Re: [CentOS] NIC bonding - missing eth0?

2011-02-17 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 17/02/2011, at 8:40 AM, Smithies, Russell wrote: > Yep, that’s the problem – it keeps coming up with 3 ports instead of 4 and > eth0 is always has a different Aggregator ID. > No idea why it does that – the other server is setup the same and it’s > bonding works perfectly. I would think th

Re: [CentOS] NIC bonding - missing eth0?

2011-02-16 Thread Smithies, Russell
nd bridges as disrupting it. --Russell From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cameron Kerr Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2011 6:18 a.m. To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIC bonding - missing eth0? On 16/02/2011, at 3:12 PM, Smithies, Rus

Re: [CentOS] NIC bonding - missing eth0?

2011-02-16 Thread Cameron Kerr
On 16/02/2011, at 3:12 PM, Smithies, Russell wrote: > > 802.3ad info > LACP rate: slow > Active Aggregator Info: > Aggregator ID: 19 > Number of ports: 3 > Actor Key: 17 > Partner Key: 5 > Partner Mac Address: 00:1b:90:3d:90:c0 > > Slave Interfac

Re: [CentOS] nic bonding

2011-01-17 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:23 AM, John Horne wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 14:05 +1300, Smithies, Russell wrote: >> >> I've just setup nic bonding on our server (DL585-G7 running Centos 5.5 >> x86_64) as detailed on the wiki: >> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces and all seems

Re: [CentOS] nic bonding

2011-01-17 Thread John Horne
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 14:05 +1300, Smithies, Russell wrote: > I've just setup nic bonding on our server (DL585-G7 running Centos 5.5 > x86_64) as detailed on the wiki: > http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces and all seems > fine but from other "howto's" I've seen on the web, they'r

Re: [CentOS] nic bonding

2011-01-16 Thread Smithies, Russell
org] On > Behalf Of Rajagopal Swaminathan > Sent: Monday, 17 January 2011 4:31 p.m. > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] nic bonding > > Greetings, > > do updatedb > Please locate the bonding.txt in the installation > > go through the procedure >

Re: [CentOS] nic bonding

2011-01-16 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
;s working OK, just odd it's not there. > > --Russell > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Thompson [mailto:s...@vgersoft.com] >> Sent: Monday, 17 January 2011 2:13 p.m. >> To: Smithies, Russell >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] nic bonding >> >>

Re: [CentOS] nic bonding

2011-01-16 Thread Smithies, Russell
ot really a problem as it's working OK, just odd it's not there. --Russell > -Original Message- > From: Steve Thompson [mailto:s...@vgersoft.com] > Sent: Monday, 17 January 2011 2:13 p.m. > To: Smithies, Russell > Subject: Re: [CentOS] nic bonding > > On