On 03/30/2012 04:48 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 30.3.2012 05:26, Nataraj wrote:
>
>> The way that I finally got rid of all the residual spam that makes it
>> through greylisting, SPF, spamassassin, clamav is to handout unique mail
>> addresses and use black/whitelists. So for example if I assign a
On 3/30/2012 7:48 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 30.3.2012 05:26, Nataraj wrote:
>
>> The way that I finally got rid of all the residual spam that makes it
>> through greylisting, SPF, spamassassin, clamav is to handout unique mail
>> addresses and use black/whitelists. So for example if I assign an
On 30.3.2012 05:26, Nataraj wrote:
> The way that I finally got rid of all the residual spam that makes it
> through greylisting, SPF, spamassassin, clamav is to handout unique mail
> addresses and use black/whitelists. So for example if I assign an email
> address for incoming mail from a mailin
On Fri, March 30, 2012 5:26 am, Nataraj wrote:
> So for example if I assign an email address for incoming mail from a
> mailing list and then setup a whitelist entry that only allows that
> address to receive email from the mailservers that serve that mailing
> list and then blacklist all other i
On 3/29/2012 11:26 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> On 03/29/2012 03:00 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Thanks to some nice people on here and other forums I have pretty much
>> finalized my whole mail system on centos 6.x.
>>
>> With all the checks, greylisting, dev/null of any 8+ spam level SA, I
>> stil
On 03/29/2012 03:00 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks to some nice people on here and other forums I have pretty much
> finalized my whole mail system on centos 6.x.
>
> With all the checks, greylisting, dev/null of any 8+ spam level SA, I
> still get a few mails.
>
> It seems like everyti
6 matches
Mail list logo
