On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Negative wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Negative wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, wrote:
>>>
Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
> Negative wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Negative wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> Negative wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
>>> > Negative wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
>>> >> Negative
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, wrote:
>
>> Negative wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
>> > Negative wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
>> >> Negative wrote:
>>
>> >> > I still wonder what is causing this. I
Negative wrote:
> Now I, too, can start complaining about Gnome 3. I've read it's like
> Windows, but it's the spitting image of the Mac OS.
Maybe, but I was having to deal with it on a user's fedora 15 machine, and
I ACTIVELY dislike it, with it's
scroll-over-and-the-transparent-menu-fades-in cr
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:00 PM, wrote:
> Negative wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
> > Negative wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
> >> Negative wrote:
>
> >> > I still wonder what is causing this. I couldn't find any mention of a
> >> > similar problem, inclu
On 10/05/11 11:14 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The whole point of the GPL is to require the release of source (to
> anyone who gets binaries) of any derived work. Kernel modules aren't
> strictly considered to be derived from the kernel, although there has
> been some speculation that they could be.
On 2011-10-05, at 12:14 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:36 PM, wrote:
>>
Yeah, well, the RHEL stuff I assume is released; their own heavy
enhancements, I don't know.
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter if someone else released source. Anyone
>>> distributing binaries con
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:36 PM, wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, well, the RHEL stuff I assume is released; their own heavy
>>> enhancements, I don't know.
>>
>> It doesn't matter if someone else released source. Anyone
>> distributing binaries containing GPL code is supposed to also supply
>> the matching s
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:16 PM, wrote:
>>
It was - the docs for the version that was around in early '09 *said*
that the latest release was based on RHEL 3.
>>>
>>> You are supposed to be able to download the open source components
>>> here:
>>> http://downloads.v
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:16 PM, wrote:
>
>>> It was - the docs for the version that was around in early '09 *said*
>>> that the latest release was based on RHEL 3.
>>
>> You are supposed to be able to download the open source components here:
>> http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/datacenter_clou
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:01 PM, wrote:
>>
>> It was - the docs for the version that was around in early '09 *said*
>> that the latest release was based on RHEL 3.
>
> You are supposed to be able to download the open source components here:
> http://downloads.vmware.com/d/in
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:01 PM, wrote:
>
> It was - the docs for the version that was around in early '09 *said* that
> the latest release was based on RHEL 3.
>
You are supposed to be able to download the open source components here:
http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/datacenter_cloud_infrastr
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, wrote:
>>> You could use VMware server or player as an alternative to kvm under
>>> Centos. VMware ESXi loads as the base OS, so you have to wipe
>>> everything and start over. The latest release (5.0) claims that
>>> virtualization can be
Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
> Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
>> Negative wrote:
>> > I still wonder what is causing this. I couldn't find any mention of a
>> > similar problem, including on my desktop in my office, where I have a
>> > very
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:31:29AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, wrote:
> >> Centos. ?VMware ESXi loads as the base OS, so you have to wipe
> >> everything and start over. ?The latest release (5.0) claims that
> >> virtualization can be 'nested' - that is you could
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, wrote:
>> You could use VMware server or player as an alternative to kvm under
>> Centos. VMware ESXi loads as the base OS, so you have to wipe
>> everything and start over. The latest release (5.0) claims that
>> virtualization can be 'nested' - that is you cou
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Negative
> wrote:
>>>
>> VMware's a possibility. Would I need to remove the kvm package? Do I
>> have to keep libvirtd off?
>>
> You could use VMware server or player as an alternative to kvm under
> Centos. VMware ESXi loads as the base OS,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Negative wrote:
>>
> VMware's a possibility. Would I need to remove the kvm package? Do I have
> to keep libvirtd off?
>
You could use VMware server or player as an alternative to kvm under
Centos. VMware ESXi loads as the base OS, so you have to wipe
everything
Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
>
>> Negative wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>> >> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative
>>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> So now I've found I can run X without problems and I can run
>>
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, wrote:
> Negative wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
> >> Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> So now I've found I can run X without problems and I can run qemu-kvm
> >> >> without proble
Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> So now I've found I can run X without problems and I can run qemu-kvm
>> >> without problems, but I cannot run both at the same time.
>> >
>> > 'X'
Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> So now I've found I can run X without problems and I can run qemu-kvm
>> >> without problems, but I cannot run both at the same time.
>> >
>> > 'X'
Negative wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> So now I've found I can run X without problems and I can run qemu-kvm
>> >> without problems, but I cannot run both at the same time.
>> >
>> > 'X'
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative
> > wrote:
>
> >> So now I've found I can run X without problems and I can run qemu-kvm
> >> without problems, but I cannot run both at the same time.
> >
> > 'X' should be split cleanly i
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative
> wrote:
>> So now I've found I can run X without problems and I can run qemu-kvm
>> without problems, but I cannot run both at the same time.
>
> 'X' should be split cleanly into client and server programs where in
> X-speak the ser
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Negative wrote:
>> Not sure what that means. Freenx would at least keep the sesson
>> active when you disconnect.
>>
>
> I was trying to say, but not very well, that when qemu-kvm is running a
> guest and X is running, whether it's on the local video hardware or
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Negative
> wrote:
> >
> >> Do you have to use the local video at all? What happens if you use
> >> freenx and run in a session started from a remote NX client?
> >>
> >
> > Doesn't freenx use X? I haven't in
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Negative wrote:
>
>> Do you have to use the local video at all? What happens if you use
>> freenx and run in a session started from a remote NX client?
>>
>
> Doesn't freenx use X? I haven't installed but will try it.
Yes, it uses X, but it doesn't use the local
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Negative
> wrote:
> > >
> > Since the crashes can be duplicated and are only caused by this one
> > combination of events, I don't know.
> >
> > On another machine, I had a case where none of the kvm guests wou
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Negative wrote:
> >
> Since the crashes can be duplicated and are only caused by this one
> combination of events, I don't know.
>
> On another machine, I had a case where none of the kvm guests would boot. It
> turned out to be a conflict between libvirt and the nv
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:24 PM, wrote:
> Negative wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:18 PM, wrote:
> >> Negative wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
> >> >> Brian Mathis wrote:
> >> >> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative
> >> >> >
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> I built g
If you haven't already, check the mainboard & power supply for bad
capacitors:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Negative wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:18 PM, wrote:
>> Negative wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
>> >> Brian Mathis wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative
>> > >
>> >> > wrote:
>> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using
>> >
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:18 PM, wrote:
> Negative wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
> >> Brian Mathis wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative >
> >> > wrote:
> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the
> virtual machine mana
Negative wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
>> Brian Mathis wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative
>> > wrote:
I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the
virtual machine manager on a  just updated to centos 5.7, and they
are
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Negative wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
>
>> Brian Mathis wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative
>> > wrote:
>> >> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the
>> >> virtual machine manager on a  just upd
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
> Brian Mathis wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative
> > wrote:
> >> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the
> >> virtual machine manager on a  just updated to centos 5.7, and they are
> >> both crashing the ho
Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative
> wrote:
>> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the
>> virtual machine manager on a  just updated to centos 5.7, and they are
>> both crashing the host machine. They run only  for a few minutes, but
>>
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative wrote:
> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the
> virtual machine manager on a just updated to centos 5.7, and they are both
> crashing the host machine. They run only for a few minutes, but suddenly
> freeze, crashing the
On 10/03/2011 10:16 PM, Negative wrote:
> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the
> virtual machine manager on a just updated to centos 5.7, and they are both
> crashing the host machine. They run only for a few minutes, but suddenly
> freeze, crashing the host. The
40 matches
Mail list logo
