Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:15:56AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > >> At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list > >> wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Ro

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: >>> What are the kernel versions? >>> >>> CentOS

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > > What are the kernel versions? > > > > CentOS kernel: > > > > 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.cen

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > What are the kernel versions? > > CentOS kernel: > > 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.centos.plus > > Fedora 10 kernel: > > 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 It could just

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > What are the kernel versions? CentOS kernel: 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.centos.plus Fedora 10 kernel: 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 25 May 2009 12:53:55 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:24:03PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:24:03PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > >> > >>> Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> >>> Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is a >>> mass storage device? Do I need to write some udev rules? >> >> S

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is a >> mass storage device? Do I need to write some udev rules? > > Sorry for replying to my own post, but upon furthe

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

2009-05-25 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is a > mass storage device? Do I need to write some udev rules? Sorry for replying to my own post, but upon further investigation, it appears that perhaps the usb-st