At 2011-12-23 Fri 20:09 -0500，fred smith wrote：
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 01:37:03AM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > Vreme: 12/24/2011 01:00 AM, fred smith piše:
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Is that sound on-board? If it is disable it in B
>>
>> Add the modules to:
>>
>> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf
>>
>> And re-install the kernel. The dracut util that builds the initramfs
>> includes this file at install time.
>
> at last, I've had the opportunity to pursue this. all I have to do is
> blacklist the snd_hda_codec_realtek module, re
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:33:07PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> On 12/23/2011 5:00 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> >> On Dec 23, 2011, at 2:47 PM, fred smith
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:02:12PM -0500, fred smith wro
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 01:37:03AM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/24/2011 01:00 AM, fred smith piše:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> >>
> >> Is that sound on-board? If it is disable it in BIOS, if it isn't, remove
> >> the card.
> >>
> >> See if it
Vreme: 12/24/2011 01:00 AM, fred smith piše:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
>>
>> Is that sound on-board? If it is disable it in BIOS, if it isn't, remove the
>> card.
>>
>> See if it breaks after that.
>
> the Bios has only a very few options, and disabling sound i
On 12/23/2011 5:00 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Dec 23, 2011, at 2:47 PM, fred smith
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:02:12PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:53:13PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2011, at 2:47 PM, fred smith wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:02:12PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:53:13PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>> On 12/22/2011 05:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> >>>
On Dec 23, 2011, at 2:47 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:02:12PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:53:13PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 12/22/2011 05:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:56:42PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:02:12PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:53:13PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 12/22/2011 05:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:56:42PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> > >>
> > >> There is a new kernel building right now t
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:53:13PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 05:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:56:42PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >> There is a new kernel building right now that might
> >> fix something ... though I do not see anything specifical
Am 23.12.2011 07:41, schrieb Rainer Traut:
>>>
>>>
>> It will be in 6.2/updates/
>>
>> Still building right now.
>
> Are you sure this will help?
> It looks to me he's already using RHEL6.2 with latest kernel 220.
>
Sorry forget my post, he's running 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 and the new one
is 2.6.3
Am 23.12.2011 00:53, schrieb Johnny Hughes:
http://users.rcn.com/fredricksmith/dump.jpg
>>> There is a new kernel building right now that might
>>> fix something ... though I do not see anything specifically about your cpu.
>>>
>>> Here is the errata link:
>>>
>>> http://rhn.redhat.c
On 12/22/2011 05:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:56:42PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 12/22/2011 04:46 PM, fred smith wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:30:23PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
>>>
If you come up em
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:56:42PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 04:46 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:30:23PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> >> On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If you come up empty (all the same kernel modules exist in bot
On 12/22/2011 04:46 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:30:23PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
>> On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
>
>>
>> If you come up empty (all the same kernel modules exist in both) then
>> it's likely a bug in some kernel module. The "emergency_shell"
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:30:23PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
>
> If you come up empty (all the same kernel modules exist in both) then
> it's likely a bug in some kernel module. The "emergency_shell" part of
> dracut may be useful in debug this. Wh
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:30:23PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:56:51PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> >> On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> >>> Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU)
On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:56:51PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
>> On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
>>> Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU).
>>>
>>> during boot, (if I hit ESC to see the boot messages) it says "s
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:56:51PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU).
> >
> > during boot, (if I hit ESC to see the boot messages) it says "starging udev"
> > then nothing else for a fe
On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU).
>
> during boot, (if I hit ESC to see the boot messages) it says "starging udev"
> then nothing else for a few seconds, then a huge register dump scrolls
> by. it's too big to see the
20 matches
Mail list logo
