge.repo file.. do any of yall see anything wrong with anything in there? Sam # Name: RPMforge

Re: [CentOS] rpmforge.repo

2009-08-06 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 15:41 +0200 schrieb Sam Drinkard: > How come rpmforge.repo wants to install a whole slew of perl modules, > yet if I leave rpmforge.repo out of the update process, none of the perl > modules shows up? Here's the rpmforge.repo file.. do any of yall see > anything wron