On May 8, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 10:38 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On May 8, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Craig White wrote:
> I would simply try adding a 'description' to an LDAP group and then
> see
> if you can add/delete members to that group.
BRILLIAN
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 10:38 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On May 8, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Craig White wrote:
> > No - I just checked and the same thing still exists even if I add the
> > 'top' objectclass to a 'non-samba' group but if it's a samba group, I
> > have no problem adding/removing me
On May 8, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 10:13 -0700, Craig White wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 09:43 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On May 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Craig White wrote:
>>>
> I tried that a while back, together with webmin and that php
On May 8, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 10:13 -0700, Craig White wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 09:43 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On May 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Craig White wrote:
>>>
> I tried that a while back, together with webmin and that php
>
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 10:13 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 09:43 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On May 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Craig White wrote:
> >
> > >> I tried that a while back, together with webmin and that php thing.
> > >>
> > >> I was kinda hoping to use webmin for
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 09:43 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On May 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Craig White wrote:
>
> >> I tried that a while back, together with webmin and that php thing.
> >>
> >> I was kinda hoping to use webmin for everything; DNS, DHCP, LDAP so
> >> that a jr sys admin could man
On May 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Craig White wrote:
>> I tried that a while back, together with webmin and that php thing.
>>
>> I was kinda hoping to use webmin for everything; DNS, DHCP, LDAP so
>> that a jr sys admin could manage our intranet based services. But
>> with LDAP, webmin doesn't seem to
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 07:04 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On May 6, 2010, at 10:20 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:52 AM, wrote:
> >> On May 6, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Even though you may not require the SMB extensions, the smbldaptoo
On May 6, 2010, at 10:20 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:52 AM, wrote:
>> On May 6, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Even though you may not require the SMB extensions, the smbldaptools
>>> may be worth looking into. It's toolset are similar to the regular
>>>
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:52 AM, wrote:
> On May 6, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Even though you may not require the SMB extensions, the smbldaptools
>> may be worth looking into. It's toolset are similar to the regular
>> Linux user management tools, with the backend taking ca
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Arun Khan wrote:
> Even though you may not require the SMB extensions, the smbldaptools
> may be worth looking into. It's toolset are similar to the regular
> Linux user management tools, with the backend taking care of
> populating the LDAP DIT and you keeping your sanity
On May 6, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:33 PM, wrote:
>> Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP
>> thats provided in Centos.
>>
>> Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to
>> multiple groups?
>>
>> Should I crea
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:33 PM, wrote:
> Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP
> thats provided in Centos.
>
> Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to
> multiple groups?
>
> Should I create a new group that has multiple GIDs and assign a user
On May 6, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> In short:
>>>
>>> 1. Define the posixGroup DN
>>> 2. Add one or more memberUid entries.
>>
>> So would I extend this and add members there instead of in there own
>> entry? How would it look?
On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In short:
>>
>> 1. Define the posixGroup DN
>> 2. Add one or more memberUid entries.
>
> O, I think I follow.
>
> Say my current group definition in ldap is;
>
> # pm, groups, foo.bar
> dn: cn=pm,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar
> objectClass: top
> objec
On May 6, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP
>> thats provided in Centos.
>>
>> Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to
>> multiple gr
On Thu, 6 May 2010, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP
> thats provided in Centos.
>
> Any suggestions to have the outcome of having a user belong to
> multiple groups?
>
> Should I create a new group that has multiple GID
Sorry for that.
Adding via ldap.
I've tried adding groupOfNames to the users ldif file like so;
objectClass: groupOfNames
...
member: cn=staff,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar
member: cn=pm,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar
Both staff and pm are defined as follows;
# staff, groups, logan.tv
dn: cn=staff,ou=groups
are you adding users to local groups in /etc/group or are you creating groups
in ldap?
On 2010-05-06, at 11:03 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Not having much luck adding a user to more then 1 group in OpenLDAP
> thats provided in Centos.
>
> Any suggestions to have the outcome
19 matches
Mail list logo
