On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> I am a new hylafax+ user and other than the ghostscript problem I am
> very impressed. Hylafax+ does allow you to control the location of
> ghostscript so once I get it compiled I should be able to point it to
> the correct version. In
still a bunch of clients that communicate via fax
and not e-mail, as much as I would prefer e-mail.
--
Greg Ennis
PoMec Corporation
www.PoMec.Net
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Pratt
Reply-to: CentOS mailing list
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ghostscript-8.70-14.el5_8.1
Greg, I haven't sent a fax in ages, so my suggestion would be to take a
step back and see if you still need to use fax. You may still have a need
for it, but I'm just suggesting that you think about it!
Cheers,
Cliff
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 12:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> I am a new hylafax+ user and other than the ghostscript problem I am
> very impressed. Hylafax+ does allow you to control the location of
> ghostscript so once I get it compiled I should be able to point it to
> the correct version. Ins
On 08/05/2013 12:26 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/4/2013 3:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> First try installing compiled rpm on a TEST system, and if that does not
>> work you can try recompiling the source rpm, or ask someone to help you,
>> maybe maintainer of ghostscript in Fedora.
>
> if
On 08/05/2013 12:26 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/4/2013 3:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> First try installing compiled rpm on a TEST system, and if that does not
>> work you can try recompiling the source rpm, or ask someone to help you,
>> maybe maintainer of ghostscript in Fedora.
>
> if
On 8/4/2013 3:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> First try installing compiled rpm on a TEST system, and if that does not
> work you can try recompiling the source rpm, or ask someone to help you,
> maybe maintainer of ghostscript in Fedora.
if you rebuild it via the RPM, it likely will overwrite
On 08/04/2013 11:38 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:55 -0500
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>> Is there
>> a way to be able to compile the 9.07 in different directories so that I
>> do not destroy 8.70 or the libraries.
>
> Of course. You can simply compile the tarball or the rpm, as
On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:55 -0500
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Is there
> a way to be able to compile the 9.07 in different directories so that I
> do not destroy 8.70 or the libraries.
Of course. You can simply compile the tarball or the rpm, assuming that your
system has all of the required depe
On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:56:10 -0500
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I surely appreciate the maintainers of the repositories; can any of you
> direct me to whom maintains ghostscript on the repository or when 9.07
> is planned to be included. I would also like to request that ghostpcl
> be included, but
On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:56:10 -0500
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I surely appreciate the maintainers of the repositories; can any of you
> direct me to whom maintains ghostscript on the repository or when 9.07
> is planned to be included. I would also like to request that ghostpcl
> be included, but
11 matches
Mail list logo
