[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:30:53 -0500
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have it running on a fully updated CentOS 4 machine and it
>> seems to be okay. I've only used the writer portion for a few
>> documents though. I've been fairly absent from that l
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:30:53 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have it running on a fully updated CentOS 4 machine and it
> seems to be okay. I've only used the writer portion for a few
> documents though. I've been fairly absent from that laptop today.
Where did you get it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:26:22 -0400
Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
Would I have to be concerned about any issues if I put
open office 2.3 on centos 4.5?
Anyone done it?
Jerry
I have it running on a fully updated CentOS 4 ma
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:26:22 -0400
Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
> Would I have to be concerned about any issues if I put
> open office 2.3 on centos 4.5?
>
> Anyone done it?
>
> Jerry
I have it running on a fully updated CentOS 4 machine and it seems
to be
4 matches
Mail list logo