Re: [CentOS] pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks

2007-12-03 Thread mouss
Miark wrote: > What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and > mime_checks in Postfix? > > I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see > almost no difference other than the available flags. whenever you can, use pcre. it has a "better" syntax. it's also fas

Re: [CentOS] pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks

2007-12-03 Thread Curt Micol
On Dec 3, 2007 4:11 PM, Miark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and > mime_checks in Postfix? > > I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see > almost no difference other than the available flags. It's been a while since I'

Re: [CentOS] pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks

2007-12-03 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007, Miark wrote: >What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and >mime_checks in Postfix? > >I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see >almost no difference other than the available flags. The main difference is that pcre uses the same regu