On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 06:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> > Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
> > locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
> > hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and H
On 03/07/2014 11:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>> I'm using CentOS myself, but if you need that particular feature of SL
>> it may be the better choice for you.
> Have you used yum-plugin-security?
>
>
Why yes, yes I have. It is not equivalent to the SL versioning for the
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 06:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
>> Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
>> locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
>> hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
>> same
On 03/05/2014 06:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
> locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
> hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
> same rev with all the same pa
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Cliff Pratt
> wrote:
>> I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
>> paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
>> because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming)
>> re
On 03/05/2014 03:19 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
> see the updated source file here:
> http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
>
> But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
> ht
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Bart Schaefer
> wrote:
>> rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64
>>
>> This will tell you what other packages depend on the gnutls library.
>
> Wouldn't 'yum remove gnutls' be a better check since it will walk
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
> paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
> because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression
> testing of applicat
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Bart Schaefer
wrote:
> Before you update anything, I suggest you run
>
> rpm -e --test gnutls
>
> If this complains about "refers to more than one package" then use
>
> rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64
>
> This will tell you what other packages depend on the
Thanks for all the thoughtful responses. I have learned a couple of things.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 06.03.2014 um 01:00 schrieb Michael Coffman <
> michael.coff...@avagotech.com>:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/5/20
Am 06.03.2014 um 01:00 schrieb Michael Coffman :
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
>>> Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
>>> locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. W
On 03/06/2014 12:27 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
> paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
> because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression
> testing of applications or be
I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression
testing of applications or because a third party package vendor specifies a
part
Before you update anything, I suggest you run
rpm -e --test gnutls
If this complains about "refers to more than one package" then use
rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64
This will tell you what other packages depend on the gnutls library.
It's probably fewer than you think, because RHEL/Cen
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>>
>> No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows
>> how to get them, even selectively.
>
> More to the point, "6.4" and "6.5" are just markers in the sand for
> "CentOS 6". 6.5 is basically just a rebasing of the pac
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Harris"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 4:43:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 20
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman
> > updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no
> > more updates. Now I know so thanks...
>
> No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yu
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
>>>
>> so you're a year behind on any security fixes why are you worried
>> about this one, then?
>>
>
>
> This seems like it has more potentiol to impact users in my environment
> that are using a web browser to access sites outside our f
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> > Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
> > locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
> > hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and H
On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
> locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
> hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
> same rev with all the same packa
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
same rev with all the same packages. A large number of vendor packages
and interna
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
> Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
Why? 'yum update gnutls' will get it, bringing along only things
specified as having version-specific dependencies if there are any.
But it is generally a bad idea to let the res
On 3/5/2014 3:22 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
what? why???
yum update gnutls
*done*
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
__
Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote:
> > I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?
> I
> > see the updated source file here:
> > htt
On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote:
> I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
> see the updated source file here:
> http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
>
> But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
> http:
On 3/5/2014 1:19 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
> see the updated source file here:
> http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
>
> But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
> http:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:19:26 -0700
Michael Coffman wrote:
> Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4?
"yum update" should bring your system up to the current Centos release which
includes the gnutls fix.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
_
On 03/06/2014 10:19 AM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
> see the updated source file here:
> http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
>
> But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
> h
28 matches
Mail list logo
