Re: [CentOS] firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!

Lars Hecking wrote: > Nicolas Thierry-Mieg writes: >> >> nspluginwrapper is for running 32-bit plugins in a 64-bit browser. Now >> that we have functional 64-bit flash and java plugins I don't see the >> need, but YMMV. > > We do not have a functional 64-bit flash plugin, and no 64-bit adobe plug

Re: [CentOS] firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg writes: > > nspluginwrapper is for running 32-bit plugins in a 64-bit browser. Now > that we have functional 64-bit flash and java plugins I don't see the > need, but YMMV. We do not have a functional 64-bit flash plugin, and no 64-bit adobe plugin, so we need the wrapper

Re: [CentOS] firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!

On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 21:39 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Lars Hecking wrote: > > Nicolas Thierry-Mieg writes: > >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>> Found this, and I > >>> remember the plugins directory... except firefox 3.6.11, I can't f

Re: [CentOS] firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!

Lars Hecking wrote: > Nicolas Thierry-Mieg writes: >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Found this, and I >>> remember the plugins directory... except firefox 3.6.11, I can't find any, >>> not in ~/.mozilla, not in /usr/lib64/mozilla. Anyone have a c

Re: [CentOS] firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg writes: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Found this, and I > > remember the plugins directory... except firefox 3.6.11, I can't find any, > > not in ~/.mozilla, not in /usr/lib64/mozilla. Anyone have a clue for the > > poor? >

Re: [CentOS] firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Found this, and I > remember the plugins directory... except firefox 3.6.11, I can't find any, > not in ~/.mozilla, not in /usr/lib64/mozilla. Anyone have a clue for the > poor? that's strange: [nthie...@localhost ~]$