On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
some rpmforge packages may even conflict with the base distro. What do you
need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel? The
only thing I know of are some kmod packages from elrepo, and I have the
elrepo.repo configuration so tha
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 13:26 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
> not play well together and that if I use both,
> epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
> Alas I had it the other way around.
> rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
On Jun 9, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2015 03:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> What do you
>> need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel?
>
> Do you happen to know of somewhere other than rpmforge where I can find
> hexedit and gqview for el6 ?
On 06/09/2015 03:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us
wrote:
What do you
need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel?
Do you happen to know of somewhere other than rpmforge where I can find
hexedit and gqview for el6 ? Epel has them for el5, but not el6.
Fortunately, installing the
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
> not play well together and that if I use both,
> epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
> Alas I had it the other way around.
> rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
> I no longer need audacity,
> but w
On 6/9/2015 11:26 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I no longer need audac
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:50:37AM -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> > I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
>
> Ruckus stirs itself on most mailing lists!
>
> Overworked sysadmins just need to go get a cup of coffee and count to 10
> before they hit "reply", or at least before they hit "send".
cen...@cen
>
> I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
> Thanks for the help
Ruckus stirs itself on most mailing lists!
Overworked sysadmins just need to go get a cup of coffee and count to 10
before they hit "reply", or at least before they hit "send".
I know that dealing with dwindling IT budgets and angry m
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
>> I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
>> Is it me or is there a problem with the repository
>>
>
> fyi, its back online per a email reply to my query on the
> users/at/lists.rpmforge.net list...
>
c
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
> Is it me or is there a problem with the repository
>
fyi, its back online per a email reply to my query on the
users/at/lists.rpmforge.net list...
___
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:43 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
>
> I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
Not your fault at all. I know that Dag often monitors this list and on
occasions when he can't/doesn't get stuff resolved at the rpmforge
site/lis
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> William L. Maltby wrote:
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting t
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> > William L. Maltby wrote:
> > > You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
> > > problem, by posting to that list rather than here.
> > >
> >
> >
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
> > problem, by posting to that list rather than here.
> >
>
> you mean the list you can't find since the rpmforge website is
> apparent
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 19:22 -0500, Mail List wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:26:28 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote
> > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:46 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> > > I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
>
>
> > You'll probably get a better response
William L. Maltby wrote:
> You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
> problem, by posting to that list rather than here.
>
you mean the list you can't find since the rpmforge website is
apparently down?
luckily, google had a cached entry for it. i signed up for
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:26:28 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:46 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> > I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
> You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
> problem, by posting to that li
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:46 -0600, rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> I have not been able to connect to rpmforge for a couple of days
> Is it me or is there a problem with the repository
You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
problem, by posting to that list rather than h
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have rpmforge for both architectures? Currently is
only for 64bit, but I need some libraries 32bit (rrdtool) to install
ganglia.
A problem is that the /etc/yum.repos.d/mirrors-rpmforge file has
$ARCH in it, which would still be
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to have rpmforge for both architectures? Currently is
> only for 64bit, but I need some libraries 32bit (rrdtool) to install
> ganglia.
A problem is that the /etc/yum.repos.d/mirrors-rpmforge file has
$ARCH in it, which would still be x86_64 even i
Anything like this would probably have to be an upstream thing. But it
would probably be a good idea for people to put this into their
kickstart configs...
i think that the yum setup diverges from upstream already, so i don't see
this as a big change from that.
___
Joe Pruett wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:48:48 -0700 (PDT):
> i forgot to add to my suggestion: make the check_obsoletes option in
> yum-priorities be enabled by default for c5 as it is in c4.
There's also an obsoletes option in yum.conf. That option you are talking
about is for priorities.conf a
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:40 -0700, Joe Pruett wrote:
> rpmforge has just released a new perl-DBD-mysql for el4 that has an
> obsoletes against perl-DBD-MySQL and the protectbase yum plugin doesn't
> grok obsoletes. the priorities plugin does. so if you are having issues
> with this, install th
also, i'd like to suggest that the priorities plugin be made added to the
base install and that the centos-base repos be configured with priority 1.
it looks like c4 has the priority setting, but c5 doesn't and neither have
the plugin installed. it seems like this would create a little more
st
Jim Perrin wrote on Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:47:03 -0400:
> This is a known issue with rpm's http code. It doesn't do cookies. It
> can't really follow redirects (302 or otherwise) well, and generally
> it's a hack.
Ah, well, now I understand. Yes, there occurs a redirect. It once used to
work, with a
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> go look at the http code in rpm :D
>
> do you get the same result?
This is a known issue with rpm's http code. It doesn't do cookies. It
can't really follow redirects (302 or otherwise) well, and generally
it's a hack. Tha
Karanbir Singh wrote on Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:22:21 +0100:
> go look at the http code in rpm :D
do you get the same result?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I wanted to install the rpmforge-release package on a new install and get
the following. Do others have the same problem?
b51:~ rpm -ivvvh http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-
release-0.3.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
Retrieving http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rp
On Monday 21 April 2008 18:41:31 Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
> Hello, I have suffered the same problem you describe with clam updates.
> Finally it worked the upgrade from 0.92.XXX to 0.93.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa|grep -i clam
> clamav-db-0.93-2.el4.rf.i386
> clamd-0.93-2.el4.rf.i38
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 19:41 +0200, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
>
> P.S.: Yes, I do love top-posting if it helps (before some taliban says
> something to me, the list is to help people. I hope not to be
> unpolite)
>
I'm not taliban, nor intolerant. But Have you thought about what you
just
Hello, I have suffered the same problem you describe with clam updates.
Finally it worked the upgrade from 0.92.XXX to 0.93.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa|grep -i clam
clamav-db-0.93-2.el4.rf.i386
clamd-0.93-2.el4.rf.i386
clamav-0.93-2.el4.rf.i386
The problem I had was that at starting the cl
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 21 April 2008 14:38, John wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge
> > > without success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the pr
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 21 April 2008 14:38, John wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge
> > > without success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the pr
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:56 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> John wrote:
> > rpm -qa | grep clam
> > clamav-db-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
> > clamd-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
> > clamav-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
>
> Those are stone old and have security issues. DO NOT USE THEM.
>
> Ralph
Now your forcing me to yum update clamav
John wrote:
> rpm -qa | grep clam
> clamav-db-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
> clamd-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
> clamav-0.91.2-1.el5.rf
Those are stone old and have security issues. DO NOT USE THEM.
Ralph
pgpQrKh5f8JeZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
On Monday 21 April 2008 14:38, John wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge
> > without success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
> >
> > Anne
>
> Did you try to manually download it? S
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:33:33PM +0100, Anne Wilson enlightened us:
> For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge without
> success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
>
As has been covered before, this isn't the correct list for this question.
There is
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:33 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> For several days now I've been trying to update clamav from rpmforge without
> success. Does anyone know what's likely to be the problem?
>
> Anne
Did you try to manually download it? Several peeps seem to be having a
problem with.
Don't L
Dag Wieers wrote on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:35:42 +0200 (CEST):
> Yesterday evening I added a TIMESTAMP to the root of my tree in order to
> follow up on the correctness of mirrors. And after 12 hours more than 50%
> of the mirrors do not have that TIMESTAMP file.
>
> It is possible that it is filter
Peter Kjellstrom napsal(a):
> We see it too. My assumption is that it has to do with slow mirror sync
> somehow. It seems a bunch of mirrors typically sit on a old or new version
> that does not work with the local data (previously pulled from another
> mirror). My typical fix is to ignore it (e
Dag Wieers wrote on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:21:38 +0200 (CEST):
> I wonder if this could be related to the fact that the metadata and data
> are synchronized independently and not with the rsync --delay-updates
> options.
The error refers to the metadata only it seems. What exactly does this
check *
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 15:21 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> I wonder if this could be related to the fact that the metadata and
> data
> are synchronized independently and not with the rsync --delay-updates
> options.
Seems like a reasonable hypothesis. How hard would it be to test it by
synchronizing
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > As already said the problem exists with an unspecified number of
> > mirrors. I
> > don't use "a" mirror. I installed your rpmforge repo rpm package.
> > That
> > retrieves the list of mirrors a
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > As already said the problem exists with an unspecified number of
> > mirrors. I
> > don't use "a" mirror. I installed your rpmforge repo rpm package.
> > That
> > retrieves the list of mirr
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> As already said the problem exists with an unspecified number of
> mirrors. I
> don't use "a" mirror. I installed your rpmforge repo rpm package.
> That
> retrieves the list of mirrors and tries one (at random it seems). The
> checksum fai
Dag Wieers wrote on Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:21:49 +0200 (CEST):
> You could start off with specifying what server you are using and whether
> you have the same problem with other mirrors.
As already said the problem exists with an unspecified number of mirrors. I
don't use "a" mirror. I installed yo
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Dag Wieers wrote on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:33:21 +0200 (CEST):
>
> > If you do have problems related to network issues, setting up a local
> > mirror is a good way to control the environment _and_ save ond bandwidth.
>
> It's sure not a network issue. Don't
Dag Wieers wrote on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:33:21 +0200 (CEST):
> If you do have problems related to network issues, setting up a local
> mirror is a good way to control the environment _and_ save ond bandwidth.
It's sure not a network issue. Don't experience it at the moment as yum is
still using t
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> > I've only seen this on networks where I (or my providers) use
> > proxies, however you may have better luck asking on the rpmforge
> > user's list.
>
> M... I "sufer" this issue frequently. And I establish the connection from
> several site
Jim Perrin wrote on Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:18:19 -0400:
> I've only seen this on networks where I (or my providers) use
> proxies, however you may have better luck asking on the rpmforge
> user's list.
I'm not using a proxy. On first glance it looks to me like the repo gets
so frequently updated t
I've only seen this on networks where I (or my providers) use
proxies, however you may have better luck asking on the rpmforge
user's list.
M... I "sufer" this issue frequently. And I establish the connection
from several sites (home, work). Maybe I'm behind a proxy network in my
hme conn
On 8/26/07, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Almost each time I want to use rpmforge with yum I get a "Metadata file
> does not meet checksum" error. Yum usually has to try at least five
> mirrors before it succeeds, sometimes it doesn't find a mirror with a
> useable file. This is with Ce
52 matches
Mail list logo
